¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ

Language selection

Search

Minister of Foreign Affairs appearance before the Committee of the Whole – Supplementary estimates (A) – Briefing material

2020-06-17

Table of contents

Question period monitoring

Question TopicDate of QuestionQuestionerQuestioner:Political PartyQuestionResponderResponseCountry
Covid-19 China PPE2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaGood morning, Mr. Chair. Thank you very much for this opportunity. My first question is for Minister Anand. Is the contract with Becton Dickinson for vaccine syringes a sole-sourced contract?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, the precise terms of our contracts are at the current time not being disclosed given the importance of making sure that we protect our supply chain. When the time is right and the pandemic is over, we will make sure to be fully transparent with regard to these.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaI think the minister's excuse that providing a bit of transparency to Canadians would jeopardize our supply chain just doesn't wash. Has her department found a secret PPE manufacturer that no other country has heard of?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, let me assure the member opposite and all members of this House that our country is facing unprecedented needs as we fight COVID-19. This is an urgent time. Contracting under the National Security Exceptions, including sole-source contracts, has been in the interests of Canadian—
The Chair: I'll go back to Ms. Block.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE China2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaOn the one hand, Minister Anand highlights agreements with Canadian companies who are making PPE; but on the other, she refuses to name foreign manufacturers who have been awarded sole-source contracts totalling hundreds of millions of dollars. Why the disparity?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, as you're aware and the member opposite is also aware, we are procuring millions of items of PPE across a range of goods. In cases where we are disclosing names of suppliers, that is in conjunction with the permission that we are being given by a supplier itself. We need to be careful in these times—
The Chair: To Ms. Block.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaAt the very least, and as a service to the rest of the world, will the minister reveal the name of the supplier and manufacturer that sold Canada millions of substandard KN95 masks so that other countries will not make the same mistake?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, I understand the question being posed to me. However, let me assure the member opposite and this House that we are negotiating a range of exits from this contract with the supplier, and we do not want to jeopardize those negotiations by revealing this information at this time. When the time is—
The Chair: Ms. Block.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaThe science was extremely clear on the effectiveness of masks in January, and it has not changed since. Mr. Chair, last week at the health committee the Red Cross stated that Canada has received 42 tonnes of PPE and other supplies from both Taiwan and China. The minister of health recently stated there is an 80/20 split for supply shipments with 80% going to the provinces and territories, and 20% going to NESS. Can the minister tell this House exactly how much of the 42 tonnes of supplies has gone to NESS.Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)As the Minister of Procurement, we are responding to requests from the provinces and territories and we are delivering PPE to front-line health care workers under the 80/20 arrangement which is working very well for our provincial and territorial colleagues, and we are responding to emergencies in addition to those distributions.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE China2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaSince we sent expired supplies to China, what are the expiry dates of the supplies that we received in return from China?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, may I suggest to the member opposite that as he himself has recounted, we are procuring millions and millions of PPE supplies. Expiry dates on these supplies vary by product and by order, Mr. Chair.
Thank you.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong Repatriation2020-06-04Member of Parliament - May, Elizabeth (Saanich—Gulf Islands)Green PartyThrough you to the Prime Minister, there is a pattern in history where sometimes leaders will use a crisis that absorbs people's attention to do things they otherwise might not do for fear of global condemnation such as in a pandemic we see President Bolsonaro of Brazil turning more brutality against indigenous people in the Amazon. My questions want to focus on the People's Republic of China, which I think is doing the same thing, and on Prime Minister Netanyahu in Israel. To the question of China, we now see the People's Republic of China cracking down in Hong Kong in ways that violate the commitment to one country, two systems.
What will the Government of Canada do to help Canadian citizens even if they are dual citizens of People's Republic to get home to Canada?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I would like to thank my colleague for the question.
We know that one country, two systems is what has been underpinning the liberty and freedom enjoyed by the people in Hong Kong. We are very concerned and deeply concerned by the imposition unilaterally by Beijing of a national security law, which would undermine that very foundation. What we're looking at, Mr. Chair, is we're working with allies to look at the implications that imposition would have on the various arrangements and agreements we have in place with Hong Kong.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE China Taiwan2020-06-04Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Liberal Party of CanadaWhat is the breakdown of the items received from Taiwan and China through the Red Cross? How many masks, gowns, gloves, etc., have been received?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, the items that we are receiving externally and via our procurements are all put to the NESS and then delivered out to the provinces and territories on the basis of the 80/20—
The Chair: Mr. Kitchen.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Government of Canada speaks generally of 300,000 Canadian citizens in Hong Kong. Can the Minister of Immigration tell us more exactly how many Canadian citizens are currently resident in Hong Kong?Member of Parliament - Mendicino, Marco (Eglinton—Lawrence)The first thing that I would like to clarify, Mr. Chair, is that those Canadians who are in
Hong Kong and elsewhere have a right to return home. With regard to those who wish to seek asylum, we have a robust system in place that ensures that everyone making a claim will receive a fair hearing. That will continue.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of CanadaMinister, how many of the Canadian citizens currently resident in Hong Kong—I would like at least an estimate from you—currently hold valid Canadian passports? How many have recently made passport applications?Member of Parliament - Mendicino, Marco (Eglinton—Lawrence)As my honourable colleague knows, those citizens who do hold citizenship do have a right to return home. We will continue to monitor the situation very closely to ensure those who wish to exercise their right do so in accordance with the health and safety measures in place at the border.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Kong Kong2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of CanadaThese answers underline the deficiencies of this temporary committee. With respect to the minister, the PMO doesn't like straight answers. At least, if the Standing Committee on Immigration were sitting we would get straight answers from the deputy minister, department officials, and the occasional witness allowed by the government. Again, does the minister have any estimate of the number of Canadian citizens currently resident in Hong Kong?Member of Parliament - Mendicino, Marco (Eglinton—Lawrence)Mr. Chair, as my honourable colleague said, there is an estimate of approximately 300,000 who hold Canadian citizenship. Those individuals do have the right to return home. When they exercise that right they must do so in accordance with the travel restrictions in place to reduce the likelihood of the spread of COVID-19.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of Canada[Inaudible] the minister. Has the department updated its emergency contingency plans in the event of worst possible outcomes in Hong Kong?Member of Parliament - Mendicino, Marco (Eglinton—Lawrence)Mr. Chair, I know that my colleague, the Minister of Global Affairs is working very closely with our representatives in that region. In the meantime, our officials are also providing—
The Chair: We'll now go back to Mr. Kent.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Jong2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of CanadaMinister, last year, Canada signed members of global affairs standing rapid deployment team to our consulate general in Hong Kong to assist the mission and Canadian citizens in that territory. Is that team in place today?Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I would like to thank the member for his important questions. We have the current amount of staff that we need in Hong Kong. As the need would be, we would be prepared, like we've done in Wuhan and like we've done when we repatriated Canadians from more than 110 countries. We can deploy these teams. They are rapid-response teams. As the case may be we—
The Chair: Back to Mr. Kent.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China WeChat2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Kent, Peter (Thornhill)Conservative Party of CanadaIf I could ask a final question to the Minister of Digital Government, can the minister tell us whether she read the House of Commons cyber security email titled, “IT Security Alert: Risks with the WeChat Application”?Member of Parliament - Duclos, Jean-Yves (Québec)Thank you, Mr. Chair. The minister in question has already made clear that this is not part of her own work. This is something else in her network which is now out of the network and she has clearly said that the views expressed by that person are not her views.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China WeChat2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Aboultaif, Ziad (Edmonton Manning)Conservative Party of CanadaIt was revealed that the Liberal minister, Joyce Murray, allowed her WeChat social media platform to be used to advance the interest of an arm of the Chinese Communist Party. Does the minister accept responsibility for this attack on Canadian journalists?Member of Parliament - Duclos, Jean-Yves (Québec)The minister made clear two things. First, that person was not part of her network. Secondly, she does not share the views that were shared.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China2020-06-03Member of Parliament - Aboultaif, Ziad (Edmonton Manning)Conservative Party of CanadaIs the minister aware of the espionage activities that the United Front carries out on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party? Yes or no.Member of Parliament - Duclos, Jean-Yves (Québec)Monsieur le président, je vais répéter en français ce que j'ai dit en anglais. La ministre a dit deux choses très clairement: la première, la personne ne fait pas partie de son réseau; la deuxième, les avis et opinions exprimés par cette personne ne sont pas partagés par la ministre.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Huawei2020-06-02Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, now that Bell Canada has decided to partner with Erickson to deliver its 5G network, the Liberals will undoubtedly ban Huawei, but the Liberal inaction on Huawei is just another example of this government's weak leadership. Instead of deciding for himself a year ago, the Prime Minister is forcing the business community to make the decision for him. Why couldn't the Prime Minister have shown some backbone and banned Huawei a year ago?Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Chair, our approach every step of the way has been to listen to experts, to work with allies, to listen to the counsel of our security and intelligence community that has been looking into this issue. We know we need to make sure that Canadian businesses, Canadians, Canadian infrastructure are protected at the same time
as we remain competitive in the world. That has guided our approach on this from the beginning.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Huawei2020-06-02Member of Parliament - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaJe crois que d'accepter qu'un conjoint ou une conjointe vienne à la maison n'est pas mettre les Canadiens à risque. Il y a un sondage fait au Canada, actuellement, qui détermine qu'une grande majorité des Canadiens ne fait aucunement confiance au régime communiste chinois et ne veulent pas avoir Huawei au Canada. Il y a une bonne nouvelle: on apprend aujourd'hui que BCE et Telus ont décidé de ne pas faire affaire avec Huawei. Le gouvernement, n'ayant plus à gérer BCE et Telus, est-il en mesure de dire aujourd'hui qu'il n'y a aucune autre compagnie qui va utiliser Huawei, et que cette compagnie va être barrée pour le 5G?Member of Parliament - Guilbeault, Steven (Laurier—Sainte-Marie)Merci de la question.
Notre gouvernement va toujours protéger nos réseaux et faire en sorte que les Canadiens et les Canadiennes bénéficient des dernières innovations en matière de télécommunication. Un examen des technologies 5G, des considérations économiques et des sûretés sont en cours.
Nous allons nous assurer que la sûreté des Canadiens et des Canadiennes et leurs données privées ne seront jamais compromises.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Huawei2020-06-02Member of Parliament - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaJe voudrais rappeler au ministre que cela fait des années qu'on est là-dessus, et que le SCRS a confirmé que Huawei n'était pas fiable à la sécurité du Canada. Il y a deux Canadiens injustement détenus par le régime communiste chinois. Le même régime continue de mentir au monde concernant la COVID‑19 et bloque nos exportations, en plus de terroriser les citoyens de Hong Kong. Quand le premier ministre va-t-il confirmer qu'il va bannir Huawei du développement de la technologie 5G au Canada? C'est une question simple.Member of Parliament - Blair, Bill (Scarborough Southwest)Hon. Bill Blair: Mr. Chair, let's be very clear. Canadians deserve to have access to the most beneficial 5G technology and, at the same time, the safety and security of Canada's digital environment will be of paramount consideration. We're doing the work required and we're not basing that agenda on some media report, but, rather, to ensure that all scientific and security factors are taken into account. We are engaged in robust discussions with our Five Eyes partners, including the United States, and all of our security agencies.
Mr. Chair, we'll do the work necessary to—
¸ (1415)
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Shin, Nelly (Port Moody—Coquitlam)Conservative Party of CanadaHow many of these domestic manufacturers rely on supply chains in China?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, we are dealing with a situation of very high global demand for the same product. As a result, we—
The Chair: We'll go back to Ms. Shin.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the full parliament with its full powers sat through two world wars, previous pandemics and the October Crisis in 1970. The government of those days did not seek the suspension of this House. The government is not only failing to defend democracy here but also abroad. It can't utter the word “Taiwan”. It is failing to be strong and clear on Hong Kong and while the situation today is not that of decades past, it is clear that Canada in the past has stood for the rights of people in Hong Kong. Canada needs to take much stronger diplomatic action on Hong
Kong. There are some 300,000 Canadians living there and they are looking for the government's support. So when will this government act? When will it threaten economic sanctions, like the U.S. administration has? When will it provide asylum and a clear path to citizenship like the U.K. government has? When will it speak up against the Communist Party of China's united front workers operating here in this country? When will it do like Australia did in calling for an international investigation of COVID-19, an organized international coalition of like-minded democracies to defend Hong Kongers and the violation of the Sino-British treaty?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I'd like to thank the member for this very important question.
Mr. Chair, I'll remind the member to look at our statement of the 28th of May. It's already done, Mr. Chair. Canada has spoken to the world, has spoken up. We've made a first declaration with our colleagues in Australia and the U.K. to say that we have deep concerns.
We all know, Mr. Chair, that the [Inaudible] system, the high degree of liberty and freedom enjoyed by the people in Hong Kong has made Hong Kong what it is today, a beacon when it comes to trade and financing, and we know and we have experienced deep concern. Again, on the 28th of May, with the United States, with the United Kingdom, with Australia, Canada was front and centre with these countries to say we have deep concerns that the imposition of a national security law by Beijing would undermine the very foundation, the very principles that have made Hong Kong so successful, Mr. Chair, and we said at that time that we with our international partners would look at the implications and the ramifications that it may have on our arrangement.
And Mr. Chair, I've called a meeting of our Five Eyes tonight. I'll be chairing a meeting of our Five Eyes with the foreign ministers. We will be discussing, we'll continue to raise our voices, to stand up for the people of Hong Kong, and we will do it with our allies, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the full parliament with its full powers sat through two world wars, previous
pandemics and the October Crisis in 1970. The government of those days did not seek the suspension of this House. The government is not only failing to defend democracy here but also abroad. It can't utter the word “Taiwan”. It is failing to
be strong and clear on Hong Kong and while the situation today is not that of decades past, it is clear that Canada in the past has stood for the rights of people in Hong Kong. Canada needs to take much stronger diplomatic action on Hong
Kong. There are some 300,000 Canadians living there and they are looking for the government's support. So when will this government act? When will it threaten economic sanctions, like the U.S. administration has? When will it provide asylum and a clear path to citizenship like the U.K. government has? When will it speak up against the Communist Party of China's united front workers operating here in this country? When will it do like Australia did in calling for an international investigation of COVID-19, an organized international coalition of like-minded democracies
to defend Hong Kongers and the violation of the Sino-British treaty?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I'd like to thank the member for this very important question.
Mr. Chair, I'll remind the member to look at our statement of the 28th of May. It's already done, Mr. Chair. Canada has spoken to the world, has spoken up. We've made a first declaration with our colleagues in Australia and the U.K. to say that we have deep concerns.
We all know, Mr. Chair, that the [Inaudible] system, the high degree of liberty and freedom enjoyed by the people in Hong Kong has made Hong Kong what it is today, a beacon when it comes to trade and financing, and we know and we have experienced deep concern. Again, on the 28th of May, with the United States, with the United Kingdom, with Australia, Canada was front and centre with these countries to say we have deep concerns that the imposition of a national security law by Beijing would undermine the very foundation, the very principles that have made Hong Kong so successful, Mr. Chair, and we said at that time that we with our international partners would look at the implications and the ramifications that it may have on our arrangement.
And Mr. Chair, I've called a meeting of our Five Eyes tonight. I'll be chairing a meeting of our Five Eyes with the foreign ministers. We will be discussing, we'll continue to raise our voices, to stand up for the people of Hong Kong,
and we will do it with our allies, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the full parliament with its full powers sat through two world wars, previous pandemics and the October Crisis in 1970. The government of those days did not seek the suspension of this House. The government is not only failing to defend democracy here but also abroad. It can't utter the word “Taiwan”. It is failing to be strong and clear on Hong Kong and while the situation today is not that of decades past, it is clear that Canada in the past has stood for the rights of people in Hong Kong. Canada needs to take much stronger diplomatic action on Hong
Kong. There are some 300,000 Canadians living there and they are looking for the government's support. So when will this government act? When will it threaten economic sanctions, like the U.S. administration has? When will it provide asylum and a clear path to citizenship like the U.K. government has? When will it speak up against the Communist Party of China's united front workers operating here in this country? When will it do like Australia did in calling for an international investigation of COVID-19, an organized international coalition of like-minded democracies to defend Hong Kongers and the violation of the Sino-British treaty?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I'd like to thank the member for this very important question.
Mr. Chair, I'll remind the member to look at our statement of the 28th of May. It's already done, Mr. Chair. Canada has spoken to the world, has spoken up. We've made a first declaration with our colleagues in Australia and the U.K. to say that we have deep concerns.
We all know, Mr. Chair, that the [Inaudible] system, the high degree of liberty and freedom enjoyed by the people in Hong Kong has made Hong Kong what it is today, a beacon when it comes to trade and financing, and we know and we have experienced deep concern. Again, on the 28th of May, with the United States, with the United Kingdom, with Australia, Canada was front and centre with these countries to say we have deep concerns that the imposition of a national security law by Beijing would undermine the very foundation, the very principles that have made Hong Kong so successful, Mr. Chair, and we said at that time that we with our international partners would look at the implications and the ramifications that it may have on our arrangement.
And Mr. Chair, I've called a meeting of our Five Eyes tonight. I'll be chairing a meeting of our Five Eyes with the foreign ministers. We will be discussing, we'll continue to raise our voices, to stand up for the people of Hong Kong, and we will do it with our allies, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China WeChat Lawsuit Covid-19 PPE2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Prime Minister continues to pander to the communist regime in China. We were shocked to hear that his own Minister of Digital Government used WeChat, a Chinese social media site, to raise funds to sue a Global News reporter.
For what? For daring to expose China's attempt to hoard PPEs during the COVID question.
My question is this. Is it the practice of the government to support lawsuits against Canadian reporters who challenge the hostile actions of the regime in China and will the Prime Minister now condemn the actions of the digital government minister?
Member of Parliament - Guilbeault, Steven (Laurier—Sainte-Marie)We value the important work of media across the country and across the world. Attacking the integrity of hardworking journalists is not acceptable. Like many members on all sides of this House, WeChat is a social media platform used to engage and share information with the Chinese Canadian community. Participation in this group, much like the Facebook group, is guided by posted guidelines and a disclaimer. In this case, the individual who violated the guidelinesof the group is no longer a part of this group.
Thank you
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FTA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, Canadians have no reason to trust the Prime Minister on anything to do with China, especially when it comes to trade policy. Two and a half years ago, the Prime Minister travelled to China to commence free-trade negotiations and the talks ended up in complete failure and embarrassment. Still the Prime Minister continues to cozy up to the Chinese regime, refusing to ban Huawei from our 5G network or to speak out convincingly against China's oppression in Hong Kong. Meanwhile, the two Michaels are continuing to languish in Chinese jails. This is the kind of partner the Prime Minister wants to negotiate a trade agreement with.
Can the minister tell us whether at any time during the last six months the Prime Minister or anyone else in his government have had discussions with China about a free trade agreement? A simple yes or no will do.
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to my honourable colleague for that question.
As you know, Canada has a complex and multidimensional relationship with China. Canada will continue to engage with China with eyes wide open. Any work that we do on trade and on all matters will always be in the interest of Canadians first.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FTA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaI think Canadians will see the minister didn't even answer a simple yes or no question, so I'll ask her a simpler yes or no question. Is she or anyone else in her government presently discussing or negotiating a free trade agreement with China, yes or no?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, we will always do our work, including any discussions on trade and indeed all our work, with the interests of Canadians and Canadian businesses at the absolute top of our priority. Thank you, Mr. Chair.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FTA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaAgain, there is no answer, so I'll try again. Will the minister now assure Canadians that she and the Prime Minister's government will not negotiate a free trade agreement with China, yes or no?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Any work that we do will always be guided in the best interests of Canadians and Canadian businesses.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FTA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, I am just flabbergasted. This minister has been asked three times if the government is negotiating a trade agreement. She refuses to answer, so I'll try again.
Will the minister tell us why she thinks negotiating a trade agreement with a hostile country like China is in Canada's best interest?
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to the honourable member for the question.
The answer is no.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FTA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, I just want to make sure. Free trade is a good thing when it takes place between like-minded countries that embrace free market principles and apply the rule of law. China is not such a country. In fact, China repeatedly flouts international trade rules, illegally dumps underpriced goods into Canada, and prevents Canadian canola, beef and pork from entering China. Is has also jailed Canadians without due process.
Will the minister now assure us that our government will not negotiate any free trade agreements with China? Yes orno.
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, I thank the honourable member for that question. We are not in discussions with China on a free trade agreement, and as my colleagues including the Prime Minister, and my colleague the foreign minister have said many times in this House and outside of this House our priority continues to be the immediate release of Canadians detained in China. We will always work in the interest of Canadians and Canadian businesses. That is what we will always do.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FIPA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Manly, Paul (Nanaimo—Ladysmith )Green PartyThis week marks the 31st anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre, and we are currently seeing repression of the democracy movement in Hong Kong. We know that communist China oppresses minority groups and does not respect human rights.
In spite of this knowledge, the Harper Conservative government signed a lopsided and anti-democratic investment treaty with China in 2012, the Canada-China FIPA. This Conservative deal gave Chinese state-owned corporations extraordinary powers to challenge our democratic decisions through a secretive private tribunal system.
In the years since the FIPA was signed, with no vote in Parliament, Chinese state-owned corporations have been purchasing Canadian assets and resources. These corporations can seek financial compensation from Canadian taxpayers for the loss of potential profit, when our laws and policies get in the way of their profit taking.
Can the government tell us whether any of these Chinese corporations have threatened to use the anti-democratic investor-state provisions of the FIPA to seek financial compensation from Canadian taxpayers?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Speaker, I'd like to thank the member for this very important question.
As I'm sure the member will know, Canada is setting up with its allies around the world to protect the freedom and democracy that has been enjoyed by the people in Hong Kong. As he knows, we have issued a declaration with a number of allies we have called upon, making sure that measures remain in place to protect the freedom and liberty of people of Hong Kong.
We know that the [Inaudible] treaty system has provided the framework under which the people of Hong Kong have been able to create an economy that is resilient and have made Hong Kong a place where people want to do business, commerce and trade.
Mr. Speaker, we have expressed our deep concern. I would refer the member to the joint statement we have issued with the United States, Australia and the United Kingdom. We have spoken with one voice and we have said we have deep concerns that the actions by Beijing would undermine—if they were to proceed with this national security law unilaterally—the bedrock of what has made Hong Kong, and that we will review the impact that…
The Acting Chair (Mr. Bruce Stanton): Mr. Manly, you've got about 45 seconds left.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FIPA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Manly, Paul (Nanaimo—Ladysmith )Green PartyThat was a trick question, because this anti-democratic agreement states that a Chinese corporation… We wouldn't be able to have permission to disclose that information if there was, in fact, an investor-state dispute.
Unlike NAFTA, which had a six-month period for renegotiation, the Harper Conservatives have locked us into a 15-year agreement with the FIPA and this anti-democratic agreement. Will the government re-engage the special committee on Canada-China relations so we can do a thorough investigation of this Conservative sell out to Canadian democracy—
The Acting Chair (Mr. Bruce Stanton): We are out of time, Mr. Manly. We'll go to the minister for a response.
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)I want to thank my honourable colleague for that very good question. Canada will pursue trade always in the interest of Canadians and we are in the process of reviewing our FIPA agreements so that those agreements can indeed provide the right framework for us to do trade, Canadians to do trade, with the interests of Canadians always top of mind.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FIPA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Manly, Paul (Nanaimo—Ladysmith )Green PartyThat was a trick question, because this anti-democratic agreement states that a Chinese corporation…
We wouldn't be able to have permission to disclose that information if there was, in fact, an investor-state dispute.
Unlike NAFTA, which had a six-month period for renegotiation, the Harper Conservatives have locked us into a 15-year agreement with the FIPA and this anti-democratic agreement.
Will the government re-engage the special committee on Canada-China relations so we can do a thorough investigation of this Conservative sell out to Canadian democracy—
The Acting Chair (Mr. Bruce Stanton): We are out of time, Mr. Manly. We'll go to the minister for a response.
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)I want to thank my honourable colleague for that very good question. Canada will pursue trade always in the interest of Canadians and we are in the process of reviewing our FIPA agreements so that those agreements can indeed provide the right framework for us to do trade, Canadians to do trade, with the interests of Canadians always top of mind.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Canada-China FIPA2020-06-01Member of Parliament - Manly, Paul (Nanaimo—Ladysmith )Green PartyThat was a trick question, because this anti-democratic agreement states that a Chinese corporation…
We wouldn't be able to have permission to disclose that information if there was, in fact, an investor-state dispute.
Unlike NAFTA, which had a six-month period for renegotiation, the Harper Conservatives have locked us into a 15-year agreement with the FIPA and this anti-democratic agreement.
Will the government re-engage the special committee on Canada-China relations so we can do a thorough investigation of this Conservative sell out to Canadian democracy—
The Acting Chair (Mr. Bruce Stanton): We are out of time, Mr. Manly. We'll go to the minister for a response.
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)I want to thank my honourable colleague for that very good question. Canada will pursue trade always in the interest of Canadians and we are in the process of reviewing our FIPA agreements so that those agreements can indeed provide the right framework for us to do trade, Canadians to do trade, with the interests of Canadians always top of mind.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Uighurs2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act has passed both Houses of Congress in the United States and is now on the way to the oval office for signature. What is Canada's position on this Muslim minority being jailed and re-educated by the Chinese communist party?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, thank you to my honourable colleague for that question. We are deeply concerned by the human rights situation faced by the Uyghurs and other minorities in China. This is an issue our government has raised directly with the Chinese.
Canada has also repeatedly voiced its concerns at the UN Human Rights Council. We will continue to call on—
The Chair: We'll go back to Mr. Sweet.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Rohingya2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Burmese government is another being exploited by the CCP. Their Muslim minority was driven out and now languishes in Bangladesh who is a commonwealth partner in the midst of this global pandemic. What will Canada do to answer the injustice done to the Rohingya?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Canada will always stand with human rights. Canada has repeatedly voiced its concerns with the UN Human Rights Council. We will continue to call on the Chinese government to ensure that human rights of all of its people including the freedom of religion are fully respected.Bangladesh;#14;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#Myanmar;#118
China Hong Kong2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaYesterday the rubber-stamp National Peoples Congress passed the national security bill undermining Hong Kong's autonomy and strengthening a grip of the Communist Party of China. Will the Prime Minister condemn this law?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Thank you, Mr. Chair. Canada with our international partners in the U.S., Australia and the U.K.made a joint statement in which we are expressing our deep concern regarding China's imposition of a new security law for Hong Kong.Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
Hong Kong2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaCanada has admirable history of doing the right thing when the situation is bleak. The Suez Caanal, Cyprus, the fall of apartheid, child and maternal health in Africa, and Afghanistan are examples in my lifetime of how Canada has weighed-in significantly. Why is the government letting down Hong Kongers?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, with hundreds of thousands of Canadians living in Hong Kong we have a vested interest in the stability and prosperity and the foundation of which our Hong Kong's relative autonomy and basic freedoms. Canada will always support and promote freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedoms of press around the world.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong Canadian Citizens2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaI think the 300,000 Canadians who are in Hong Kong want a little bit more than interest from the government. They'd like some action. What exactly is the government going to do to help those 300,000 Canadians who are in a breach between democracy and tyranny now?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, Canada has expressed deep concern regarding China's imposition of the security law for Hong Kong. The proposed law would undermine the one country two system framework. We are going to continue to support and promote freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of press around the world.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, deep concern. After being fired at with pepper bullets and tear gas yesterday, 300 students were arrested in Hong Kong while peacefully protesting.
Where is the outrage from this government in regards to what the CCP is doing in Hong Kong?
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, as we have said, we are deeply concerned about the arrest of political figures and about the law that has been imposed on Hong Kong. As we have said, Canada will always stand up and support freedom of speech and freedom of expression.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-28Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, I'm going to give the minister another opportunity to answer the third question that I gave. Yesterday, the rubber-stamped National People's Congress passed the national security bill, undermining Hong Kong's autonomy and strengthening the iron grip of the Chinese Communist Party. Will this government condemn that law today?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Canada will continue to support Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy and freedoms under the basic law of the one country, two systems framework. Canada and our international partners, with the U.S., Australia and the U.K., have made a joint statement deeply expressing our concern regarding China's imposition of a new security law for
Hong Kong.
Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
China WeChat2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaYesterday it was revealed that the Minister of Digital Government has been promoting a fundraising campaign to sue Global News for their story criticising the Chinese Communist Party. Why is the Minister using her authority to support the Communist Party of China, and threatening our media and freedom of expression?Member of Parliament - Murray, Joyce (Vancouver Quadra)Mr. Chair, we value the important work of media right across the country. Attacking the integrity of hard-working journalists is simply not acceptable. Like many members on all sides of the House, we chat as a social media platform used to engage and share information with—
The Chair: Now we'll go back to Ms. Falk.
China;#36
China United Front2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaIs the Minister aware of the efforts the United Front carries out on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party to influence how Canadians view The People's Republic of China?Member of Parliament - Murray, Joyce (Vancouver Quadra)Mr. Chair, I want to just be clear. The participation in the WeChat group, much like Facebook, is guided by posted— The Chair: We'll now go back to Ms. Falk.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaIs the Minister an active participant in the efforts by the Communists to muzzle a Canadian journalist and deprive Canadians of the facts about China?Member of Parliament - Murray, Joyce (Vancouver Quadra)Muzzling journalists is never acceptable, and our government is very clear on that. I will say that the individual in question posted something outside of the guidelines of my WeChat group, and is no longer—
The Chair: We'll now go back to Ms. Falk.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China WeChat2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaChair, the Liberals can't shrug this off. The Minister admitted to the Breaker that her own political staff manages this WeChat. This is someone who is paid by Canadian taxpayers. Why is the Minister using tax dollars to help China attack Global News and the freedom of expression.Member of Parliament - Murray, Joyce (Vancouver Quadra)I think the member knows very well that the people who post on WeChat are free to post what they choose within certain guidelines. Those guidelines were ignored. That person is no longer part of my WeChat group. The post was completely unacceptable, and I do not share the views of the individual.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaChair, Sam Cooper is an investigative Canadian journalist who has uncovered many different criminal rackets that can be linked back to Beijing. Has the Minister apologized to Sam Cooper for attempting to shut down his work?Member of Parliament - Murray, Joyce (Vancouver Quadra)As we all know, community outreach is a very important part of the work of a member of Parliament. WeChat is one of many social media sites regularly used by members—
The Chair: Back to Ms. Falk.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Foreign Interference2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Ted (Provencher)Conservative Party of CanadaChair, in December of 2008, the Liberals passed Bill C-76. This included provisions to prevent foreign interference in Canadian society. Does the government believe that Joyce Murray's actions have violated this portion of the act?Member of Parliament - Blair, Bill (Scarborough Southwest)Mr. Chair, I want to assure the member that we are always vigilant in any foreign interference in our national security, or issues of political interference in our society. It's monitored carefully by the national security establishment, according to the law as it exists in this country, and we will remain vigilantCanada;#32;#China;#36
China2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaChair, in May of 2019, the Liberals launched their digital charter. One of the principles was strong democracy, a commitment to defend freedom of expression. Will the Liberals hold Joyce Murray's WeChat accountable if it has violated this part of the charter?Member of Parliament - Blair, Bill (Scarborough Southwest)Mr. Chair, we are absolutely committed to the rule of law and will always uphold it. I think, as the Minister has made very clear, she was not involved in this process and had no control over the individual who posted that matter.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China WeChat2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Falk, Rosemarie (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Conservative Party of CanadaChair, unfortunately I don't believe that was a sufficient answer. This is really a yes or no. Will the government hold Joyce Murray's WeChat accountable if it has violated their part of the charter?Member of Parliament - Blair, Bill (Scarborough Southwest)Again, Mr. Chair, I want to assure the member that our government remains committed to the rule of law and we will always work tirelessly to uphold the laws of this country.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid 19 Supply Chains2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Hoback, Randy (Prince Albert)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, this government is refusing to come to terms with what COVID-19 will mean for the future of international trade. Why is Canada not at the table with our largest trading partner protecting the viability of our international supply chains and capitalizing on the opportunities of others doing the same?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, Canada has unprecedented access to a number of markets around the world because of the extraordinary agreements that we have made to provide access to customers in those international markets. During COVID-19, we have been working with our G20 partners. I have had two meetings with G20 trade ministers on the importance of keeping supply chains—
The Chair: We'll go back to Mr. Hoback.
Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 Supply Chains2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Hoback, Randy (Prince Albert)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, is this payback for the Prime Minister snubbing these countries at the original TPP signing?Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Chair, we have a CPTPP arrangement with these countries, and we are looking forward to making sure that we get Canadian businesses growing into those markets.Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
China Canola2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Hoback, Randy (Prince Albert)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, on the agriculture side, canola farmers would like to know the status of canola going into China. Can she update this House on that status?Member of Parliament - Bibeau, Marie-Claude (Compton—Stanstead)Je vous remercie, monsieur le président. Je vais assurer à mon collègue que nous demeurons en constante collaboration avec nos représentants, nos alliés, nos partenaires commerciaux de la Chine.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaThank you, Mr. Chair. Senior Canadian bureaucrats received very credible reports in early January that China was procuring and hoarding PPE. As a member of cabinet, was the health minister aware?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Chair, from the very beginning of the outbreak in early January we were aware of the challenges our health sector would face, and we began immediately to work with the provinces and territories to understand what the need would be and how we could best prepare.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE Donation2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaIn April the minister stated that there was not enough supplies in the national emergency stockpile. Can she explain why she approved a donation of 16 tons of PPE for China on January 31, claiming it would not compromise our supply? She can't have it both ways. We don't have enough; we have enough and it won't compromise.Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, we are operating in a highly competitive global environment, and the reality is that we need to make sure we have multiple complementary supply chains operating at the same time, which we have been doing in the past weeks and months, in order to ensure our frontline health care workers have the supplies they need to keep Canadians safe. That's our priority. That's what we're working on.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaHealth care workers are now having to look at modified full-face snorkels as an alternative to N95 masks. Did it not occur to the minister that our hospitals and care homes could have used that PPE she shipped out, providing a longer opportunity for them to also get procurement done?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)As the member opposite knows, the equipment that was donated when China was in its outbreak was an important donation of nearly expired or expired goods that it was in desperate need of in its effort to try to contain the virus. As the member opposite knows, we've been able to work successfully with provinces and territories to ensure they have what they need.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China State-owned Long Term Care Homes2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, I would suggest that during February and March our hospitals would have consumed that almost-expired product very efficiently, but I want to move on to another topic.
When defending the sale of 22 seniors' home to the Chinese government, the Prime Minister stated, “We have a strong regulatory regime that imposes rigorous standards. This regime ensures the care our seniors get is top quality." That was in 2017. Now he states that he is saddened, shocked, disappointed and he's angered. Was the Prime Minister completely obvious to the risks, or was he just too anxious to please the Chinese government when he sold those 22 homes?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)The homes the member opposite is referring to are in the province of B.C., and I have to commend the province for the early work it did to protect seniors in those long-term care homes. The member opposite is trying to confuse the issue. As she knows, the review we did was entirely separate than the standards to which the province holds care homes to.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China State-Owned Enterprise2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Prime Minister does not have authority over seniors' homes, which he has clearly stated, but he does have authority over the act where he approved the sale. At 18 months, government has an obligation to make sure there is compliance. Was that done?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Chair, the long-term care homes in each province fall within the jurisdiction of their own particular act, and those provinces and territories are responsible for fulfilling the inspections required under that act.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China State-Owned Enterprise2020-05-27Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaUnder the Investment Canada Act, the government is obligated to review the sale for compliance. Four homes that had to close. Since the government approved the sale, it is complicit in the care of our seniors in this countryMember of Parliament - Bains, Navdeep (Mississauga—Malton)Mr. Chair, I want to make it very clear that we understand how difficult this is for seniors. That is why we followed the appropriate steps outlined under the Investment Canada Act to make sure that any measures we took kept seniors and their well-being first and foremost.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid China PPE2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Jansen, Tamara (Cloverdale—Langley City)Conservative Party of CanadaYes, I understand that a number of Chinese mask manufacturers have been nationalized, and products for Canadians have been confiscated by the CCP government. Is the drop in N95 orders due to, in actual fact, contracts being cancelled?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)On N95 masks, I would like to assure the member and this House that we have multiple contracts in place for the procurement of N95 masks, including with 3M in the United States, whose masks are crossing our border weekly over the next month.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Jansen, Tamara (Cloverdale—Langley City)Conservative Party of CanadaThat didn't quite answer my question. Have any of our orders been cancelled by the nationalization of these manufacturers in China?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)We have [Inaudible] in place in China. We have our embassy and other firms actively ensuring that our supplies from source, from the manufacturing source, make their way to the warehouse and then over 40 flights have come to Canada with those masks and other supplies. Our supply chains are operating despite the global environment being highly competitive, Mr. Chair.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-27Member of Parliament - Jansen, Tamara (Cloverdale—Langley City)Conservative Party of CanadaWe know many millions of N95 masks have arrived in Canada from China, and have been substandard. What is the total number of substandard masks that have arrived?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, as previously explained to this House, about eight million masks did not meet spec by the Public Health Agency of Canada, and have been repurposed to some extent in other areas of the system.Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Covid-192020-05-26Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the media is also reporting today that the Minister of Digital Government has been promoting a fundraising campaign to sue Global News for its story that criticized the Chinese Communist Party. WeChat is a Chinese state-sanctioned social media platform that is monitored by the communist state security and, worse yet, the minister has admitted that her taxpayer-funded political aide is the one who manages her WeChat account and who allowed the fundraising campaign to be promoted. Clearly, this is inappropriate.
What action has the Prime Minister taken in light of these revelations?

Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, as a party and as a government, we value the important work that journalists do right across the country. Attacking the integrity of hard-working journalists is absolutely unacceptable. The individual who posted this link on this particular group is no longer a member of this group and is not affiliated with the electoral district association in question.

Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-05-26Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, this is so typical of the Liberals. When it comes to things like this, they only apologize when they get caught. When we put this in light of their whole approach to China, foreign affairs experts are saying that the government's approach is to speak softly and carry no stick.
Yesterday, I gave the Prime Minister four opportunities to condemn the attack on the freedom of the people of Hong Kong by the Government of China. He refused. We have seen a pattern of appeasement toward the PRC, but this is much worse. By helping an arm of the Chinese government suppress media critical of the PRC here in Canada, the Prime Minister is actually doing its dirty work.
Why are the Prime Minister's cabinet ministers helping the dictators in the PRC?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, as I said, the individual in question was not associated with the electoral district association or the member of Parliament and minister in question.
We are, of course, deeply concerned about the proposals for introducing legislation related to national security in Hong Kong. With hundreds of thousands of Canadians living in Hong King, we have a vested interest in its stability and prosperity. We continue to support Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy and freedoms under the basic law and the “one country, two systems” framework, which would be undermined by this proposal. We will always support and promote freedom of speech, freedom of expression and freedom of the press around the world.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-05-26Member of Parliament - Sweet, David (Flamborough—Glanbrook)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, yesterday the Prime Minister refused to condemn the odious attacks by China on the free people of Hong Kong. Worse yet, the Liberals voted against recommencing the Canada-China committee to address the threat to Hong Kong's democracy by the CCP. Liberals claim to be defenders of freedom, but they stand by while a communist regime drags lawmakers out of a legislative council, locks up those who fight for democracy and is hell-bent on exerting authoritarian rule over Hongkongers.
Enough is enough. When will the Liberals stand up for human rights and democracy, and against the dictators in China?

Member of Parliament - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, we are deeply concerned about proposals for introducing legislation related to national security in Hong Kong. With hundreds of thousands of Canadians living in Hong Kong, we have a vested interest in its stability and prosperity, the foundations of which are Hong Kong's relative autonomy and basic freedoms.
Canada continues to support Hong Kong's high degree of autonomy and its one country, two systems framework. We continue to encourage all parties to engage in peaceful and meaningful dialogue to address the legitimate concerns expressed by the Hong Kong population.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
China Hong Kong2020-05-26Member of Parliament - Blaney, Steven (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, if the Liberals are so deeply concerned, why are they opposed to a group of Canadian parliamentarians looking into human rights in Hong Kong at the Special Committee on Canada-China Relations?
Freedom of expression is important, especially during a pandemic. In 2019, the Liberals boasted that they would defend freedom of expression. They are manoeuvring for a seat on the UN Security Council. Parliament can study this issue to defend freedom of expression.
Why are the Liberals not standing up to China to defend Canadians' rights and democracy?
Member of Parliament - Rodriguez, Pablo (Honoré-Mercier)Mr. Speaker, I disagree completely with what my colleague said.
There are currently eight committees that meet on a regular basis. For example, the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food met five times and heard from 32 witnesses. In total, there have been 74 committee meetings and we heard from 580 witnesses. Furthermore, 23 ministers have appeared. This was all done during a pandemic, with all the difficulties it has caused. We managed it, we ensured that committees can sit.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-25Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Canada used to have a history of principled leadership on the world stage. The Government of China has launched an unprecedented attack on the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong. Now the government should go beyond statements and act in concert with our allies to show the Government of China that it must abide by its commitments.
Will the Prime Minister unequivocally condemn the actions of the PRC, and will he propose a real plan for supporting the people of Hong Kong and our allies around the world who have already started to be targeted by Chinese retribution?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, Canada has always been very clear in standing up for human rights around the world, including in regard to the Chinese government. We support the over 300,000 Canadians who live in Hong Kong and support all people of Hong Kong, to continue the one country, two systems rule, which has been in place in Hong Kong and China for a couple of decades now.
We will continue to stand up strongly for human rights on the world stage, working with our allies and holding others to account. We call for a de-escalation of tensions and for the Chinese government to listen to citizens in Hong Kong who have important things to say.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-25Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, a concrete way that the Prime Minister can actually support the people of Hong Kong is to unequivocally condemn the actions of the communist regime in Beijing. It is the one violating the one country, two systems principle, and the Prime Minister is refusing to condemn those actions and refusing to propose any kind of plan to support our allies across the world.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, Canada, under a Conservative government, led the world in promoting a series of coordinated economic and political measures that punished and isolated the Putin regime and sent a clear message that violations of international law would not be tolerated.
Will the Prime Minister condemn the actions of the PRC and propose a meaningful plan to support the people of Hong Kong?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, we have expressed in no uncertain terms our deep concern over the measures proposed by the People's Republic of China in regard to Hong Kong. We stand with the people in Hong Kong who believe that freedom of expression and freedom of assembly continue to be an essential part of their way of life.
We will continue to work with our allies all around the world to stand up for human rights, including in Hong Kong.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-25Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, why is it so hard for the Prime Minister to condemn the actions of the communist government in China? The Prime Minister has let Canada get bullied and pushed around on the world stage. Two Canadians are being held illegally. The government of China put blocks on Canadian exports. All the while, the Prime Minister has done nothing.
Now the PRC is violating the one country, two systems policy and violating the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong. What is he so afraid of? Why is it so hard to stand up to the PRC? Why does he continue with the policy of appeasement?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, my job as Prime Minister is to stand up for Canadians. It is to be there to defend the rights of Canadians and to protect Canadians, both at home and abroad. That is why we have been unequivocal in our defence of the two Michaels arbitrarily detained in China; we have continued to work to resolve that situation.
We will continue to stand up for Canadians' rights, for Canadian interests, including those of agricultural producers and exporters. We will continue to defend Canadian interests everywhere around the world, including with China.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Hong Kong2020-05-25Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the problem is that the Prime Minister has actually done nothing to stand up for Canadians.
What did he do after two Canadians were held illegally by the PRC? He still wrote that cheque to the Asian infrastructure bank and still gave that institution Canadian taxpayers' money to help further the advancements of the foreign policy of China.
Here we are today, and he refuses to condemn these actions. These are actions that have been condemned by governments around the world, by public policy institutions. Why is it so hard for him to just call this out for what it is, an abuse of the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, we put out a very strong statement alongside the governments of the U.K. and Australia with our deep disagreement over the measures proposed by China for Hong Kong. We will continue to defend the rights of people in Hong Kong, particularly the 300,000 Canadians who live there. We continue to defend Canadian interests around the world, including in regard to China.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Borders2020-05-21Member of Parliament - Jeneroux, Matt (Edmonton Riverbend)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Chief Public Health Officer of Canada testified at our health committee this week that she waited too long to close the borders. Would the Deputy Prime Minister agree with her?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Thank you for the question. Let me just say that Canada currently has restrictive border measures in place. One of the aspects of our border measures that I think is most valuable to Canadians— The Chair: We'll go back to Mr. Jeneroux.Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 Border Closures2020-05-21Member of Parliament - Jeneroux, Matt (Edmonton Riverbend)Conservative Party of CanadaI would remind the member that it was on December 31st, 2019, that a Canadian company, BlueDot, first discovered evidence of the coronavirus spread. It was also in early January that the Public Health Agency was made aware of the potential spread to Canada, but it wasn't until March 16th, after many calls from all opposition parties, I might add, that this government implemented travel bans.
Again, would the Deputy Prime Minister agree that her government waited too long to close the borders?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Let me just continue my answer. One of the most important and, I would say, trickiest aspects of our travel restrictions has been to ensure that we have restrictions in place with our largest neighbour, most important trading partner, the United States, restrictions which simultaneously protect the health of Canadians but also permit essential travel for businesses, for services. That was a complex balance to achieve. I'm very pleased that we have achieved it.Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 State Owned Enterprises2020-05-21Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Chair, the COVID pandemic has left many Canadian companies vastly undervalued and, therefore, vulnerable to foreign takeovers by hostile regimes. Such takeovers represent significant risks, not only to our national sovereignty but to our national security. Even NATO and the European Union have recently warned of this danger as countries like China buy up stressed assets all around the world.
The last time the Investment Canada Act was strengthened was under Stephen Harper when we placed tougher restrictions on investments from state-owned foreign investors. That was a vast improvement but times have changed.
With the COVID pandemic the threat of losing our economic sovereignty has only increased. Will the minister commit today to conducting a full review of the Investment Canada Act, yes or no?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)I'd like to thank the member opposite for his very important question. He raises a very important point that today, at a time when our economy is facing a very difficult situation, Canadian companies are particularly vulnerable. Today is also a time when we have particular reason to pay attention to the sanctity of our supply chains in areas like medical equipment, also when it comes to food security.
Let me assure the honourable member that our government, informed by the work of our excellent intelligence analysts, is very focused on ensuring the safety and sanctity of Canadian companies and of ensuring that they are not acquired inappropriately.
China;#36
Covid-19 State Owned Enterprises2020-05-21Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaWill the minister conduct a full review of the Investment Canada Act to prevent Canadian flagship companies and our strategic assets from being bought up by hostile foreign interests, yes or no?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Let me say that the member points to a very important issue, one that I think should concern all Canadians. It is never right for Canadian companies to be acquired by hostile foreign interests in the world today where we have more reason than ever to be concerned about our national security. We need to pay particular attention to this and we are.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaDoes the government agree that an independent inquiry must be independent of WHO control and able to review all WHO records?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Madam Chair, our government has been very clear, working together with our allies, cosponsoring an EU-sponsored resolution, that we do believe a post-crisis review is the right thing to do.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaMy question was very clear. Does the government agree that an independent inquiry must be independent of WHO control and able to review all WHO records?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)My answer was also very clear, which is that Canada, working together with our closest allies, such as the EU, has been very clear that we support a post-crisis review.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaThat was the answer to the first question I asked, not the second question I asked. But I have another one on the record that I think is clear. Does the government agree that an independent inquiry must be able to access affected areas within China and conduct private interviews with witnesses in China?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Our government has been very clear, has been working effectively with our strongest democratic allies in the world, such as the EU. We believe a post-crisis review is absolutely necessary. We will continue pushing for that.
Let me just say, right now we're focusing on fighting coronavirus in Canada.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaAgain, that wasn't the question I asked.
Another minister has said that it's not the WHO's job to evaluate the quality of the data that is given by member states. I want to ask if the Deputy Prime Minister believes the same about the work of the International Atomic Energy Agency or the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Madam Chair, let me be extremely clear about our government's public position taken just a few days ago, which is we support an independent and comprehensive review of the WHO response to the pandemic. We're working with our allies to get that done, and we will.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaDoes the Deputy Prime Minister agree with her colleague Minister Gould, who said that it's not the responsibility of the WHO to evaluate the quality of the data they receive from member states?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)I think that I have been extremely clear about the government's position when it comes to the WHO. Canada is working closely with our democratic partners to ensure there is an independent and comprehensive post-crisis review, and one will happen we'll make sure it does.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaI've asked five or six questions and the minister keeps repeating her answer to the first question I asked but not to any of the others. Has the government applied any pressure to the WHO to encourage representatives to testify before Canada's health committee?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Madam Chair, the work of parliamentary committees is independent as it ought to be and we support the work of all of our parliamentary committees, including calling the witnesses who they'd like to interview.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaOf course the health committee is independent but the government should ensure the WHO understands how important it is that multilateral organizations would receive money from Canadian taxpayers are willing to be accountable to Canadian parliamentary committees when those witnesses are summoned. Has the government conveyed to the WHO the importance of a multilateral organization that receives significant Canadian funding be willing to give testimony before Canadian parliamentary committees during a time of crisis?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Let me just say this, the government supports the work of our parliamentary committees very much including the health committee and the health committee has the right to call witnesses they believe are necessary for its work. When it comes to the WHO our Minister of International Development has spoken directly with the leader of the WHO and made clear that a post-crisis review is the right thing and Canada is calling for it.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Vaccine2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaShe's not too crazy of the issue of the parliamentary committee. Experts as well as our British and American allies are reporting China based hackers are trying to steal COVID-19 related research and intellectual property. In that light, why is this government funding a COVID-19 related research partnerships between the U of A
and the Wuhan Institute of Virology?
Member of Parliament - Bains, Navdeep (Mississauga—Malton)When it comes to intellectual property we're the first government who introduced a national intellectual property strategy. We understand that we need to support our researchers and scientists and make sure that they have the ability to see those benefits right here in Canada for Canadians and we'll continue to work with our allies.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 UN2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaComme députés, nous sommes tous redevables envers les Canadiens, que ce soit dans nos circonscriptions ou ici à Ottawa. Cependant, on voit que plusieurs s'opposent à un retour au Parlement le 25 mai. En premier, c'est le Parti libéral, puis le Bloc québécois. Oui, pour être honnête avec mon collègue du Bloc québécois, M. Blanchet, le Bloc québécois pose des conditions économiques. Il conclut un accord, alors que la seule condition qu'on devrait avoir pour savoir si on revient siéger, c’est la santé publique. Pour l'instant comme on peut voir, c'est facile d'avoir plus de députés pour venir faire notre travail et poser des questions à mes collègues du gouvernement. Ceux-ci ont un grand sourire, depuis le début, parce que, pour eux, c'est facile de faire comme on le fait là, alors qu'il y a d'autres choses à faire.
J'aimerais savoir pourquoi le premier ministre appelle, tous les jours ou presque, des premiers ministres et des présidents à travers le monde pour avoir leur appui pour le siège du Conseil de sécurité de l'ONU. Est-ce qu'il considère qu'un siège à l'ONU est plus important qu'un siège à Ottawa?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Le premier ministre du Canada comprend que ceci est un moment historique pour le Canada et le monde. Le premier ministre comprend l'importance de la voix du Canada en ce moment historique. Après la Seconde Guerre mondiale, le Canada a fait un travail important en créant l'ordre international de l'après-guerre. Le Canada doit et peut le faire maintenant. C'est pourquoi le premier ministre fait ces appels.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Vaccine Hacking2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Findlay, Kerry-Lynne (South Surrey—White Rock)Conservative Party of CanadaThis government has chosen to partner with a Chinese company backed by the Chinese military to conduct research into COVID-19. The communist regime is widely believed to have hidden data from the world which could have helped prevent the virus's global spread. The Chinese military has also been accused of trying to hack research data by our own intelligence agencies. Does this government believe that the Chinese government is really the best party to conduct important scientific research with?Member of Parliament - Bains, Navdeep (Mississauga—Malton)As she full well knows, the health and safety of Canadians is our government's top priority. That is why we're working hard on all fronts to deliver safe and effective treatments and vaccines against COVID-19 for Canadians as quickly as possible. The specific collaboration that the member opposite is talking about really underscores why it's important for us, as Canadians, to explore every promising option for a COVID-19 vaccine. It is important that we do this and pursue this path, because it's in the best interest of Canadians.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 State Owned Enterprises2020-05-20Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaIf you notice, Madam Chair, that the minister did not answer the question, a simple yes or no question. I'll ask it this way. Why won't the minister standup for Canada and protect us against foreign investments that would harm our economy, undermine our sovereignty, and threaten our national security, why?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)I would really like assure the member and all Canadians our government will always stand-up for the national interest. We will always stand-up for national security, and that definitely means not allowing hostile interests to buy up our companies.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Cyber Breaches2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Alleslev, Leona (Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Canadian Security Establishment has warned that intellectual property that Canadian health organizations are developing associated with researching vaccines and treatments and tests for coronavirus are valuable targets for the Chinese communist party-backed hacking.
Has the Prime Minister or any member of cabinet been made aware of any cyber breaches?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Chair, as a government we take extremely seriously the safety and security of Canadians and of our intellectual property. That's why the Canadian Security Establishment continues to do extraordinary work in keeping Canada and Canadians safe. We receive regular updates from the CSE and from all our intelligence agencies on what we can do and what we continue to do to ensure that Canada is protected.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Cyber Abuses2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Alleslev, Leona (Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the Communications Security Establishment has indicated that there is a heightened risk and increased measures are needed to protect Canadian national security interests at this time. Could the Prime Minister let us know what additional measures the government is taking to heed these increased warnings and protect Canada?Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)We have over the past years increased the resources available to the CSE because we know how important it is to constantly be remaining vigilant in protecting Canadian networks, Canadians institutions and the safety and security of Canadians from cyber-intrusion and cyber-attacks. We continue to ensure our national security agencies have the tools necessary to do what is needed to be done.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Alleslev, Leona (Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaCanada is a member of international organizations like the WHO because we expect to receive accurate and timely information that enables us to make decisions on the actions we need to take to keep Canadians safe, but if the WHO doesn't validate and verify that information they share with member states, it puts us all at risk. Over the weekend, the international development minister said that it is not the WHO's responsibility to question the information provided by China in this pandemic. Right from day one, Canada has made bad decisions based on bad information from the WHO. The crisis is not over. Is the government continuing to trust, without verifying, the information from the WHO?Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, Canadians well know this is a global crisis that is hitting locally in every country around the world, and we need strong global institutions to able to counter this. That is why we continue to
support the work of the WHO. However, as we go through this, it is clear there will need to be improvements to the WHO, to the international institutions that serve us, and Canada will be there, as we have been, in asking questions and demanding answers.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaContracts normally lay out the expectations of the buyer and commitments by the seller. Given the number of contracts the government has signed for PPE, through you Madam Chair, what is the total amount of PPE supplies Minister Anand expected to have received to date based on these contracts?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)I thank the member opposite for the question. As she knows, our government has been working through a whole-of-government approach to ensure that we can acquire personal protective equipment for all front-line workers, medical workers. We've been working very closely
with our counterparts at the provincial and territorial levels to ensure that we understand the demand, and to make sure that we have appropriate orders in place. In addition, we've been working, as you know, on a domestic front to ensure the ability to produce PPE going into the future.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaStories about suitcases of cash and supplies being diverted are appearing in media around the world. How many of
the government's orders for PPE have gone missing?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)As we know, the supply chain is extremely fragile in terms of acquiring PPE around the world. Canada, like many other countries, has struggled, but we have been working very diligently, as you know, on the ground with many countries as well here to ensure the safety of the supply.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaSo I'll take that to mean that they have no idea. Over 80% of the N95 masks received have not met the standard of an N95 mask. What are the names of the suppliers and manufacturers that provided Canada with the eight million substandard N95-KN95 masks?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)As the member opposite knows, we would never allow defective N95 masks to be used by front-line workers. That's why all of the masks that we receive here in Canada—
Mrs. Kelly Block: That's not what I asked, Madam Chair. I asked: What is the name of the suppliers and manufacturers?
The Acting Chair (Mrs. Carol Hughes): The hon. member will have to allow the minister to respond in the appropriate amount of time that she had asked the question, and if she has another question, she can then ask that question.
Mrs. Kelly Block: Thank you, Madam Chair.
The Acting Chair (Mrs. Carol Hughes): The hon. minister.
Hon. Patty Hajdu: Thank you very much, Madam Chair, and I thank the member for the question. As the member knows, it's extremely important that the equipment that we procure overseas meets the quality and standard that will, in fact, protect the front-line health care workers to which it's destined and to ensure that we complete full testing.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaWhat is the total value of the contracts to these suppliers and manufacturers of the substandard N95 masks?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)It is very important to understand that this is an extremely difficult procurement situation. Canada has been working together, as I said, collaboratively with our provinces and territories to ensure that we can acquire PPE that is so
desperately needed by our front-line workers.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaWhat mechanism is in the contracts for recouping Canadians' money?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)I don't assume that the member means to imply that we can put a price on the safety of front-line workers. I know she understands just how tight the supply chain is and just how difficult it is across the world as countries compete for PPE that is very hard to procure. She, I am sure, understands the value of protecting our front-line health care workers to the best of our ability.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaI absolutely understand that, which is why I'm asking questions about substandard masks and what sort of mechanisms have been put into these contracts to ensure that we have the funds available to procure masks in other places.
With the government prepaying for PPE to suppliers, mostly with Chinese manufacturing, what guarantee does the government have that we will actually receive the PPE at all?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)As the member knows, we've been working very closely with a number of partners, including Ambassador Barton, to ensure that we have a strong supply chain coming out of China, but also out of many other countries. It is important for the member opposite to know that we will stop at nothing to protect our front-line health care workers. That's what they deserve given the enormous sacrifices they're making for all of us.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Block, Kelly (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek)Conservative Party of CanadaAt committee on Friday, the deputy minister for PSPC indicated the role of Deloitte in Canada was, number one, reporting and, number two, vetting potential suppliers. Can Minister Anand tell us if Deloitte vetted the supplier of the eight million substandard masks sold in Canada?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)We're working with a number of partners, private sector and otherwise, to ensure that we can get what we need to protect our front-line health care workers and, in fact, that the materials we acquire meet the strong standards to protect their health and safety.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-19Member of Parliament - Webber, Len (Calgary Confederation)Conservative Party of CanadaMany of my constituents are not happy with the World Health Organization's early handling of this pandemic. As the minister is aware, the health committee has been stonewalled by the World Health Organization in our attempts to get Canadian, Dr. Bruce Aylward, to testify. We know the minister and her government support the World Health Organization with Canadian taxpayer money. Madam Chair, does the minister believe the world Health Organization should allow Dr. Aylward to testify?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)We fully support the independent nature of House of Commons committees.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China State-Owned Enterprises2020-05-14Member of Parliament - McLeod, Cathy (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Conservative Party of CanadaThis week, the Prime Minister acknowledged the failure in our long-term care and senior residences. He noted it was a system with serious and significant challenges that must be strengthened. If we look back three short years to 2017, we see the Prime Minister was warned about his approval of the sale of Retirement Concepts, 22 Canadian seniors facilities that are now owned by the Chinese government. At the time, the Prime Minister defended the decision by saying, “We have a strong regulatory regime that imposes rigorous standards; the regime ensures the care our seniors receive is top quality.” My question, through you to the Prime Minister, is this. Did he simply neglect to ensure due diligence, or was he so anxious toMember of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)I share the member's concerns about the conditions in long-term care homes across the country. We know that this sector and the seniors who live in these homes have been significantly impacted by the outbreak of COVID-19. We've been working closely with the provinces and territories most affected, in fact all provinces and territories, to ensure they have the support to get through this crisis and to save lives. We have committed, as the Prime Minister has noted, to working with the provinces and territories to create stronger standards and I look forward to that work.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-14Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, we've learned that more and more Chinese-made masks approved by Health Canada are failing to meet minimum safety standards. Guangdong Golden Leaf Technology Development Co. is one of 65 Chinese manufacturers that has lost approval to sell products in the U.S. following tests by the CDC there, yet the manufacturer remains
approved to sell in Canada. Waiting until after the fact to do quality control puts the lives of Canadians at risk. What is the minister doing to protect the lives of our front-line health care workers from defective PPE?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)I agree that we need to protect the health and safety of front-line workers during this pandemic and, in particular, health care workers who are relying on quality standard PPE. That's why any medical supplies or PPE that is donated or that we purchase, procured by PSPC, to distribute to provinces, territories and therefore to health care workers are verified by the Public Health Agency of Canada to ensure they meet appropriate standards for use. Some KN95 masks imported into Canada by medical device companies and individuals have not been tested. They were imported independently and, following our review, we are now requiring independent testing data for new KN95 approvals from Health Canada. Our bulk-buy procurement process is not affected—Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China Transparency2020-05-14Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the Chinese government must be held to account for its mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic. Its lack of transparency and suppression of information caused significant delays in the rest of the world's ability to prepare for and react to this virus, contributing to an unnecessary loss of life across the globe. Our traditional allies are calling for an international investigation into China's concealment of key COVID-19 data.The Conservatives support our allies and an investigation. Does the Prime Minister?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Chair, as the Prime Minister has recently said, it is absolutely appropriate for us to look into the behaviour of all countries in the handling of this global pandemic—Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-14Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaOne month ago, when asked for thoughts on the legitimacy of the COVID-19 data China has shared with the WHO, the Minister of Health accused the media of pedalling conspiracy theories. Canada, population 37 million, has had over 72,000 confirmed COVID cases as of today; yet, China, population 1.4 billion, has confirmed less than 83 cases total.
Does the minister continue to trust that China has not suppressed any information and that they have been open and transparent with the WHO?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)I think, as our government has been very clear, a post-pandemic review of all of the actors, including Canada, will be an important part of how we assess the world's response to this pandemic, the international bodies that serve us and certainly our own response. We know that during the course of an outbreak, it's very difficult to collect data, and we've seen that even in our own country. When things are happening quickly, it can be difficult to assess what's happening. We also know that it's difficult to assess the death rate, because sometimes people are dying and it is only afterwards that post review determines the related COVID-19—Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Who China2020-05-14Member of Parliament - Kitchen, Robert (Souris—Moose Mountain)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, it's all well and good for a cleanup after the fact, but if no lessons were actually learned, as we are finding with the recommendations that went unheeded after the SARS epidemic, then history is bound to repeat itself. In December, Bruce Aylward was appointed the co-lead of the WHO-China joint mission on coronavirus and has served as assistant director general at the WHO in the past. He is by far the most informed Canadian with respect to the WHO's actions on COVID-19. Mr. Aylward has twice rejected invitations to appear at the health committee, forcing the committee to take the extraordinary step of issuing a summons. Given that the Government of Canada heavily relies on the information provided by the WHO to make decisions
around COVID-19, can the Prime Minister inform this House what actio
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)When it comes to the work of committees, let me just say that we strongly support the essential work of parliamentary committees. They are, of course, absolutely independent, but we support their work and we support their ability to call all witnesses that they feel they need to speak to in order to best inform Canadians.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China PPE2020-05-14Member of Parliament - Jansen, Tamara (Cloverdale—Langley City)Conservative Party of CanadaWe've been hearing about the millions of masks arriving in Canada that are unuseable. Bill Matthews, the deputy minister, mentioned that the PPE we are ordering from China is being inspected by embassy staff
in China before it leaves, and again in Canada. I'm wondering how it is possible that millions of masks are still arriving that are unuseable.
Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)I will say that the inspection of masks is not aprocess of simply doing a look-over. There are machines that are required to inspect N95 masks. The important thing is once they were in Canada they were inspected by the Public Health Agency of Canada and they were not distributed to
health care workers because they did not meet those specifications. However, 1.8 million masks have been deployed to other areas and are still useable.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO Taiwan2020-05-13Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the Prime Minister indicated that he would support Taiwan's inclusion in the WHO only as a non-state observer. Of course, that designation does not exist. Participants of the WHO are either states or NGOs. Will the Prime Minister support Taiwan's participation as a state observer?Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Chair, we will continue with our one China policy, but we have always advocated Taiwan's meaningful inclusion in international bodies where it makes sense to do so, and that includes at the WHO.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE2020-05-13Member of Parliament - Gray, Tracy (Kelowna—Lake Country)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, last week British Columbia unveiled its plan to begin reopening its economy. I've been speaking with many business owners and business associations in my riding, and I'm hearing that they're not getting their orders for cleaning supplies. Some businesses have said their back orders go back to March. They do not know how they can possibly reopen if they are not meeting health cleaning standards or accessing PPE for their employees and customers. They are well aware of the issues arising from this government's reliance on Chinese manufacturing rather than building capacity here. What is the government doing to address these issues and ensure wholesale supply companies get products now so that they can distribute them to the businesses that need them?Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Chair, our government is rapidly and aggressively buying life-saving equipment that Canada needs from a diverse range of suppliers. We are building up domestic capacity as well as procuring internationally. Our priority is to make sure front-line health care workers have the support they need. In terms of other areas of the economy, we are working with our federal and provincial counterparts to make sure that we can do so in collaboration with them.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China2020-05-13Member of Parliament - Hoback, Randy (Prince Albert)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Liberals hand-picked ambassador to China, Dominic Barton, stated that China's conduct during the pandemic is damaging to its own soft power. However, when asked if there should be an investigation into China's behaviour during the crisis, the health minister stated that's not for her to say because she doesn't have “all the evidence about what China did or didn't do.” Why is Canada's ambassador to China criticizing China's actions during the pandemic while this Liberal government is defending it?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Chair, Ambassador Barton is an excellent representative of Canada in China, and he is a member of our government and very much shares and helps to formulate our government's policy when it comes to China. Ambassador Barton, of course, shares our government's view that a post-crisis review is absolutely necessary.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China2020-05-13Member of Parliament - Hoback, Randy (Prince Albert)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Liberals hand-picked ambassador to China, Dominic Barton, stated that China's conduct during the pandemic is damaging to its own soft power. However, when asked if there should be an investigation into China's behaviour during the crisis, the health minister stated that's not for her to say because she doesn't have “all the evidence about what China did or didn't do.” Why is Canada's ambassador to China criticizing China's actions during the pandemic while this Liberal government is defending it?Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Chair, Ambassador Barton is an excellent representative of Canada in China, and he is a member of our government and very much shares and helps to formulate our government's policy when it comes to China. Ambassador Barton, of course, shares our government's view that a post-crisis review is absolutely necessary.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 PPE Procurement2020-05-12Member of Parliament - Kusie, Stephanie (Calgary Midnapore)Conservative Party of CanadaA national security expert from the University of Ottawa has said that the national emergency strategic stockpile has failed in the current crisis resulting in some provinces such as Saskatchewan using expired PPE
and provinces such as Alberta using faulty PPE that cause rashes and headaches. What is the government doing to expedite procurement and to counter the
Member of Parliament - Anand, Anita (Oakville)I will start off by saying that we have multiple supply chains operating at the same time from China, domestically, the United States, and countries around the world. Our first priority is to make sure we get safe, effective, equipment and supplies, into the hands of our front-line health
care workers. Given the global supply chains and the competitive nature this is an ongoing project and we are making success for our front-line health care workers.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Vaccine2020-05-12Member of Parliament - May, Elizabeth (Saanich—Gulf Islands)Green PartyMy first question is directed to the Prime Minister. It's a question...it's a higher level abstraction. We all know that we're being told we need a vaccine and the quest for a vaccine is all-consuming globally. However, people who think about this issue and the question of the power structure, the profit motive, particularly Dr. Matthew Herder of the Public
Health Law Institute at Dalhousie University are questioning this model. We know that Jonas Salk never sought a patent on his polio vaccine.
Can we assure that public dollars going to find a vaccine will result in a product that is shared globally, openly and not for profit?
Member of Parliament - Bains, Navdeep (Mississauga—Malton)Mr. Chair, I want to take this opportunity to thank the member for her question. Our approach has been very clear. When it comes to science we have an open science model where we're working with different partners and different jurisdictions to help develop a potential vaccine, to look at counter measures, and other therapeutics. Our goal is to make sure that we do so in a collaborative fashion because this is a global pandemic. Make no mistake. If it's Canadian ingenuity and Canadian IP that's driving it, we want to support them as well.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 Vaccines2020-05-12Member of Parliament - May, Elizabeth (Saanich—Gulf Islands)Green PartyAs a follow-up to the Minister, it was interesting to see that the claim made by this public health institute at Dalhousie that the wonderful research that was being done in Winnipeg on an Ebola vaccine, because of the for-profit motive and the interests in Big Pharma in seeing their market before they develop the product, it is alleged that the Ebola vaccine was actually delayed by the for-profit model.
I wonder if we might, again, Mr. Minister, consider examining this profit motive around the development of lifesaving vaccines and other drugs. Is that a conversation that the Minister is having with others?
Member of Parliament - Bains, Navdeep (Mississauga—Malton)Again, I'd like to thank the member for her question. I'm working very closely with my colleague, Minister Hajdu, as well as the chief science advisor to look at all options. I'm glad she highlighted the Ebola virus which was developed here in Canada. I'm also proud of the fact that the
DNA sequencing for SARS was also done in Canada, so we have incredible scientists and researchers. We are engaging with them and we are empowering them, and we will continue to share those details with the public.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China Taiwan2020-05-07Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaThank you, Mr. Chair. This question is directed to the Minister of Foreign
Affairs. On March 28, the minister personally tweeted out a thank you to the People's Republic of China for donating PPE to Canada. This tweet happened within three hours of China's announcing that gift. As it turned out, many of these PPE were defective and could not be used. More recently, Taiwan donated half a million surgical masks to Canada, and yet here we are two weeks later and the minister has yet to personally thank Taiwan for its generosity. Will the minister now thank this free and democratic country for its generous gift to Canadians?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I'd like to thank my colleague for the question. Indeed we are very grateful to every nation for helping Canada. This is a global pandemic, which knows no borders. We have been expressing our thanks to many nations that have contributed. We will continue to do so. It is important in a time of pandemic, Mr. Chair, that we don't play politics, that humanity comes together. I can say, from my COVID foreign ministers call, the world community has come together to make sure that the supply chains would remain intact, that we would have transit hubs, that we would have air bridges. We will continue, Mr. Chair, to work with every nation when it comes to health. This is a public good. We want to work together with everyone.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China Taiwan2020-05-07Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaWell, Mr. Chair, I didn't hear a “Thank you” there, so I'm going to try again. On May 4 the Government of Taiwan delivered 25,000 surgical masks to the Government of British Columbia. On hand were B.C.'s Minister of Citizens' Services Anne Kang and Minister of State for Child Care Katrina Chen, who, as ministers, officially thanked the Government of Taiwan for its donation. Again, will the minister now do the right thing, and on behalf of Canadians recognize the generosity of Taiwan and thank its government for that timely donation?Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, as I said to you before, Canada's grateful to all who have given supplies to Canada. This is a common endeavour. We are thankful. We are grateful to every nation. We will continue to be so. Like I said, when it comes to global health, when it comes to helping each other, I think it is a duty for all to come together. We are grateful and thankful for all those who have agreed to help Canada and Canadians from coast to coast to coast in times of need. I've repeated that and have said that many times in many fora, Mr. Chair, that we are grateful and thankful to all of those who are helping Canada.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China Taiwan WHO2020-05-07Member of Parliament - Fast, Ed (Abbotsford)Conservative Party of CanadaWell, no specific “Thank you” to Taiwan again. The Government of Taiwan has been the world leader in successfully fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. We have a lot to learn from them and their response. Sadly, the People's Republic of China continues to oppose Taiwan's
membership in the World Health Organization. Will the minister now do the right thing and ensure Canadians that he will fully support efforts to grant Taiwan membership in the World Health Organization?
Member of Parliament - Champagne, François-Philippe (Saint-Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Chair, I'd like to thank the member. As a former trade minister he's very well aware of Canada's “one China” policy. That being said, Mr. Chair, we support Taiwan to continue meaningful participation in international multinational fora, particularly when it comes to health, Mr. Chair. This is a global good. We want to support every nation. We
recognize that Taiwan and others have been doing very well in fighting this pandemic. We also believe that Taiwan's role as an observer in the world health assembly meeting is of interest to the international health community. We have been supportive of that.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-06Member of Parliament - Jeneroux, Matt (Edmonton Riverbend)Conservative Party of CanadaCan the minister confirm that she has reached out to the WHO in support of the health committee's request to speak to Dr. Aylward?Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Chair, I personally have not reached out to the WHO.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 WHO2020-05-06Member of Parliament - Williamson, John (New Brunswick Southwest)Conservative Party of CanadaThe Chinese Communist Party is critical of a decision by MPs to formally summon a Canadian World Health Organization adviser to testify before Parliament's health committee. As well, Beijing is pressuring other nations to dismiss these investigations.
Will the health minister urge WHO officials to co-operate with our Parliament to understand the international agency's handling of COVID-19?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Let me just say to that, Mr. Chair, that no country in the world has any business telling Canadian parliamentarians and Canadian parliamentary committees what they can and cannot do. We are a sovereign country and a sovereign democracy. I think all of us are rightly proud of that.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China2020-05-06Member of Parliament - Williamson, John (New Brunswick Southwest)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, the Deputy Prime Minister told the House last week that she holds former Liberal MP Irwin Cotler in high regard after he blamed Communist China for the scale and spread of COVID-19. Mr. Cotler also likened Beijing's cover-up to the Chernobyl disaster in the former Soviet Union. As well, the Deputy Prime Minister agreed that democracies are more transparent and accountable than totalitarian governments.
Why then has Ottawa not joined Australia and other democracies in calling for an investigation of Beijing's reporting of COVID-19?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Chair, I very much hold Irwin Cotler in high regard, as I think every member of the House does. I don't think I agreed that democracies are more transparent than authoritarian regimes. I think I said they were and maybe others agreed with me, which is good because we are a democracy.
When it comes to looking into how we got here with coronavirus, we absolutely agree that it is going to be very important to have a review. Our Minister of International Development spoke about that with Dr. Tedros of the WHO
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 / 5 Eyes2020-05-05Member of Parliament - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaMerci, monsieur le président. Le gouvernement chinois n'a pas été transparent avec le reste du monde en ce qui concerne le coronavirus. L'Australie a demandé une enquête approfondie, mais a reçu des menaces du régime communiste.
Est-ce que le Canada va se tenir aux côtés de ses alliés du Five Eyes et demander au gouvernement chinois d'être complètement transparent?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Nous continuons d'être solidaires avec nos alliés, incluant les Five Eyes, qui ont été d'ailleurs très solidaires du Canada dans le dossier des deux Canadiens détenus de façon injuste depuis longtemps en Chine. Nous allons continuer de nous attendre à ce qu'il y ait des réponses à toutes nos questions dans les mois et les années à venir sur l'origine de cette pandémie, y compris les questions importantes pour la Chine. En même temps, nous allons travailler pour nous assurer que tous les Canadiens ont tout l'équipement et toutes les protections nécessaires pour
passer à travers cette pandémie.
Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#New Zealand;#123;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 / 5 Eyes2020-05-05Member of Parliament - Bezan, James (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman)Conservative Party of CanadaThank you, Mr. Chair. Through you to Minister Sajjan again, I'm going to change gears a bit. I know that back in January, military intelligence through, CF Intelligence Command, was reporting through the chain of
command the novel coronavirus and the outbreak in Wuhan. On what date was he, as Minister of National Defence, given his first intelligence briefing on the outbreak and the pandemic in China?
Member of Parliament - Sajjan, Harjit S. (Vancouver South)Mr. Chair, we have been following this crisis from day one. We work with our Five Eyes intelligence sources and this has been a whole-of-government effort right from the beginning. I can assure you that our
response to this pandemic has been with all the necessary information. Obviously, I can't discuss the intelligence in this forum, but I can assure you that a response has been well informed with the correct information.
Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#New Zealand;#123;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 / 5 Eyes2020-05-05Member of Parliament - Bezan, James (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman)Conservative Party of CanadaThank you, Mr. Chair. Minister Sajjan, we know that intelligence was going up the chain of command in National Defence. It was reported in the media that, in early January the hierarchy within the Canadian
Armed Forces was being made aware of the coronavirus outbreak. So I asked you, Minister, when did you become aware of it, and what did you do with that intelligence?
Member of Parliament - Sajjan, Harjit S. (Vancouver South)Mr. Chair, I get regular briefings on intelligence. Yes, I was made aware of this in January.
As with all our intelligence, we work together from a whole-of-government perspective with all of our intelligence agencies. One thing I can assure you is that our response has been well informed with all the correct information that is provided to me and other members of cabinet.
Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#New Zealand;#123;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 / 5 Eyes2020-05-05Member of Parliament - Bezan, James (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman)Conservative Party of CanadaWhat was the timeline from the time you were first told, Minister Sajjan, about the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan...what did you do with that intelligence? When did you give it to the Prime Minister or Minister
Hajdu as the Minister of Health?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Chair, let me say that our government's response to this global pandemic has of course been informed by the excellent work of Canadian intelligence agencies throughout. We have been working on this from very early on. On January 2, [Inaudible] first spoke with provincial health authorities to alert them to the situation. On January 14, it convened a meeting of all provincial health authorities. In January, the Prime Minister convened a meeting of the incident response group, and in January we increased screening at all major airports. All of these actions were informed by the work of our excellent intelligence community, and of course our work with our Five Eyes, NATO, and NORAD allies.Australia;#9;#Canada;#32;#China;#36;#New Zealand;#123;#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland;#183;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 Intelligence2020-04-28Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Chair, information has come out that a Canadian company called Bluedot was able to track incidents of COVID-19 in China as early as December 2019. Bluedot has indicated that among its clients are 12
countries, including frontline health-care providers here in Canada.
Can the Prime Minister indicate whether the Government of Canada had access to Bluedot's information back in December?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Chair, we were advised in early January of the possibility of what became COVID19. In China, we made sure that we were monitoring intelligence sources and working with our Five Eyes partners on
that. As you highlight, a Canadian company was involved in tracking the spread early on. We are glad to have that company with us now.
Our information on what was going on in China came to us through a range of intelligence services, public accounting and recording, as well as our Five Eyes and other allies around the world. We continue to work with all those allies to understand exactly what is going on around the world and how we can best position ourselves. We are working with a range of technology companies and innovators to ensure that we're actually doing everything we can to monitor and track the spread of COVID-19 in Canada. There's lots more to do, but Canadian innovation will certainly be a part of that as we move forward.
Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 Intelligence2020-04-28Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaA very quick question then…
In that answer, the Prime Minister indicated that he had received information in January from a variety of sources.
One of those sources of information was the Canadian military intelligence experts, who warned that this disease was going to be more serious than the WHO had originally indicated, so we have asked this question several times before.
It's a simple yes or no question. Did the Prime Minister or anyone in cabinet see the Canadian military intelligence report that was issued in January?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)The public health officer of Canada convened a conversation with her provincial counterparts as of January 2 to address reports of a particularly bad strain of influenza that was occurring in China. We
got regular updates from our intelligence officials. I cannot share specific briefings with you here, obviously, but I can assure you that our intelligence agents and officials were very active in keeping the cabinet and the government apprised of the latest developments.
Canada;#32;#China;#36;#United States of America;#185
Covid-19 China2020-04-20Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, our intelligence partners continue to raise serious concerns about the accuracy of information coming out of China. The advice and direction from the WHO depend on the honesty and transparency of its member countries.
The government has ignored Canadian experts who were calling for swift and decisive action much sooner. The government chose to continue air travel between China and Canada and waited weeks to impose travel restrictions, yet the Prime Minister and his health minister continue to vouch for the Government of China.
Going forward, will the government continue to trust information coming from the communist government of China?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, from the very beginning we followed the best public health advice. We engaged early to keep Canadians safe and prevent the spread of the virus.
On January 2, the Public Health Agency of Canada alerted all provincial health authorities. On January 14, Dr. Theresa Tam and the Public Health Agency of Canada convened a meeting of the Canadian Council of Chief Medical Officers of Health. We convened the incident response group in January. We enhanced airport screening measures in January and increased them as the situation evolved.
We will continue to respond to the situation as it evolves, and we will continue to base our decisions on the best available facts and evidence.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 China2020-04-20Member of Parliament - Scheer, Andrew (Regina—Qu'Appelle)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, there are reports that three Canadian planes that left for China to pick up medical equipment from China returned to Canada empty. The planes were supposed to return last night.
Can the government confirm whether or not those planes were in fact scheduled, whether or not they arrived and whether or not they were able to obtain the medical equipment that they were sent to obtain?
Member of Parliament - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, over the past weeks we have been engaged in unprecedented efforts, collaborating with partners and friends around the world to ensure that we can get the PPE and medical equipment so necessary for Canadians on the front lines in hospitals across the country. That is what we continue to do.
We have teams on the ground in China and elsewhere to coordinate the departure and arrival of shipments. We have had challenges with those shipments, as the global competition for these items is fierce.
We will continue to work as best we can to ensure that we continue to deliver all the necessary equipment to our heroes working on the front lines.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-04-20Member of Parliament - Brassard, John (Barrie—Innisfil)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, we know the medical intelligence cell of the Department of National Defence reported on the risk of COVID-19 in early January and Global Affairs would have been reporting on it around the same time. It is very likely that the ministers of National Defence and Global Affairs at a minimum would have been briefed on the detailed warnings and analysis about the emergence of the deadly potential of the coronavirus in Wuhan, China. It is even more likely that the Privy Council Office would have briefed the Prime Minister on the emerging threat.
On what date did the PCO prepare a briefing note for the Prime Minister?
Member of Parliament - Freeland, Chrystia (University—Rosedale)Mr. Speaker, the coronavirus is a global pandemic and, as such, poses a profound security threat to Canada. For that reason, Canada's intelligence community has been deeply engaged in informing the government's actions. That is why in January the incident response group was convened by the Prime Minister, where briefings were shared and discussed.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-04-20Member of Parliament - Brassard, John (Barrie—Innisfil)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, in early January, MEDINT, a cell of our country's military intelligence branch, began producing those detailed warnings. On January 30, the WHO declared the outbreak a “public health emergency of international concern”. In the backdrop of these two warnings, our government shipped 16 tonnes of personal protective equipment to China in February and left Canada scrambling to find supplies to protect our front-line health care workers.
Did the Minister of Health know about the DND report and did she receive a briefing note from the Privy Council Office on it?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, in a global pandemic, the principle is that all countries work together to defeat the virus where it is most present. In January, the outbreak in Wuhan, China was posing a significant public health threat to the entire world. As such, and as a partner country with the WHO, Canada supplied some personal protective equipment that was rapidly becoming out of date to Canada and that could certainly be used in Wuhan's efforts to fight the virus there.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-04-20Member of Parliament - Godin, Joël (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, because it was slow to close Canada's borders, this government allowed thousands of people from at-risk areas to enter the country and put Canadians at risk.
After many calls from our party, Roxham Road was finally closed, but, once again, we saw that many people crossed the border illegally and no security measures were taken.
My question is simple. I would like to know how many illegal migrants entered Canada since the pandemic began.
Member of Parliament - Blair, Bill (Scarborough Southwest)Mr. Speaker, in early March we began discussions with our allies and partners who share the Canada-U.S. border with us on how we could restrict non-essential travel. That discussion took place and culminated in an agreement between our two countries to restrict non-essential travel while still allowing essential workers and trade to continue to move forward. As part of that agreement, we implemented significant new restrictions on people who cross our borders irregularly as non-essential. That has been a very effective measure that has been put in place. Since the time of that agreement, now 30 days ago, there have been fewer than 10 individuals who have crossed the border and been subsequently directed back to the United States.Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-19 EDC2020-04-20Member of Parliament - Kmiec, Tom (Calgary Shepard)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, CFIB data suggests that one-third of Canadian small businesses will never open again, if the government continues to drag its feet in getting financial support into their hands. Small business loan programs established through BDC and Export Development Canada are desperately needed, but many small business owners worry that it simply won't be enough to save them.
To the Minister of Finance, or any minister in the government, how many small businesses have received funding from BDC and EDC, separately reported over the regular loan volume, and what is the government doing to speed up program deployment?
Member of Parliament - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, we are listening to small businesses all across the country. As of Friday, and today those numbers would be even higher, almost a quarter of a million business owners and businesses across the country have seen those loans approved. This is real help that will help all of our businesses across the country.
We will continue to help them because we have expanded the criteria so that more businesses can access a $40,000 interest-free loan, for businesses with $20,000 of payroll up to $1.5 million of payroll.
We are going to help even more businesses in the country. Nothing is more important than helping our businesses right now.
Canada;#32;#China;#36
Covid-192020-04-20Member of Parliament - Boulerice, Alexandre (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, an article on Ricochet reveals troubling information about errors made and the lack of pandemic preparedness.
SARS hit in 2003, but the government does not seem to have learned anything from that experience. On the other side of the world, South Korea had what it needed. They tested all their people. They had masks for everyone. Here, we are still scrambling for equipment. As a result, Quebec's death rate is 23 times higher than South Korea's.
What steps will the government take to provide protective equipment to health workers?
Member of Parliament - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, it has been all hands on deck to try to secure personal protective equipment for our health care workers across the provinces and territories.
The federal government has been working very closely with our counterparts to ensure that we find supplies, that we place those orders together and that we are able to get those orders out of countries. Also, we have been ramping up our ability to produce personal protective equipment and other medical supplies domestically, which will greatly increase our capacity to ensure an ongoing supply going forward.
It is a tragedy that so many people have lost their lives across this country, particularly in long-term care homes, which I know the province of Quebec is struggling with. We continue to work with our counterparts to protect those lives.
Canada;#32;#China;#36

COVID-19 issues notes

Canadian leadership

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Repatriation efforts

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Emergency loan program for Canadians abroad

Update

The Emergency Loan Program continues to support Canadians abroad without any other financial means to get home.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The COVID-19 Emergency Loan Program is a temporary financial assistance program to help Canadian citizens and Permanent Residents outside Canada affected by COVID-19 to return home, or to help them shelter in place while they are working toward returning to Canada. They must demonstrate that prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, they had existing plans to return to Canada that have been disrupted by COVID-19 impacts on travel, and that they do not have another source of funds.

The maximum amount of a loan is $5,000 per person to cover the return to Canada and/or short-term needs while they work toward returning home.

Loans are repayable but granted on an interest-free basis for six months.

Consular issues

Supplementary messages

Update

While our operations to bring Canadians home are winding down, our support to Canadians abroad remains. Missions continue to provide dedicated consular support to remaining Canadians during the “Shelter in Place”.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The delivery of that assistance is now more complex and time-consuming. The way assistance can be provided may vary greatly from one mission to another, and will be delivered in the context of altered and restricted mission postures. To support Canadians in this phase of response, alternative service delivery mechanisms are in place such as remote delivery of assistance, the provision of transactional services by appointment only and the delivery of assistance through local partners if face-to-face assistance is required. We are focusing on the most pressing needs by adapting to local conditions and by taking advantage of the different communication means to assist Canadians abroad remotely. Contact with Canadians detained abroad continue to be maintained, either by using alternative contact methods or by in-person visits whenever possible.

The Emergency Watch Centre and missions are working to provide support to those in difficult circumstances through information on local conditions and health advice. The needs of Canadian abroad are being continually monitored.

Consular assistance is provided to Canadian citizens only but, in an emergency event, some services may be extended to permanent residents with limited exceptions.

PPE and medical supplies global market support

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Assisting Canadian suppliers of PPE

Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020, there have been a number of TCS successes. A number of opportunities have arisen beyond purely commercial transactions to promote Canadian companies, including potential opportunities with United Nations agencies, the World Health Organization and Pan-American Health Organization and other multilateral, regional and plurilateral procurement initiatives (e.g. Africa Union platform, World Bank Group). The TCS will work to increase awareness of the international opportunities with companies who have interest and capacity for internationalization.

Global supply chains

Canada depends heavily on imports of medical products and pharmaceutical inputs. Given our highly integrated supply chains, the current pandemic could impact Canadian production capacity. Elements most critical to Canada’s supply chains include facemasks, protective suits, hand sanitizer, ventilators, and some pharmaceutical inputs. The current crisis has had impacts on Canada’s ability to secure equipment and pharmaceutical inputs.

Canada is bolstering its manufacturing capacity for urgently needed medical supplies. However, Canada will continue to require inputs from international markets to build finished products and to support companies with export capabilities of medical and pharmaceutical supplies.

International assistance – Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

COVID-related costs

Update

The flight facilitation costs include a variety of expenses ranging from underwriting seats on flights, costs of ticketing agencies and of domestic fees, or ground travel arrangements (this can include feeder flights and other modes of transportation organized to bring Canadians to departure cities for their commercial flight to Canada).

Supporting facts and figures

Indirect Costs:

China

Foreign state-owned investors

Supplementary messages
Update

On April 18, 2020, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada released a policy statement announcing “enhanced scrutiny” under the Investment Canada Act of foreign investment related to public health or the supply of critical goods and services, as well as “all foreign investments by state-owned investors.”

Supporting facts and figures

The 2019 annual report on the administration of the Act provides insight on the investments that have led Cabinet to order a national security review:

Background

Administered by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, the Act provides for the assessment of whether significant foreign investments are of economic benefit to Canada. Separately, the Act also provides that any foreign investment can be subject to a national security review.

A threshold determines significant foreign investment. For 2020, the thresholds are:

The Act does not discriminate based on nationality and the majority of investments do not result in action. Canada welcomes state-owned investment that is commercially motivated and of net benefit, and that is not a national security concern.

Greater China - Donations of PPE

Supplementary messages
Background

In the urgency to source essential personal protective equipment (PPE) goods in short supply in Canada to combat COVID-19, the Government of Canada, working closely with the Canadian Red Cross and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), has accepted donations of PPE from the PRC, Taiwan as well as corporate offers of donations and other forms of in-kind COVID-19 support in other jurisdictions.

In May 2020, the Canadian Red Cross received donations from the PRC as well as Taiwan. The donation from the PRC included respirators, masks, gloves and gowns, and the donation from Taiwan was masks. Taiwan has delivered a second donation to the Canadian Red Cross of masks, respirators and gowns.

In February 2020, the Government of Canada deployed PPE to support the ongoing response to the novel coronavirus outbreak in China through a standing arrangement with the Canadian Red Cross Society. The equipment consisted of protective clothing, face shields, respirators (masks), goggles and gloves with a combined weight of approximately 16 metric tonnes. The Canadian Red Cross confirmed that the PPE was received by the Hubei Red Cross and the supplies have been fully distributed.

Personal protective equipment and medical supplies received by the Government of Canada, whether procured or donated, is verified by PHAC that it meets the Government of Canada technical specifications for COVID-19 as available on the Public Services and Procurement Canada’s buy and sell website.

If PHAC cannot account for the quality, it will not be allocated to the provinces and territories for frontline healthcare response. Supplies that do not meet specifications are subsequently assessed for potential use in non-healthcare settings.

CanSino vaccine

Supplementary messages
Responsive only – status of shipment
Background

The next step for developing CanSino’s vaccine in Canada involves a shipment of trial vaccine doses and vaccine seeds to the NRC. This shipment will only be allowed to depart China once the State Council, China’s chief administrative authority, approves the export of vaccine trial candidates — something it has been reluctant to do for any of the numerous vaccines being developed in China. The delay may stem from concerns among China’s leadership that a failed or less-than-successful overseas trial of a vaccine labeled as “Chinese” could have a negative impact on China’s reputation or standing on global health issues.

When asked at a June 8 press conference if China would conduct clinical trials of vaccines outside China, Chinese Minister of Science and Technology (MOST) Wang Zhigang was non-committal, saying that “if the Chinese vaccine is ready for application after it is developed and clinically tested, we will provide it as a public product to the world.” Chinese Health Minister Ma Xiaowei was equally vague when asked if China would develop vaccines internationally, saying that “after the vaccine is developed and put into use in China, it will provide the vaccines to the world as promised.”

Canada has made several representations to Chinese leadership in support of the CanSino-NRC collaboration. Ambassador Barton has engaged counterparts at China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, National Health Commission, and Ministry of Science and Technology, and Ministers Hajdu and Bains signed, respectively, letters requesting support from Chinese Health Minister Ma Xiaowei and Vice Premier Hu Chunhua.

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ continues to make all efforts to find a resolution and get the shipment to Canada as soon as possible.

United States

Canada – U.S. border issues

Supplementary messages
Update

The Canada-U.S. temporary border measures were renewed on June 5th, and continue to be in effect until June 21, 2020. The measures restricting entry to Canada from the rest of the world are in effect until June 30, 2020.

Canada is closely monitoring the implementation of the arrangement and assessing how it may be adjusted as we approach the expiry dates.

IRCC is now the only department responsible for approving family reunification.

Supporting facts and figures

U.S. economic prosperity network

Supplementary messages
Supporting facts and figures
Background

What is the EPN? The EPN is a recently renamed U.S. State Department-led initiative encompassing various, existing U.S.-led plurilateral initiatives with the objective of deepening economic relationships on the basis of shared values (e.g. trust, transparency, reciprocity, accountability, and national sovereignty). Some of these initiatives already include Canada, such as possible forthcoming G7 deliverables on the Global Partnership for Artificial Intelligence and the Blue Dot Network on infrastructure development.

Why is it coming up now? In a Reuters report from May 4, 2020, U.S. Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and Environment, Keith Krach, speaks about U.S. efforts to create an alliance of trusted partners under the auspices of an Economic Prosperity Network (EPN). The article includes a fragmented quote from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, referring to work with Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea and Vietnam to “move the global economy forward”, including with respect to supply chain security.

Where does Canada stand? Canadian officials in Washington D.C. are in regular contact with U.S. State Department, Department of Commerce, U.S. central agencies, and like-minded counterparts. They have been able to establish that the media report likely conflated the EPN with a separate (and now concluded) “Indo-Pacific Coordination Group” where the U.S. and Indo-Pacific partners cooperated on the immediate COVID-response.

Contrary to what was suggested by the media reporting at issue, the EPN will be open to all “trusted partners” and will not be limited to Indo-Pacific countries. At this time, the EPN does not appear to include formal work on supply chains. We expect the U.S. State Department to share more specifics about the EPN with potential participants in the near future.

Export Development Canada (Support and oversight)

Supplementary messages

Update

EDC has established a COVID-19 landing page on its website to better direct Canadian companies to available Government supports. EDC and Canadian financial institutions believe that uptake for EDC products will increase as the economic recovery proceeds.

Supporting facts and figures

India N95 export ban and pharmaceutical imports

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

On March 3, India restricted the export of 13 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), and formulations made from these. On March 25, India added hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) to the list of restricted exports; a drug deemed an essential medicine by the WHO used to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, among other ailments. By May 28, under mounting international pressure, India rescinded the export restrictions on all APIs, leaving HCQ as the only pharmaceutical product remaining on the prohibited list. However, India continues to release this product on a case-by-case basis and has in fact shipped this drug to 60 countries since the pandemic was announced.

Minister Ng, Minister Champagne and PM Trudeau have spoken with their Indian counterparts on the importance of India maintaining its role in the global supply chain of medical and pharmaceutical products.

International education

Supplementary messages

Update

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ has pivoted student recruitment and partnership events from in-person to virtual. Three successful online EduCanada promotion events have been delivered to date, and an online presence is planned for the October, 2020 partnership event organized by the European Association of International Educators (EAIE).

Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has introduced policy changes that allow international students who cannot travel to Canada the flexibility to study online up to December 31, 2020 and still be eligible for the Post-Graduate Work Permit Program (PGWPP). Until August 31, 2020, international students working in essential services are also allowed to work more than the 20 hours per week normally permitted. IRCC capacity to process student visas remains limited. Although online applications are accepted, many Visa Application Centres remain closed meaning that biometrics and medical requirements cannot be completed.

The Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) is available to international students who meet the income threshold and are currently in Canada. The Canada Emergency Student Benefit (CESB) is not open to international students.

Supporting facts and figures

International pledge for open supply chains

Supplementary messages

Update

Building on Canada’s support of a number of multilateral statements advocating for open supply chains, Canada will host a virtual meeting of Ottawa Group Ministers on June 15, 2020. The meeting will help to build support among like-minded countries for work directed at using the WTO to address challenges resulting from the pandemic, and to lay the groundwork for economic recovery.

Supporting facts and figures

World Health Organization

Supplementary messages

Update

U.S. funding to, and membership in, the WHO

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The 73rd session of the World Health Assembly (WHA) convened virtually on May 18th-19th, 2020. Canada’s WHA statement was delivered (by video recording) by Minister of Health Hajdu, and included Canada’s support for a “comprehensive post-crisis review.”

Canada co-sponsored the EU-led Resolution on COVID-19 at the WHA. This Resolution provides a solid, consensus-based foundation for next steps in the global COVID-19 response, including an independent and comprehensive review at an appropriate time.

Similar to previous years, Taiwan’s participation as an observer at the WHA was a contentious issue in a lead-up to the session. [REDACTED] However, an invitation was not ultimately extended to Taiwan.

Supplementary estimates (A) 2020-2021

Summary documents

Page proofs supplementary estimates A

Organization summary (dollars)Previous estimates to dateThese supplementary estimatesProposed authorities to date
TransfersAdjustments
Note: Additional details by organization are available on the Treasury Board Secretariat website – .
Budgetary
Voted
1a Operating expenditures1,897,264,276(600,000)1,840,1681,898,504,444
5 Capital expenditures113,830,264--113,830,264
10a Grants and contributions5,035,414,948600,0008,096,8005,044,111,748
15 Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements71,024,000--71,024,000
20 Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments1--1
Total Voted7,117,533,489-9,936,9687,127,470,457
Total Statutory366,689,928-41,037,353407,727,281
Total Budgetary Expenditures7,484,223,417-50,974,3217,535,197,738
Non-Budgetary
Voted
L25 Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Capital subscriptions1--1
L30 Loans – International Financial Assistance Act60,500,000--60,500,000
Total Voted60,500,001--60,500,001
Total Statutory10,640,000--10,640,000
Total Non-Budgetary Expenditures71,140,001--71,140,001
Explanation of Requirements (dollars)  
Budgetary
Voted Appropriations
Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance AgendaVote 1a1,840,168
Vote 10a8,096,800
Total 9,936,968
Total Voted Appropriations 9,936,968
Total Statutory Appropriations 41,037,353
Transfers
Internal Transfers
Internal reallocation of resources from contributions ($19,400,000) and operating ($600,000) to Grants from the International Development Assistance for Multilateral ProgrammingVote 1a(600,000)
Vote 10a600,000
Total -
Total Transfers -
Total Budgetary 50,974,321
Listing of Transfer Payments (dollars)Estimates to DateThese Supplementary EstimatesRevised Estimates
Grants
Grants from the International Development Assistance for Multilateral Programming2,513,653,83920,000,0002,533,653,839
Grants for Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program10,470,0004,000,00014,470,000
Contributions
Contributions for Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program8,800,0004,096,80012,896,800
Listing of Statutory Authorities (dollars)Authorities To DateThese Supplementary EstimatesProposed Authorities
Budgetary
Contributions to employee benefit plans115,237,70537,353115,275,058
Payments for consular assistance pursuant to the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act-41,000,00041,000,000

Items for inclusion in the Proposed Schedule 1 to the Appropriation Bill

(for the financial year ending March 31, 2021)

Vote No.ItemsAmount ($)Total ($)
 Department of foreign affairs, trade and development  
1a
  • Operating expenditures, including those related to the appointment of Canada’s representatives abroad, to the staff of those representatives, and to the assignment of Canadians to the staffs of international organizations
  • Authority to make recoverable advances to international organizations in amounts not exceeding the amounts of the shares of those organizations
  • Expenditures in respect of the provision of office accommodation for the International Civil Aviation Organization
  • Authority to make recoverable expenditures for assistance to and repatriation of distressed Canadian citizens and Canadian residents who are abroad, including their dependants
  • Authority, as referred to in paragraph 29.1(2)(a) of the Financial Administration Act, to expend in the fiscal year – in order to offset related expenditures that it incurs in that fiscal year – revenues that it receives in that fiscal year from:
    1. trade and education fairs;
    2. departmental publications; and
    3. the following services:
      1. training services provided by the Canadian Foreign Service Institute,
      2. trade missions and other international business development services,
      3. investment development services,
      4. international telecommunication services,
      5. other services provided abroad to other departments and to agencies, Crown corporations and non-federal organizations, and
      6. specialized consular services.
  • The payment to each member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada who is a minister without portfolio, or a minister of State who does not preside over a ministry of State, of a salary – paid annually or pro rata for any period less than a year – that does not exceed the salary paid under the Salaries Act, rounded down to the nearest hundred dollars under section 67 of the Parliament of Canada Act, to ministers of State who preside over ministries of State
1,840,168 
10a
  • The grants listed in any of the Estimates for the fiscal year
  • Contributions, including payments for other specified purposes and for the provision of goods and services for:
    1. the promotion of trade and investment; and
    2. international humanitarian assistance and assistance in relation to international security, international development and global peace.
8,096,800 
   9,936,968
   9,936,968
Statutory Forecasts (dollars)Authorities To DateThese Supplementary EstimatesProposed Authorities
Budgetary
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Payments to International Financial Institutions – Direct payments (International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act)250,684,323-250,684,323
Contributions to employee benefit plans115,237,70537,353115,275,058
Payments for consular assistance pursuant to the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act-41,000,00041,000,000
Payments under the Diplomatic Service (Special) Superannuation Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. D-2)500,000-500,000
Minister of Foreign Affairs – Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade – Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Minister of International Development – Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Total Budgetary366,689,92841,037,353407,727,281
Non-budgetary
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Payments to International Financial Institutions – Capital subscriptions10,640,000-10,640,000
Total Non-budgetary10,640,000-10,640,000

Expenditures by Program or Purpose

Budgetary (dollars)Estimates to DateThese Supplementary EstimatesRevised Estimates
OperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Help for Canadians Abroad52,504,10841,000,000---41,000,00093,504,108
Development, Peace and Security Programming4,798,828,0241,277,521-8,696,800-9,974,3214,808,802,345
Programs not included in these Estimates2,632,891,285-----2,632,891,285
Total7,484,223,41742,277,521-8,696,800-50,974,3217,535,197,738
Total Budgetary7,484,223,41742,277,521-8,696,800-50,974,3217,535,197,738
Non-Budgetary (dollars)Estimates to DateThese Supplementary EstimatesRevised Estimates
Organizations not included in these Estimates71,140,001-71,140,001
Total Budgetary71,140,001-71,140,001

Budgetary Expenditures by Standard Object

This table shows the forecast of total expenditures by Standard Object, which includes the types of goods or services to be acquired, or the transfer payments to be made and the funds to be credited to the vote.

Definitions of standard objects available at:

Budgetary Expenditures by Standard Object (dollars)1 - Personnel2 - Transportation and communications3 - Information4 - Professional and special services5 - Rentals6 - Purchased repair and maintenance7 - Utilities, materials and supplies8 - Acquisition of land, buildings and works9 - Acquisition of machinery and equipment10 - Transfer payments11 - Public debt charges12 - Other subsidies and paymentsLess: Revenues and other reductionsTotal
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development11,726,3345,847,138983,46311,442,2718,281,3011,259,7151,837,299--8,696,800-900,000-50,974,321
Total11,726,3345,847,138983,46311,442,2718,281,3011,259,7151,837,299--8,696,800-900,000-50,974,321

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - Overview

Supplementary messages

Through the Supplementary Estimates (A), ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ sought an increase of $51.0 million to its authorities of $7.48 billion:

Supporting facts and figures
Organization summary (dollars)Previous estimates to dateThese supplementary estimatesProposed authorities to date
TransfersAdjustments
Note: Additional details by organization are available on the Treasury Board Secretariat website – .
Budgetary
Voted
1a Operating expenditures1,897,264,276(600,000)1,840,1681,898,504,444
5 Capital expenditures113,830,264--113,830,264
10a Grants and contributions5,035,414,948600,0008,096,8005,044,111,748
15 Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements71,024,000--71,024,000
20 Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments1--1
Total Voted7,117,533,489-9,936,9687,127,470,457
Total Statutory366,689,928-41,037,353407,727,281
Total Budgetary Expenditures7,484,223,417-50,974,3217,535,197,738
Non-Budgetary
Voted
L25 Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Capital subscriptions1--1
L30 Loans – International Financial Assistance Act60,500,000--60,500,000
Total Voted60,500,001--60,500,001
Total Statutory10,640,000--10,640,000
Total Non-Budgetary Expenditures71,140,001--71,140,001
Explanation of Requirements (dollars)  
Budgetary
Voted Appropriations
Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance AgendaVote 1a1,840,168
Vote 10a8,096,800
Total 9,936,968
Total Voted Appropriations 9,936,968
Total Statutory Appropriations 41,037,353
Transfers
Internal Transfers
Internal reallocation of resources from contributions ($19,400,000) and operating ($600,000) to Grants from the International Development Assistance for Multilateral ProgrammingVote 1a(600,000)
Vote 10a600,000
Total -
Total Transfers -
Total Budgetary 50,974,321

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - By vote

[Continued…]

Supplementary messages
Supporting facts and figures
Organization summary (dollars)Previous estimates to dateThese supplementary estimatesProposed authorities to date
TransfersAdjustments
Budgetary
Voted
1a Operating expenditures1,897,264,276(600,000)1,840,1681,898,504,444
5 Capital expenditures113,830,264--113,830,264
10a Grants and contributions5,035,414,948600,0008,096,8005,044,111,748
15 Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements71,024,000--71,024,000
20 Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments1--1
Total Voted7,117,533,489-9,936,9687,127,470,457
Total Statutory366,689,928-41,037,353407,727,281
Total Budgetary Expenditures7,484,223,417-50,974,3217,535,197,738

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - Statutory funding

Supplementary messages
Background
Supporting facts and figures
(dollars)Authorities To DateThese Supplementary EstimatesProposed Authorities
Budgetary
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Payments to International Financial Institutions - Direct payments (International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act)250,684,323-250,684,323
Contributions to employees benefit plans115,237,70537,353115,275,058
Payments for consular assistance pursuant to the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act-41,000,00041,000,000
Payments under the Diplomatic Service (Special) Superannuaction Act (R.W.C., 1985, c. D-2)500,000-500,000
Minister of Foreign Affairs - Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade - Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Minister of International Development - Salary and motor car allowance (Salaries Act and Parliament of Canada Act)89,300-89,300
Total Budgetary366,689,92841,037,353407,727,281
Non-budgetary
Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
Payments to International Financial Institutions - Capital subscriptions10,640,00010,640,000
Total Non-budgetary10,640,000-10,640,000

Funding requests

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - Funding to implement the feminist international assistance agenda

Supplementary messages
Update
Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility:

 EBPSalariesOperatingTransfer paymentsTotal
3. Development, Peace and Security Programming37,352186,7631,653,4058,096,8009,974,320
Grand Total37,352186,7631,653,4058,096,8009,974,320

Allocation by Standard Object:

Objects of ExpenditureTotal
01 - Personnel - EBP37,352
01 - Personnel186,763
02 - Transportation and Communications100,500
03 - Information3,000
04 - Professional and Special Services29,000
05 - Rentals2,000
06 - Purchased Repair and Maintenance-
07 - Utilities, Materials and Supplies18,905
08 - Acquisition of Land, Buildings, and Works-
09 - Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment-
10 - Transfer Payments8,096,800
12 - Other Subsidies and Payments1,500,000
Less: Revenues credited to the vote-
Total9,974,320
Background

Adjustments

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - Payments for Consular assistance pursuant to the Public Health Events of National Concern Payment Act

Supplementary messages
Expected results
Background
Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility:

 Operating
4. Help for Canadians Abroad41,000,000
Grand Total341,000,000

Allocation by Standard Object:

Objects of ExpenditureTotal
01 - Personnel - EBP2,445,311
01 - Personnel9,056,907
02 - Transportation and Communications5,746,638
03 - Information980,463
04 - Professional and Special Services11,413,271
05 - Rentals8,279,301
06 - Purchased Repair and Maintenance1,259,715
07 - Utilities, Materials and Supplies1,818,394
08 - Acquisition of Land, Buildings, and Works-
09 - Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment-
10 - Transfer Payments-
12 - Other Subsidies and Payments-
Less: Revenues credited to the vote-
Total41,000,000

Financial Details – Total Approved Funding - $100M

Total Budget Approved (budget letter - April 2, 2020) ($ in millions)2019-20202020-2021Total
Enhanced Consular Services
Expanded Emergency, Watch and Response Centre (EWRC)
Salary0.00.40.4
Overtime0.50.51.0
Equipment and Overhead0.00.00.0
Training0.00.00.0
Miscellaneous costs0.10.10.1
Standing Rapid Deployment Team (SRDT)
Training0.00.20.2
Standby Costs0.00.20.2
Deployment Costs0.31.11.3
Dedicated Consular Case Management Unit
Salary0.21.81.9
Overtime0.50.51.0
Equipment and Overhead0.00.00.0
Mission Temporary Help and Overtime5.05.010.0
Subtotal - Enhanced Consular Services6.59.716.2
Support for Impacted Canadians
Partnerships for Medical Liaison and Psychological and Social Support1.53.55.0
Subtotal - Support for Impacted Canadians1.53.55.0
Travel Advice and Communications
Enhanced Travel Information Program
Salary0.00.20.3
Overtime0.30.30.5
Equipment and Overhead0.00.00.0
Consulting Services to Enhance Travel Pages0.00.20.2
Communications with Traveling Canadians
Salary0.00.30.4
Overtime0.00.10.1
Equipment and Overhead0.00.00.0
Advertising and Social Media to Inform Traveling Canadians0.20.40.5
Subtotal - Travel Advice and Communications0.51.51.9
Facilitated Returns and Evacuations
Assisted Departure Flights15.816.031.8
Medical Support Staff for Assisted Departure3.60.03.6
Communications Tools0.20.00.2
Personal Protection/Security Equipment - HQ/Missions3.10.03.1
Subtotal - Facilitated Returns and Evacuations22.716.038.7
Financial Assistance
Financial Assistance2.08.010.0
Subtotal - Financial Assistance2.08.010.0
Subtotal - Consular & Emergency Management33.238.671.8
Contingency due to high risk and uncertainty0.021.321.3
IS - 0%0.00.00.0
Total GAC Costs33.259.993.1
Central Costs
EBP1.82.44.2
SSC0.30.40.6
Accommodation0.81.22.0
Subtotal - Central Costs2.94.06.8
Total36.063.9100.0

Increase to grant ceiling

2020-2021 supplementary estimates (A) - Internal reallocation of resources from contributions and operating to grants from the International Development Assistance for multilateral Programming

Supplementary messages
Update
Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility:

 OperatingGrantsContributionsTotal
3. Development, Peace and Security Programming(600,000)20,000,000(19,400,000)-
Grand Total(600,000)20,000,000(19,400,000)-

Allocation by Standard Object:

Objects of ExpenditureTotal
01 - Personnel - EBP-
01 - Personnel-
02 - Transportation and Communications-
03 - Information-
04 - Professional and Special Services-
05 - Rentals-
06 - Purchased Repair and Maintenance-
07 - Utilities, Materials and Supplies-
08 - Acquisition of Land, Buildings, and Works-
09 - Acquisition of Machinery and Equipment-
10 - Transfer Payments600,000
12 - Other Subsidies and Payments(600,000)
Less: Revenues credited to the vote-
Total0
Background

Public accounts 2018-2019

Public Accounts 2018-2019 - Overview

Supplementary messages

Public Accounts 2018-19 - Losses

Supporting facts and figures

Significant losses reported in the 2018-19 Public Accounts include:

GAC response when dealing with these situations:

Recent enhanced measures undertaken by GAC

Additional information

Other Losses

Public Accounts 2018-19 – Travel and Conferences

Supplementary messages
Supporting facts and figures

Public Accounts 2018-19 – Lapses

Supplementary messages
Supporting facts and figures

Operating - Vote 1:

Frozen allotment ($27.1 million)

Special purpose allotments ($30.7 million)

Programming and others ($20.7 million)

Capital - Vote 5:

Frozen allotment ($14.0 million)

Special purpose allotments ($7.4 million)

Capital Projects ($17.9 million)

Grants and Contributions - Vote 10:

Frozen allotments ($237.0 million)

Assessed contributions ($41.0 million)

Programming ($5.0 million)

Spending and assets

Quasi-Statutory Framework

Background

Adjustments for Currency Fluctuations:

Assessed Contributions:

Foreign Inflation on Overseas Operations:

Foreign Service Allowances:

Locally Engaged Staff Salary Revision:

Locally Engaged Staff Salary Pension Benefits:

Funding by core responsibility

Briefing Note On Departmental Results Report 2018-19

Supplementary messages
Background
Explanation of variances

Overview – Funding By Core Responsibility

Background
Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility:

(in dollars)Supplementary Estimates A
Estimates to dateOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalRevised Estimates
Budgetary
Help for Canadians Abroad52,504,10841,000,000--41,000,00093,504,108
Development, Peace and Security Programming4,798,828,0241,277,521-8,696,8009,974,3214,808,802,345
Programs not included in these Estimates2,632,891,285----2,632,891,285
Total7,484,223,41742,277,52108,696,80050,974,3217,535,197,738

Development, Peace And Security Programming

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
Development, Peace and Security Programming
Main Estimates4,798,828,024 4,798,828,024
Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance Agenda 9,974,3219,974,321
Total4,798,828,0249,974,3214,808,802,345

Support For Canada's Presence Abroad

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
Main Estimates1,092,864,562-1,092,864,562
Total1,092,864,562-1,092,864,562

International Advocacy And Diplomacy

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
International Advocacy and Diplomacy
Main Estimates896,219,038-896,219,038
Total896,219,038-896,219,038

Trade And Investment

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
Trade and Investment
Main Estimates381,672,612-381,672,612
Total381,672,612-381,672,612

Help For Canadians Abroad

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
Help for Canadians Abroad
Main Estimates52,504,108-52,504,108
Payments for Consular assistance pursuant to the Public Health Events of National Concern Payments Act-41,000,00041,000,000
Total52,504,10841,000,00093,504,108

Internal Services

Background
Supporting facts and figures
(in dollars)Main EstimatesSupplementary Estimates ATotal
Internal Services
Main Estimates262,135,073-262,135,073
Total262,135,073-262,135,073
Date modified: