¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ

Language selection

Search

Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Deputy Minister of International Development, Deputy Minister of International Trade, and Associate Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs before the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (AEFA)

2022-06-09

Table of contents

  1. Background Information
    1. Scenario Note
    2. Modernizing Canada’s Diplomacy - Concept Note
    3. AEFA Members’ Biographies
  2. Our People
    1. Hybrid Work & the Future of Work
    2. Talent Management & Skills Development
    3. Foreign Service Skills Development
    4. Foreign Language Training
    5. Diversity, Inclusion & Gender Equality
    6. Official languages
    7. Staffing
    8. LES
    9. Conditions of the Foreign Service (enabling rotationality)
    10. Wellbeing
  3. Our Policy Capacity and Core Responsibilities
    1. Global Trends & Drivers of Diplomacy
    2. International Advocacy and Diplomacy
    3. Evidence Based Foreign Policy Analysis
    4. Delivering, Measuring & Reporting on Results
    5. Trade and Investment
    6. Development, Peace and Security Programming
    7. Help for Canadians Abroad
  4. Our Technological and Digital Capacity
    1. Digital and Data Strategy
    2. Innovation and Experimentation
    3. Managing Risks – IT and broader issues
  5. Our Global Presence
    1. Global Footprint & Services - International Platform
    2. Property, Infrastructure & Technology
  6. Additional Materials
    1. Chart – GAC Attrition Rates
    2. Chart – Rotational Pools
    3. USS HR Fact Sheet
    4. Q & A

Appearance before the senate committee on foreign affairs and international trade

Study on the canadian foreign service and elements of the foreign policy machinery within global affairs Canada, and on other related matters

A. Background Information

Meeting scenario

Other relevant appearance request

The committee invited all three GAC Ministers to appear at the committee’s subsequent meetings in June. Those dates did not work for Ministers. This may be revisited in the fall.

Committee context

Committee membership & intrests

Modernizing Canada’s Diplomacy - Concept Note

1. Context

In his Mandate Letter from 16 December 2021, Prime Minister Trudeau directed Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mélanie Joly, “to advance Canada’s interests and values in a world facing increasingly complex threats and issues, (…) by, amongst other things, strengthening Canada’s diplomatic capacity”.

On February 24, 2022, Senator Boehm put forward a motion, adopted by the Senate, authorizing the Standing Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (AEFA), that he chairs, to examine and report “on the Canadian foreign service and elements of the foreign policy machinery within ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ, and on other related matters; and that the committee submit its final report no later than March 30, 2023, and that it retain all powers necessary to publicize its findings for 180 days after the tabling of the final report.”

Under the leadership of the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ (GAC) is undertaking an internal review of targeted aspects of its organization and policy framework to modernize and strengthen Canada’s capacity to engage globally so that the department remains well equipped to fulfill its mandate in the long term, in a rapidly changing world. This concept note outlines the scope, path, and ambition of this review process.

The Minister of Foreign Affairs will be regularly briefed on progress, and is expected to communicate early in the process her engagement, expectations and commitment.

2. Initial Diagnostic

A complex and destabilizing global landscape has repercussions for Canada’s international agenda. The international forces, dynamics and agreed set of rules, laws, norms and institutions that have shaped the world for the last 75 years are at genuine inflection points. Canada finds itself navigating turbulent and contested geopolitical waters, as the global order and the power distribution within it are in the midst of a recalibration, the outcome of which remains ambiguous and uncertain. A snapshot of this moment in time reveals that we confront sequential, compounding, overlapping and acute crises, placing our domestic and international governance systems in a state of perpetual stress testing.

Canada’s capacity to engage globally currently faces a number of opportunities and challenges that call for its modernization, including:

The department is increasingly asked to respond to situations and events that are without precedent, using tools, structures and processes born from, and designed for, a different time.

Protecting and advancing our national interests and values in today’s world, including in the areas of security, political, consular, trade and development, hinges upon our ability to engage with and influence the decisions and conduct of foreign governments, regional and international organizations, as well as a growing number of non-state actors in a variety of contexts. Canada needs to retain and build its capacity to exert influence on the international scene.

3. Scope & Objectives:

This exercise is not a comprehensive review of the department. It will focus on four different pillars:

  1. a) Our people: Ensuring we are able to recruit, retain and develop a diverse workforce with the right leadership qualities and skill sets to meet the global challenges of today and tomorrow. Putting in place effective mechanisms and systems to build expertise and knowledge, as well as deploy and reallocate strategically our human resources, especially in times of crises.
  2. b) Our policy capacity: Ensuring we have the capacity to anticipate and identify opportunities and challenges to advance and protect Canadian interests, as well as to address emerging policy challenges. Ensuring our workforce and diplomats have the tools and programs to support their work, and effectively engage with stakeholders in policy development.
  3. c) Our technological and digital capacity: Ensuring we have the digital tools, infrastructure and sustainable funding we need to project our interests and values in an increasingly virtual world, have access to data and analytics to maximize data-driven decision-making and insights on global issues, and can safeguard information and networks from cyber threats.
  4. d) Our global presence: Ensuring we have the capacity and an effective process in place to assess and adjust our global presence on an ongoing basis to meet emerging challenges and opportunities and to ensure alignment with our strategic interests.

Across all four pillars, the exercise will ensure strong communication and build coherence across the trade, development, foreign policy and consular portfolios of the department. Departmental efforts underway including, but not limited to, those related to equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI), mission of the future, digital and data strategies, financial sustainability, and the future of work, will inform, shape and provide input to this exercise.

4. Governance:

The Associate Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, supported by the Assistant Deputy Minister for Strategic Policy, will lead the review effort, under the direction of the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs.

An Advisory Council will be convened by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs to provide input into, and feedback on, the review on a quarterly basis.

An ADM Steering Group will regularly review progress and provide guidance on the exercise, its key findings and recommendations. This ADM-level Steering Committee will include: Strategic Policy (PFM) as Chair, Human Resources (HCM), Corporate Planning, Finance and Information Technology (SCM), International Platform (ACM), International Business Development, Investment and Innovation (Chief Trade Commissioner) (BFM), Sub-Saharan Africa Branch (WGM), and Americas (NGM) – as the home of Mission Support Bureau (NMD).

A small, dedicated and multidisciplinary team housed within the Strategic Policy Branch, under the Foreign Policy Bureau (POD), is being assembled to support this project. The team will be working in close partnership with their working level colleagues across the five above-mentioned branches, as well as all other branches across the department, in consultation with missions abroad, when needed.

Please refer to Annex A for further elaboration on governance aspects of the project.

5. Communication and Consultations:

An Executive Committee (ExCo) retreat on April 29 was the first step in terms of departmental communication, to be followed by early communication with staff through a broadcast message. The latter will provide information about the project and explain its parameters. Dialogues with employees, missions and departmental champions, including the Anti-Racism Secretariat and equity, diversity and inclusion networks, will take place throughout the project.

Consultations with partner departments will also be essential, given their growing engagement abroad and the global nature of an increasing number of domestic issues, such as health, environment, agriculture, migration and security.

The department will also actively participate in the Senate AEFA study.

Dialogues with Canadian stakeholders will also inform the modernization review, including think tanks, experts, scholars, former Canadian senior officials and Head of Missions, business and NGOs.

Finally, consultations will also be undertaken with other foreign ministries that are undergoing or have recently undergone similar reviews, and/or offer comparative models for service delivery.

6. Timelines/ Critical Path:

The project commenced in April 2022 and is slated to be completed within one year. The first presentation of the project to the GAC ExCo took place April 29.

Internal and external dialogues and consultations are expected to start in late May 2022. Following the official launch of the project with employees by Deputy Ministers.

[REDACTED].

Progress reports, which may include interim findings, will be provided to ExCo, GAC Deputy Ministers, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, on a regular basis.

The aim is to develop a draft report for GAC Deputy Ministers’ consideration [REDACTED].

[REDACTED].

Please refer to Annex B for a detailed critical path

7. Resources:

This review will be undertaken within existing departmental resources. Efforts will be made to identify opportunities for reallocation to address resource requirements that may be identified as part of this exercise. Some of the recommendations emanating from the review will likely require additional resources if they are to be implemented.

ANNEX A – Governance and Partners

Text version

Core Team: DMA, PFM POD Team, ADM Steering Group, departmental strategies underway

Executive Leadership and Legislative: PMO, MINA, Senate and Parliamentary processes

Canadian Stakeholders: Canadian think tanks, experts, scholars, former Canadian HOMs, former GAC senior officials, business, NGOs, etc.

GoC: OGDs, GAC networks, employee associations/unions

Foreign Partners: Consultations with foreign partners undertaking similar reviews and/or modernization efforts

Executive Bodies: ExCo, DM4, DMCC, P&PC

Advisory Council

[REDACTED]

Consultations will include:

AEFA Members’ Biographies

Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade (AEFA)
44th Parliament – First Session
December 2021 to Present

CHAIR

Peter Boehm
(ISG – Ontario)

Deputy Chair

Peter Harder
(PSG – Ontario)

2nd Deputy Chair

Michael L. MacDonald
(CPC – Cape Breton, NS)

Members

Stephen Greene
(CSG – Nova Scotia)

Gwen Boniface
(ISG – Ontario)

Victor Oh
(C – Ontario)

David Richards
(CSG – New Brunswick)

Marty Deacon
(ISG – Ontario – Waterloo Region)

Mary Coyle
(ISG – Nova Scotia)

Amina Gerba
(PSG – Quebec)

Mohamed-Iqbal Ravalia
(ISG- Newfoundland- Labrador)

Yuen Pau Woo
(ISG – British Colombia)

Order for Questioning:

Unlike the House of Commons, there is no specific order of questions. While the opening remarks are being given, members catch the eye of the Clerk, indicating they wish to be added to the list to ask questions. Any Senator, even if they are not a member of the committee, has the right to attend the meeting, sit at the table and ask questions. These non-committee members may not vote, however, votes at Senate committees are very rare.

Witnesses typically have 10 minutes each for their opening remarks, but the Chair will often request witnesses to keep opening remarks to 5 minutes if appearing alongside other witnesses providing opening remarks.

Mandate:

The Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade studies and reports on legislation referred to it by the House of Commons. The committee usually initiates at least one major study at a time that can last more than a year. In addition to motions that allow for a specific topic of study, the committee will always have a broad motion that allows short studies of one or two meetings as “global issues develop”.

The general subject area of the committee includes the following:

The federal departments and crown corporations under the committee’s direct scrutiny are:

Peter Boehm
(ISG – Ontario)
Date of nomination: 2018-10-03
Date of retirement: 2029-04-26

PETER BOEHM
Key Interests
Notable Committee Memberships

Member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Born in Kitchener, Ontario, Senator Boehm holds a PhD in history from the University of Edinburgh, a Master of Arts in international affairs from the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University and a Bachelor of Arts in English and History from Wilfrid Laurier University.

He was Deputy Minister for the G-7 Summit and Personal Representative of the Prime Minister (Sherpa) from July 2017, until his retirement from the Public Service in September 2018. Peter Boehm had previously been Deputy Minister of International Development, Associate, and, subsequently, Senior Associate Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs. From 2013 to 2017, he concurrently served as Sherpa for the G-8 and subsequent G-7 Summits, as well as the Nuclear Security Summit.

A former career Foreign Service officer, he served as Ambassador to Germany from 2008 to 2012 and previously as Assistant Deputy Minister for the Americas, North America and Consular Affairs. Abroad, he was Minister (political and public affairs) at the Embassy of Canada to the United States in Washington and Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the Organization of American States. He has held a variety of diplomatic positions including assignments in Cuba and Costa Rica.

Senator Boehm is not in support of Motion No. 36 to Motion to Call Upon the Government to Condemn the Joint Azerbaijani-Turkish Aggression Against the Republic of Artsakh.

Peter Harder
(PSG—Ontario)
Date of nomination: 2016-03-23
Date of retirement: 2027-08-25

PETER HARDER
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Senator Harder entered the Senate in March 2016 where he served as the Government Representative from April 2016 until January 2020.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Harder arrived in the Senate with nearly 30 years of experience in the Federal Public Service, including in the departments of immigration, public safety, industry, the treasury board and foreign affairs.

Senator Harder was born in Winnipeg but grew up in Vineland, Ont., in the Niagara Region. His parents, refugees from the former USSR, owned a local grocery store where he worked as a teen. He studied political science at the University of Waterloo before moving to Ottawa to work as a parliamentary intern. After completing graduate studies at Queen’s University, he joined the Foreign Service in 1977, and soon after served as an assistant to then-Minister Flora MacDonald. He then served as Chief of Staff to the Rt. Hon. Joe Clark, then Leader of the Opposition and, subsequently, the Deputy Prime Minister in the first government of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.

Senator Harder served as the founding Executive Director of the Immigration and Refugee Board. He was first appointed as Deputy Minister in 1991 – a role he eventually would play under five different prime ministers and 12 ministers, including in the departments of immigration, public safety, industry, treasury board and foreign affairs.

Victor Oh
(CPC—Mississauga, Ontario)
Date of nomination: 2013-01-25
Date of retirement: 2024-06-10

VICTOR OH
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

He is a member of the Canada-China Legislative Association.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Victor Oh is a proud Canadian of Chinese heritage. He immigrated to Canada from Singapore in 1978 Since then, he has been an active community leader and a resident of Mississauga, Ontario. As a prominent member of the Chinese-Canadian community, Mr. Oh has devoted himself to promoting multiculturalism in addition to helping newcomers establish themselves in Canada and start their own businesses.

Mr. Oh is the founding Chairman of the Canada-China Business Communication Council and President of Wyford Holdings. He also serves as a member of the Board of Governors of Sheridan College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning. He is the former President of Mississauga Chinese Business Association and former Co-chair of the Confederation of Greater Toronto Chinese Business Association.

Over the years, Mr. Oh has been recognized for his contributions to Ontario and Canada. He was awarded the Robert Boyne Memorial Award by the Peel Regional Police Services Board in 2007 and the prestigious Citation for Citizenship (now known as Canada’s Citizenship Awards) by the Government of Canada in 2008, in recognition of his outstanding role in promoting the value of citizenship and helping newcomers integrate into Canadian society. In 2010, Mr. Oh became the first Chinese in 26 years to receive a Tribute Dinner by the Community Living Foundation of Mississauga. In 2011, the Canadian Immigrant magazine named him one of the top 25 Canadian immigrants.

Michael L. Macdonald
(CPC —Cape Breton, Ns)
Date of nomination: 2009-01-02
Date of retirement: 2030-05-04

MICHAEL L. MACDONALD
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

He is the Co-chair of the Canada-US Inter-Parliamentary Group and Treasurer of the Canada-Korea Inter- Parliamentary Friendship Group.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

The Honourable Michael L. MacDonald is a Nova Scotia businessman and long-time Conservative activist He is the youngest of 10 children in a family with ancestral roots to some of Cape Breton’s earliest settlers.

Senator MacDonald attended King’s College at Dalhousie University in Halifax, graduating in 1977 with an honours degree in political science. He first came to Ottawa in 1978, working as a researcher in the Progressive Conservative Research Office until 1980. Returning to Nova Scotia, he worked in the office of the Hon. Gerald Sheehy (1980-82), and later served as Executive Assistant to Premier John Buchanan (1982-84). Thereafter, returning to parliament hill, he served as Executive Assistant to the Hon. Tom McMillan (1984-85), and later to the Hon. Stewart McInnes (1985-87).

Since 1988, he has been the President and owner of the Fortress Inn Louisbourg, a motel and restaurant complex near his family home in Cape Breton.

He ran twice for federal office, first in 1988, in the riding of Cape Breton-East Richmond, and again in 2004, running in Dartmouth-Cole Harbour. He also ran twice provincially for the Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative Party in 1993 and 1998.

Until his appointment to the Upper House, Senator MacDonald served as Vice-President of the Conservative Party of Canada, and the Party’s National Councillor for Nova Scotia.

He has also maintained an active role in the Nova Scotia community – coaching minor hockey and baseball, raising funds for cystic fibrosis research, as well as supporting various organizations to promote and preserve Nova Scotia heritage and the Gaelic language.

Mary Coyle
(ISG—Nova Scotia)
Date of nomination: 2017-12-04
Date of retirement: 2029-11-05

MARY COYLE
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Coyle holds a diploma in French language from the Université de Besançon in France and a Bachelor of Arts in languages and literature with a major in French and a minor in Spanish from the University of Guelph. After working for the Ministry of Commerce and Industry as a Cuso International Cooperant in Botswana, she earned a Master of Arts in rural planning and development at the University of Guelph. She subsequently worked as a Rural Development Advisor in Indonesia and later to support two State Islamic Universities develop their community engagement strategies.

In 1997, she joined St. Francis Xavier University, serving as Vice President and Director of the school’s Coady International Institute and in 2014, she became the Executive Director of the Frank McKenna Centre for Leadership.

Senator Coