¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ

Language selection

Search

Minister of Foreign Affairs appearance before the Committee of the Whole – Briefing material

2021-05-31

Table of contents

  1. Scenario note
  2. Opening statement and speeches
  3. Critics biographies
  4. Question Period monitoring
  5. 2021-2022 Main Estimates overview

Issue notes

  1. Afghanistan
  2. Arbitrary Detention Initiative
  3. Arctic sovereignty
  4. Arms exports
    1. Export controls - General
    2. Saudi Arabia – Export controls and LAVs
    3. Production of papers
    4. Turkey - Export controls
  5. Belarus - Including arms exports
  6. Cameroon
  7. China
    1. 5G Review
    2. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)
    3. CanSino vaccine
    4. Belt and Road Initiative
    5. China consular cases
    6. Hong Kong
    7. Bilateral military training with China
    8. Meng Wanzhou arrest and U.S. extradition request
    9. Procurement of physical security equipment (Nuctech)
    10. Regional maritime tensions
    11. Taiwan
    12. Tibet
    13. Import Prohibition on Goods Produced by Forced Labour
    14. Forced labour (global supply chains)
    15. Uyghurs and forced labour
    16. Visa Application Centres
    17. Canadian advocacy on the consular cases of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor
  8. Consular cases involving Canadian citizens abroad
  9. COVID-19
    1. Impact of COVID-19 on human rights
    2. Impact of COVID-19 on democracy
    3. International assistance – Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
    4. PPE and medical supplies global market support
    5. COVID-19 repatriation efforts
    6. World Health Organization (WHO)
    7. COVID-19 travel restrictions
    8. COVID-19 vaccines (incl. COVAX)
  10. Cuba
  11. Crisis in Tigray, Ethiopia
  12. Feminist Foreign Policy
  13. Situation in Haiti
  14. Canada-India bilateral relations
  15. Indo-Pacific approach
  16. International security, democracy and human rights
    1. Bill to amend the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act
    2. Canada’s National Action Plan for Women, Peace and Security
    3. Canadian Centre for Peace, Order and Good Government
    4. Disinformation and the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM)
    5. Foreign state-backed interference and intimidation activities in Canada
    6. Promoting and Protecting Democracy Fund
    7. Peacebuilding
    8. UN peace operations
  17. Iran
    1. Iran-U.S. regional tensions
    2. Iran - Human rights
    3. Iran and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)
    4. Flight PS752
  18. Israel
    1. Israel – Bilateral overview
    2. Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)
    3. International Criminal Court investigation into the “Situation in Palestine”
    4. Israeli settlements
    5. Jerusalem
    6. Israeli-Palestinian conflict
  19. Libya
  20. Mali
  21. Mexico trade challenges
  22. Middle East Strategy extension
  23. Myanmar
    1. Political situation in Myanmar
    2. Rohingya crisis
  24. Nagorno-Karabakh
  25. NATO
  26. Nicaragua
  27. North Korea (Nuclear focus)
  28. Treaty on Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
  29. Office for Human Rights, Freedoms and Inclusion (OHRFI)
  30. OECD Secretary-General campaign
  31. Physical security at missions abroad
  32. Quadrilateral dialogue
  33. Russia – Sanctions and human rights
  34. Canada’s sanctions regime
  35. Saudi Arabia
    1. Saudi Arabia - Human rights
    2. Saudi Arabia - Bilateral dispute
  36. Human rights in Sri Lanka
  37. Syria
    1. Syria consular cases
    2. Syria crisis and peace talks
    3. Syria (ICJ)
    4. Syrian Civil Defense (White Helmets)
  38. Ukraine – Russian aggression and NATO membership
  39. United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNWRA)
  40. United States
    1. Canada-United States relations
    2. Bilateral economic priorities
    3. Buy American and Buy America
    4. Canada-U.S. relations and roadmap
    5. Central American migration
    6. Canada-U.S. vaccine cooperation
    7. Line 5
  41. UN Security Council (UNSC) campaign cost
  42. Venezuela
  43. Yemen

Meeting scenario

Opening statement and speeches

Rules-based International System and Promotion and Protection of Human Rights

(Speech to support GAC participation in Committee of the Whole)

In today’s uncertain global landscape, it is essential to have an effective rules-based international system that promotes and protects the interests and prosperity of all Canadians.

The current system – a set of norms, institutions, treaties and arrangements that provides rules of the road for managing competing national interests and facilitating international cooperation – was built to support global security and prosperity through coordinated action in response to shared global challenges. It is based on a respect for international law and the territorial integrity of states, and guided by the fundamental premise that no country can accomplish alone what we can accomplish together.

This system has contributed to the relative peace and steadily expanding prosperity of the last 75 years. It has facilitated massive trade growth (from 12% of global GDP in 1960 to over 30% today). It has helped advance collective security by reducing the use of hard power between states, instituting rules for the use of force, and supporting peaceful settlement of disputes.

Through a vast array of treaties, institutions, and cooperation arrangements, it has provided an expanding framework to foster the conditions for open markets, the rule of law, and democratic governance. It has allowed the world to manage issues of common interest, from fishing rights to air transport, extradition, postal services, telecom regulations, and the creation of legal frameworks for the promotion and protection of human rights.

Challenges to the Rules-based System

Through the decades, the system has largely proven resilient in the face of inter-state tensions. However, the system has been stressed by several factors in recent years, amplified during the pandemic:

At the same time, we face acute global challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation and forced migration, that cannot be solved by countries acting alone.

Some elements of the current system continue to function well. International financial institutions, such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and regional development banks, are playing a critical role in enabling the global economic stability that is crucial for an inclusive, climate smart and sustainable recovery, particularly for the most vulnerable who have been hit the hardest by the crisis.

But other elements of the current international system have a more complicated record, and there are concerns about the representativeness of some international institutions, as emerging states are concerned with increasing their voice and feel excluded from decision- making.

Canadian responses

In the face of these pressures, action is required not just to protect the current system but also to strengthen and reform it to address the challenges that will shape our future.

From the development of the Bretton Woods institutions, NATO and the UN to more recent multilateral action to ban land mines, prevent the recruitment and use of child soldiers or to fight climate change, Canada has a long history of working with diverse partners to develop and leverage rules-based multilateral mechanisms to address global challenges.

Today, we must reach out and rally as many partners as possible to future proof the system so it can address emerging issues and adapt to serve the interests of all states and all people.

The COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated the need for collective responses to complex global challenges, from the provision of vaccines to the entire global population, to the technological and economic transformations needed to address climate change.

More broadly, Canada has a long and proud tradition of constructive involvement in the UN. This is why we co-chaired in January the UN Peacebuilding Fund Replenishment Conference, and that we are working with partners to advance the UN reform agenda for making the UN a more efficient, transparent and accountable organization that remains an effective platform for advancing Canadian interests.

At the same time, Canada is a respected voice across other institutions and forums, many of which we were instrumental in developing: NATO, the G7, the G20, La Francophonie, the Commonwealth, APEC, the Organization of American States and others.

Through all these settings, Canada prioritizes the advancement and protection of human rights and the push for gender equality.

However, even as we work to revitalize international institutions, we may also need to create new collaborative forums where old ones no longer meet the challenge.

For example, Canada is acting as co-chair of the Media Freedom Coalition, and co-founded the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence, which convenes experts from science, industry and civil society dedicated to the responsible development and use of artificial intelligence, grounded in human rights, inclusion, diversity, innovation, and economic growth. We have joined new cross-regional initiatives, such as the Alliance for Multilateralism, and a leaders’ network initiated by Spain and Sweden to support implementation of the UN 75th Anniversary Declaration.

Canada is a trading nation. Nearly two thirds of our economy and millions of Canadian jobs depend on international trade and investment—as we prepare for a strong, inclusive economic recovery, international trade will be crucial to generate growth and create good jobs. Fair, predictable, rule-based trade creates opportunities for Canadian businesses to succeed at home and abroad. Canada created and participates in the Ottawa Group for WTO Reform. The WTO has an indispensable role in facilitating rules-based international trade, but the need to modernize is urgent, so that members can prevent trade-distorting policies and resolve trade issues before they escalate into formal disputes. Through our leadership of the Ottawa Group, Canada is committed to making the WTO a more inclusive, modern, resilient, and transparent system for all.

Today, we have both the opportunity and the responsibility to build on our past efforts.

73 years ago, countries around the world came together to adopt the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which outlines the fundamental rights and freedoms to which we are all entitled. While much progress on human rights has been achieved since 1948, events of 2020 have reminded us that there is still a long way to go – and the multilateral human rights system remains a critical tool to pursue our common goal of ensuring the protection and promotion of human rights for all. For Canada, it is one of the most important ways to engage in advancing human rights around the world.

We know that we cannot achieve progress on human rights alone. That is why Canada continues to actively engage in the UN human rights system, including through mechanisms like the Universal Periodic Review, where Member States receive peer feedback on their human rights records, every four years. Canada is also proud to engage at forums like the UN General Assembly Third Committee, and Human Rights Council, where we lead resolutions on ending child, early and forced marriage; ending violence against women and girls; and supporting human rights in Iran. While sadly, Canada and our like-mindeds are continuing to witness the rising trend of anti-rights and gender equality backlash in these settings, it only further underscores the need for progress and sustained dialogue.

In the face of this backlash, and the challenges posed by COVID-19, around the world – including in Canada – human rights defenders, members of the media, volunteers, civic leaders, Indigenous representatives, and more are fighting for more inclusive and just societies. Many are doing so in the midst of shrinking civic space, including internet shutdowns, and other threats to freedom of expression. And too many, especially women human rights defenders, risk the safety of themselves and their families through the course of their work. Canada is continuing to listen to the experiences of these brave individuals, and is investing in initiatives like our “Voices at Risk” guidelines on supporting human rights defenders – a publicly accessible resource, meant for use by Canadian officials at home and abroad.

Around the world, Canada takes action with a clear understanding of its national interests and a commitment to stand firm in the defence of our most cherished values and principles.

This requires that we work to advance gender equality through all of our international actions, both bilaterally and multilaterally.

The current rules-based system has been essential for promoting and supporting gender equality. Multilateral cooperation and the advancement of gender equality are closely linked. The structures, goals, operations and resources of both regional and global institutions have a significant influence over how Canada, and the world, are able to take action in support of gender equality and human rights.

Last year, we marked several milestones in the history of women’s rights, including Beijing+25 and the 20th anniversary of Security Council resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security.

Today, Canada works to build on these commitments and fight for advancement on gender equality, working with and through the multilateral institutions to:

In a time of profound change, complex challenges and considerable opportunities, Canada will continue to play a constructive role in shaping the evolving global system for the benefit and prosperity of all Canadians.

Remarks - The Honourable Marc Garneau, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Canada - Committee of the Whole appearance May 3, 2021

Introduction

Mr. Chair, Honourable Members, thank you for inviting me to appear before the Committee of the Whole. I’m pleased to be joined by a number of senior leaders from ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ.

First, a few words on the global crisis that preoccupies us all.

COVID-19 poses a unique and truly global challenge. It has underscored the need for bilateral and multilateral diplomatic relationships and solutions to shared problems.

It has also brought to the fore the national security challenge of our collective exposure to health risks.

And it has demonstrated the importance of the work we do to provide assistance to Canadians abroad in their hour of need. We are also ensuring Canadian businesses have the tools they need to manage complex supply chains, and helping other countries achieve health, peace and sustainability.

China - General

Our bilateral relationship with China is one of Canada’s most complex and multidimensional.

As you know, there are important issues on which Canada and China fundamentally disagree and some issues where pragmatic cooperation remains.

But China’s increasing authoritarianism and coercive diplomacy precludes a return to the state of bilateral relations prior to the arbitrary detentions of Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig.

Our message to China is clear: the world is watching.

Canada recognizes the importance of maintaining dialogue, and will continue to defend its interests and uphold core principles bilaterally as well as via the pursuit of partnerships at the international level.

Democratic countries must stand together to promote values of democracy and human rights. We continue to do so.

Arbitrary detention

Canada has made unprecedented progress in addressing arbitrary detention for diplomatic leverage. We are building a common front to oppose this abhorrent practice.

Almost one-third of the world’s countries (62, and growing) endorse Canada’s Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations. This is Canadian diplomacy in action.

The impact is tangible: countries that coercively detain a citizen of another country have the eyes of the world turned on them. They face the collective criticism of countries standing together in solidarity.

Arbitrary Detention for diplomatic leverage is unlawful, unacceptable, and it will not succeed. The Government of Canada will always stand up for Canadians in difficulty and distress abroad.

G7

On May 5, at the G7 Foreign and Development Ministers Meeting in London, Canada released a Partnership Action Plan with full G7 support. The Plan turns words into action, and further raises the penalty for Arbitrary Detention.

At the G7, we discussed Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, specifically. Our communiqué called on China to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms. We expressed our deep concern about the human rights violations and abuses in Xinjiang and Tibet, as well as the crackdown in Hong Kong. We repeated our call for unfettered access to Xinjiang for the UN High Commission for Human Rights to investigate the situation on the ground.

The summit covered a lot of ground. It allowed us to have meaningful talks with our counterparts on a number of pressing international issues.

Through our participation, Canada reaffirmed its commitment to working with these key partners to expand global efforts to end the pandemic and defend human rights, fundamental freedoms, and the rules-based international order.

Protection and promotion of human rights

Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic has had a particularly profound impact on human rights. It has devastated lives and livelihoods. It has deepened inequalities and underscored the importance of social and economic rights. And it has been used as a pretext by some governments to undermine human rights.

At the UN Human Rights Council earlier this year, Canada joined in calls for human dignity and rights, gender equality, the empowerment of women and girls and inclusion. We focused our attention on Sri Lanka, Venezuela, Iran, Belarus, and China, as well as on the Rohingya and Myanmar.

We also emphasized the critical importance of Media Freedom and Digital Inclusion.

As the world races to protect public health -- including through the development and distribution of vaccines -- it’s our responsibility to ensure human rights are front and centre.

This is not just the right thing to do. As long as people are vulnerable to COVID-19 anywhere, there’s a risk to populations everywhere.

That’s why Canada supports a human rights-based approach to vaccination and other public health measures. Access must be equitable, timely and affordable.

This approach makes our public health measures more effective. It’s critical to ending the pandemic.

In all our activities, we must do all that we can to protect vulnerable and marginalized people and communities. Respect for human rights is the key to a more peaceful, prosperous, and sustainable world.

Canada in the world

The global challenges we face call for nimble alliances and strong partnerships. We are using the alliances we have, and building the alliances we need. Canada will continue to reinforce our bilateral and multilateral ties with traditional allies while pursuing new collaborations with emerging partners.

This effort starts with our enduring alliance with the United States. This is an alliance with global reach, but it is rooted in, and reliant on, the security of our shared continent. It involves, among other things, a path to the modernization of NORAD, which the President and Prime Minister agreed to launch.

In February the two leaders announced a Roadmap for a Renewed U.S.-Canada Partnership, which sets out priorities for engagement in six key areas:

The Arctic remains a critical priority for Canada. It is one of the key venues for our efforts to combat climate change. Through the implementation of the Arctic and Northern Policy Framework and engagement within the Arctic Council, Canada will continue to address challenges faced by northern communities, including Indigenous peoples, and to ensure that the Arctic remains peaceful, secure and sustainable.

Climate change is front and centre in Canada’s efforts to build back better, both at home and abroad.

As we prepare for the important climate summit in the UK this upcoming November, Canada remains committed to the Paris Agreement, to net-zero targets and to mobilizing on climate action, including on energy demand.

We continue to advance democracy, human rights and the rule of law, including through our support for UN peace operations and Canada’s Women, Peace and Security agenda. Our objectives include lasting peace and security; sustainable and inclusive economic growth; and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Our feminist foreign policy underpins our efforts.

An effective and inclusive rules-based international system is critical to Canada’s success. We are working with partners to strengthen respect for international law and established norms of behaviour.

Conclusion

Canada’s values and interests lie at the heart of everything we do on the international stage. Thank you for your time today. I look forward to hearing from you with any questions or comments.

Remarks - The Honourable Rob Oliphant, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs - Committee of the Whole appearance May 31, 2021

Introduction

Mr. Chair, Honourable Members, thank you for inviting me to speak to the Committee of the Whole to talk about our work at ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ.

I’ll limit my remarks to Canada’s concerns with respect to increasing authoritarianism and coercive diplomacy practised by China.

China

While Canada’s policy review on China remains ongoing, our approach to China continues to evolve.

Canada also continues to work with its partners on our concerns with China. International rules and norms that have ensured stability and prosperity for decades, and our goal is to protect those rules and norms.

Human rights are top of mind. We are seeing a crackdown on human rights defenders, lawyers and journalists in China, as well as ethnic and religious minorities. I’ll say more in a moment about the situations in Xinjiang and Hong Kong.

Securing the release of Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor remains a top priority for Canada. We also seek clemency for all Canadians facing the death penalty.

Consular cases

More than two years since their arbitrary detention in China, Canada continues to call for the immediate release of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.

Since December 2018, Canada has had more than 1,250 interactions with Chinese officials, other governments and key stakeholders to advocate for Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor’s release.

We are grateful to all who have joined in expressing concerns. That includes the 23 likeminded partners whose embassies sent diplomats to the trials of Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor. They did so in solidarity with these two men, and they echoed Canada’s message that these detentions are unacceptable.

Canada is also deeply concerned by the arbitrary sentencing of Robert Schellenberg. We call for clemency for him, and for all Canadians facing the death penalty.

Canada continues to work with our allies to end the abhorrent practice of arbitrary detention and to uphold the rule of law and the rights of citizens around the world.

Hong Kong

Canada remains deeply concerned over the rapid deterioration of rights and freedoms in Hong Kong.

Recent actions by the Chinese central government to stifle political participation represents a further abrogation of China’s commitment to preserve Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy, its Basic Law and the One Country, Two Systems framework.

Canada strongly supports the One Country, Two Systems framework under Hong Kong’s Basic Law. We call for continued adherence to this framework. It’s in everyone’s interest to have a stable and prosperous Hong Kong, where the rule of law and fundamental rights and freedoms are guaranteed.

Canada is working with international partners to hold Hong Kong and Chinese central authorities to account for breaching international obligations that commit them to respecting the fundamental rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents.

We urge authorities in Beijing and Hong Kong to uphold their international obligations.

Uyghurs / Xinjiang

COVID-19 has had a profound, detrimental impact on human rights worldwide. It is imperative that democratic countries stand together at this time to promote human rights and democratic values.

With respect to the treatment of the Uyghur population in Xinjiang, our message to China is clear: the world is watching.

We cannot ignore China’s mounting, systematic campaign of repression and deplorable treatment in Xinjiang. In March, Canada joined key allies to call on China to put an end to its repression of the Uyghurs. We want to hold those responsible to account.

Canada takes allegations of genocide very seriously. The international community must work together on this very serious matter.

That is why we have repeatedly called for an international investigation in response to allegations of genocide. The investigation must be conducted by an international and independent body so that impartial experts can observe and report on the situation first-hand.

We call on China to halt the human rights violations affecting Uyghurs and other minorities in Xinjiang.

Conclusion

The eyes of the world are on China, and we will continue to press for accountability and respect for human rights, consistent with our values as Canadians.

Thank you for your time today. I look forward to your questions.

Critics Biographies

Hon. Michael D. Chong, P.C (CPC—Wellington – Halton Hills, ON), Critic for foreign affairs

Key interests

Parliamentary roles

Mr. Chong is currently serving as the Official Opposition’s Critic for Foreign Affairs. MP Chong served as the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and the Minister for Sport from February to November 2006. He has been a member of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA), the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN), the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (CEUS), among others.

Notable committee memberships

Background

Mr. Chong was first elected to Parliament in 2004 and has been Chair of several House of Commons Standing Committees. He is a co-founder and member of the All Party Climate Caucus since it was formed in 2011. In the 42nd Parliament, MP Chong served as the Official Opposition’s Shadow Minister for Infrastructure and Shadow Minister for Science. In 2015, Chong’s Reform Act passed Parliament and became law.

Prior to his election, Mr. Chong acted as Chief Information Officer for the National Hockey League.

Players’ Association and as a Senior Technology Consultant to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority for the redevelopment of Pearson International Airport. MP Chong also co-founded the Dominion Institute, now known as Historica Canada, an organization committed to raising Canadians’ awareness of history and civics. He currently sits on its Board of Governors. Mr. Chong attended Trinity College in the University of Toronto where he obtained a degree in philosophy.

Issue specific background

China general

On May 10, MP Chong filed an OPQ on AIIB requesting details on payments.

On March 26, at QP, he raised the secret trials of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor and questioned the government on its participation in the AIIB. On March 30, he expressed concerns on Twitter that the Chinese were limiting access to the WHO investigating team.

On April 12, he accused the government of threatening to cancel funding for the Halifax Security Forum if it awarded the John McCain Prize to Taiwan’s President and wanted to know whether Canada supports Taiwan’s participation at the WHO’s meeting in May 2021.

China consular cases

On September 30, 2020, MP Chong stated that China was violating human rights and international treaties in its treatment of Michael Spavor, Michael Kovrig, the Uyghurs, and the people of Hong Kong. He asked if the government would impose sanctions on those responsible in China.

China Uyghurs

On December 10, 2019, MP Chong rose in the House of Commons to speak about Canada’s relationship with China. He stated, “I would say this in response to the economic concerns that have been voiced by many about our relationship with China. More important than economic concerns are the principles and values on which this country is founded, principles such as democracy, human rights and the rule of law.

Those are the very principles we risk undermining and doing away with if we continue to focus on the economic consequences of taking a reset and decoupling in our China relationship”. He went on to speak about how China has increasingly used economic blackmail, including attacks on Canadian farmers with regards to pork, beef and canola.

MP Chong also made the situation of Uyghurs his warhorse together with MP Garnett Genuis. On January 24, 2021, they issued a Conservative statement calling on the government to recognize the Uyghur genocide, encourage allies to do the same, and update its travel advisories to reflect the potential threats to Canadians when travelling to China. He led the charge on the motion adopted by the House recognizing the genocide of Uyghurs on February 22, 2021. On March 27, MP Chong, along with members of SDIR, was specifically targeted by Chinese sanctions to which he responded that he would wear it as a badge of honour. He is now advocating for Canada to put in place systems to prevent imports of goods issued of forced labour.

Arms export controls

On October 6, during an address in reply of the Speech from the Throne, MP Chong noted that the government has been inconsistent in upholding its international obligations under the ATT by permitting arms exports to Saudi Arabia and Turkey. On October 26 at QP, MP Chong asked whether the PM overrode GAC’s recommendation and approved the export to drone systems to Turkey, saying their diversion to the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is in clear violation to the ATT, the Wassenar Arrangement and Canadian laws. On November 3, 2020, MP Chong continued this line of questioning and enquired whether the PM had agreed to PM Erdogan’s request for the export of drone systems to Turkey.

On March 24 at QP, MP Chong raised the documents provided to the Committee on arms exports to Turkey, coming to the conclusion that “after a bit of pressure was put on the government by the arms export lobby and by Turkish authorities, and after the government was told that these arms exports would be used for the defence of human rights, the government buckled and naively reversed its earlier decision and approved these arms exports to Turkey”.

On May 13, MP Chong expressed concerns on social media about reports of Azerbaijani troops crossing into Armenia. He declared “Having approved arms exports that upset the balance of power in Nagorno- Karabakh war, the Trudeau government must speak up to defend the territorial integrity of Armenia.”

Social media

On social media, MP Chong has be most vocal on the following issues: China Uyghur genocide, Taiwan, Israeli-Palestinian conflict and . Since his nomination as Foreign Affairs Critic in October 2020, he has been meeting with ambassadors and posting reports of their discussions on Twitter. Of late, he met with the ambassadors of Saint-Kitts-and-Nevis (May 11), Colombia (May 11) and Serbia (Apr 23).

Stephane Bergeron (BQ—Montarville, QC), Critic for foreign affairs

GAC-related key interests

Parliamentary roles

Mr. Bergeron is currently the Bloc Québécois’ (BQ) Critic for Foreign Affairs. He is a member of numerous parliamentary associations and interparliamentary groups, particularly the Canada-China Legislative Association (CACN) and the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA). He also served as the Whip for the BQ from 1997 to 2001.

Notable committee membership

Background

Mr. Bergeron served as a BQ member of the House of Commons from 1993 to 2005 and a member of Quebec’s National Assembly from 2005 to 2018. In 2019, he returned to the House of Commons as a BQ member. Mr. Bergeron has bachelors and master’s degrees in Political Science. After first leaving the House of Commons and serving in Quebec’s National Assembly for 13 years, he was Registrar of Rimouski’s CEGEP. He was previously a political advisor and a teaching assistant at Université Laval within the Political Science department. From 1984 to 1993 he served in the Canadian Forces as a naval Cadet Instructor Cadre officer.

Issues-specific background/statements

The majority of Mr. Bergeron’s statements have been regarding China, including the eight-month vacancy of the Ambassador position and the effect on the bilateral relationship.

He has raised human rights in Question Period, asking “What will it take for the government to take action and finally get Raif Badawi released?” Then following up his question by stating, “it is scandalous that Raif Badawi is languishing in prison after seven years without having committed any crime. If the government can sit down with Saudi Arabia at the G20 , if it can sit down with Saudi Arabia to do business and sell the country weapons, then it can certainly sit down with Saudi Arabia to demand the release of Raif Badawi.” On social media, he advocated for the Government to repatriate Canadian children in Syrian refugee camps, denounced privatization and social injustices in Chile, criticized Canada’s lack of action regarding Israel’s annexation plan.

Upon the announcement that Canada is lifting its ban on export of military goods to Saudi Arabia, MP Bergeron tweeted: Aurait-on profité de la crise (COVID-19) pour aller de l’avant en catimini avec cette décision controversée, en espérant qu’elle passe sous le radar?

On COVID-19, on social media, MP Bergeron criticized the government for not closing its borders with the US. He also commented on repatriation of Canadians saying that Minister Champagne needed to keep his promise to offer consular and financial support to Canadians abroad. BQ leader Yves-François Blanchet also expressed early on his concerns about the Canada-US border staying open, insisting that all non-essential entries should be prohibited. On the repatriation of Canadians, he stressed that no Canadian should be left alone. He criticized the government in light of closures of consulates and missions. He asked his caucus members to help in any way possible with repatriation efforts of Quebecers. On April 9 though, he thanked GAC and consular officials for having done a Titans’ job. On vaccination, on March he commented an article from the Journal de Québec titled Le vaccin comme baïonette : Par sa «diplomatie des vaccins», la «Chine (cherche à couper) l’herbe sous le pied à ceux qui appellent au boycottage des Jeux de Pékin pour son horrible bilan en matière de droits de la personne, (notamment) des Ouïghours»...

Jack Harris (NDP—St. John’s east, NL), Critic for foreign affairs

GAC-related key interests

Parliamentary roles

Mr. Harris is currently the NDP’s Critic for Foreign Affairs, Public Safety, and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency. He is also the Deputy Critic for Defence.

Notable committee memberships

Background

Jack Harris is a lawyer and politician from Newfoundland and Labrador. He has represented St John’s East several times: from 1987-1988, from 2008 to 2015, and winning his seat again in 2019. He was the leader of the Newfoundland and Labrador New Democratic Party from 1992 to 2006.

Issues-specific background/statements

On December 10, 2019, Mr. Harris rose in the House of Commons to voice his support for the creation of a special committee on Canada and China relations. He stated, “Madam Speaker, clearly, the relationship would deteriorate. We have seen in the past year or so how quick and easy it is for China, in this case, to take actions that hurt people. We have to move on this and we should move quickly”. On the same day, Mr. Harris also spoke about the importance of Canada engaging in multilateralism as a solution to ongoing tensions between Canada and China. On October 30, 2020, MP Harris called on the Minister to release the details of its investigation on the export of drone systems to Turkey and cease all exports. On March 13, 2021, MP Harris commented the Globe and Mail article of March 12 : It appears that the Liberal government “decided the relationship with Turkey was more important than arms-control obligations.” On March 24, following an article relating Chinese cyber espionage of Canadian Uyghurs on Facebook, he tweeted: It's not acceptable for this kind of surveillance to happen in Canada. The Liberal gov has an obligation to require Facebook and other social media giants to make sure they aren’t being used as a tool for authoritarian governments. #NDP #StandwithUyghurs

Garnett Genuis (CPC—Sherwood Park-Fort Saskatchewan, AB), Critic for international development and human rights

Key interests

Parliamentary roles

Garnett Genuis is currently the Conservative Critic for International Development and Human Rights. He previously served as the Conservative Critic for Canada-China Relations and Multiculturalism. He was a member of the Canadian NATO Parliamentary Association (CANA) from September 2018 to March 2019 and a member of the Canada-United States Inter-Parliamentary Group (CEUS) from February to March 2017. In September 2017 he triggered an emergency debate in the House of Commons concerning the plight of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, and he has presented a private member’s bill and numerous petitions over the past two parliaments to draw attention to the combat against trafficking in human organs.

Notable committee membership

Background

Mr. Genuis was elected in 2015 and 2019. He grew up in Strathcona County and got involved in his community through volunteering with various organizations, including a local care centre. At age 15, he began writing a column for Sherwood Park News for which he continues to be a regular contributor as an MP.

Mr. Genuis holds a Bachelor of Public Affairs and Policy Management from Carleton University and Master’s of Science in Philosophy and Public Policy from the London School of Economics. Prior to his election, he worked in the Prime Minister’s Office.

Issues-specific background/statements

Mr. Genuis often rises in the House of Commons to speak about a variety of foreign affairs-related issues. In the 43rd Parliament he has asked the government about Iran, Sri Lanka, Canada-China relations, and Taiwan during Question Period. He also sparked an emergency debate in the House of Commons concerning the genocide of Rohingya Muslims in Burma and is sponsoring Senator Ataullahjan’s Bill S-204 (trafficking in human organs) in the House of Commons (currently at second reading).

During a briefing on International Development by departmental officials on October 15th, 2020, MP Genuis asked for details related to the Canadian Centre for Peace, Order and Good Governance.

On Nov. 26, 2020, he introduced a motion (M-55) to combat foreign state interference in Canada.

On January 24, together with Foreign Affairs Critic Chong, he issued a Conservative statement calling on the government to recognize the Uyghur genocide, encourage allies to do the same, and update its travel advisories to reflect the potential threats to Canadians when travelling to China. Although

MP Chong presented the motion for the House to recognize the Uyghur genocide, he has been a strong advocate on this topic and spoke quite often on the issue in the House.

Social media

Of late, MP Genuis raised the situation in the Tigray region on a number of occasions, China, funding of UNRWA and antisemitism, Iran at the UN Commission on the Status of Women, and expressed his support of Taiwan at the WHA.

Question Period topic analysis by MP

NameQP TopicsExample of Intervention
Michael Chong (CPC)Russia - Czech Expulsion of Diplomats Ethiopia - Situation in Tigray China - Uyghurs and Forced Labour x2 Taiwan - Halifax Security Forum x2 China - WHO and COVID x2 Taiwan - Participation in the WHO China – Chinese Nationals Working in Winnipeg Virus Lab x3MINA Main Estimates Appearance, November 2020
Erin O'Toole (CPC)US – Pipelines x3 COVID-19 - Border Measures x4 US - Cross-border COVID Vaccines China – CanSino Vaccine x3Health Committee of the Whole, November 26, 2020
Julie Vignola (BQ)Polar Sovereignty x4Appearance at OGGO by officials regarding Nuctech, November 2020
Garnett Genuis (CPC)UNRWA x2 Iran - Participation in UN Commission on the Status of Women x2MINE Main Estimates Appearance, April 2021
Jagmeet Singh (NDP)WTO TRIPS Waiver x3 Violence in Israel, West Bank and GazaQuestion Period, May 6, 2021
Tracy Gray (CPC)Buy America x3 Trade Priorities in BudgetMINT Main Estimates Appearance, April 26, 2021
Michelle Garner- Rempel (CPC)India - Domestic Vaccine Manufacturing x2 China - Domestic Vaccine ManufacturingHealth Committee of the Whole, November 26, 2020
James Cumming (CPC)US - Pipelines x2INDU Main Estimates Appearance by Ministers Ng and Monsef, November 19, 2020
Marilyn Gladu (CPC)US - Pipelines x2COVI Committee Meeting, June 17, 2020
Michael Kram (CPC)US - Pipelines x2CIIT Appearance by Officials - Impact of COVID-19 on Canada's Trade Relationships, July 9, 2020
Pierre Paul-Hus (CPC)COVID-19 - Border Measures x2MINA Appearance at CACN, November 23, 2020
Michael Barrett (CPC)Ambassador to Japan Ambassador to ChinaETHI Appearance by GHL on WE Charity, March 29, 2021
Sharron Stubbs (CPC)China - Huawei x2SECU Main Estimates Appearance by Minister Blair, November 25, 2020
James Bezan (CPC)Taiwan - Halifax Security Forum x2NDDN Appearance by Minister Sajjan, April 6, 2021
Richard Martel (CPC)COVID-19 - Border Measures x2Question Period, April 22, 2021
Pierre Pollievre (CPC)US – Pipelines x2COVI Committee Meeting, May 13, 2020
Greg McLean (CPC)US – Pipelines x2MINT Appearance at RNNR on Softwood Lumber, February 26, 2021
Rachel Dancho (CPC)US - Cross-border COVID VaccinesMain Estimates Appearance by Ministers Hussen and Qualtrough, March 16, 2021
Daniel Blaikie (NDP)WTO TRIPS WaiverMINT Main Estimates Appearance, April 26, 2021
Heather McPherson (NDP)WTO TRIPS WaiverMINT Appearance at SDIR on CORE, March 23, 2021
Jeremy Patzer (CPC)US - PipelinesMINT Appearance at RNNR on Softwood Lumber, February 26, 2021
Candice Bergen (CPC)COVID-19 - Border MeasuresCOVI Committee Meeting, June 8, 2020
Alain Therrien (BQ)COVID-19 - Border MeasuresMain Estimates Appearance by Minister LeBlanc, November 17, 2020
Marty Morantz (CPC)Violence in Israel, West Bank and GazaMINA Main Estimates Appearance, November 2020
Warren Steinley (CPC)US - PipelinesAGRI Supp Estimates C Appearance by Minister Bibeau, March 2021
Chris Lewis (CPC)COVID-19 – Border MeasuresMINA Appearance at CAAM, April 2021
Elizabeth May (Green Party)Violence in Israel, West Bank and GazaCOVI Committee Meeting, June 17, 2020
Lianne Rood (CPC)US - PipelinesAGRI Supp Estimates C Appearance by Minister Bibeau, March 2021
Cheryl Gallant (CPC)Iraq – War Crimes Committed by Iraqi SoldiersNDDN Appearance by Minister Sajjan, April 6, 2021
Brian Masse (NDP)US – Cross Border VaccinationsINDU Main Estimates Appearance by Ministers Ng and Monsef, November 19, 2020
SubjectDate of QuestionQuestionerPolitical PartyQuestionResponderResponse
Violence in Israel, West Bank and Gaza2021-05-14MP - Morantz, Marty (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Marty Morantz (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia—Headingley, CPC): Madam Speaker, violence has erupted in Israel, the West Bank and Gaza. Hamas has fired thousands of rockets into civilian areas, demonstrating its obvious intent to kill as many Israeli citizens as possible. This, along with deliberatively setting up bases in civilian areas using Palestinian civilians as human shields, constitutes war crimes. The Minister of Foreign Affairs' statements to date on this violence have been ambiguous at best. Will the minister state unequivocally today that he supports Israel's right to defend itself, just as President Biden has done?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Hon. Marc Garneau (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lib.): Madam Speaker, our comments and statements have been crystal clear. The indiscriminate barrage of rocket attacks fired by Hamas into populated areas of Israel is absolutely unacceptable and must cease immediately. Canada supports Israel's right to live in peace with its neighbours within secure boundaries and recognizes Israel's right and duty to ensure its own security. Canada remains fully committed to the goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East. Canada remains a steadfast ally of Israel and a friend to the Palestinian people.
Chinese nationals working at the virus lab in Winnipeg2021-05-13MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, it is becoming clear that scientists at the government's virus lab in Winnipeg worked closely with China. One of these scientists, Dr. Qiu, not only visited China five times in two years for this work, but also collaborated with scientists at China's military institute and trained scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology to a level 4 standard, enabling them to handle the world's most deadly viruses. With all the known concerns about China's communist leadership, why was the current government helping China build capacity to handle the world's most deadly viruses?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, I think the member opposite knows, first of all, that these particular researchers are no longer with the Public Health Agency of Canada and that I cannot comment due to privacy obligations. The National Microbiology Laboratory plays a critical role in research around the world and here in Canada.
Chinese nationals working at the virus lab in Winnipeg2021-05-13MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, in a democracy, citizens deserve answers. To work at the government's level four lab in Winnipeg requires a secret clearance, a clearance normally only given to Canadian citizens. The CBC has reported that on July 5, 2019, Dr. Qiu and Dr. Cheng, along with Chinese students, were escorted from the lab by the RCMP. How on earth did Chinese nationals get secret clearance to work at the government's level 4 lab in Winnipeg, Manitoba?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, first let me talk about the important role the National Microbiology Laboratory plays and continues to play, especially in the context of a global pandemic. I thank the professionals there who are working day and night to help Canadians with the laboratory and research needs we have. I cannot comment on this matter due to privacy obligations. These people are no longer with the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Chinese nationals working at the virus lab in Winnipeg2021-05-13MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, we live in a democracy, where transparent and open government is incredibly important, something the current government is not upholding. We know that secret clearance requires senior-level approval. We know that CSIS raised national security concerns about Dr. Qiu, Dr. Cheng and the Chinese students at the government's lab in Winnipeg, as The Globe and Mail has reported. With all that we know about China's communist leadership, how were these individuals given secret clearance at the government's level 4 lab, where the world's most dangerous viruses are handled?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, I will repeat that the National Microbiology Laboratory is a Canadian treasure and has been providing incredible research and laboratory support to Canadians and Canadian organizations around the country during the pandemic. I will also remind the member opposite that these individuals are no longer with the Public Health Agency of Canada, and that I cannot comment due to privacy obligations.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-13MP - McLean, Greg (Calgary Centre)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Enbridge's Line 5 has been consistently sanctioned as safe by the U.S. regulator. Now the governor of Michigan is trying to overrule that federal oversight authority. Enbridge is being pushed into a U.S. court to defend the energy needs of Canadians and the 30,000 jobs in Ontario that depend on Line 5. This pipeline operates under an international agreement signed by our two nations. For the sake of Canada’s energy security, will the Prime Minister step up and engage with the U.S. president on the enforcement of our treaty?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is a critical energy and economic link between Canada and the U.S. Because of our efforts, it continues to operate today. On Tuesday, the Government of Canada filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan, sending a clear signal as to where Canada stands on this issue. I want to thank my counterparts, Minister Savage in Alberta, Minister Eyre in Saskatchewan, Minister Rickford in Ontario and Minister Julien in Quebec, for their collaboration and their unity on this issue. This is a full- court press by team Canada, with the support of industry and labour.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-13MP - Steinley, Warren (Regina—Lewvan)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, we have seen nothing but incompetence from the natural resources minister. Why do we have to wait for a U.S. mediator to tell us if and how long we can continue to use Line 5. On this file, the minister has done the very least he could and all at the very last moment. Line 5 is a critical piece of energy infrastructure in Canada. It supplies western Canadian oil to eastern refineries and creates good-paying jobs along the way. If the relationship has never been better between the U.S. and Canada, why does the Prime Minister not pick up the phone, call President Biden and get the Line 5 issue resolved today?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, I take exception to the hon. member's comments. First of all, we are taking the exact approach that the Canada-U.S. special committee asked us to, the same approach that the provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Quebec and Ontario urged us to take. Canada has filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan. It sends a clear signal as to where Canada stands on this issue. We are encouraged that Enbridge and the State of Michigan continue to participate in the court-ordered mediation process. We are confident it will yield a local solution.
Canada-US Border measures2021-05-13MP - Lewis, Chris (Essex)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the government’s failure to secure our borders has yet another casualty. Fourteen months ago, the Canada-U.S. border was closed on land, sea and air. While Canadian charter boats are moored at dock, American charter boats are being issued work permits by the government. There was a recent sting by the RCMP, but generally, enforcement of our sea border has been lax. When will the Minister of Public Safety pull these work permits permanently and start enforcing our sea borders?Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the member's acknowledgement that we did close our border with the United States 14 months ago. We have imposed unprecedented restrictions on the movements of people and goods across that border, while at the same time maintaining essential supply lines. As the member acknowledged, there has been enforcement by the RCMP on the issue that he raises, and we will continue to do our job working very collaboratively and reciprocally with our U.S. counterparts. Those measures are working to help keep Canadians safe while we work toward the successful vaccination of our population. We will continue to maintain those restrictions as long as they are necessary.
Middle East Crisis, Israel and Palestine2021-05-13MP - May, Elizabeth (Saanich—Gulf Islands)Green PartyMr. Speaker, the increasing crisis in the Middle East is a danger to the region and beyond. We are hobbled when we limit our response to “both sides must de-escalate”. Yes, they must, but true peace will never be achieved if we keep ignoring that one side is the occupier, the other is occupied. This current crisis was provoked by actions of the Netanyahu government and other extreme elements within settler groups. Can Canada speak out clearly to defend the Palestinian people against illegal annexation, illegal settlements and illegal forced evictions?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, Canada remains gravely concerned by the continued expansion of settlements and by the demolitions and evictions, including the ongoing cases of Sheikh Jarrah and Silwan. These actions impact families and livelihoods, and do not serve peace or international law. Unilateral actions that prejudice the outcome of direct negotiations and further jeopardize the prospects for a two-state solution must be avoided. We will always stand ready to support efforts for a two-state solution.
CanSino2021-05-12MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, what the Prime Minister neglected to say is he wanted the first dose to actually come from China and his original plan was with CanSino. That fell apart. Now Canadians are waiting on the longest second-dose period in the world and the disastrous communications from the minister, the Prime Minister, NACI, from all of them, is leading to more vaccine hesitancy. Now the Prime Minister's comments are suggesting we have lockdowns until fall and Thanksgiving. Enough. How much longer will this pandemic be in Canada because of the Prime Minister's failure to secure vaccines earlier?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, from the very beginning of this pandemic we worked with partners around the world to secure a large portfolio of potential vaccines coming to Canada. That is bearing fruit with four different approved and safe vaccines in this country and millions of doses arriving every single week. We know the path toward a better summer is to get that first dose and drive down cases. We are going to have a better summer and we are going to have an even better fall because I see Canadians stepping up every single day to do the right thing for themselves and their families and get vaccinated.
CanSino2021-05-12MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, that is the first time the Prime Minister has acknowledged his attempts to partner with Communist China on a vaccine. We lost months because of his partnering on this portfolio. That is why they were so late. Let us see how we partnered with the developed world, because the only way the Prime Minister made his so-called targets was by stealing from COVAX, by stealing from the developing world that Canada usually helps, so I will ask him this. Since he admitted it today, why possibly, when China is holding our citizens hostage and stealing our intellectual property, did the Prime Minister choose a CanSino partnership for his doses for Canadians?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, that is simply not true. We signed seven vaccine contracts with vaccine makers from around the world and not one of them was from China. We moved forward on delivering vaccine doses as of December. We were among the first countries to start receiving doses, and we are now in the top three of the G7 countries with respect to doses for our citizens. We will continue to deliver for Canadians. We will continue to work with the provinces and territories to make sure Canadians are kept safe and we get through this in the right way.
CanSino2021-05-12MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, I am going to ask that again because the Prime Minister knows Canadians are in a tough third wave. The provinces are in lockdown with restrictions because we do not have vaccines like the U.S. and the U.K. do. There is a new answer just delivered to the Prime Minister, so maybe it contains the details on why he decided, in the midst of a global pandemic that originated in Wuhan, to partner with a state- owned Chinese enterprise to get us vaccines. That initial decision is why we have the third wave.MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, the level of misinformation and  disinformation coming from the Conservatives should really concern all Canadians. We reached out as of last spring to look for any and all sources of vaccines for Canadians. We suspended any engagement with the Chinese CanSino when we saw it was not going to deliver. That is why we have secured deals with Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Novavax and others to deliver vaccines for Canadians. This is what we have moved forward with every single day. We have delivered to keep Canadians safe.
Violence in East Jerusalem and Sales of Firearms to Israel2021-05-12MP - Singh, Jagmeet (Burnaby South)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, violence in East Jerusalem is deeply disturbing. Demolitions, forcibly removing Palestinians from their homes and blocking access to important gathering spots are all violations of human rights and international laws. Instead of taking action to stop or deal with the long-standing illegal occupation, the Prime Minister is effectively supporting the status quo and going as far as to sell weapons to Israel. Arming one side of the conflict is undermining the peace process and supporting illegal occupation. Will the Prime Minister commit to stopping the sale of arms to Israel while it is violating international human rights?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, we are following the situation with grave concern. We call on all parties to end the violence, de- escalate tensions, protect civilians and uphold international law. Rocket attacks against Israel are completely unacceptable, and Canada supports Israel's right to ensure its own security. Violence at Al-Aqsa is also unacceptable. Places of worship are for people to gather peacefully and should never be sites of violence. We are also gravely concerned by continued expansion of settlements and evictions. Canada supports the two-state solution, and we urge all parties to renew their commitment to peace and security.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-11MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, tomorrow the Governor of Michigan wants to shut down the Line 5 pipeline that is critical to the Canadian economy. After many months of inaction, this morning, mere hours before the deadline, the Liberal government filed an objection with the court. Is this last-minute legal action an admission that the Prime Minister's outreach to President Biden has failed?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is a critical piece of infrastructure for both Canada and the United States. It is vital for energy workers and families on both sides of the border. Today, the Government of Canada filed a submission in U.S. court in support of the continued safe operation of Line 5 and in support of continued mediation between Michigan and the company. As we have for many months, Ambassador Hillman and government officials will continue to engage with our counterparts on this important issue.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-11MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, tomorrow the Governor of Michigan wants to shut down the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline. This closure will affect every worker from Montreal to Lévis. After many months of inaction, this morning, mere hours before the deadline, the Liberal government filed an objection with the court. Is the Liberal government too late once again to protect Canadian jobs?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, quite the opposite. Line 5 is a critical piece of infrastructure both for Canada and the United States and that is why we have been working on this issue for months. It is vital for energy workers and families on both sides of the border. Today, the Government of Canada filed a submission in U.S. court in support of the continued safe operation of Line 5 and in support of continued mediation between Michigan and Enbridge. As we have for many months, Ambassador Hillman and government officials will continue to engage with the American authorities on this important issue.
Polar Icebreaker – National Shipbuilding Strategy2021-05-11MP - Bratina, Bob (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek)Liberal Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, with Canada's most capable icebreaker, the CCGS Louis S. St-Laurent set to retire in 2030, it is critical that the Coast Guard has the capacity it needs to continue to provide support in the north. To meet this need, it is imperative that construction of new vessels begin as soon as possible. Could the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard update the House on how her efforts to expand the Coast Guard fleet are going?MP - Jordan, Bernadette (South Shore—St. Margarets)Mr. Speaker, our government is committed to ensuring that the Coast Guard has the tools it needs to do its very important work. That is why, last week, we were pleased to announce the construction of two new Polar icebreakers, one to be built at Seaspan in Vancouver and the other in Quebec at Davie Shipbuilding. The construction of these ships is going to support over 3,000 jobs across the country, including in places like Heddle Shipyards in Ontario and Genoa Design in Newfoundland and Labrador. These icebreakers are critical to the north, and we are committed to ensuring the Coast Guard has what it needs.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-10MP - Poilievre, Pierre (Carleton)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the Lévis and Montreal refineries depend on Line 5 to supply Canadians with 50% of their oil and gas. Thousands of jobs depend on Line 5 continuing to operate. However, the Governor of Michigan has said she wants to shut it down in two days, and the government has done nothing to protect it. What will the government do in the next 48 hours to protect these jobs?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is a critical piece of energy infrastructure, vital to North American energy security. We are working on the diplomatic level, we are working on the political level and we are working on the legal level to defend it. Last week, the House had an emergency debate; there was no daylight between parties. The members for Banff—Airdrie and Sarnia—Lambton suggested that the Leader of the Opposition actually spoke with the Governor of Michigan on this issue. In the spirit of a team Canada approach to this, and this is important, will the hon. member perhaps share with this House what the governor said?
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-10MP - Poilievre, Pierre (Carleton)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, it is no surprise that the minister and the Prime  Minister cannot get the governor on the phone themselves, because, of course, they have done nothing but fail in Canada-U.S. relations for the last five years. They failed to get a buy America exemption, as Harper did under Obama. They failed to resolve the softwood lumber dispute, as Harper did under George W. Bush. They have had three presidents to work with, and yet no concessions whatsoever. The U.S. President will not even intervene right now to help save this vital energy link  on which thousands of jobs and our entire energy system in central Canada depend. Why should we have any confidence that they will do better this time, after their failures the last times?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, I will take that as a non-answer. At a time when producers and workers in western Canada are concerned about getting their products to market, when consumers are worried about the price of gas and how that will affect the heat in their homes, what have the Conservatives been doing? They have been fundraising off threats to shut down Line 5, fundraising for their election campaign. It is insulting to oil and gas workers and insulting to Canadians who just want to heat their homes. While Conservatives are focused on improving their bank account, we are standing up for Line 5 with a full team Canada.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-10MP - McLean, Greg (Calgary Centre)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, today is May 10. In two days, on May 12, the government will fail if the Governor of Michigan closes down Line 5. When is the government going to actually recognize that this is something serious it has to deal with? When is the government going to talk to the Governor of Michigan, and also with the President of the United States, and get this problem solved?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is not just an issue for producers in Alberta or consumers in Ontario. It supports the entire country. Thousands of jobs depend on it, and thousands of homes depend on it for heating. We are working closely with Minister Savage in Alberta, with whom I was just on the phone, and with Minister Eyre in Saskatchewan as well. We have been talking with Minister Rickford in Ontario, with Sarnia mayor Mike Bradley, and I have been speaking with Minister Julien in Quebec. This is a full-court press by team Canada. While the Conservatives are more focused on using this to fundraise, we are standing up for oil and gas workers and defending Line 5.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-10MP - McLean, Greg (Calgary Centre)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the Minister of Natural Resources is leaving no stone unturned, he says, and he is looking at all options. That is what he tells us. However, there are 48 hours left before 30,000 jobs and millions of people who depend on them are affected. Fuel shortages, food distribution impacts, essential goods and personal protective equipment not being manufactured are what awaits us if the government does not have a contingency plan in place. Where is the Prime Minister while his minister is turning over stones and not getting it done?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, I can assure the House that we are looking at all our options. We will leave no stone unturned in defending Canada's energy security. We will work at the political level, at the diplomatic level and at the legal level. We are ready to intervene at precisely the right moment. We are standing up for energy workers, we are standing up for energy consumers and we are standing up for energy security. People will not left be left out in the cold.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-10MP - Rood, Lianne (Lambton—Kent—Middlesex)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, two days, that is all the time that is left before the Line 5 pipeline is set to shut down. My constituents in Lambton—Kent—Middlesex and farmers across southwestern Ontario are worried. Farmers depend upon propane supplied by Line 5. Where and how will they get their propane to heat their barns and greenhouses, and dry their grain? Will the Prime Minister get on the phone with President Biden and stress the urgency and importance of keeping Line 5 open? There is less than 48 hours left.MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, I can assure the House and the hon. member we are looking at all our options. We will leave no stone unturned in defending Canada's energy security. We are working at the political level, we are working at the diplomatic level, we are working at the legal level and we will be ready to intervene at precisely the right moment. We will stand up for energy workers and for energy consumers in the country. We are standing up for Canada's energy security. People will not be left out in the cold.
War Crimes committed by Iraqi Soldiers2021-05-10MP - Gallant, Cheryl (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, today, media reports state that Canadian Armed Forces members saw video evidence of war crimes committed by the very Iraqi soldiers they were ordered to train in Operation Impact. Our troops, my constituents, immediately reported seeing videos of prisoners being tortured, raped and murdered to their superiors. They first reported what they saw in September of 2018, yet there is no proof these reports were ever acted upon despite follow-ups as recently as last year. Did the minister know about this video evidence of war crimes?MP - Sajjan, Harjit S. (Vancouver South)Mr. Speaker, Canada is contributing to the greater peace and security in the world and remains a strong partner in the fight against Daesh. We are committed to meeting our obligations under international and domestic law. Our government takes allegations of this nature extremely seriously, and we are actively looking into this troubling allegation, which we just heard of now.
Cross-border Vaccination & Border Task Force2021-05-10MP - Masse, Brian (Windsor West)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, cross-border vaccination deals have been made by Manitoba with North Dakota, Alberta with Montana and Ontario is negotiating with Michigan. The federal government has completely failed to help on this, like it did with delivering vaccines in time to avoid a third wave. For months, I have been requesting the establishment of a border task force to ensure businesses and families are part of developing a safe border plan. Now the U.S. Senate majority leader has engaged Congress in demanding a border plan. When will the Prime Minister finally do his job and establish a safe border task force instead of him and a select few making it up on the fly?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, every step of the way we have worked very closely with our United States counterparts to protect the health and safety of Canadians and indeed of our American cousins and neighbours. I want to speak a little about vaccines though. It is a great day. Over 18.4 million vaccines have been shipped to provinces and territories to date. As of May 7, 16 million had been administered across the country. We can see the finish line, and I want to thank all Canadians for stepping up to get vaccinated when their turn arrives. This is great news for Canada, and this is great news for the United States. We will continue to work closely with our American cousins  and neighbours.
Polar Icebreaker – National Shipbuilding Strategy2021-05-07MP - Vignola, Julie (Beauport—Limoilou)Bloc QuébécoisMr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois hopes that Davie will build the polar icebreaker that the federal government announced yesterday. We have been waiting for it for years. Of course, before we celebrate with a parade, we want details. All we have right now is a government press release, but no contract, no formal letter of intent, no start date. The government is asking us to celebrate no questions asked, which makes it look like an election promise. When will we see a real contract for the construction of the icebreaker signed by Davie?MP - Rodriguez, Pablo (Honoré- Mercier)Mr. Speaker, I am not asking the Bloc Québécois to celebrate, but at least to acknowledge that this is good news for Quebec. It is good news for Davie, it is good news for all Davie suppliers, it is good news for Quebec City, Lévis and all the regions. The Bloc Québécois does not like it when things are going well. I have said more than once that in Davie's case, the Conservatives did not want to help, the Bloc cannot help and we kept our promise.
Polar Icebreaker – National Shipbuilding Strategy2021-05-07MP - Vignola, Julie (Beauport—Limoilou)Bloc QuébécoisMr. Speaker, yesterday, I said that we were pleased, and I just said that we are pleased. However, as long as Davie does not have a signed contract for the icebreaker, then this is all just good intentions. This is not the first time that Davie has been the subject of the federal government's good intentions right before an election. For example, just before the 2019 election, the Prime Minister and his minister responsible for the Quebec City region made a big show of announcing that they wanted Davie to become a partner in the shipbuilding strategy. They announced real opportunities for Davie, just as they are doing now. Two years later, Davie is still not a partner. Good intentions are not enough. When will we see something tangible? When will we have a signed contract?MP - Rodriguez, Pablo (Honoré- Mercier)Mr. Speaker, we have always been there for the Davie shipyard. We have always believed in the Davie shipyard. We gave Davie over $2 billion in contracts. We invited Davie to qualify to become the third shipyard, and it is in the process of doing that. Things are going well. It should quickly achieve the status of third shipyard. I do not understand why the Bloc Québécois is unable to recognize good news when it sees it. Perhaps they are refusing to see it because it is in fact good news. Once again, the Conservatives did nothing for Davie and the Bloc Québécois cannot do anything for Davie, but we are doing the right thing for Davie.
Pipelines - Enbridge’s Line 5 and Keystone XL2021-05-07MP - Cumming, James (Edmonton Centre)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, my riding has been severely impacted by COVID-19. Many people have lost their jobs, their homes and their livelihoods. More people are homeless, opioid abuse is skyrocketing and more and more families are struggling to make ends meet. The last thing constituents in my riding need is another blow to the oil and gas sector, which provides jobs and opportunities, and helps fund our vital social programs. What is the government's strategy to ensure thousands more Canadians do not suffer the consequences of another cancelled pipeline?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, last night in this House we held an emergency debate. It was a debate in which all parties participated. It was a debate in which we made our intentions and the purpose of the mission of this government on pipelines very clear. TMX, when we look back, is something that we approved and we are building. More than 7,000 jobs were created. We approved Line 3 and another 7,000 jobs were created. These are pipelines that will take us into the future. When we look at existing pipelines that are essential to our energy security nationally, we will leave no stone unturned in making sure we are there for Canadian workers, that we are there for—
Pipelines - Enbridge’s Line 5 and Keystone XL2021-05-07MP - Cumming, James (Edmonton Centre)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, that just does not cut it. No stone unturned? The Prime Minister had six years to demonstrate his support for the natural resource sector and what do we have now? The cancellation of Keystone XL and the potential shutdown of Line 5. We are once again facing a last-minute crisis due to the government's lack of action. When will the Prime Minister pick up the phone, show some leadership and receive assurances from the President that this vital pipeline will continue to operate and enforce the Transit Pipelines Treaty?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, last night in this House during the emergency debate, there was no daylight between the parties. Line 5 is a critical piece of energy infrastructure. It is vital to North American energy security. I will repeat what I said to the House last night. People will not be left out in the cold. The heating of Canadian homes, the flying of Canadian jets and the operation of Canadian refineries are non-negotiable. Line 5 is not just vital to Canada, it is also vital to the United States and therefore it is vital to all of North America. That is the case we are making. Line 5 is essential to North American energy security.
Pipelines - Enbridge’s Line 5 and Keystone XL2021-05-07MP - Gladu, Marilyn (Sarnia—Lambton)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the deadline to submit a brief of support to keep Enbridge’s Line 5 open is in just four days. The Canada-U.S. committee unanimously recommended this action, and the Natural Resources Minister said last night that he would take every action diplomatically and legally to keep Line 5 open. This is the most urgent action required and the Liberals have known about it for months. Why did they leave it to the last minute and when will they submit the amicus brief?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for her advocacy for her constituents. I can assure this House we are looking at all our options. We will leave no stone unturned in defending Canada's energy security. We are working at the political level, we are working at the diplomatic level, we are working at the legal level and we are ready to intervene at precisely the right moment. We are standing up for energy workers, for energy consumers and for Canada's energy security. People will not be left out in the cold.
Pipelines - Enbridge’s Line 5 and Keystone XL2021-05-07MP - Kram, Michael (Regina—Wascana)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, usually it is a good thing when Canadians from west to east come together for a common cause, but it is not so good when that common cause is a common threat. The Governor of Michigan is threatening to shut down the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline, in a clear violation of treaty obligations between the United States and Canada. This would put 25,000 Canadian jobs at risk. When is the Prime Minister going to phone President Biden and insist that the Transit Pipelines Treaty be enforced?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, as we have said, Line 5 is the most efficient way to deliver the products that Michigan needs to heat its homes, to fly its jets and to power its economy. We do not need more trucks on the road jamming up the 401 or jamming up our already congested border crossings, and those idling trucks would be releasing emissions in Governor Whitmer's backyard, in Michigan, while they wait to cross the border. Line 5 is safe. It has been for 65 years. It will continue to be so. It is safer and better for the environment than the alternatives, and that is the case we are making in defending Canada's energy security.
Czech Republic expels Russian diplomats2021-05-07MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, recently the Czech Republic concluded Russian intelligence agents attacked an ammunition depot on Czech soil in 2014, causing deaths. In response, the Czech Republic expelled 18 Russian diplomats, and four EU countries expelled Russian diplomats in solidarity with the Czech Republic for this violation of international law. Three years ago, Canada expelled Russian diplomats in solidarity with the United Kingdom for violating international law in the Salisbury poisonings. Will the government do likewise in solidarity with the Czech Republic?MP - Oliphant, Robert (Don Valley West)Mr. Speaker, our position on Russia remains unequivocal. Canada will continue to hold Russia accountable for all its actions. We have strong sanctions against Russian officials under the Magnitsky act and the Special Economic Measures Act. Our government takes foreign interference seriously. To safeguard our national interests at home and abroad, we will continue to work with our allies to put pressure on Russia to counter its foreign interference.
WTO TRIPS Waiver on Vaccine Patents2021-05-07MP - Blaikie, Daniel (Elmwood—Transcona)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, I think indigenous people in Canada deserve a better, clearer plan and a much greater sense of urgency from this government when it comes to life-saving water, just as people the world over deserve a better answer and a greater sense of urgency when it comes to putting their need to get life-saving vaccine ahead of the profits of international pharmaceutical companies. Yet, this government continues to refuse to get behind a waiver at the WTO. The United States of America announced just this week that it is getting behind that waiver. When will Canada be part of the solution and not the problem at the WTO?MP - Bendayan, Rachel (Outremont)Mr. Speaker, our government has always been, and will continue to be, a strong advocate for equitable access to affordable and safe COVID-19 vaccines around the world. Canada has actively participated in the negotiations on waiving intellectual property protections to COVID-19 vaccines under the WTO, and we will continue to work with our international partners towards a speedy and just recovery. This pandemic is not over anywhere until it is over everywhere.
Polar Icebreaker – National Shipbuilding Strategy2021-05-06MP - Vignola, Julie (Beauport—Limoilou)Bloc QuébécoisMr. Speaker, for years now, the Bloc Québécois has been calling for the Davie shipyard to be awarded a polar icebreaker contract. Today's announcement is not bad news, but Davie still has not been named the third partner under the national shipbuilding strategy. No contract has been signed, there is no start date for building and no timeline. Can the government tell us when we will get those dates? Otherwise, the announcement is nothing but electioneering.MP - Rodriguez, Pablo (Honoré- Mercier)Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois is as grouchy as ever, I see. Before, they would say that there was no contract for Davie. Now they say that there is one. They come off as a bunch of grouchy Smurfs. The Bloc cannot do anything for the Davie shipyard. The Conservatives never wanted to help the Davie shipyard. We are keeping our promises to Davie.
Polar Icebreaker – National Shipbuilding Strategy2021-05-06MP - Vignola, Julie (Beauport—Limoilou)Bloc QuébécoisMr. Speaker, my colleagues will understand why I am talking about an election. The government had one contract for a polar icebreaker to award to either Davie Shipyard or its rival in British Columbia, Seaspan. In a surprise move, the government just announced a contract for a second icebreaker, this one going to Seaspan. However, that shipyard had an identical contract withdrawn in 2019 because it was unable to start building. Essentially, the government is saying yes to everyone with no regard for Seaspan's construction capacity, timelines or costs. Are the contracts announced today meant to be election promises?MP - Rodriguez, Pablo (Honoré- Mercier)Mr. Speaker, the only party talking about an election right now is the Bloc Québécois. No one on this side has uttered the word “election”, that is for sure. Today we are announcing excellent news for the people of Lévis, for the Davie shipyard and for the entire supply chain. It means thousands of jobs in hundreds of small and medium-sized businesses across Quebec. I would expect the Bloc to be happy about this. What is clear is that the Conservatives never wanted to help Davie, the Bloc cannot help Davie, but we are keeping our promises to Davie.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-05-06MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, over the last five months, the Conservatives have asked the government 47 different times to take action regarding the Line  5 pipeline. Thousands of Canadian jobs are on the line, from Alberta to Ontario to Quebec. The government is once again missing in action, and now the Michigan governor is calling the project a “ticking time bomb.” For the 48th time, when are Canadians going to see the government finally stand up for Canadian workers and for our natural resources sector?MP - O'Regan, Seamus (St. John's South—Mount Pearl)Mr. Speaker, people will not be left out in the cold. The heating of Canadian homes or the flying of Canadian jets or the operation of Canadian refineries are non-negotiable. Line 5 is not just vital to Canada, it is also vital to the United States. Therefore, it is vital to all of North America. Shutting it down would have profound consequences. There are 5,000 direct jobs in Sarnia, 23,000 indirect jobs in the region, thousands of jobs at refineries in Montreal and Lévis, but also in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan, and that is the case we are making. Line 5 is essential for North American energy security.
WTO TRIPS Waiver on Vaccine Patents2021-05-06MP - Singh, Jagmeet (Burnaby South)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, we are in a global pandemic. We need to vaccinate all Canadians, of course, but we also have a responsibility to help people around the world. Poorer countries need the COVID-19 vaccine patents to be waived. Will the Prime Minister commit to supporting a waiver on COVID- 19 vaccine patents, instead of protecting the profits of big pharmaceutical companies?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, our government has always been, and will always be, a strong advocate for equitable access to affordable, safe and life-saving COVID-19 vaccines around the world. We will actively participate in negotiations to waive intellectual property protection particular to COVID- 19 vaccines under the WTO Agreement on TRIPS. This pandemic is not over until it is over everywhere and we will continue to work toward a just and speedy recovery.
WTO TRIPS Waiver on Vaccine Patents2021-05-06MP - Singh, Jagmeet (Burnaby South)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, the United States has already made a clear  commitment that it will be supporting the suspension of patent protection. My question is very clear. We are in a global pandemic and we need concrete steps. Poorer countries are asking for a patent waiver so that they can produce vaccines and save lives in their countries. Instead of protecting the profits of big pharmaceutical companies, will the Prime Minister support the patent waiver so that poorer countries can produce the vaccine and save lives?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, let me repeat my response. Canada will actively participate in negotiations to waive intellectual property protection particular to COVID-19 vaccines under the WTO Agreement on TRIPS. We have been a leader in the global effort to ensure there is equitable access to successful vaccines and critical medical supplies around the world and we are determined to continue our hard work with WTO members to reach an agreement and to find solutions that will accelerate the production and equitable distribution of vaccines.
WTO TRIPS Waiver on Vaccine Patents2021-05-06MP - McPherson, Heather (Edmonton Strathcona)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, I was absolutely delighted yesterday to hear that the U.S. government has recognized the extraordinary realities of COVID- 19 and has committed to waiving intellectual property rights, putting the lives of millions of people ahead of big profits for pharmaceutical companies, yet we have heard nothing but platitudes, half promises and deflection from the Liberals. I am proud of Joe Biden and the United States government for its decision to support the TRIPS waiver. When will Canadians be able to be proud of our government? When will the Liberals put people ahead of profits?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, our government continues to be a leader in the global effort to ensure that there is equitable access to successful vaccines and critical medical supplies around the world. We will actively participate in negotiations to waive intellectual property protection, particularly to COVID-19 vaccines under the WTO agreement on TRIPS. We agree that the pandemic is not over anywhere until it is over everywhere. We will continue to work with our international partners toward a speedy and just recovery.
Waiving Vaccine Patents for Poorer Countries2021-05-05MP - Singh, Jagmeet (Burnaby South)New Democratic PartyMr. Speaker, the situation right now in India is catastrophic. It is horrible to see the images of people desperate for help. People are dying because they cannot get access to oxygen. The situation requires the entire world to come together to provide support. We need to provide support to India to help the people of India. There is one concrete thing the Liberal government could do.  What poorer countries need is for vaccine patents to be waived so they could produce more vaccine and protect more people. What we have seen so far from the Liberal government is that it is more interested in protecting the profits of big pharmaceutical companies than actually helping these poorer countries by waiving those patent protections. Will the Prime Minister waive, or support the waiver, of those patent protections, so poorer countries could produce more vaccine, and we could get the help to India and the people of India that they need?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, the ongoing tragedy in India is breaking hearts around the world. This is why Canada has reached out to our Indian counterparts to ensure they know we are there to help in a broad range of ways. The Minister of Foreign Affairs has spoken with his counterparts, and we will continue to be there to support people suffering in India. With respect to the WTO, we are actively working with international partners to support the WTO's dialogue with the pharmaceutical sector and to accelerate equitable global vaccine production and distribution. In this way, as well as through our contributions to COVAX, our government is committed to ensuring equitable access to vaccines.
Funding UNWRA Produced Study Materials2021-05-03MP - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, last week at committee the Minister of International Development claimed that hateful content in UNRWA-produced materials was not produced by UNRWA and was removed last year, but a February impact report demonstrates the continuing presence of hateful content in UNRWA-produced study materials, which denounce Arab states over the Abraham Accords and call for the banishment of Jews from Israel. Could the minister confirm that she is now aware that hateful content persists in UNRWA-produced materials and tell the House what she intends to do about it?MP - Gould, Karina (Burlington)Mr. Speaker, as I have said numerous times, this government stands against anti-Semitism, and we have been very clear about that. As soon as I learned about this material I was deeply concerned and contacted my officials, as well as UNRWA itself, to get to the bottom of this. I have been in touch with counterparts around the world, and we are working with UNRWA to ensure that the materials it teaches, which are provided by the jurisdiction in which it operates, meet UN values and uphold the principles of neutrality.
Funding UNWRA Produced Study Materials2021-05-03MP - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the minister says she takes anti-Semitism seriously, but her government is funding it in UNRWA-produced study materials. Again, these are UNRWA-produced study materials. The European Parliament has denounced UNRWA for hateful comments in study materials that it produces and continues to use, but the minister is still badly mis-characterizing the situation by referring to Palestinian authority textbooks. She had promised an investigation. She is failing to follow up and Canadian taxpayer dollars are still funding anti-Semitic hate. When will the minister recognize what is happening and actually take action in response?MP - Gould, Karina (Burlington)Mr. Speaker, as I have communicated to the House on several occasions, we take this issue with the utmost seriousness and became engaged as soon as we learned of it. I continue to engage with UNRWA on this, but let me remind the hon. member that UNRWA provides education to 500,000 Palestinian students. Without UNRWA, they would not have access to education. We remain absolutely committed to upholding UN values and the principle of neutrality. We will continue to work with UNRWA to ensure that these objectives are met, but we also know that they provide a valuable service to 500,000 Palestinian children.
Buy America Exemptions2021-04-30MP - Gray, Tracy (Kelowna—Lake Country)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, on Wednesday, President Biden addressed the U.S. Congress and stated his buy American measures will be tough and any potential exemptions to it have been “strenuously limited”. Buy America and the buy American executive order are of serious concern because the Liberals have still not received assurances that Canada will be exempt. Can the Minister of International Trade confirm that Canadian businesses and workers will be exempt from these strenuous buy America rules?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, I want to assure Canadian businesses and workers that we are absolutely standing up for them and working for them, and we are actively engaged with our American partners. I have raised this issue with the President, as well as with my colleague, the new U.S. trade representative. We are going to continue to work in the interest of our Canadian businesses, just as we have over the last five years.
Buy America Exemptions2021-04-30MP - Gray, Tracy (Kelowna—Lake Country)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, what has changed? CBC reported in January that the first phone call between the Prime Minister and U.S. President was warm, friendly and collegial, according to a senior government official. The official reportedly said, “Many of the priorities are aligned. He's got a good rapport with us and wants to work with us, as we do with him”. Here we are, about to enter May, and the U.S. stance on buy American has gotten even stronger. Can the minister explain why we are moving backward?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, to the contrary, we have a plan, a road map between Canada and the U.S. We continue to work with  the United States on building back for the benefit of Canadian businesses and workers, both in the United States and in Canada. I want to assure Canadians that, should there be any efforts to expand or introduce new domestic content requirements, we will absolutely ensure it does not apply to Canada or affect our Canadian supply chain. We are an integrated market, where we have integrated supply chains, and we will continue to work with our American partners.
Buy America Exemptions2021-04-30MP - Gray, Tracy (Kelowna—Lake Country)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, President Biden’s comments clearly show the U.S. is not backing down from buy America measures. In January, a readout from the Prime Minister’s Office stated, “the Prime Minister and President agreed to consult closely to avoid measures that may constrain bilateral trade, supply chains, and economic growth.” How is this working for us? It is obviously not. When will the minister get serious on the file, get on the phone and secure an exemption for Canadian exporters?MP - Ng, Mary (Markham—Thornhill)Mr. Speaker, I want to assure the hon. member that the government and I are working at all levels with our American partners. They are our largest trading partner, and our supply chains are incredibly connected. We will continue to work with the Americans to ensure we reinforce this deeply connected and mutually beneficial economic relationship, so we can grow middle-class jobs here in Canada as well as in the United States.
Humanitarian Crisis in Tigray, Ethiopia2021-04-29MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Canadians continue to raise concerns about the conflict in Ethiopia's Tigray region; Canadians like Professor Ann M. Fitz- Gerald, Canadians living in diaspora groups here at home and Canadian aid groups. Over a million people have been displaced, and there are reports of ethnic cleansing and gross violations of human rights. The government has committed funds to support humanitarian efforts in the region. What other measures has the government taken to defend human rights and the people of this region?MP - Gould, Karina (Burlington)Mr. Speaker, I share the hon. member's deep concern for the humanitarian crisis in Ethiopia. As the member mentioned, we have committed an additional $34 million for the humanitarian situation in Ethiopia to be used flexibly to address the crisis. The Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Prime Minister and I have all spoken to our counterparts in Ethiopia. We are supporting the work of the UN Human Rights Commission to support the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission to investigate human rights abuses, including abuses of sexual and gender violence.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-04-29MP - Gladu, Marilyn (Sarnia—Lambton)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the deadline for amicus briefs in support for Line 5 is May 11, which is less than two weeks away. A unanimous report from the Canada-U.S. parliamentary committee as well as the  natural resources minister has indicated that they will send a brief to support the 25,000 Canadian jobs that will be impacted. Can the minister update the House as to when in the next two weeks it will be submitted?MP - Serré, Marc (Nickel Belt)Mr. Speaker, Line 5 is non-negotiable. People will not be left out in the cold. I would like to thank the members of the Canada-U.S. special committee for their hard work on studying Line 5. We have received the report and will be reviewing it, but it is clear that there is no daylight between parties, between Canadians, on this issue. Line 5 is essential to Canada's energy security. Line 5 is not just vital for Canada, not just vital for the United States, but it is also vital for North America. We will do all we can to make sure that this does not get shut down.
Enbridge’s Line 52021-04-29MP - Patzer, Jeremy (Cypress Hills—Grasslands)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Enbridge Line 5 has two weeks left in Michigan. If oil stops flowing, Canadians, particularly in Ontario and Quebec, will face fuel shortages and job losses. A while ago, the Minister of Natural Resources said that he is “very confident” that this pipeline will keep running, but this week, reports are calling the government's diplomatic approach “frustrated”. With so much at stake and little time left, Canadians are beyond frustrated. Can the minister be absolutely clear that this threatened shutdown will be averted by May 13?MP - Serré, Marc (Nickel Belt)Mr. Speaker, I want to assure the House that we are looking at all options. We will leave no stone unturned in defending Canada's energy security. We are working at all political levels, the diplomatic level and the legal level. We are ready to intervene precisely at the right moment. Line 5 is non-negotiable. We are standing up for energy workers and for Canada's energy security. People will not be left out in the cold.
Trade as a Priority in the Budget 20212021-04-27MP - Gray, Tracy (Kelowna—Lake Country)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, exports are responsible for one in five jobs in Canada and nearly a third of our GDP. Robust trade not only provides economic security for families and businesses but will also help reduce our massive federal debt. Despite being critical to our economic recovery, trade appears to be an afterthought in the budget. This is not a surprise. The same government missed a deadline to implement the trade continuity agreement with the U.K. and has still not negotiated a buy America exemption. Why did the government fail to make trade a priority in its recent budget?MP - Bendayan, Rachel (Outremont)Mr. Speaker, I am happy to take this question, because only a few weeks ago Canada ranked number two in the entire world in terms of foreign direct investment attractiveness. We take our exporters very seriously in this country. They are an integral part of our economy and will form an integral part of our economic relaunch. We are certainly going to continue supporting our exporters, and when it comes to having their backs, this government has consistently been there for them, as we will continue to be through to the other side of this pandemic.
Stronger Border Measures2021-04-26MP - Bergen, Candice (Portage—Lisgar)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, I will answer my own question. The Prime Minister is both grossly incompetent and complicit when it comes to cover-up of sexual harassment in the military. Once again, the Prime Minister was late at the border, and his measures are not strong enough to make a difference. The Prime Minister has never taken flights coming from hot spots seriously. In fact, today, somebody could fly in from India to Buffalo, New York, hop in a cab and cross the border into Canada. With that comes more COVID variants. Canadians do want stronger measures. Will the Prime Minister protect our borders?MP - Alghabra, Omar (Mississauga Centre)Mr. Speaker, Canada has one of the strongest border measures in the world. Travellers coming into Canada  today need to get a COVID test prior to departure; then they need to be tested upon arrival; then they need to stay at a hotel for three days; then they need to finish their quarantine and get a test on day eight; and, if they are found to be infected while arriving, they are asked to spend the remainder of their quarantine period at a government facility. Last week, we took extra measures and suspended flights from India and Pakistan.
Iran’s participation in the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women2021-04-26MP - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the Government of Iran has just been elected to the UN Commission on the Status of Women, where it will be able to join Saudi Arabia in contributing to international discussions on  advancing the rights of women and girls. This elevation obviously makes a mockery of the important work that the commission should be doing. What is the position of the Government of Canada on the appropriateness of Iran's leaders holding a seat at the UN Commission on the Status of Women?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, Canada will always be unequivocal when it comes to the protection of women's rights around the world. Canada also firmly believes in the United Nations and multilateralism. We recognize that the UN, including the women's rights commission, is not perfect. However, let me be clear, our strong position on the human rights situation in Iran, including women, has been expressed repeatedly, both in public and in private, and we will continue to do so.
Iran’s participation in the UN’s Commission on the Status of Women2021-04-26MP - Genuis, Garnett (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, if the government is not hesitating in stating its position, it should do so right now with respect to the presence of the Government of Iran on the UN women's rights commission. We have all seen the images of courageous Iranian women standing up to the regime, a regime that the government unfortunately continues to try curry favour with. It is another slap in the face for these oppressors to be on that commission and the government should clearly state the problem here. Now that the Security Council bid is over, will the government recognize the need for UN reform? Will the minister simply denounce this ghastly outcome at the UN women's rights commission?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, I do not want to repeat myself, but we have always been unequivocal when it comes to the protection of women's rights around the world and we will continue to do so at all times. As members know, votes at the United Nations on these kinds of appointments are done by secret ballot.
Defending Ukraine’s sovereignty2021-04-26MP - Baker, Yvan (Etobicoke Centre)Liberal Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, seven years ago, Russia invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea. Canada has been very supportive of Ukraine through a number of measures, including through public statements that repeatedly state that Canada's support for Ukraine's sovereignty is “unwavering”. Recently Russia amassed 80,000 troops on Ukraine's borders and continues to be a threat to invade at any time. An invasion would have consequences, not just for Ukraine but for Canada and our allies. Could the Minister of Foreign Affairs tell us what Canada is doing, and will do, to defend Ukraine's sovereignty?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for Etobicoke Centre for his question and his advocacy. Since 2014, we have provided over $800 million in international assistance to Ukraine, as well as military training and institutional-level defence reform support via Operation Unifier. We have also sanctioned more than 440 Russian individuals and entities. We are aware of reports that Russia has ordered the withdrawal of troops from the area, and we continue to follow these developments very carefully. Canada will always remain a steadfast friend and ally of Ukraine.
China – Uyghurs, effective measures on Chinese exports/imports2021-04-23MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, yesterday the British Parliament followed this Parliament's example and adopted a motion recognizing the genocide of the Uighur Muslims. The Uighurs are being forced to pick cotton and produce tomatoes. The measures the government put in place in January to ban these imports are ineffective. Other countries are using more effective measures. Will the government bring in effective measures to ban these imports from China?MP - Oliphant, Robert (Don Valley West)Madam Speaker, the member reminds us that the whole world is watching China, and our message to China remains clear: We are watching as well. More than ever, democratic countries must stand together to promote values of democracy and human rights, as must parliamentarians  and parliaments around the world. We welcome the decision by the U.K. Parliament. We understand it, and it is in a very similar situation to our parliamentary decision. We will continue to let China know that we are watching every human rights situation that is important to all Canadians.
China – Uyghurs, effective measures on Chinese exports and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank2021-04-23MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, countries around the world are waking up to the threats from China. The Canadian Parliament, the U.K. Parliament, the Dutch Parliament and the Biden administration have all recognized the Uighur genocide. Yesterday, Australia cancelled two Chinese infrastructure agreements, both part of China's belt and road initiative. When will the government do the same and withdraw from another belt and road initiative? When will it indicate it wants to play no part in exporting China's authoritarian model and withdraw from the China- led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank?MP - Oliphant, Robert (Don Valley West)Madam Speaker, as we have said repeatedly in the House, the relationship with China remains complex and multi- faceted. We will stand up for Canadian human rights and values around the world, including with regard to China. Every action that we take with China will be in the best interests of Canada and Canadians. We again remind the House that we are watching China on every aspect.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - Therrien, Alain (La Prairie)Bloc QuébécoisMr. Speaker, what is happening at the border with the Brazil and India variants is very worrisome. Every day, planes are arriving from India full of COVID-19 cases. This morning, the Premier of Quebec announced that he was writing a letter asking Ottawa to take action. Why? It is because Ottawa is asleep at the wheel. Fortunately, it just received the letter. Once again, the federal government is waiting to be told what to do. It just cannot do its job. We need to ban flights from India today. We do not need a plan or an announcement, but an immediate stop. What is the government waiting for?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, let me be clear. Since the beginning, we have added measures at our border to protect Canadians from the importation of COVID-19, and we have been successful. Of all of the incoming travellers from February 21, 1.8% have been positive for COVID, and those have been captured by the testing and quarantine regime. We know that we need to work together to protect Canadians from COVID in their communities across the country from coast to coast. We will stop at nothing to be a partner to provinces and territories.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the government was first asked about travel restrictions for COVID-19 in January of last year. It is 15 months later, and the Liberals still have not learned anything. In the last two weeks, more than 100 flights have landed in Canada with at least one positive COVID-19 case on board. When are Canadians going to get a serious plan to secure the border?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, every step of the way the government has added measures to protect Canadians from the importation of COVID-19. In fact, infections resulting from international travel represent just over 1% of total infections in this country. Those infections are caught because we have a rigorous process. Travellers must submit to a pre-departure test, a post-arrival test, a stay in a government quarantine facility, a further quarantine of up to 14 days, and a test on day 10. We will stop at nothing. We constantly review the data. We will add more measures if necessary.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the government will stop at nothing except closing the border to keep out dangerous variants. In fact, travel restrictions are an example of a plan that works. The Atlantic Canada bubble is an example of that. British Columbia and Quebec have now both registered cases of the double-mutation variant from India. Is the Prime Minister going to immediately stop flights from COVID hotspot countries, yes or no?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, I would like to first of all start by thanking and commending Atlantic Canada and the premiers of those provinces for taking bold action on COVID-19, including keeping measures in place until cases are so low as to be sure that they will not rebound, making sure that they have strong measures to isolate people, and to protect people while they are isolating to ensure those people are in fact staying home and not spreading COVID in communities. That is the work that we need to do together across this country. I will reiterate, we have some of the strongest measures in the world. We will stop at nothing to protect Canadians.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the health minister is thanking the Atlantic premiers for the leadership that her Prime Minister fails to take at the border. It is ironic, but it should not be a surprise from this health minister, who ignored travel restrictions on the first wave of the pandemic, and Canadians paid the price. Now we find out the most dangerous variants are coming in. We are not properly vaccinated, because of her failures, and the government is not taking restrictions now. When will that minister stop failing Canadians?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, what Canadians want right now, more than anything else, is for their elected leaders to work together to protect their lives. That is exactly what we have done every step of the way, with provinces and territories, no matter where a Canadian lives. In regard to borders, we have some of the strongest measures in the world. As I mentioned, travellers go through a rigorous process of testing and quarantine. We will stop at nothing. We continue to monitor data. We will add additional measures if necessary.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the government continues to ignore the border. The variants are now a daily concern. The Liberal government must stop flights from Brazil and India. International flights from hotspot countries continue to land as usual. The Prime Minister's slowness in addressing this crisis poses a risk to the health and safety of Canadians. When will the Prime Minister stop flights from hotspot countries?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, the Leader of the Opposition should pick a lane. One week, they are arguing for opening up the borders; this week, they are arguing for tighter restrictions at the borders. I will tell him what we will do. We will continue to use science to guide us and to protect Canadians. Every step of the way, we have added measures to protect Canadians. We have some of the most rigorous measures in the world, a combination of testing and quarantine, including checks on people in quarantine. We will continue to do that, and we will not hesitate to do more if necessary.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - Martel, Richard (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the media headlines could not have been clearer than they were this morning. The Indian variant has arrived in Canada and the first case of it has been confirmed in Quebec in the region of the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry. The Prime Minister has already been criticized many times for his management of the health crisis, particularly for waiting several weeks before temporarily closing the Canadian border to people coming from China. Today, he has a chance to redeem himself. Will he temporarily close Canada's borders to people coming from India?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, as I have been saying today and, indeed, all along, we will stop at nothing to protect the health of Canadians. We have some of the strongest measures in the world at our borders. Travellers are required to submit to a predeparture test and a post-arrival test, and spend 14 days in quarantine. Several stay in a government- authorized quarantine facility while they await their negative tests. We will not hesitate to add additional measures if the data and science indicate that we should do so.
Travel Restrictions (India) and Securing the border2021-04-22MP - Martel, Richard (Chicoutimi—Le Fjord)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, our leader and member for Durham quickly called for the government to temporarily stop flights from countries with serious outbreaks of COVID variants. The Premier of Quebec also formally asked the Liberal Prime Minister to do more at our borders. We have been calling for these measures for a long time, but now it is too late. We already have a case of the Indian variant in Canada. The Conservatives want to take action at our borders. How many variant cases will it take before the Liberals take action?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, this is where I differ in opinion with the member opposite. It is never too late to do something about COVID-19. There are always measures that we can take together, with provinces and territories, indeed with Canadians, to protect each other. COVID is something that requires a great deal of work collaboratively to control. It is a global pandemic. We will not hesitate to add additional measures at our borders when we need to do so.
Measures for Combatting Climate Change2021-04-22MP - Scarpaleggia, Francis (Lac- Saint-Louis)Liberal Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, climate change is top of mind for Canadians and for my constituents in Lac-Saint-Louis. We know that we need to do more. I was happy to see the Prime Minister announce our new climate targets today to Canadians and to countries around the world. Could the Minister of Foreign Affairs update us on this important development and on the measures we are taking to combat climate change?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Lac-Saint-Louis for his important question and for his commitment to protecting the environment. Climate change is real, and Canadians deserve a credible climate plan. Today our government committed to enhancing its emissions reduction target by 40% to 45% below 2005 levels by 2030. We have made it clear that we will be a leader on climate action. We will invest in a cleaner future and a stronger economy.
Manitoba and North Dakota cross-border COVID-19 vaccinations2021-04-21MP - Dancho, Raquel (Kildonan—St. Paul)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, 4,000 Manitoba essential workers will be fully vaccinated months earlier than the Prime Minister planned, thanks to the kindness and generosity of the North Dakota people. While transporting goods within the United States, Manitoba truckers will receive both recommended doses, two doses, within a short six- week period. Full credit goes to Manitoba's premier for his visionary leadership on this. Will the Prime Minister admit that it is in fact his vaccine shortages that caused the third wave of the pandemic and encouraged multiple premiers to go cap in hand to the governor of North Dakota?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives would do well to pay a little more attention to science rather than grounding everything in their partisan attacks. I would like to remind the hon. member that we have worked every step of the way with the provinces and territories throughout this pandemic, including on procuring and supplying them with vaccines. Provinces are free to make their own decisions on who should be prioritized for vaccination. We are happy to see the Province of Manitoba making essential workers such as truckers a priority. As I have said many times, every Canadian who wants to be will be fully vaccinated by September.
Manitoba and North Dakota cross-border COVID-19 vaccinations2021-04-20MP - O'Toole, Erin (Durham)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the third wave of COVID-19 is ravaging Canada. We are in this situation because the federal government did not secure enough supply of vaccines fast enough to prevent it. Today, the Government of Manitoba had to secure help from North Dakota to vaccinate essential workers. How many Canadians will have to be vaccinated in the United States because of the Prime Minister's failure to secure vaccines?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, it is important in this House that we be grounded in facts. Our plan is working, and we are getting more vaccines than anticipated. We have now delivered over 13.3 million doses to provinces and territories, with more than 10 million doses of vaccine already administered. Thanks to the tireless work of officials to accelerate vaccine deliveries, we are now in the top three of G7 and G20 countries.
Domestic Manufacturing Partnership with India for Vaccines2021-04-20MP - Rempel, Michelle (Calgary Nose Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, I offer congratulations to India for announcing that all its adults will be eligible for a vaccine as of May 1. While Canada's government has not domestically produced a single dose of COVID vaccine, India has been vaccinating its population with its own vaccines, produced within its borders, while also manufacturing vaccines for Canada. Why did the Minister of Public Services and Procurement not secure a partnership with India, a large democracy and one of the largest vaccine-producing nations in the world, to develop and manufacture vaccines in Canada in early 2020?MP - Champagne, François- Philippe (Saint- Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Speaker, we made historic investments in biomanufacturing in Canada. I am sure the member will remember Medicago. She will remember VIDO in Saskatchewan, and she will remember AbCellera and Precision Nanosystems in Vancouver. In fact, 12 days after the World Health Organization declared a pandemic, we were already investing $200 million. Within 30 days we added another $600 million, so we have invested about $1 billion since the World Health Organization declared a pandemic. We made historic investments, and we will continue to invest to ensure the safety of all Canadians.
Domestic Manufacturing Partnership with India for Vaccines2021-04-20MP - Rempel, Michelle (Calgary Nose Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, the fact is that Canada has not produced a single dose of vaccine domestically. By now, we should be producing enough vaccine to supply our own population, as the Americans and Brits are. Instead, the federal Liberals have failed and put countries, such as India, that are facing a third wave in the impossible situation of sending a G7 country vaccines despite needing to vaccinate their own countrymen. The federal Liberals are also raiding the vaccine supply meant for the developing world through COVAX. Imagine if we had a manufacturing partnership with India. How many lives could have been saved if the Prime Minister had secured a domestic manufacturing partnership with India last—MP - Champagne, François- Philippe (Saint- Maurice—Champlain)Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank the member. I would say to just imagine this: We have a partner to manufacture a vaccine in Canada. It is called Novavax. It has chosen Canada out of all the jurisdictions in which it operates. More interestingly, we also have a domestic company called Medicago in which we have invested $173 million to make sure that we will have a made-in-Canada vaccine. In addition to that, yesterday the Minister of Finance added another $2 billion to make sure that we could continue to invest in manufacturing, and to invest in the health and safety of all Canadians.
Vaccine deal with China2021-04-20MP - Rempel, Michelle (Calgary Nose Hill)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, I am sure the minister will remember that the federal Liberals did not attempt to partner with India but they did partner with the Government of China. Last year, the federal Liberals negotiated vaccine development with a company owned by the Chinese government, with whom Canada has many high-profile, ongoing concerns, which then unsurprisingly cancelled the deal after stringing the federal Liberals along for months. Why did the federal Liberals engage in a doomed vaccine production deal with the Government of China as opposed to securing one with our allies in India, the largest democracy in the world?MP - Anand, Anita (Oakville)Mr. Speaker, the argument from the opposition in that question is patently false. We have seven APAs with leading vaccine manufacturers, positioning Canada to be one of the leading procurement bodies and countries in the world. Let us just remember the facts. Across the country, 13.4 million doses have been distributed already, 10.2 million Canadians or 24% of Canadians have had at least one dose of vaccine, and we are resting at number two in the G20 for doses administered per 100 people. We will continue delivering for Canadians now and until all Canadians—
Border measures for travellers entering Canada2021-04-19MP - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint- Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, last week, Brazilian public health officials announced the discovery of much more transmissible, vaccine-resistant variants. This new state of affairs has brought Brazil's health care system to the verge of collapse. What was the Liberal government's reaction to this news? The Liberals decided to put an end to additional screening for travellers entering Canada from Brazil. The Prime Minister is prolonging this health crisis by refusing to take action to secure our borders. Why?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, we have some of the strongest measures in the world to screen for COVID-19 at our borders, regardless of the country of origin. It is important that all travellers are screened for COVID-19 and that all positive cases are sequenced for the variants. That is exactly what we are doing. All travellers are required to submit a predeparture test, test on arrival, quarantine in a government-approved hotel and then quarantine for an additional 14 days until such time that they are cleared of having COVID. We will stop at nothing to protect Canadians at our borders.
Border measures for travellers entering Canada2021-04-19MP - Paul-Hus, Pierre (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint- Charles)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, that is clearly not working. The measures that have been put in place since the beginning of the pandemic are not working and recent measures are not working either. We must not forget that there were no variants in Canada until just a few weeks ago. The major problem in Canada right now is the variants that are coming in from places around the world, like Brazil. We had special measures in place for flights arriving from Brazil, and the government decided to stop applying them. The Prime Minister is playing with fire. Can someone explain to me why the government stopped applying the special measures for flights arriving from Brazil?MP - Hajdu, Patty (Thunder Bay—Superior North)Mr. Speaker, I will repeat that we have some of the strongest measures at the border in the entire world, including, by the way, a ban on foreign nationals entering Canada, predeparture testing required before boarding a plane, post-arrival testing and a stay in a government- authorized quarantine hotel until the return of a negative COVID test. All positive tests are quarantined, and all positive cases are quarantined. All travellers must submit a test at day 10. That is how we stop COVID at our borders. We will continue to protect Canadians from importation.
Ian McKay, Ambassador to Japan2021-04-16MP - Barrett, Michael (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, former Liberal Party national director Ian McKay was found guilty of breaking ethics laws when he hid investments in his cannabis company, which was in breach of federal law. What did he earn for his troubles? We would think sanctions or other penalties. No, he was named Canada's ambassador to Japan by the Liberal government. We have another unscrupulous Liberal representing Canada on the world stage. Are ethical breaches prerequisites for Liberal insiders to be given major appointments?MP - Oliphant, Robert (Don Valley West)Madam Speaker, I want to point out how important the relationship we have with Japan is, as an ally, as a friend and as a very significant trading partner. The appointment of Mr. McKay is a significant appointment in that it acknowledges the fact that we want to build our economic, cultural and social relationships with Japan. We trust Mr. McKay to represent Canada well, and Japan will continue to grow in importance with Canada as we grow together.
Dominic Barton, Ambassador to China2021-04-16MP - Barrett, Michael (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, it is clear that to be a Canadian ambassador under the Liberal government, one better be a Liberal insider. Ethical breaches and connections to human rights abusers go a long way. This must be why Dominic Barton, with his deep connections to Communist China, was named Canada's ambassador to China, an ambassador to China who participated in meetings down the road from concentration camps. When the Liberals are considering ambassadors, which is higher on the resumé: ethical breaches or complacency in corruption?MP - Oliphant, Robert (Don Valley West)Madam Speaker, again, with respect to our relationship to our allies and our friends, as well as those countries we have challenges with, Canada is well represented by professional public servants, as well as ambassadors, who represent Canada with dignity, grace, intelligence, compassion and dogged determination. Ambassador Barton exercises that sort of public service, and I am proud to have him as our ambassador to Canada.
Huawei2021-04-16MP - Stubbs, Shannon (Lakeland)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians' 2020 annual report says that the Chinese Communist Party is increasingly targeting Canada's science and technology sector through programs like its Thousand Talents Program, which gets Chinese scientists to bring research back to China. However, despite evidence that Canada's 5G technology is being, as the reports says, “actively targeted”, the Liberals still refuse to ban Huawei from our network. Let us try this again. Will the Liberals take a stand against Chinese wolf warrior diplomacy and ban Huawei?MP - Ehsassi, Ali (Willowdale)Madam Speaker, let me assure the member that we take national security very seriously. We take national security and the research environment, and we do the work required to ensure that Canadians have full confidence. We ensure that everything has protocols, that Canadians are safe and secure, and they do not have to worry about the types of concerns the member has identified.
Huawei2021-04-16MP - Stubbs, Shannon (Lakeland)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, Chinese citizens are coerced by the regime and Huawei is an arm of the communist party. The NSICOP's report also states, “China and Russia remain the primary culprits” for foreign interference and “are the most significant long-term threats to Canada's sovereignty and prosperity”, yet the Prime Minister defends the communist party's interests even threatening to withdraw from the Halifax security forum if Taiwan was recognized for its resistance to China's relentless pressure. How can the Prime Minister defend Canada from the CCP's interference if he is an active apologist for it?MP - Ehsassi, Ali (Willowdale)Madam Speaker, let me reiterate one more time that we are constantly on the lookout and do everything within our power to safeguard our research, our national security and our economic interests. These are valid concerns to have, but as the member is fully aware, the Minister of Public Safety and the Minister of Industry have taken numerous steps over the course of the past several months to ensure that Canadians have nothing to be concerned about.
Enbridge’s Line 5 and the Transit Pipeline Treaty2021-04-16MP - Kram, Michael (Regina—Wascana)Conservative Party of CanadaMadam Speaker, the Enbridge Line 5 pipeline transports Saskatchewan and Alberta oil to eastern Canada. It supplies half of Ontario and Quebec's gasoline, diesel, home heating fuel and jet  fuel. However, next month, the governor of Michigan is going to shut down that pipeline, jeopardizing tens of thousands of jobs across Canada. Why has the Prime Minister not yet engaged directly with President Biden on enforcing the transit pipeline treaty between our two countries?MP - Serré, Marc (Nickel Belt)Madam Speaker, Line 5 is non-negotiable. People will not be left out in the cold. I want to also thank the members of the Canada-U.S. special committee for their hard work on setting Line 5. We have received their report and will be reviewing it, but it is clear there is no daylight between parties and Canadians on this issue. Line 5 is essential to Canada's energy security, and we will continue to defend it.
John McCain Prize for Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen2021-04-14MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, it has come to light that the government threatened to cancel future funding for the Halifax security forum if it awarded the John McCain Prize to Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen. The government’s attempt to silence those critical of China is shameful and it plays right into China's desire to silence its critics abroad. Will the Prime Minister admit this was a mistake and commit to continuing to fund the Halifax International Security Forum even if it awards the John McCain Prize to Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, the minister has already addressed this issue, including at committee yesterday. The government has supported and provided funding to the Halifax security forum throughout our time in office, and the minister has participated every year and will continue to. On Taiwan, I have always supported Taiwan's meaningful participation in multilateral international forums, and Canada continues to have strong and growing trade and people-to-people relations with Taiwan.
China’s obstruction of the WHO investigation into the origins of COVID-192021-04-14MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, determining the origin of the coronavirus is essential for preventing the next pandemic. However, we still do not know the exact origins of COVID-19, because Chinese leadership obstructed the investigation by the World Health Organization, the WHO. Will the Prime Minister publicly acknowledge that the WHO caved to pressure from China, and will he work with our allies in calling for an overhaul of that organization?MP - Trudeau, Justin (Papineau)Mr. Speaker, Canada is committed to working with the WHO and international experts to get a better understanding of the origins of the pandemic. We have some shared concerns regarding the recent WHO-convened study in China. We support a transparent and independent analysis of the origins of the pandemic. We will continue to work with our partners and allies toward the development of an independent process for international evaluations of diseases of unknown origin in the future.
Taiwan’s participation in next month’s WHO meeting2021-04-14MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Taiwan's handling of the pandemic has been one of the world's most successful. With a population of only 23 million, it has had only 1,000 coronavirus cases and 10 deaths. Next month, countries will be participating in WHO's annual meeting, but Taiwan has not been invited, even though it had observer status until 2017. On Monday in the House, the foreign affairs minister referred to Taiwan as a country. In light of that position, does the government support Taiwan's participation at next month's meeting?MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Mr. Speaker, as a government, we have always been consistent in supporting Taiwan's meaningful participation in international forums. Taiwan's role as an observer in the World Health Assembly's meetings is in the interest of global health. We welcome the participation from the entire international community to work together to promote global health.
John McCain Prize for Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen2021-04-13MP - Bezan, James (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, that is what we call part of the Liberal cover-up. Media are reporting that the defence minister was appeasing China when he threatened to yank funding from the Halifax security forum if organizers did not torpedo the John McCain award to Ms. Tsai Ing-wen, the President of Taiwan. John McCain’s daughter Meghan called it “Absolutely pathetic”, describing the Liberal government as “a bunch of cowards condoning Chinese genocide.” Why is the defence minister taking his marching orders from the communist regime in Beijing instead of standing up for democracy, human rights and strong female world leaders?MP - Sajjan, Harjit S. (Vancouver South)Mr. Speaker, the assertions that the member is making could not be further from the truth. The Halifax International Security Forum is an independent organization, and it makes its own decisions on this matter.
John McCain Prize for Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen2021-04-13MP - Bezan, James (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, we know that the minister and the government could be given an award for having the most phoney feminist credentials. David Mulroney, Canada's former ambassador to China, said the Liberals' move was “A national disgrace. Canada's Feminist Foreign Policy has no room for one of the most courageous, principled and seriously threatened women on the planet.” Will the defence minister guarantee the Halifax security forum will get to keep its funding, and will he support bestowing the John McCain award to the President of Taiwan?MP - Sajjan, Harjit S. (Vancouver South)Mr. Speaker, as I stated from the beginning, the Halifax International Security Forum is an independent organization, and it makes its own decisions on where the awards need to go. National Defence has supported the international security forum in Halifax for the last 10 years, and once a request is made, it will be considered.
John McCain Prize for Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen2021-04-12MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, over the weekend, reports indicated the government threatened to cancel funding for the Halifax Security Forum if it awarded the John McCain Prize to Taiwan's President Tsai Ing-wen. The government’s attempt to silence those critical of China is shameful and it is counterproductive because it plays right into the hands of China. Will the government reverse its position, speak out for human rights democracy and the rule of law and support the John McCain Prize for President Tsai Ing-wen?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, we will always be there to defend human rights. We have been there. In the case of China, very recently we imposed sanctions on the individuals who were identified with respect to the treatment of Uighurs in Xinjiang. We have always spoken up very clearly, whether it is in China or in other countries, to defend the human rights of people living in those countries because it is part of our fundamental values.
China’s obstruction of the WHO investigation into the origins of COVID-192021-04-12MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, determining the origin of the coronavirus is essential for preventing the next pandemic. However, we still do not know the exact origins of COVID-19, because Chinese leadership is obstructing the investigation by the WHO. Will the government acknowledge that the WHO caved to pressure from China, and will it work with our allies in calling for an overhaul of that organization?MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, we very clearly acknowledged in a report we worked on with other countries that more needs to be done to better understand the origins of COVID-19. The report that was submitted by the World Health Organization has gaps, and more information is needed to truly understand the situation. Canada, along with several other countries, has recognized that fact, and we encourage the World Health Organization to go further to gain a better understanding of the origins of this pandemic.
Taiwan’s participation in next month’s WHO meeting2021-04-12MP - Chong, Michael (Wellington—Halton Hills)Conservative Party of CanadaMr. Speaker, Taiwan’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the most successful in the world. With a population of only 23 million, Taiwan has only had about a thousand coronavirus cases and 10 deaths. In May, Canada along with other countries, will be participating in the meeting of the World Health Organization, but Taiwan has not been invited even though it had observer status until 2017. Does the government support Taiwan’s participation at next month’s meeting? Hon. Marc Garneau (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lib.)MP - Garneau, Marc (Notre-Dame- de-Grâce—Westmount)Mr. Speaker, I want to pick up on what my hon. colleague said and very clearly state that Taiwan has been extremely successful in handling the COVID-19 pandemic within its own country. There are things to be learned from its experience. We feel that dealing with the issue of the pandemic is something that should involve all those who have been forced to handle this very difficult situation.

2021-22 Main Estimates overview

Supporting facts and figures

2021-22 Main Estimates – Year-Over-Year Changes – Explanation of Items

Organizational Estimates

2019–20 Expenditures2020–21 Main Estimates2020–21 Estimates To Date2021–22 Main Estimates

Budgetary

Voted

1

Operating expenditures

1,883,363,260

1,897,264,276

1,872,756,289

1,878,192,919

5

Capital expenditures

108,543,093

113,830,264

170,095,264

106,409,752

10

Grants and contributions

4,674,051,462

5,035,414,948

6,810,942,883

4,275,879,707

15

Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements

68,493,656

71,024,000

72,371,264

85,473,000

20

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments

0

1

2

1

Total Voted

6,734,451,471

7,117,533,489

8,926,165,702

6,345,955,379

Total Statutory

442,451,726

366,689,928

437,072,941

377,282,685

Total Budgetary

7,176,903,197

7,484,223,417

9,363,238,643

6,723,238,064

Non-budgetary

Voted

L25

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Capital subscriptions

0

1

2

1

L30

Loans – International Financial Assistance Act

0

60,500,000

60,500,000

154,000,000

Items voted in prior Estimates

1,512,675

0

0

0

Total Voted

1,512,675

60,500,001

60,500,002

154,000,001

Total Statutory

15,336,772

10,640,000

56,538,550

49,435,453

Total non-budgetary

16,849,447

71,140,001

117,038,552

203,435,454

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates – Year-Over-Year Changes – Explanation of Items

Supplementary messages

The 2021-22 Main Estimates include:

Supporting facts and figures

Annex A

2021-22 Main Estimates, Summary of year-over-year Adjustments

2021-22 Main Estimates6,723,238,064
2020-21 Main Estimates (last year's)7,484,223,417
Net decrease(760,985,353)
Funding decreases include:
1 Decrease related to funding received in previous years to help developing countries to address the impact of climate change(363,000,000)
2 Sunset of funding received for Renewing Canadaʼs Middle East Strategy (Budget 2019)(249,687,056)
3 Decrease related to funding received in previous years to implement the Feminist International Assistance Agenda(124,538,007)
4 Decrease in the current funding for the Peace and Stabilization Operations Program(57,000,000)
5 Decrease in the current funding for the Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment to support mission security abroad (Planned to access from the fiscal framework previously approved funding)(31,640,070)
6 Decrease in the current funding for Canada’s participation in Expo 2020 Dubai, United Arab Emirates(15,089,755)
7 Transfers to other government departments to provide support to departmental staff located at missions abroad(8,863,388)
8 Adjustment to contributions of employee benefit plans(5,736,878)
9 Sunset of reprofiled funding to support Operation IMPACT through the Middle East Strategy(3,900,000)
10 Sunset of funding received for Advancing Clean Technology in Canada’s Natural Resources Sectors(3,888,388)
11 Sunset of reprofiled funding for the Canadian International Innovation Program(1,282,383)
12 Decrease of the current funding for Enhanced Export Diversification Support(1,250,000)
13 Other adjustments(4,282,819)
Sub-total(870,158,744)
The funding decreases listed above were offset by the following funding increases:
14 Adjustment related to the cost of assessed contributions, due to changes in the international organizations' budgets and the impact of currency fluctuations resulting18,714,589
15 from the payment in the prescribed foreign currency of these contributions Funding for compensation related to collective agreements17,883,803
16 Adjustment relating to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations incurred on expenditures at missions abroad15,470,861
17 Increase in funding for payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada14,449,000
18 Funding for locally engaged staff salaries and related benefits incurred at missions abroad12,029,765
19 Adjustment to increase the spending authorities for International Financial Institutions to support the Fifteenth Replenishment of the Africa Development Fund – Direct payments9,870,000
20 Adjustment for inflation on overseas operating costs8,836,400
21 Funding to enhance Canada’s global Artic leadership (Budget 2019)6,918,973
22 Funding for the Trade Commissions Service Electronic Client Relationship Management Solution5,000,000
Sub-total109,173,391
Net decrease(760,985,353)

2021-22 Main Estimates - Decrease related to funding received in previous years to Help Developing Countries Address the Impact of Climate Change

In the lead up to the 2015 Paris Climate conference to support developing countries, the Prime Minister announced a $2.65 billion funding commitment to advance international climate change objectives.

The 2021-22 Main Estimates include a net decrease of $363.0 million compared to the 2020-21 Main Estimates to implement programming to help developing countries address the impact of climate change.

These decreases align with the planned funding profiles for each of these initiatives.

Supplementary messages

Results

Canada Clean Energy and Forest Facility

Establishing Canadian Climate Funds Focused on the Private Sector

Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility

Transfer PaymentsTotalInitiativeCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-21174,000,000174,000,000Funding for Canada Clean Energy and Forest Facility
109,000,000109,000,000Funding for Establishing Canadian Climate Funds
Focused on Private Sector
Development, Peace and Security Programming
80,000,00080,000,000Funding for the International Fund for Agriculture Development’s Climate-Smart Agriculture in Developing Countries
2021-22-363,000,000363,000,000
Funding for Canada Clean Energy and Forest Facility Funding for Establishing Canadian Climate Funds Focused on Private Sector Funding for the International Fund for Agriculture Development’s Climate-Smart Agriculture in Developing CountriesDevelopment, Peace and Security Programming
---
Year-over-year adjustment(363,000,000)

Canada Clean Energy and Forest Facility

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-21174,000,000174,000,000Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----174,000,000174,000,000
2021-22Development, Peace and Security Programming
-------
Year-over year(174,000,000)

International Fund for Agricultural Development

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-2180,000,00080,000,000Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----80,000,00080,000,000
2021-22Development, Peace and Security Programming
-------
Year-over-year adjustment(80,000,000)

Establishing Canadian Climate Funds Focused on the Private Sector

In total, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ allocated $473.5 million over five years (2017-18 to 2020-21) to support the second phases of these two initiatives; $250 million to the International Finance Corporation to support the Canada Climate Change Program

- Phase II; and, $223.5 million to the Inter-American Development Bank to support the Canadian Climate Fund for the Private Sector in the Americas - Phase II, of which $109.0 million was requested via the 2020-21 Main Estimates.

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-21109,000,000109,000,000Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----109,000,000109,000,000
2021-22Development, Peace and Security Programming
-------

Background

In November 2015, in the lead up to the Paris Climate Conference, the Prime Minister announced Canada’s contribution to supporting the implementation of the Paris Agreement would be $2.65 billion in climate finance for developing countries in the five-year period to 2020-21.

Of the overall $2.65 billion commitment, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ is programming 98% with Environment and Climate Change Canada programming the balance of approximately 2%.

As at March 2021, Canada has announced $2.3 billion of programming against its target of $2.65 billion.

{MINE will appear before FAAE in late April, and will announce that the $2.65B has been fully disbursed.}

Environment and Climate Action is a core action area of Canada’s Feminist International Assistance Policy. Consistent with the policy, Canada is pursuing gender-responsive climate action, which recognizes that environment and climate action is most effective when women and girls play an active role in designing and developing strategic responses to climate change and environmental issues.

Qs and As

How will the COVID-19 crises impact this program and what is the department doing to mitigate?

What do these funds cover?

How do you justify these expenditures?

Canada Clean Energy and Forest Facility

How does this project advance Canada’s international commitments to developing countries?

Why should Canada pursue climate action through working with the World Bank?

Where is results information available?

International Fund for Agricultural Development’s Climate Smart Agriculture in Developing Countries

Why should Canada pursue climate action through working with the International Fund for Agricultural Development?

How will Global Affairs ensure this project advances Canada’s international commitments to developing countries?

Funding for Establishing Canadian Climate Funds Focused on the Private Sector

Can you provide an example of a project using this funding?

La Castellana and Achiras Wind Projects in Argentina;
Pecasa - First wind farm in Dominican Republic

General

What are some examples of specific initiatives and programs ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ has announced to date?

Climate Change Funding and Commitment

Climate change COP21
Total Target: $2.65 B of which $2.59 B for GAC from 2015/16 - 2020/21
2015/162016/172017/182018/192019/202020/21Total
Disbursements1682483484265263312,047This commitment is on track to be met with operational and planned initiatives
Operational and Planned initiatives561561
Total2,608

2021-22 Main Estimates - Decrease Related To The Funding Received For Renewing Canada’s Middle East Strategy

Supplementary messages

Expected results

Results to date

Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-212,626,625709,1892,738,9726,074,786International Advocacy and Diplomacy
2,446,957660,6782,460,043229,100,000234,667,678Development, Peace and Security Programming
641,732173,2685,980,9516,795,951Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
862,640232,9121,053,0892,148,641Internal Services
6,577,9541,776,04712,233,055-229,100,000-249,687,056
2021-22International Advocacy and Diplomacy Development, Peace and Security Programming Support for Canada's Presence Abroad Internal Services
-------
Year-over-year adjustment(249,687,056)

Background

Qs & As

What did these funds cover?

How has the COVID-19 virus affected the Strategy?

2021-22 Main Estimates - Decrease related to funding received in previous years to implement the Feminist International Assistance

Agenda

Supplementary messages

Results

Supporting facts and figures

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalInitiative
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-2110,006,6682,001,3345,851,028263,821,441128,794,431410,474,902Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance
195,000,000195,000,000Agenda Reprofile of funding for the establishment of the Partnership for Gender Equality (Equality Fund)
2,318,943463,7882,200,9679,500,000130,600,000145,083,698Funding for Innovative Financing Programs to support International Assistance
3,376,935675,3875,302,39925,550,00037,940,00072,844,721Funding for the Weapons Threat Reduction Program
15,702,5463,140,50913,354,394-298,871,441492,334,431823,403,321
10,146,9462,029,3897,384,070263,085,063221,649,288504,294,756Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance Agenda
(89,000,000)(89,000,000)Reprofile of funding for the establishment of the Partnership for Gender Equality (Equality Fund)
2021-223,349,665669,9332,623,6677,000,000187,000,000200,643,265Funding for Innovative Financing Programs to support International Assistance
3,382,212676,4425,404,31825,550,00037,940,00072,952,972Funding for the Weapons Threat Reduction Program
186,76337,3531,653,4054,000,0004,096,8009,974,321Funding for Counter Terrorism Capacity Building Program - Sahel
17,065,5863,413,11717,065,460-299,635,063361,686,088698,865,314
Year-over-year adjustment(124,538,007)

Allocation by Core Responsibility

Funding to implement the Feminist International Assistance Agenda

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
578,881115,776250,000944,657International Advocacy and Diplomacy
8,328,9881,665,7984,992,438263,821,441128,794,431407,603,096Development, Peace and Security Programming
1,098,799219,760608,5901,927,149Internal Services
10,006,6682,001,3345,851,028-263,821,441128,794,431410,474,902
578,881115,776250,000944,657International Advocacy and Diplomacy
2021-228,439,1251,687,8256,309,485263,085,063221,649,288501,170,786Development, Peace and Security Programming
1,128,940225,788824,5852,179,313Internal Services
10,146,9462,029,3897,384,070-263,085,063221,649,288504,294,756
Year-over-year adjustment93,819,854

Funding for the establishment of the Equality Fund

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-21195,000,000195,000,000Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----195,000,000195,000,000
2021-22(89,000,000)(89,000,000)Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----(89,000,000)(89,000,000)
Year-over-year adjustment(284,000,000)

Funding for Innovative Financing Programs to support International Assistance

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-211,991,741398,3482,012,7549,500,000130,600,000144,502,843Development, Peace and Security Programming
327,20265,440188,213580,855Internal Services
2,318,943463,7882,200,967-9,500,000130,600,000145,083,698
2021-222,902,135580,4272,363,1947,000,000187,000,000199,845,756Development, Peace and Security Programming Internal Services
447,53089,506260,473797,509Internal Services
3,349,665669,9332,623,667-7,000,000187,000,000200,643,265
Year-over-year adjustment

Funding for the Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Program – Sahel

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2021-22157,71131,5421,636,2004,000,0004,096,8009,922,253Development, Peace and Security Programming
29,0525,81117,20552,068Internal Services
186,76337,3531,653,405-4,000,0004,096,8009,974,321

Funding for the Weapons Threat Reduction Programs

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-212,931,449586,2904,889,11725,550,00037,940,00071,896,856Development, Peace and Security Programming
445,48689,097413,282947,865Internal Services
3,376,935675,3875,302,399-25,550,00037,940,00072,844,721
2021-222,933,023586,6054,989,11725,550,00037,940,00071,998,745Development, Peace and Security Programming
449,18989,837415,201954,227Internal Services
3,382,212676,4425,404,318-25,550,00037,940,00072,952,972
Year-over-year adjustment108,251

Background

Qs and As

How will the current COVID-19 crisis impact Canada’s effort on these initiatives and what is the department doing to mitigate?

How will ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ measure the impact of the additional $2.0 billion over five years on the FIAP implementation?

How will ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ achieve Canada’s G7 commitment on Quality Education for Girls, Adolescent Girls and Women in Developing Countries?

Why establish the Equality Fund?

How is International Assistance Innovation Program support different from traditional support (grants and contributions) offered by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ?

How will International Assistance Innovation Program initiatives be assessed?

Have the programs supported any projects to date?

Could you please provide a few examples of what the innovative finance program funding (Vote 10) will be used for?

2021-22 Main Estimates - Decrease in the current funding for the Peace and Stabilization Operations Program

Supplementary messages

Results

Afghanistan Program

Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalInitiative
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-212,323,889464,7782,895,86555,000,0005,050,00055,000,000Renewed Approach to Canada’s Development Assistance and Security Sector Support to Afghanistan
-4,000,00014,734,532Funding for Canada’s Contribution to United Nations Peace Operations
2021-222,323,889464,7782,895,8653,000,0004,050,00012,734,532Funding for Canada’s Contribution to United Nations Peace Operations
2,323,889464,7782,895,865-3,000,0004,050,00012,734,532
Year-over-year adjustment(57,000,000)

Renewed Approach to Canada’s Development Assistance and Security Sector Support to Afghanistan

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-2155,000,000Development, Peace and Security Programming
----55,000,000-55,000,000
2021-22Development, Peace and Security Programming
-------
Year-over-year adjustment(55,000,000)

Canada’s Contribution to United Nations Peace Operations

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020-212,116,498423,3002,784,5294,000,0005,050,00014,374,327Development, Peace and Security Programming
207,39141,478111,336360,205Internal Services
2,323,889464,7782,895,865-4,000,0005,050,00014,734,532
2021-222,116,498423,3002,784,5293,000,0004,050,00012,374,327Development, Peace and Security Programming
207,39141,478111,336360,205Internal Services
2,323,889464,7782,895,865-3,000,0004,050,00012,734,532
Year-over-year adjustment(2,000,000)

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Funding For The Duty Of Care Special Purpose Allotment To Support Mission Security Abroad

Supplementary messages

Results

Supporting facts and figures

Operating and CapitalVariance
2020-212021-22
ARLU 2018-19Funding for Duty of Care115,557,238103,560,496(11,996,742)
ARLU 2020-21Funding for Colombo Chancery Relocation Reprofile of Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment (SPA)619,350 26,720,4124,202,8423,583,492 (26,720,412)
Other Adjustments ( Quasi- Statutory adjustments, Collective Bargaining, etc.)3,493,592
Year-over-year adjustment in Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment(31,640,070)

Allocation by Core Responsibility

Funding Reprofile for the Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment

Vote 1 & Vote 5 (Duty of Care SPA)Core Responsibility
Available Funding (Ref. Levels)Total available fundingReprofile Request (Ref. Levels)Revised Funding (Ref. Levels)
2017 -1826,720,41283,133,552(26,720,412)0Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
2018-1913,144,96337,018,752013,144,963
2019-20202,769,514236,790,5020202,769,514
2020-21170,981,485203,195,56126,720,412197,701,897
2021-22158,995,407238,518,0680158,995,407
2022-23181,937,226234,933,4690181,937,226
2023-24177,386,607226,550,5790177,386,607
2024-25158,282,752310,945,4100158,282,752

Funding for Duty of Care to support mission security abroad

Regular Funds (Non-SPA)Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment (SPA)Total
2020 -219,142,302115,557,238124,699,540
2021-223,137,815103,560,496106,698,311
Net decrease under the Duty of Care SPA(11,996,742)

Funding for the Colombo Chancery Relocation project

Regular Funds (Non-SPA)Duty of Care Special Purpose Allotment (SPA)Total
2020 -2144,139619,350663,489
2021-2271,9594,202,8424,274,801
Net increase under the Duty of Care SPA3,583,492

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Adjustment related to the cost of assessed contributions due to changes in the international organizations' budgets and the impact of currency fluctuations Resulting from the payment in the prescribed foreign currency of these contributions

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Program2021-22 & Ongoing
ODA portionNon-ODA portionTotal Change
United Nations Peacekeeping06,700,2746,700,274
Other Assessed10,065,93912,014,31522,080,254
Total10,065,93918,714,58928,780,528
PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2021 -2227,971,31227,971,312International Advocacy and Diplomacy
809,216809,216Trade and Investment
(10,065,939)(10,065,939)Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----18,714,58918,714,589

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Funding For Compensation Related To Collective Agreements

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2020 -214,457,434757,7655,215,199International Advocacy and Diplomacy
4,500,845765,1425,265,987Trade and Investment
2,056,947349,6822,406,629Development, Peace and Security Programming
533,76890,740624,508Help for Canadians Abroad
1,912,270325,0862,237,356Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
2,854,014485,1843,339,198Internal Services
16,315,2782,773,599----19,088,877
7,370,6521,253,0078,623,659International Advocacy and Diplomacy
7,022,1551,193,7758,215,930Trade and Investment
2021-224,167,772708,5184,876,290Development, Peace and Security Programming
1,183,908201,2641,385,172Help for Canadians Abroad
4,483,020762,1155,245,135Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
7,373,0751,253,4198,626,494Internal Services
31,600,5825,372,098----36,972,680
Year-over-year adjustment17,883,803

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Funding For Currency Exchange Fluctuations on Expenditures at Missions Abroad

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2021 -221,673,277451,786220,1102,345,173International Advocacy and Diplomacy
1,364,387368,384303,9872,036,758Trade and Investment
212,37757,342338,781(749,499)(140,999)Development, Peace and Security Programming
387,495104,62359,794551,912Help for Canadians Abroad
3,000,977810,2646,866,77610,678,017Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
6,638,5131,792,3997,789,448--(749,499)15,470,861

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Funding for payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Ongoing Reference LevelIncremental RequestMain EstimatesSupplementary EstimatesTotal AuthoritiesExpendituresSurplus (Deficit)
2017-1850,779,00015,494,00066,273,000066,273,00065,625,437647,563
50,779,00015,494,00066,273,000066,273,00065,625,437647,563
2018 -1950,779,000050,779,00018,761,99769,540,99769,540,9970
50,779,000050,779,00018,761,99769,540,99769,540,9970
2019-2050,779,00018,095,00068,874,000068,874,00068,493,656380,344
50,779,00018,095,00068,874,000068,874,00068,493,656380,344
Year-over-year adjustment14,449,000
Ongoing Reference LevelIncremental RequestMain EstimatesSupplementary EstimatesTotal AuthoritiesExpenditures as of March 10thCommitments as of March 10thProjected Surplus (Deficit)
2020 -2150,779,00020,245,00071,024,0001,347,26472,371,26462,213,8578,811,5021,345,905
50,779,00020,245,00071,024,0001,347,26472,371,26462,213,8578,811,5021,345,905
LES PensionCore Responsibility
2020 -2120,245,000Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
20,245,000
2021-2234,694,000Support for Canada's Presence Abroad
34,694,000

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - By Vote

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

The following items represent the increases / decreases by Vote:

2019-20
Expenditures
2020-21
Main Estimates
2021-22
Main Estimates
Variance
(2021-22 to 2020-21)
Voted
Vote 1 - Operating expenditures1,883,363,2601,897,264,2761,878,192,919(19,071,357)
Vote 5 - Capital expenditures108,543,093113,830,264106,409,752(7,420,512)
Vote 10 - Grants and contributions4,674,051,4625,035,414,9484,275,879,707(759,535,241)
Vote 15 - Payments in respect of pension,68,493,65671,024,00085,473,00014,449,000
insurance and social security programs or other
arrangements for employees locally engaged
outside of Canada
Vote 20 - Payments to international financial11
institutions – Direct payments
Total Voted6,734,451,4717,117,533,4896,345,955,379(771,578,110)
Total Statutory442,451,726366,689,928377,282,68510,592,757
Grand Total7,176,903,1977,484,223,4176,723,238,064(760,985,353)
Budgetary Expenditures by Standard Object
01Personnel1,315.8
02Transportation and communications116.8
03Information25.8
04Professional and special services332.8
05Rentals230.4
06Purchased Repairs and maintenance35.0
07Utilities/materials and Supplies53.4
08Acquisition of land, buildings and works40.7
09Acquisition of machinery and equipment81.9
10Transfer payments4,534.1
11Public debt charges….
12Other subsidies and payments5.7
Less: Revenues and other reductions49.2
Total6,723.2

2021-22 Main Estimates - Grant And Discretionary Contribution Programs

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Grants and Contributions are broken down as follows: ( $ millions)

2021-22 Main Estimates
VotedStatutoryTotal
Grants2,547.00.92,547.9
Contributions1,728.8257.41,986.2
Total Budgetary Expenditures4,275.8258.34,534.1

2021-22 Main Estimates - International Organizations – Assessed Contributions

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

The most significant assessed contributions by category in the 2021-22 Main Estimates include:

Program2021-22 & Ongoing
ODA portionNon-ODA portionTotal Change
United Nations Peacekeeping06,700,2746,700,274
Other Assessed10,065,93912,014,31522,080,254
Total10,065,93918,714,58928,780,528
PersonnelEBPOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsTotalCore Responsibility
GrantsContrib & Other
2021-2227,971,31227,971,312International Advocacy and Diplomacy
809,216809,216Trade and Investment
(10,065,939)(10,065,939)Development, Peace and Security Programming
-----18,714,58918,714,589

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - by Core Responsibility

Supporting facts and figures

Allocation by Core Responsibility

2021-2022 Main Estimates

OperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal

Development, Peace and Security Programming

165,379,434

0

3,850,168,170

0

4,015,547,604

Support for Canadaʼs Presence Abroad

1,017,990,664

96,754,503

0

(43,425,000)

1,071,320,167

International Advocacy and Diplomacy

299,679,260

2,510,489

626,839,695

0

929,029,444

Trade and Investment

317,196,192

5,289,800

56,233,590

(2,000,000)

376,719,582

Help for Canadians Abroad

56,269,518

0

0

(2,400,000)

53,869,518

Internal Services

275,381,789

1,854,960

900,000

(1,385,000)

276,751,749

Total

2,131,896,857

106,409,752

4,534,141,455

(49,210,000)

6,723,238,064

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Development, Peace And Security Programming

Supporting facts and figures

BudgetaryOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
Development, Peace and Security Programming165,379,43403,850,168,17004,015,547,604

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Support for Canada's Presence Abroad

Supporting facts and figures

BudgetaryOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
Support for Canada's Presence Abroad1,017,990,66496,754,5030(43,425,000)1,071,320,167

Background

2021-2022 Main Estimates - International Advocacy and Diplomacy 2021-22

Supporting facts and figures

BudgetaryOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
International Advocacy and Diplomacy299,679,2602,510,489626,839,6950929,029,444

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Trade and Investment

Supporting facts and figures

BudgetaryOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
Trade and Investment317,196,1925,289,80056,233,590(2,000,000)376,719,582

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Help for Canadians Abroad

Supplementary facts and figures

BudgetaryOperatingCapitalTransfer PaymentsRevenues and other reductionsTotal
Help for Canadians Abroad56,269,5180(dollars) 0(2,400,000)53,869,518

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Internal Services

Supplementary facts and figures

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Briefing note on Departmental Plan

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Briefing note on Departmental Results Report 2019-20

Supplementary messages

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ’s results highlights include:

Background

Explanation of variances

2020-21 Main Estimates - Canada’s Network Abroad

*Does not include Taiwan or the West Bank

Supporting facts and figures

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Overview of 2020-21 Main Estimates (Previous Year)

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

2020-2021 Main Estimates

2018–19 Expenditures2019–20 Main Estimates2019–20 Estimates To Date2020–21 Main Estimates

Budgetary

Voted

1

Operating expenditures

1,820,952,057

1,743,383,063

1,818,621,661

1,897,264,276

5

Capital expenditures

132,196,816

103,090,143

104,986,443

113,830,264

10

Grants and contributions

4,581,142,014

4,191,984,964

4,734,216,490

5,035,414,948

15

Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements

69,540,997

68,874,000

68,874,000

71,024,000

20

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments

0

1

2

1

Items voted in prior Estimates

0

269,548,531

269,548,531

0

Total Voted

6,603,831,884

6,376,880,702

6,996,247,127

7,117,533,489

Total Statutory

453,043,418

342,811,521

365,247,206

366,689,928

Total Budgetary

7,056,875,302

6,719,692,223

7,361,494,333

7,484,223,417

Non-budgetary

Voted

L25

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Capital subscriptions

0

1

1

1

L30

Loans – International Financial Assistance Act

0

0

0

60,500,000

Items voted in prior Estimates

(6,833,760)

0

0

0

Total Voted

(6,833,760)

1

1

60,500,001

Total Statutory

15,235,546

17,000,000

17,000,000

10,640,000

Total non-budgetary

8,401,786

17,000,001

17,000,001

71,140,001

Table 152. Organizational Estimates (dollars) - Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development

2018–19 Expenditures2019–20 Main Estimates2019–20 Estimates To Date2020–21 Main Estimates

Budgetary

Voted

1

Operating expenditures

1,820,952,057

1,743,383,063

1,818,621,661

1,897,264,276

5

Capital expenditures

132,196,816

103,090,143

104,986,443

113,830,264

10

Grants and contributions

4,581,142,014

4,191,984,964

4,734,216,490

5,035,414,948

15

Payments, in respect of pension, insurance and social security programs or other arrangements for employees locally engaged outside of Canada, or in respect of the administration of such programs or arrangements

69,540,997

68,874,000

68,874,000

71,024,000

20

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Direct payments

0

1

2

1

Items voted in prior Estimates

0

269,548,531

269,548,531

0

Total Voted

6,603,831,884

6,376,880,702

6,996,247,127

7,117,533,489

Total Statutory

453,043,418

342,811,521

365,247,206

366,689,928

Total Budgetary

7,056,875,302

6,719,692,223

7,361,494,333

7,484,223,417

Non-budgetary

Voted

L25

Pursuant to subsection 12(2) of the International Development (Financial Institutions) Assistance Act, payments to international financial institutions – Capital subscriptions

0

1

1

1

L30

Loans – International Financial Assistance Act

0

0

0

60,500,000

Items voted in prior Estimates

(6,833,760)

0

0

0

Total Voted

(6,833,760)

1

1

60,500,001

Total Statutory

15,235,546

17,000,000

17,000,000

10,640,000

Total non-budgetary

8,401,786

17,000,001

17,000,001

71,140,001

2020–21 Main Estimates by Purpose

Background

2021-22 Main Estimates - Public Accounts 2019-20 – Overview

Supplementary messages

2021-22 Main Estimates - Public Accounts 2019-20 – Losses

Supporting facts and figures

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ response when dealing with these situations

Recent enhanced measures undertaken by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ

Additional information

Other Losses

2021-22 Main Estimates - Public Accounts 2019-20 – Travel and Conferences

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

2021-22 Main Estimates - Public Accounts 2019-20 – Lapses

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Operating - Vote 1:
Capital - Vote 5:
Grants and Contributions - Vote 10:

Afghanistan

Supplementary messages

Update

On April 14, 2021, the U.S. announced its decision to withdraw all U.S. troops from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021. NATO has announced that it will start the withdrawal of Resolute Support Missions forces on May 1, 2021. There are no conditions attached to the withdrawal, though the U.S. has sought to re-energise the stalled peace talks, in particular by bringing the Government of Afghanistan and Taliban together at a conference to be hosted by Turkey. However, the Istanbul conference has been postponed until at least the middle of May as the Taliban continues refuses to meet as long as international forces remain on Afghan soil.

UNAMA, Qatar, Turkey, the U.S. and the Government of Afghanistan continue to engage with the Taliban in an attempt to move peace talks forward.

Supporting facts and figures

Arbitrary detention initiative

Supplementary messages

Update

Since the February launch event, 3 additional countries have endorsed the Declaration: Philippines, Bahamas and North Macedonia, bringing total endorsements to 62.

Initial feedback on the draft Partnership Action Plan from delegates to the G7’s Open Societies Working Group has been universally supportive, but they did seek assurances that participation in the Action Plan would be voluntary and that there would be no requirement to ‘join’ or ‘endorse’ it.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Following the successful launch of the Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations (Declaration), Canada worked with Five Eyes partners to develop a draft Partnership Action Plan (PAP). The PAP outlines a set of six voluntary areas of cooperation and engagement to sustain momentum on the initiative such as: joint advocacy, multilateral engagement, research on cases, awareness-raising, civil society engagement, training and other forms of joint action on specific cases.

The draft PAP was shared with the G7 Open Societies’ Working Group on March 3, 2021 for review and comments. All G7 members support the PAP and are favorable to including references to both the Declaration and PAP in the G7 Foreign and Development Ministers’ Communique, in an Open Societies’ Statement annexed to the Leaders’ Statement (following the G7 Summit from 11-13 June), and/or in the Communique itself. Inclusion of these references remains subject to discussions at the political level.

In parallel, Canada is advancing plans to raise the arbitrary detention initiative in multilateral forums including the UN General Assembly, the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva and the Commonwealth.

Canada’s Arctic sovereignty

Supplementary messages

Export controls - General

Supplementary messages

Update

Since 2019, the issue of export controls has received significant and sustained public, media and parliamentary attention. Beginning in December 2020, the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development (FAAE) has been studying the granting of arms exports permits with a specific focus on Turkey. See separate briefs on the FAAE Production of Papers and Turkey.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

In 2017, the Government of Canada invested $13 million over five years to allow Canada to implement the Arms Trade Treaty’s obligations and to further strengthen the rigour and transparency of its export control regime. Budget 2021 proposed to provide $38.2 million over 5 years, and $7.9 million per year ongoing for human resources to strengthen, among other trade controls, Canada’s oversight of the movement of prohibited firearms and arms exports.

Saudi Arabia – Export controls and LAVs

Supplementary messages

Update

In January 2021, the Biden administration announced a temporary pause of arms transfers to KSA pending a blanket review of military sales signed under the previous administration. This measure affected transactions above specific thresholds.

In February 2021, President Biden stated that his administration would end “all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arms sales”. Although the review is ongoing, certain contracts suspended in January have been allowed to resume.

On April 21, 2021, the House of Representatives voted to pass the Protection of Saudi Dissidents Act which would prohibit the Administration from approving sales of defense articles or transferring such items to the government of Saudi Arabia for a period of 120 days following enactment. That prohibition would be extended for subsequent periods (for a total of three years) unless the President certifies to the Congress that the Saudi government is not violating the human rights of dissidents or detainees though actions such as the forced repatriation, intimidation or murder. This legislation still needs to pass the U.S. Senate.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The review covering November 2018 to December 2019 of all existing permits destined for KSA for items controlled under the EIPA including LAVs concluded that there is no substantial risk that these items would result in the negative consequences outlined in the ATT. However, in light of the KSA’s actions in Yemen there is a substantial risk that certain controlled items (such as bomber aircrafts) would be used to commit serious violations of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). No such items have been transferred to KSA from Canada.

Production of papers on arms exports to Turkey

Update

Background

Turkey - Export controls

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Belarus – Including arms exports

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Cameroon

Supplementary messages

5G review

Supplementary messages

Responsive, if asked about specific vendors:

Update

Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

Supplementary messages

Responsive – AIIB Projects and Forced Labour

Supporting facts and figures

Background

AIIB: The AIIB was established in January 2016 and is based in Beijing, China. It is a relatively new MDB focused on economic development through infrastructure financing in Asia. The majority of the AIIB’s active projects are co-funded with other MDBs, and are therefore governed by well-established rules and norms, including those regarding financial sustainability. The AIIB has not co-financed any projects with Chinese policy banks, such as the China Development Bank (CDB) and Chinese Export-Import Bank (ExIm Bank).

AIIB Projects in China: To date, the AIIB has approved funding for four projects in China: Legend Capital Healthcare Technology Fund; Emergency Assistance to China Public Health Infrastructure Project; Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Low Carbon Energy Transition and Air Quality Improvement Project: and Beijing Air Quality Improvement and Coal Replacement.

CanSino vaccine

Supplementary messages

Update

The National Research Council (NRC) announced on August 25, 2020, that it would move on to focus on partners other than CanSino as part of the global effort to combat COVID-19.

Background

In the early days of the pandemic, the CanSino candidate was among the most advanced in the world and was just one of many leads the government pursued. Under the agreement, CanSino would have provided its vaccine technology to the NRC at no cost to the NRC or Canada, as well as sufficient vaccine doses for early clinical trials.

Despite the department’s sustained advocacy efforts with Chinese interlocutors, Chinese authorities did not grant the necessary approval for the shipment of the CanSino vaccine candidate to Canada. In mid-July 2020, when exports of Chinese vaccine candidates to countries other than Canada were first approved, the Embassy in Beijing and the National Research Council (NRC) agreed that all possible efforts to secure approval had been made.

After these lengthy delays in receiving the CanSino vaccine, more promising candidates emerged, and the government decided to focus on those other opportunities to protect Canadians.

Vaccine research and support for CanSino Biologics

QUESTION: How much did the Government of Canada pay to Chinese vaccine maker CanSino as part of its failed vaccine deal?                                                                                                               

Supplementary messages

If pressed on how Government of Canada funding was used for the CanSino collaboration:

Background                                                                                                                                                  

The Canadian Center for Vaccinology (CCfV) was ready to start Phase 1 clinical trials of CanSino’s vaccine candidate doses as early as June, after Health Canada's review and approval of the CanSino clinical trial proposal. The CCfV is a collaboration of Dalhousie University, the IWK Health Centre, and Nova Scotia Health Authority.

The agreement between the NRC and CanSino was reviewed prior to signature by CanSino’s collaborators in the Chinese government – the Beijing Institute of Technology and the Ministry of Science and Technology – who had provided funding to CanSino.

Due to the delay in the shipment of the vaccine doses to Canada, and the fact that CanSino’s candidate was already in advanced testing in other countries, the NRC moved on to focus on other partners and COVID-19 priorities.

The NRC works with a range of Canadian therapeutic and vaccine companies, including:

Belt and Road Initiative

Supplementary messages

Responsive – BRI and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)

Update

In April 2021, Australia used the Foreign Arrangements Scheme (2020) to cancel two BRI deals between China and the State of Victoria, citing foreign policy concerns.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Established in 2013 as President Xi Jinping’s signature foreign policy strategy, the BRI aims to foster greater economic linkages and improve trade routes, primarily across the Eurasian, African and South American continents.

The BRI provides opportunities for China to leverage its economic capacity to diversify its international commercial relationships, secure strategic supply chains and resources, gain regional influence and advance long-term geopolitical objectives. No specific time limit has been imposed on the BRI, nor is there a defined budget, fixed list of projects, or a specific template or definition for what constitutes a BRI project.

Significant and widespread concerns have been raised by the international community as to whether the BRI conforms to established principles, rules and norms for international development surrounding human rights, financial sustainability and environmental protection.

Foreign Interference

Canada has been studying the issue of foreign agent registries, including examining those in place in US and Australia. On April 13, 2021 MP Kenny Chiu introduced bill C-282 creating an act to establish the foreign influence registry. This Bill is currently at First Reading.

[REDACTED]

China consular cases

Supplementary messages

Update

After access was interrupted in January 2020, Canadian officials regained consular access to Michael Kovrig, Michael Spavor, and Robert Schellenberg in October 2020. Canadian officials most recently held virtual consular visits to Mr. Kovrig on April 29, 2021, Mr. Spavor on April 30, 2021 and Mr. Schellenberg on March 17, 2021. [PLACEHOLDER Canadian officials have requested to conduct next consular visits in May 2021].

The trials of Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig took place on March 19 and March 22, 2021, respectively. Canadian officials sought consular access to both men prior to the hearings and requested to attend the trials. Both requests were denied. The verdict in both cases remains pending.

Canada is deeply troubled by the total lack of transparency surrounding these hearings and continues to work toward an immediate end to the arbitrary detention of these men. Canadian officials continue to seek ongoing and meaningful consular access to Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig, in accordance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the China-Canada Consular Agreement.

Canadians have received a death penalty sentence in China. Canada has raised its opposition to the death penalty with China and continues high-level advocacy for clemency in these cases.

[REDACTED]

Hong Kong

Supplementary messages

Canada’s immigration policy and Hong Kong

Hong Kong Immigration (Amendment) Bill and fears of “exit bans”

Supporting facts and figures

Background

In June 2020, the National People’s Congress of China imposed the National Security Law in Hong Kong, which led to the rapid erosion of rights and freedoms in the Special Administration Region. Hong Kong’s protest movement has weakened considerably since the introduction of the law and the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The escalating clampdown on rights and freedoms by authorities has compelled Canada, in concert with its international partners, to issue numerous statements of concern with respect to Hong Kong, including most recently regarding the targeting of ten of Hong Kong’s most prominent pro-democracy activists for participation in a peaceful assembly.

QP Note - Hong Kong

ISSUE: New immigration measures were announced in response to the situation in Hong Kong related to the passage of national security legislation on June 30, 2020, by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of China.

PROPOSED RESPONSE

If pressed:

If pressed on passport

If pressed traveling to Canada

Background

Current situation in Hong Kong

Canada’s response - New temporary and permanent pathways for Hong Kong youth

Additional measures being implemented for Hong Kong

Travel restrictions

Refugee resettlement

Measures for Hong Kong human rights defenders at risk

Commitment to implement a new refugee stream for human rights defenders

Canadians and Canadian permanent residents residing in Hong Kong

Canadian Immigration and Passport Services in Hong Kong

Bilateral military training with China

Supplementary messages

Update

The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) have traditionally maintained limited defence ties with the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), guided by the Cooperation Plan Initiative (CPI) signed by the Canadian and Chinese Defence Ministers in 2013. The CPI outlines the types of military activities to be pursued between the CAF and the PLA. While the CAF has not conducted any recent bilateral engagement activities with the PLA, the CPI remains in force as a non-binding agreement. The last formal CAF-PLA bilateral training activity took place in February 2018, when a PLA delegation observed winter survival training at CFB Petawawa. The last major multilateral activity hosted in China was the participation of a CAF delegation in the World Military Games in October 2019.

Supporting facts and figures

Meng Wanzhou arrest and U.S. extradition request

Supplementary messages

Procurement of physical security equipment (Nuctech)

Supplementary messages

Update

PSPC and GAC, in consultation with CSE, are collaborating on an interim procurement strategy for GAC’s x-ray machines and services requirements for cases where x-ray machines have become obsolete are unrepairable or there is an imminent need.

GAC is also moving forward with the establishment of National Security Exemptions on key security equipment.

Regional maritime tensions

Supplementary messages

Update

Regional tensions have heightened as China has pursued a more assertive policy to advance its claims in the South China Sea (SCS) and East China Sea (ECS) through repeated entries by Chinese naval, coast guard and militia fishing vessels in disputed waters, including off the coasts of Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines and Vietnam. In March 2021, a large fleet of more than 200 Chinese vessels were anchored around Whitsun Reef in the SCS, prompting protests from the Philippines and Vietnam, which both have claims there, as well as the United States. China has also increased the pace and scale of land reclamation and construction of military facilities on disputed features and artificial islands. These escalatory and destabilizing actions are eroding the rules-based international order. ASEAN claimant states (the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam), as well as Indonesia, have become increasingly outspoken regarding China's actions in the SCS. Japan has also criticized the increasing presence of Chinese vessels near the disputed Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands in the ECS, which reached a new peak in 2019-2020.

Tensions between the U.S. and China have escalated concurrently. In July 2020, theU.S. announced a more forward leaning policy towards maritime claims in the SCS, which includes a rejection of any Chinese claim to waters beyond a 12-nautical mile territorial sea derived from land features it claims in the Spratly Islands. The U.S. and Japan reiterated their objections to China’s “unlawful” maritime claims and activities in the SCS in a joint statement in April 2021. In September 2020, the U.K., France and Germany submitted essentially identical note verbales to the UN challenging the legality of elements of China’s maritime claims in the SCS, as being inconsistent with UNCLOS.

The U.S. has also increased the frequency of its “Freedom of Navigation Operations” (FONOPs) to challenge China’s claims. Canada does not conduct FONOPS-type operations and, as a general approach, does not take position on the maritime disputes of other states.

Supporting facts and figures

Taiwan

Supplementary messages

Canada’s One China Policy

Taiwan’s meaningful participation in international organizations

Cross-Strait tensions

Canada-Taiwan Economic Consultations

CPTPP Accession and Canada-Taiwan FIPA

Responsive: Taiwan CPTPP accession

Update

In recent months, PLAAF aircraft have increased the frequency and scale of military exercises in the Taiwan Strait.

In November 2020, when the World Health Assembly resumed its session, Taiwan was once again not invited to participate as an observer in the Assembly over objections from the PRC and its international partners.

Supporting facts and figures

Tibet

Supplementary messages

Update

Canada’s Ambassador to China, Dominic Barton participated in a Chinese government hosted visit to Lhasa, Tibet from October 26-30, 2020. This was the first visit to Tibet by a Government of Canada official since 2015.

On March 11, 2021, at the 46th session of Human Rights Council in Geneva, Canada expressed concerns over deeply troubling reports of deaths in custody of Tibetans.

Supporting facts and figures

Question Period Note - Date: March 9, 2021

Import Prohibition on Goods Produced by Forced Labour

Issue: Recent media coverage regarding shipments from companies suspected of using forced labour.

Proposed Response:

The Government of Canada is committed to upholding human rights and international labour standards.

Goods that are mined, manufactured, or produced wholly or in part by forced labour, are prohibited from entering Canada. Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) is the

Government of Canada’s lead department for labour-related programs, and the CBSA works closely with ESDC to identify goods that have been produced by forced labour and prevent their entry into Canada.

The CBSA takes its responsibilities to prevent the importation of goods produced by forced labour very seriously. Generally, all goods entering Canada, may be subject to a more in-depth exam. The CBSA uses a risk management approach to determine which goods entering Canada require a secondary examination.

The CBSA prohibits such goods from entering Canada when it has sufficient evidence to do so.

Importers of goods classified under tariff item No. 9897.00.00 may appeal the classification as prohibited, re-export the goods or abandon the goods.

CBSA and ESDC have recently established a Memorandum of Understanding to enable this cooperation further to the CUSMA.

Import Prohibition on Goods Produced by Forced Labour

Background:

Canada has imposed an importation ban on goods that were produced by forced labour, as described in An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, which received Royal Assent on March 13, 2020. As described in paragraph 202(8), Chapter 98 item No. 9897.00.00 of the Customs Tariff, the law has been amended to include a reference prohibiting goods mined, manufactured or produced wholly or in part by forced labour. These amendments made under the Act came into force in Canada on

July 1, 2020, as outlined in CBSA Customs Notice 20-23, Import prohibition on goods produced wholly or in part by forced labour.

Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) is the Government of Canada’s lead department for labour-related programs and the CBSA works closely with ESDC to identify goods that have been produced by forced labour and prevent their entry into Canada. ESDC’s Labour Program is actively monitoring and researching evidence related to problematic supply chains, and documented evidence of goods being produced with forced labour is transmitted for CBSA’s consideration. The CBSA conducts risk analyses on goods entering the country to determine if they are admissible. The CBSA may use this information to identify and intercept shipments containing goods that have been identified as suspected to have been produced by forced labour.

The CBSA and ESDC entered into a Memorandum of Understanding on February 24, 2021, which establishes the enforcement strategy for preventing the importation of goods produced by forced labour.

Shipments containing goods suspected of being produced by forced labour will be detained at the border for inspection by a border services officer. If in the judgement of the officer the goods were produced by forced labour, the officer will apply the tariff classification under chapter 9897 and prohibit the goods from entering Canada. Importers of goods classified under tariff item No.

9897.00.00 may appeal the classification as prohibited, re-export the goods or abandon the goods.

Tariff Classification determinations are made on a case-by-case basis for each specific shipment, based on available supporting evidence and analysis. As such, the Customs Tariff can not be used to prohibit the importation of goods solely on the basis of originating from a specific country or region, though it can serve of as a key indicator of risk. Implementing such restrictions would fall under the purview of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ.

The Customs Tariff import prohibition is the only legislative enforcement tool in Canadian law regarding the importation of goods produced by forced labour.

Importers are encouraged to work with their foreign suppliers to ensure that any goods imported into Canada have not been mined, manufactured or produced wholly or in part by forced or compulsory labour.

The Government of Canada expects companies to take every step possible to ensure that their supply chains conform to Canadian law with respect to the prohibition on the import of forced labour. It is the responsibility of the importing company to conduct due diligence on its supply chains to ensure that it is not directly or indirectly sourcing products from entities implicated in forced labour or other human rights violations.

Forced labour (global supply chains)

Key facts

Forced Labour Prohibition

Supply Chain Legislation

Modern Slavery Bill

Background

Forced Labour Ban

Supply Chain Legislation

Modern Slavery Bill

Uyghurs and forced labour

Supplementary messages

Responsive: Has Canada blocked any shipments due to forced labour concerns related to Uyghurs?

At present there has been no shipments related to Uyghur forced labour that have been prohibited from entering Canada.

Responsive: Why were these measures announced if they cannot be enforced?

The first step in addressing forced labour is to acknowledge the issue and introduce relevant prohibitions. The Government has done this. Now that goods produced by forced labour are prohibited by law from entering into Canada, the next step is to document the operational evidence necessary to enforce the law.

This is what the Government is doing. CBSA is now working with ESDC-Labour to gather sufficient and defensible evidence so as to apply the tariff prohibition.

Supporting facts and figures

Question period note - Date: Mar. 18, 2021

Classification: Department: IRCC

ISSUE: VFS Global Issue

PROPOSED RESPONSE:

We take the privacy of Canadians and our clients very seriously.

We require that Visa Application Centres (VAC) handle information according to Canada’s privacy laws. No immigration data is stored at the VAC; the information is stored in Canada.

The Government of Canada requires that all VAC employees, including subcontractor employees, who have access to Personal Information obtain a security screening equivalent to Canadian Reliability Screening level.

IT safeguards, such as encryption, are built into the terms of the VAC contract to ensure that personal information is protected.

VACs only provide administrative support and biometrics collection services to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) applicants. All visa processing and decision making is done by trained IRCC officers.

Canada ensures stringent privacy standards are being met through audits and site reviews conducted by Canadian officials.

We are committed to ensuring that the privacy of our clients remains protected.

If pressed on China law:

There are risks to operating in any foreign environment, and we are soberly aware of the risks of operating in China.

Foreign companies operating in China are required to partner with a local Chinese company.

VFS Global is permitted to subcontract VAC services to other companies who meet the security screening requirements set out by the Government of Canada.

Similar to Canada, many likeminded countries, Five Eyes allies, use both VFS Global and the same subcontractors in China.

If pressed on the breach:

We take the privacy of Canadians and our clients very seriously.

The breach that occurred in 2015 involved another VFS Global client government. Canadian clients and systems were not affected in any way.

VFS Global is not required to notify Canada of any data breaches that occur at other client government VACs or on other client government systems.

Safeguards governing the protection of personal information, such as encryption, are built into the terms of the contract.

On expanding the contract to include digitization of paper applications

The Government is currently exploring a new application digitization platform that could further strengthen the security and privacy protections in the digital transfer of paper applications submitted at VACs.

This platform would be required to meet stringent privacy standards in accordance with Canada’s privacy laws.

Background

Visa Application Centres

VACs provide administrative support and biometric collection services in the local language to applicants before, during and after their application is assessed by an IRCC visa officer

VACs do not represent the Government of Canada. They play no role in the decision-making process and are expressly forbidden to provide any visa- related advice to applicants

VACs are run by private companies and are governed by a formal contract with the Government of Canada

For a fee, VACs can:

For an additional fee, VACs offer other services, including making photocopies, assisted services for filling forms and self-service computers for those wishing to apply online. Value-added services may vary depending on the VAC locations.

Canadian advocacy on the consular cases of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor

Supplementary messages

Update

On December 10, 2018, Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor were arbitrarily detained for allegedly endangering China’s national security. On June 19, 2020, Mr. Kovrig and Mr. Spavor were formally charged with crimes relating to national security. After consular access was interrupted in January 2020, Canadian officials regained access to Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor in October 2020. Canadian officials most recently held virtual consular visits to Mr. Kovrig on April 29, 2021, and Mr. Spavor on April 30, 2021. Canadian officials have requested to conduct next consular visits in May 2021.

The trials of Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig took place on March 19 and March 22, 2021, respectively. Canadian officials sought consular access to both men prior to the hearings and requested to attend the trials. Both requests were denied. The verdict and sentencing in both cases remain pending.

An extensive demarche was done immediately prior to their trials to ask countries for support in echoing Canada’s concerns regarding the cases. A total of twenty-three embassies, including the EU, sent diplomats to the trials in a show of solidarity with these men, and to echo Canada’s message that these detentions are unacceptable. Additional countries also raised our concerns with the Chinese in private.

Canada is deeply troubled by the total lack of transparency surrounding these hearings and continues to work toward an immediate end to the arbitrary detention of these men. Canadian officials continue to seek ongoing and meaningful consular access to Mr. Spavor and Mr. Kovrig, in accordance with the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the China-Canada Consular Agreement.

Consular cases involving Canadian citizens abroad

Supplementary messages

Clemency – Canadians facing the death penalty abroad

Consular assistance for Canadian children and families

Impact of COVID-19 on human rights

Supplementary messages

Impact of COVID-19 on democracy

Supplementary messages

International assistance – Personal protective equipment (PPE)

Supplementary messages

PPE and medical supplies global market support

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Assisting Canadian suppliers of COVID-19 solutions: To increase Canadian companies’ awareness of international opportunities, the TCS has developed a directory of Canadian companies that provide solutions to support the fight against COVID-19. The Directory is intended to be a tool for Trade Commissioners at post to match COVID-19-related opportunities with Canadian manufacturers that have the interest and capacity for internationalization.

Global supply chains: The pandemic has affected Canada’s ability to secure medical supplies and pharmaceutical inputs. While existing supply chains are not expected to be greatly transformed, the industry is working to build in more redundancy to ensure they are more flexible and resilient. Canada is bolstering its manufacturing capacity for urgently needed medical supplies and working with allies and industry to ensure international trade rules are respected and supply chains are not interrupted.

Canadian companies will continue to require inputs from international markets to build finished products and access to international markets for medical and pharmaceutical supplies to ensure long-term sustainability.

Backlogs caused by COVID-19 response: COVID-19 has put an enormous strain on existing notification bodies and certification agencies around the world. As such, Canadian manufacturers are experiencing delays in obtaining critical certifications that impact procurement and fulfillment of contracts. The TCS is working to help Canadian companies with these issues.

COVID-19 repatriation efforts

Supporting facts and figures

World Health Organization (WHO)

Supplementary messages

Update

On March 30, 2021, Canada signed on to the U.S.-led joint statement in response to the Final Report from WHO-convened COVID-19 Origins Study. The statement reaffirms the importance of transparency, openness and collaborative scientific inquiry for investigating outbreaks of unknown origin such as SARS-CoV-2.

Supporting facts and figures

COVID-19 travel restrictions

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

A Global Travel Advisory recommending against all non-essential travel due to the current COVID-19 pandemic was issued on March 13, 2020 and remains in place for all destinations. It also recommends against all cruise ship travel outside of Canada.

As of March 18, 2020, the Government of Canada put in place border measures designed to keep Canadians safe and healthy and to prevent the further spread of COVID-19. This is primarily achieved through three Orders in Council (OICs) outlining quarantine, testing and other requirements; prohibiting travel from the United States (U.S.); and prohibiting travel from all other countries. The OICs are amended and renewed regularly.

Under the Orders in Council requiring quarantine and prohibiting travel from countries other than the United States, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs, of Public Safety and of Immigration can exempt travellers from quarantine requirements or entry prohibitions if in the national interest. There is no national interest authority for entry from the U.S.

At ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ exemptions to individual travellers for entry or from quarantine are normally issued at the Assistant Deputy Minister level. Exemptions from quarantine have been authorized in exceptional circumstances and require consultation with the Province or Territory of travel and with the Public Health Agency of Canada on conditions that the traveller must follow.

The Government of Canada continues to take a gradual and phased approach to reopening to international travel that takes into account the evolution of the domestic COVID-19 situation as well as a range of factors, including Provincial/Territorial considerations; processing capacity at the border; and public health system capacity to manage potential increases in cases. This work is led by Health Canada.

COVID-19 vaccines (incl. COVAX)

Supplementary messages

Update

The COVID19 Vaccine Access (COVAX) Facility began to roll out its first vaccines less than 100 days after the first immunisation in a high-income country.

Supporting facts and figures

Cuba

Crisis in Tigray, Ethiopia

Supplementary message

Feminist Foreign Policy

Supplementary messages

Update

Discussions have taken place with other countries that have avowed feminist foreign policies, including Sweden, France, Mexico, Spain and Luxembourg. Foreign Ministers of these countries met in February 2021 and committed to joint action.

Situation in Haiti

Supplementary messages

Update

The UNSC released a strong presidential statement on March 24, urging the Haitian government to strengthen the rule of law in Haiti as well as to take steps to end impunity and intensify the fight against corruption. It noted with concern the alleged use of deadly force against protesters, as well as reported arbitrary arrests.

In the resolution, the UNSC underscored the need to address essential security, transparency, and logistical considerations to allow for free, fair, and credible elections to be held in 2021.

Prime Minister Joseph Jouthe, the fourth Prime Minister under the Moïse administration, resigned on April 14. He was replaced by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Claude Joseph, on an interim basis.

Canada-India bilateral relations

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Update

India is experiencing a devastating second wave of COVID-19 infections that is overwhelming the health care system. India has requested assistance in securing medical oxygen equipment, medical supplies, and pharmaceuticals. On April 22, Canada issued a 30-day suspension for all commercial and private passenger flights from India to manage the elevated risk of importing COVID-19 cases and variants of concern. In response to India’s identified needs, on April 27, Minister Gould announced $10 million to the Indian Red Cross’ response via the Canadian Red Cross. Canada’s contribution will support the procurement of essential supplies and medicines, including oxygen cylinders, and supporting vital blood and ambulance services. Canada also donated and delivered 350 ventilators and 25,000 vials of Remdesivir from PHAC’s National Emergency Strategic Stockpile on two Canadian Air Force flights that arrived on May 8 and May 13. Finally, Canada is also financing the procurement and delivery of 1,450 oxygen concentrators for India through our contribution to UNICEF via the Access to COVID-19 Tools (ACT) Accelerator.

Over the past year, Canada and India have held 14 calls between Prime Ministers, Foreign Ministers and Trade Ministers to advance the bilateral relationship, particularly in the areas of trade and investment, pandemic response, the rules-based international order, and climate change. During the Deputy Minister-level Foreign Office Consultations held on March 24, 2021, Canada and India mutually agreed to reinvigorate Ministerial Dialogues on Trade and Investment, Energy and Finance, as well as the Strategic Dialogue between Foreign Ministers. This new momentum comes after bilateral tensions in late 2020 when India postponed bilateral engagements in reaction to comments by Prime Minister Trudeau and Canadian cabinet ministers about the ongoing farmers’ protests in India.

Indo-Pacific approach

Supplementary messages

Bill to amend the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act

Supplementary messages

Update

Bill S-2 was passed by the Senate without any amendments on December 17, 2020. The Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on February 25, 2021.

Canada’s National Action Plan for Women, Peace and Security

Supplementary messages

Update

All federal partners of Canada’s National Action Plan on WPS now have their own publicly available implementation plan.

The third annual report for Canada’s National Action Plan on WPS is scheduled to be tabled in the Spring of 2021, and it will outline progress made in implementing the Action Plan during fiscal year 2019-2020.

Canadian Centre for Peace, Order and Good Government

Supplementary messages

Disinformation and the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM)

Supplementary messages

Foreign state-backed interference and intimidation activities in Canada

Supplementary messages

Responsive: How is Canada holding HASA actors accountable?

Responsive: What measures does Canada have in place to secure its institutions from cyber-attacks or breaches of information?

Promoting and Protecting Democracy Fund

Supplementary messages

Background

The world has experienced years of democratic backsliding. In many countries, popular support for democracy is in decline. Foreign interference campaigns have been compounded by the rise of populist, extremist, and authoritarian narratives. This has contributed to the erosion of citizen confidence in democracy, the exacerbation of social and political divisions and polarization, growing distrust of governments, and the discrediting of democratic institutions and the media.

Peacebuilding

Supplementary messages

Update

UN Peacebuilding Commission (PBC):

Canada as a peacebuilding donor, including UN Peacebuilding Fund (PBF):

UN Peacebuilding Architecture Review (PBAR):

UN peace operations

Supplementary messages

Iran-U.S. regional tensions

Supplementary messages

Update

U.S.-Iran tensions remain heightened. Repeated attacks against the U.S. by Iran- backed Shia militias in Iraq have continued and have led to the U.S. threatening to close its embassy in Baghdad. While President Biden is not continuing with the Trump Administration’s policy of “maximum pressure” against Iran, sanctions are being maintained pending possible negotiations with Iran related to the Iran nuclear deal.

Iran – Human rights

Supplementary messages

Update

Canada routinely speaks out on specific human rights cases in Iran. These efforts help to hold Iran accountable by drawing international attention to the issues and indicating that Canada and the global community are monitoring the cases.

In January 2021, @CanadaFP issued a Tweet highlighting our concern over the regime’s land seizures of the Baha’i in Ivel and urging Iranian authorities to eliminate all forms of discrimination on the basis of religion or belief.

Iran and the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)

Supplementary messages

Update

In December 2020, Iran passed a law requiring it to take actions that are violations under the JCPOA. This was part of a strategy to gain advantage in any upcoming negotiations with the United States and to lift sanctions imposed by the United States. Since January 2021, Iran started enriching uranium up to 20%, significantly increased its online centrifuges, and suspended the Additional Protocol (which limits the IAEA’s ability to verify Iran’s nuclear program). Since April 2021, in response to suspected sabotage at its Natanz nuclear facility, Iran started increasing enrichment up to 60%.

Since April 2021, there have been expert-level discussions in Vienna based on parallel talks with diplomats of Iran and the United States, facilitated by the other members of the JCPOA (France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Russia and China). These discussions were convened to establish the steps that Iran would take to return to compliance and for the United States to implement sanctions relief. While it will be challenging to reach a renewed agreement, all parties, including Iran and the United States, recognize progress in the discussions.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Iran and permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) plus Germany reached a historic nuclear deal on July 14, 2015. Iran agreed to limit its nuclear program and to permit enhanced IAEA monitoring and verification in exchange for relief from sanctions.

The Trump administration withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018 and applied sanctions on Iran, citing flaws in the agreement, and that it did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program and destabilizing regional activity. In response, since June 2019, Iran has increased its uranium enrichment and stockpile levels of uranium and heavy water, violations under the JCPOA. Iran has since made further violations under the deal.

Should Iran return to compliance under the JCPOA, President Biden has indicated interest in rejoining the agreement as a starting point for further negotiations with Iran (detained Americans, human rights, ballistic missiles and regional tensions).

Flight PS752

Supplementary messages

Background

In March 2021, Iran released its final accident investigation report. Iran’s report had serious shortcomings, including that it failed to report on all relevant causes and contributing factors; it did not provide concrete safety recommendations to prevent such occurrences in the future; and most findings were not substantiated with relevant, credible information and evidence. The publication was clearly designed as a strategic document to deflect attention away from Iran and the IRGC, and onto Ukraine International Airlines, Ukraine itself, and the United States. Canada has communicated our disappointment with the report in our statement at ICAO on March 19, 2021 and we have voiced our concerns with the report to our partners and allies. Options are currently being discussed for how to respond at ICAO.

In late April 2021, Canada released its forensic team report, which put into the public domain unclassified information that Canada has assessed, provided a rebuttal of the credibility of Iran’s final safety report, and put on the public record what questions remain outstanding that Iran must answer. The report confirmed that Iranian civilian and military authorities, through their acts and omissions, bear responsibility for the downing of flight PS752. The forensic team did not find any credible evidence to suggest that the downing was a premeditated plan to destroy a civilian aircraft.

[REDACTED]

Israel – Bilateral overview

Supplementary messages

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS)

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The BDS movement is a campaign founded in 2005 by Palestinian NGOs. The BDS movement "urges nonviolent pressure on Israel until it complies with international law by meeting three demands”: (i) Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands and dismantling the barrier between the West Bank and Israel; (ii) Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and (iii) Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN Resolution 194. Much of the movement is focused on university campuses in Europe and North America and includes academic and cultural boycotts.

Critics of the campaign argue that the BDS movement is antisemitic and promotes the de-legitimization of Israel. There are also more targeted calls for boycotts of products produced in Israeli settlements in the West Bank or the Palestinian boycott of Israeli goods sold in the West Bank.

On February 12, 2020, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) published a list of 112 companies operating in Israeli settlements (no Canadian companies were listed). Canada has previously expressed concerns to the High Commissioner.

On April 21, 2021, Human Rights Watch (HRW) released a report which surveyed Israeli government practices and policies directed towards Palestinians on the one hand and Jewish Israelis on the other. The report concluded that the Israeli government has demonstrated an intent to maintain the “domination” of Israelis and systemic oppression over Palestinians across Israel and the West Bank and Gaza. The report provided numerous recommendations to be taken by the international community, including that “businesses should cease activities that directly contribute to the commission of the crimes of apartheid and persecution.”

International Criminal court investigation into the “Situation in Palestine”

Supplementary messages

Israeli settlements

Supplementary messages

Update

On 3 May 2021 a Jerusalem local planning committee approved a plan to construct 540 housing units in Har Homa ‘E’. Landowners in the area are eligible to obtain permits for construction once an access road and sewage infrastructure has been built by the municipality. Har Homa ‘E’, is a largely uninhabited site (one Palestinian family lives in the area) located West of the settlement of Har Homa, located between the Palestinian city of Bethlehem and Jerusalem. This new settlement would be effectively contiguous with Givat Hamatos, another unsettled location where a tender for the construction of 1,257 housing units was completed in January 2021. Along with Givat Hamatos, Har Homa ‘E’ would complete Israeli territorial contiguity along the southern perimeter of Jerusalem and constrict physical contiguity between Bethlehem and East Jerusalem, placing the viability of a future Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem at risk. Following a local planning committee meeting on Har Homa ‘E’ on 20 April, diplomats from 15 EU countries conducted a demarche to the Israeli National Security Council, calling for a halt to the plan. On 27 April Canada’s mission in Tel Aviv raised the issue of Har Homa E along with other issues in a demarche to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Background

Settlement activity in East Jerusalem and the West Bank has continued under all Israeli governments since 1967. As of 2020 there were 132 Israeli settlements in the West Bank with an estimated population of nearly 442,000. In East Jerusalem, which has been annexed into the Israeli municipality of Jerusalem, around 205,000 settlers live in 13 settlements, some located within primarily Arab neighbourhoods. There are also around 135 smaller, unauthorized outposts in the West Bank that are considered illegal under Israeli law. The overall population growth rate in Israeli settlements in 2019 was 3%, representing around 12-15,000 new settlers per year. According to the Oslo Accords, the future of settlements is one of the final status issues (others include Jerusalem, borders, water, refugees, and security) to be negotiated between Israel and the Palestinians as part of a comprehensive agreement.

Canada’s positions on settlements are in line with the broad international consensus. Among other issues, you raised this issue on your February 9, 2021 call with Israel’s Foreign Minister. In 2017, Minister Freeland issued a statement on Israel’s “Regulation Law,” which sought to retroactively legalize settlers’ outposts. The law was struck down by Israel’s Supreme Court in June 2020.

Jerusalem

Supplementary messages

Update

Tensions boiled over in the Old City at the Haram al-Sharif compound (Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa Mosque compound) on May 7 and again on May 10 and Israeli police clashed with Palestinian worshipers inside and around the mosque, resulting in close to 300 injuries leading to over 150 hospitalizations. [PLACEHOLDER FOR POTENTIAL Update] The past few days have seen a significant reduction in violence in Jerusalem as the focus of hostilities has shifted to Gaza and to other cities in Israel.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

During Israel’s recent election campaigns, PM Netanyahu has pledged to continue with the expansion of several settlement projects in and around Jerusalem, which would further diminish the Palestinian presence in, and connection to, Jerusalem. Several states have issued public statements criticizing the Israeli plans, and Canada has raised its concerns directly with Israeli officials, including at the ministerial level and publicly.

As the international consensus on Jerusalem (i.e., that its status must be negotiated directly between Israel and the Palestinians) begins to weaken, Israel is continuing the expansion of settlements, raising tensions between the city’s Jewish and Arab residents. In April 2021, Israel placed restrictions on Muslim worshippers’ ability to congregate at the Old City’s Damascus Gate, which contributed to widespread violence between Israelis and Palestinians. Though Israel ultimately reversed the decision in a bid to restore calm, the episode highlights the underlying tensions in this contested city.

Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Supplementary messages

Background

Tensions exploded between Israelis and Palestinians in mid-May, with clashes breaking out in Jerusalem and in particular the Haram al-Sharif /Temple Mount compound. Inter-communal violence has occurred in several cities alongside exchanges of fire between Israel on the one hand, and Hamas and other armed terrorist groups on the other, in what is considered the worst flare-up since the 2014 Gaza war. Gaza-based militants have fired over 2000 rockets at Israel, reportedly killing 9 Israelis and injuring over 200. At least 120 Palestinians (including 17 minors) have reportedly been killed, along with 600 wounded as a result of Israeli Defense Force counterstrikes targeting Hamas and other groups in Gaza. Hostilities are expected to continue into the coming week.

Prospects for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict have diminished significantly over the past several years, with no negotiations taking place since 2014. Canada is committed to the goal of a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in the Middle East, including the creation of a Palestinian state living side by side in peace and security with Israel. Canada continues to reject unilateral actions on either side that constitute obstacles to peace, including incitement to violence, Palestinian efforts aimed at international recognition of their statehood through accessions as the ‘State of Palestine’, and Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, which is a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Canada unequivocally condemns all acts of violence and terrorism.

Libya

Supplementary messages

Mali

Supplementary messages

Mexico trade challenges

Supplementary messages

Energy Sector

Mining Sector

Middle East Strategy extension

Supplementary messages

Update

Budget 2021 provides $527 million in 2021-22 to GAC, DND, CSE, and CSIS to extend Canada’s Middle East Strategy for another year. This will allow departments to continue providing development, humanitarian and security assistance and military support, and to advance peace and stability in the region. For GAC this represents $77.9 million in new funding, and $213 million in existing resources (grants and contributions).

Political situation in Myanmar

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Rohingya crisis

Supplementary messages

Update

On March 22, a deadly fire in the refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar destroyed approximately 10,000 shelters, leaving 45,000 Rohingya homeless. Canada’s mission is coordinating with international partners and UN agencies to respond.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Repatriation of Rohingya remains unlikely in the short or medium term due to the military coup in Myanmar. The needs remain significant in Bangladesh, as COVID-19 has further strained Bangladesh’s capacity and patience with the protracted crisis. The Government of Bangladesh has relocated over 14,000 Rohingya from Cox’s Bazar refugee camps to Bhasan Char island.

Nagorno-Karabakh

Supplementary messages

Responsive: Canadian Arm Exports to Turkey:

Update

On January 11, 2021, Russia convened meetings at political and officials level which facilitated communications between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and set up expert subgroups on issues such as railways, roads, combined transport communications, security, customs, and other types of control. Armenia has now called early elections for June 2021 as a result of the political crisis triggered by the defeat. On April 12, you publicly announced the results of the review of export permits to Turkey and cancelled all suspended permits.

NATO

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Nicaragua

Supplementary messages

North Korea (nuclear focus)

Supplementary messages

Update

The Biden administration is in the last stages of reviewing its policy on North Korea. Officials have stated that the complete denuclearization of North Korea remains the goal. The Biden administration confirmed in February that North Korea has yet to respond to overtures to resume diplomatic talks.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

North Korea is believed to possess up to 65 nuclear weapons, with a variety of viable delivery systems, and is likely capable of adding several weapons per year to its arsenal. It continues to produce highly enriched uranium and fissile material.

North Korea announced its withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 2003, after the US revealed that Pyongyang had a secret nuclear weapons program. Since 1994, successive US administrations have conducted negotiations with North Korea to end the regime’s nuclear program. Despite reaching agreements, North Korea has invariably resumed efforts to build its nuclear and missile capacity.

Tensions between the US and North Korea had been high during the early part of the Trump administration and have generally been lower since Trump and Kim Jong Un met 3 times between 2018 and 2019.

Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Supplementary messages

Background

The perceived lack of progress on nuclear disarmament led several states to negotiate, at the United Nations, a Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW, also known as the 'Ban Treaty'). None of the nuclear weapons states, nor any of the NATO allies, took part in the negotiations (except the Netherlands, which participated under a parliamentary mandate). Likewise, none of these states have signed or ratified the Treaty. The Ban Treaty opened for signature in September 2017 and entered into force in January 2021.

As of April 2021, the TPNW has been signed by 86 countries, of which 54 have ratified. The Treaty prohibits participation in any nuclear weapon activities, including developing, testing, producing, acquiring, possessing, stockpiling, using or threatening to use nuclear weapons. The Treaty also prohibits the deployment of nuclear weapons on national territory and the provision of assistance to any state in the conduct of prohibited activities.

The TPNW is inconsistent with Canada’s membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which relies on nuclear deterrence as a core aspect of its collective security. The Treaty also lacks the monitoring and verification mechanisms that are necessary for a credible disarmament treaty. In addition, without participation from states that possess nuclear weapons, this Treaty will not eliminate a single weapon.

Canadian civil society actively advocates for Canada to sign the Treaty, and opposition parties have pressed the Government on the issue. Canada supports the total elimination of nuclear weapons, but only as the ultimate step of a process involving states that possess nuclear weapons.

As such, Canada and many of its likeminded allies continue to focus their efforts on initiatives that reflect states’ security concerns, and which could unite nuclear and non- nuclear armed states. Canada actively advocates for the commencement of negotiations on the Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT); the entry-into-force of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT); efforts to build global capacity for nuclear disarmament verification; the expansion of nuclear arms control; and enhanced engagement of underrepresented groups such as women and youth.

Office for Human Rights, Freedoms and Inclusion (OHRFI)

Supplementary messages

Update

The promotion and protection of democracy and respect for human rights is crucial during these challenging times. The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed and exacerbated global inequality and exclusion, including online. In addition, there has been a resurgence of expressions of intolerance, xenophobia and racism associated with the pandemic. Respect for human rights, as well as freedom from discrimination and hate, must be at the center of all efforts in combatting the spread of COVID-19.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Office of Human Rights, Freedom, and Inclusion (OHRFI) serves as the focal point for the Government of Canada’s engagement with faith and belief communities, civil society actors, Indigenous communities, academics and the broader international community. The OHRFI takes a global approach in advocating for human rights, working within multilateral forums to promote a positive narrative on the benefits of inclusion, respect for diversity, and freedom of religion or belief. It now has a unit that delivers timely and targeted programming initiatives to protect democracy, human rights, including freedom of religion or belief, as well as to promote inclusion and respect for diversity globally.

OECD Secretary-General campaign

Supplementary messages

Update

On March 12, 2021, OECD members reached consensus and selected Mathias Cormann from Australia as the new Secretary General. Mr. Cormann is expected to take up the position on June 1, 2021.

Physical security at missions abroad

Supplementary messages

Quadrilateral dialogue

Supplementary messages

Update

Following an invitation from the Biden administration, Quad leaders held their first leader-level summit virtually on March 16, 2021. Leaders adopted the “Spirit of the Quad” declaration and agreed to establish a COVID-19 Vaccine Working Group, a Climate Change Working Group, and a Critical and Emerging Technologies Working Group.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Quadrilateral Dialogue (known as the 'Quad') is a strategic policy dialogue and coordination process established in 2017 which focuses on the Indo-Pacific region. Its members are Australia, India, Japan and the United States. The Quad seeks to promote broad principles on which to base regional cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, including a renewed commitment to uphold a rules-based international order and advance prosperity and security. To date meetings have been held at senior official, foreign minister and Leader levels.

Russia – Sanctions and human rights

Supplementary messages

Canada’s sanctions regime

Supplementary messages

Update

On February 18, 2021, Canada imposed sanctions against 9 Myanmar military officials for their role in the February 2021 coup d’état.

On March 22, 2021, Canada imposed sanctions against 4 officials and 1 entity for their role in gross and systematic human rights violations in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR).

In addition, on March 24, Canada imposed sanctions on 9 Russian officials in response to gross and systematic violations of human rights in Russia including related to the attempted murder and subsequent prosecution of Alexey Navalny.

On March 29, 2021, Canada also announced new sanctions on 2 individuals and 4 entities, in response to Russia’s illegal occupation and annexation of Crimea. All the above measures were taken under the Special Economic Measures Act (SEMA).

Saudi Arabia – Human rights

Supplementary messages

Update

[REDACTED]

[REDACTED]

Supporting facts and figures

Background

[REDACTED]

Raif Badawi is a Saudi blogger and activist, who is currently serving a ten-year sentence in Saudi Arabia and former Minister of Justice Irwin Cotler acts as his international legal counsel. [REDACTED]

Loujain Al-Hathloul was arrested in May 2018, along with 11 other women’s rights activists. A prominent and outspoken Saudi human rights defenders, Ms. Al-Hathloul attended UBC as a student. She was convicted of terrorism related offences in December 2020 and sentenced to 5 years and 8 months in prison with a “suspension of 2 years and 10 months of [her] punishment” due to health considerations. In February, she was conditionally released and remains subject to arbitrary arrest and detention at any time; she is barred from leaving Saudi Arabia.

In August 2020, Saad al-Jabri, a former high ranking Saudi intelligence officer and current resident in Canada, filed a lawsuit in US court accusing Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) of seeking to silence or kill him to stop him from undermining the Crown Prince’s relationship with the United States and the Trump administration.

[REDACTED]

Saudi officials perceive Canada’s public engagement on human rights issues as not only an irritant but also an unacceptable interference in domestic affairs.

Saudi Arabia – Bilateral dispute

Supplementary messages

Update

The bilateral relationship has been fractured since August 2018, [REDACTED]. Saudi Arabia’s ongoing human rights violations remain a predominant concern for Canada. In November 2020, Prime Minister Trudeau participated in the virtual G20 Leaders’ Summit hosted by Saudi Arabia.

Human rights in Sri Lanka

Update

Resolution 46/1 was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) on March 23, 2021 with 22 votes in favour, 11 votes against, and 14 abstentions. The new resolution strengthens the capacity of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to collect and preserve information and evidence of crimes related to Sri Lanka’s civil war that ended in 2009. It also requests the OHCHR to enhance its monitoring and reporting on the situation of human rights in Sri Lanka, including the preparation of a comprehensive report with further options for advancing accountability for presentation at the Human Rights Council’s 51st session in September of 2022.

Canada and the international community will consider these options when the OHCHR presents its comprehensive report.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Canada has long supported UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) action on Sri Lanka, including through resolutions 30/1 (2015), 34/1 (2017), and 40/1 (2019). Canada joined the Core Group for the resolution on Sri Lanka at the UNHRC in December 2018, alongside the UK, North Macedonia, Montenegro and Germany. Canada was disappointed when the Government of Sri Lanka withdrew its support from resolution 40/1 and its consensual framework in February of 2020, in favour of a strictly domestic approach to reconciliation. Canada and Core Group partners believe that previous domestic processes have proven insufficient to tackle impunity and deliver real reconciliation. Moreover, there have been recent and worrisome human rights trends in Sri Lanka, including the erosion of democracy through the militarization of civilian government, intervention with the independent judiciary, shrinking space for civil society and media, and concerns over the treatment of minority communities. For these reasons, the Core Group led efforts on a newly-voted resolution keep Sri Lanka on the UNHRC’s agenda at the 46th session from February 22 to March 23, 2021.

Syria consular cases

Supplementary messages

Consular case of a Canadian child

We are aware that a Canadian child exited northeastern Syria into Iraq. The Government of Canada was not involved in securing the child’s exit from northeastern Syria. Once the child was in Iraq, consular assistance was provided to facilitate the child’s travel to Canada. Due to the need to respect the child and their family’s privacy, no further information will be disclosed on this case.

Consular case of orphan child

In October 2020, the Government of Canada provided repatriation assistance on an exceptional basis to a Canadian orphan. The child is now safely back in Canada with their extended family. Due to the need to respect the child and their family’s privacy, no further information will be disclosed on this case.

Update

In March 2021, the exit of a Canadian child from an Internally Displaced Persons camp in northeastern Syria was facilitated by a former U.S. diplomat, with the consent of the child’s mother who remains in detention. The Government of Canada was not involved in this effort aside from providing consular assistance to facilitate the child’s travel from Iraq to Canada.

Background

The Government of Canada is currently aware of a number of Canadian citizens who are being detained by the Syrian Kurds in northeastern Syria. However, Canada closed its mission in Damascus, Syria, in 2012 and currently has no diplomatic representatives in the country. Canada’s ability to provide consular assistance there is therefore extremely limited.

On October 4, 2020, GAC successfully repatriated a child to Canada with the support of the Canadian Armed Forces. [REDACTED] was reunited in Canada with her extended family on October 5, 2020.

Since the repatriation of [REDACTED], GAC has received multiple enquiries from the families of the Canadian detainees asking when and if their loved ones in Kurdish detention will be repatriated to Canada.

Syria crisis and peace talks

Supplementary messages

Update

On April 21, 201, the Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on Chemical Weapons (CWC) voted to revoke Syria’s rights and privileges under the CWC, an unprecedented move in response to Syria’s possession and use of chemical weapons. In January 2021, the Geneva peace talks resumed; however, a lack of meaningful engagement by the regime meant that no progress was made. In Idlib, the March 2020 ceasefire faces daily breaches, despite having endured, largely due to the will of Turkey and Russia.

Syria (ICJ)

Supplementary messages

Background

Canada has supported accountability and transitional justice initiatives to hold the Assad regime, and other parties to the conflict, accountable for human rights violations committed in Syria since at least 2011. These violations of international human rights, including the use of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are well documented, including by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic.

Canada, the Netherlands and the Syrian Arab Republic are among 171 states parties to the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (UNCAT) that prohibits the use of torture.

On September 18, 2020, the Netherlands invoked the UNCAT with respect to Syria’s responsibility for human rights violations, in particular torture, contrary to the state’s obligations under the Convention. Canada has joined the Netherlands as a full partner in its endeavors, which may culminate in bringing a case before the ICJ. On March 4, 2021, Canada announced that it had invited the Syrian Arab Republic to enter into negotiations, pursuant to Article 30(1) of the UNCAT, to find a means of addressing Syria’s treaty violations given the longstanding dispute with the Assad regime.

On March 12, 2021, Canada and the Netherlands issued a joint Ministerial statement to affirm collaboration between the two countries, including a commitment to taking further steps to hold the Assad regime accountable for its violations of the UNCAT, and to demand justice for the victims of the regime’s horrific crimes.

Canada is committed to upholding the rules-based international order, and calls on all States and the international community to join our efforts to hold Syria accountable.

Syrian Civil Defense (White Helmets)

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Syrian Civil Defense (White Helmets) are a group of civilian first responders operating in opposition-held areas of Syria. Small groups of first responders spontaneously emerged in late 2012 to assist civilians injured or trapped due to bombardments by regime forces. In 2014, these teams came together to form a single organisation with a centralized leadership. The White Helmets serve an estimated four million civilians in Syria. To date, they have rescued or aided over 110,000 individuals and their work has earned them nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2015 and 2016. Since the summer of 2018, when the Syrian army retook control of southern Syria, the White Helmets have been limited to operating in northern Syria, principally in the Idlib governorate.

As the White Helmets have witnessed and documented regime and Russian attacks on civilians, the Syrian regime and Russia have labelled the organization as terrorists; they have maintained a vitriolic disinformation campaign alleging ties to extremist groups in Syria, and/or that it is comprised of organ traffickers or western agents. Canada, and other like-minded nations, have continued to express support for the White Helmets and defend their legitimacy as impartial and non-belligerent.

The White Helmets are dependent on funding from international donors to maintain the civil defence services they provide to communities in northwest Syria. As the White Helmets do not have the administrative capacity to manage funding from multiple donors, they have relied on partnerships with other organizations. Current donors include the US, UK, Denmark and Germany. The White Helmets also receive some support from various other sources, including a $1M grant from Grand Challenges Canada (2020) to support the White Helmets’ COVID-19 response.

[REDACTED]

Following the July 2018 evacuation of over 400 vulnerable White Helmets from southern Syria, they and their families were brought to Jordan to await onward resettlement in a number of countries, including Canada, the United Kingdom and Germany. The Government of Canada continues to systematically pursue different resettlement options for a number of White Helmets and their families currently in Jordan.

Ukraine – Russian aggression and NATO membership

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA)

Supplementary messages

Update

In January and February of 2021, reports brought to the attention of Canada and other donors to UNRWA claimed that certain educational materials used by UNRWA for ‘self-learning’ during pandemic-related school closures violated UN values. UNRWA has since assessed those materials and taken corrective actions. The Minister of International Development and Canadian officials are working closely with partners and UNRWA’s senior management to address the issue of problematic educational materials, and to help ensure that UN values are upheld and that UNRWA takes further corrective actions, as needed, in this regard.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Since 1948, UNRWA has been the only UN organization mandated to provide basic services to over five million Palestinian refugees in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. UNRWA is almost entirely funded through voluntary contributions by international donors and has faced a significant funding shortfall partly as a result of growing needs, falling contributions, and a volatile environment. UNRWA's Program Budget (education, health and social services) and its Emergency Appeals for humanitarian assistance are currently facing deficits. Without significant additional resources, services may need to be cut, leading to negative humanitarian consequences.

Canada-United States relations

Supplementary messages

Update

You met with Secretary Blinken on February 26, 2021 and agreed to coordinate on a number of global challenges, including China. On May 5, you had a pull aside with Secretary Blinken on the margins of the G7 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting. You provided background on Line 5 and highlighted Canada’s decision to file an amicus brief in support of Enbridge’s position.

On April 21, PM Trudeau had a call with President Biden ahead of the Climate Leaders’ Summit hosted by the U.S. on April 22-23. The two leaders highlighted the importance of increased global ambition in the fight against climate change, and discussed the ongoing vaccination efforts in both countries, as well as the economic recovery and the importance of the G7 in protecting our shared values. PM Trudeau also thanked President Biden for its support and efforts in securing the release of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor.

The North American Leaders’ Summit will be an important milestone in rebuilding alliances. The U.S. has indicated that a NALS is not likely before the G7 meeting in June, but the summertime frame may still be a possibility.

Supporting facts and figures (Statistics in Canadian Dollars)

Background

Border management: On April 21, the temporary border arrangement between Canada and the U.S. was extended through May 21, 2021. In the “Roadmap for a Renewed U.S.-Canada Partnership”, Prime Minister Trudeau and President Biden recognized that coordinated border policies remain central to controlling COVID-19 and new variants, while promoting economic growth and recovery. Both leaders agreed to take a coordinated approach based on science and public health criteria when considering measures to ease Canada-U.S. border restrictions in the future.

S&T and Innovation: The U.S. has proposed that both our countries conclude a legally-binding bilateral science, technology and innovation (STI) treaty. Canada’s large, complex and multi-sectorial S&T relationship with the U.S. has grown organically over time, with Canadian federal and other departments and agencies having developed their own partnership arrangements with counterparts in all corners of the United States. The proposed treaty would provide an overarching framework under which these relationships could continue to grow and develop. Exploratory talks with the U.S. concerning such a treaty have begun. If Cabinet approves a negotiating mandate, formal negotiations to finalize a treaty could begin in the fall.

Bilateral economic priorities

Supporting facts and figures

Background

PM Trudeau and President Biden met on February 23, 2021 and committed to the Roadmap for a Renewed U.S.-Canada Partnership, a cornerstone of a whole-of- government approach to Canada-U.S. relations. Economically, it prioritizes building back better to address the disproportionate impacts on women and underrepresented groups, and considers the impact of the pandemic on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). The leaders also launched a strategy to strengthen Canada-U.S. supply chain security.

Canada and the U.S. are increasing public climate-resilient and green infrastructure spending as a means to spur economic recovery after COVID-19. President Biden’s US$2 trillion green infrastructure and clean energy plan calls for investments in clean energy technologies and infrastructure, new electric vehicle charging stations, battery manufacturing, and foreign investment. Canadian firms have significant experience building and operating some of the world’s largest renewable energy plants through developers, engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and suppliers.

CUSMA entered into force on July 1, 2020, reinforcing the strong trilateral economic ties and enhancing North American competitiveness. Recently, parties have focused on implementing the auto rules of origin and the standing CUSMA committees, including those on SMEs and North American competitiveness. Canada has devoted $27.5 million over 4 years, beginning in April 2021, to support Mexican labour reform programming and establish a monitoring and compliance regime. The U.S. has appropriated US$180 million for programming to support similar efforts in Mexico. Canadian and U.S. officials engage regularly to coordinate their efforts.

Bilateral economic priorities

Update

CUSMA entered into force on July 1, 2020, reinforcing the strong trilateral economic ties and enhancing North American competitiveness. Recently, parties have focused on implementing the auto rules of origin and preparation for the first Free Trade Commission meeting from May 17 to18, 2021.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

On February 23, 2021, PM Trudeau and President Biden committed to the Roadmap for a Renewed U.S.-Canada Partnership, a cornerstone of a whole-of-government approach to Canada-U.S. relations. Economically, it prioritizes building back better to address the disproportionate impacts on women and underrepresented groups, and considers the impact of the pandemic on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). The leaders also launched a strategy to strengthen Canada-U.S. supply chain security.

Canada and the U.S. are increasing public spending on climate-resilient and green infrastructure as a means to spur economic recovery. President Biden’s US$2 trillion green infrastructure and clean energy plan calls for investments in clean energy technologies and infrastructure, new electric vehicle charging stations, battery manufacturing, and foreign investment. Canadian firms have significant experience building and operating some of the world’s largest renewable energy plants through developers, engineering firms, equipment manufacturers and suppliers.

Buy American and Buy America

Supplementary messages

Background

Buy American requirements were first established during the U.S. Great Depression and are set out in the Buy American Act of 1933, which mandates that all federal government departments purchase only U.S. goods. Canada is exempt from Buy American requirements as a result of our respective obligations under the revised WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA).

However, Canada is not exempt from Buy America requirements. Since 1982, Buy America requirements have applied to the purchase of iron, steel and manufactured goods used in state/local infrastructure projects funded – in whole or in part – by certain U.S. federal departments and agencies (mainly the Department of Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency). In addition, procurement of rolling stock (e.g., buses, subway cars, vehicles) requires 70% U.S. domestic content and final assembly in the U.S. to be considered Buy America compliant. As federal transfers or grants to lower levels of government are not covered by the U.S. under the GPA, imposing Buy America requirements is consistent with U.S. trade obligations.

There is broad bipartisan support for Buy America policies in the U.S. and it is expected that President Biden will add existing, or potentially expanded, Buy America requirements to the projects funded by the American Jobs Plan, which will invest US$2 trillion over 8 years in physical and green infrastructure, workforce development, and the caregiving economy. This initiative, which would be the subject of new legislation, could particularly impact Canadian companies supplying products for:

The federal government is engaging the U.S. Administration, members of Congress, allies at the sub-national level and in the U.S. business and labour communities, to advocate for a Canada-U.S. approach to the U.S. infrastructure package. A strong Team Canada approach will be required to advance Canada’s interests.

Canada-U.S. relations and roadmap

Supplementary messages

Trade

Climate and energy

International security and foreign policy

Inclusion and respect for diversity

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Roadmap for a Renewed U.S.-Canada Partnership prioritizes:

Central American migration

Canada-U.S. vaccine cooperation

Update

The White House announced on April 26, 2021, that the U.S. will share its entire pipeline of AstraZeneca vaccines with Canada – with 10 million doses available immediately and an additional 50 million scheduled for delivery between May and June.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

On January 21, 2021, President Biden signed an Executive Order titled “Sustainable Public Health Supply Chain” to direct authorities to secure supplies necessary to respond to domestic needs related to COVID-19, including the authorities of the Defense Production Act (DPA).

Since the issuance of this Order, the Biden Administration has invoked the DPA to increase production of vaccines by U.S. manufacturers. U.S. Government priority- rated orders do not explicitly prohibit exports. However, once a U.S. company has been issued a DPA-rated order from the U.S. government, it is legally bound to comply in fulfilling that order on a priority basis. A supplier can continue to fill other orders while working on a priority-rated order if its supplies are sufficient, in accordance with the details of the Order.

Canada has an exemption to export restrictions of certain medical products under the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), valid until June 30, 2021. These restrictions do not cover COVID vaccines.

In March of 2021, the U.S. Government exported 1.5 million AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine doses to Canada, which counted as part of Canada’s 20 million doses secured through a bilateral agreement with AstraZeneca.

Line 5

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Line 5 is a pipeline operating safely since 1953, carrying light crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs) from Alberta and Saskatchewan to Michigan and Ontario. Connecting pipelines transport these resources further to Quebec, Ohio and Pennsylvania. A shutdown of the Line 5 would cause significant economic disruption.

On November 13, 2020, Michigan announced that it was revoking Enbridge’s 1953 authorization (‘easement’) to operate its Line 5 pipeline through the Straits of Mackinac, which connect Lakes Michigan and Huron. Citing alleged violations of the easement agreement by Enbridge, which Michigan sees as an unacceptable oil spill risk, the company was given until May 12 to cease operations. The Governor has filed a legal claim seeking a state court decision to validate this action. Enbridge has filed a suit against Michigan in federal U.S. District Court, seeking to remove the case from State to federal jurisdiction. The state court case is in abeyance, awaiting a decision from federal court. The federal court has set aside all considerations and motions, with the exception of Michigan’s motion to remand the case to state court.

On February 17, the federal court judge set a briefing schedule for one procedural motion, whether to remand the case to state court, whereby all action is suspended until the federal court determines jurisdiction. Filings of pleadings may run until June 2, 2021, after Michigan’s stipulated shutdown date of May 12. The federal court judge ordered Enbridge and Michigan to enter into mediation to see if they might reach a settlement, thereby rendering court proceedings unnecessary. A mediator has been announced, with the first meeting to take place on April 16, [Update] after which they will report out a meeting schedule to the judge. Any mediation outcome is non-binding.

Canada’s advocacy in support of Line 5 has been ongoing for several years, led primarily by the Consulate General in Detroit. The Consulate General in New York has also joined the advocacy activities to cover a refinery in western Pennsylvania. In addition, Canada’s current and former ambassadors have had discussions with Governor Whitmer.

UN Security Council (UNSC) campaign costs

Supplementary messages

Venezuela

Supplementary messages

Update

The September 2020 report from the UN Fact Finding Mission on Venezuela found that high-ranking individuals in the Maduro regime have committed crimes against humanity, including forced disappearances, arbitrary detentions, torture and extra- judicial killings. An oral update from the Fact-Finding Mission on March 10, 2021, reported that there have been at least 200 killings by police since the beginning of this year.

On June 17, 2021, Minister Gould will host the International Donor’s Conference in Solidarity with Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants to raise awareness and support for the nearly 5.6 million Venezuelan refugees and migrants who have left the country since 2015.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

In Venezuela, the humanitarian situation continues to deteriorate as millions of people face food insecurity, shortages of fuel and other basic goods, a deteriorating health care system, and hyper-inflation.

Since 2019, Canada has committed a total of $86 million in response to the Venezuela crisis (as of December 31, 2020). Included in this amount is over $74 million in humanitarian and development assistance to support regional responses to the migrant and refugee crisis.

Yemen

Supplementary messages

Update

Despite the UN Secretary-General’s call for a global ceasefire, efforts for a nationwide ceasefire in Yemen have not materialized. The security situation remains extremely concerning following a renewed escalation in violence since early 2020. The overall humanitarian situation is deteriorating due to the spread of COVID-19. UN Special Envoy Martin Griffiths continues engaging in negotiations with the parties, though little progress has been made since the Stockholm Agreement in December 2018.

Supporting facts and figures

Date modified: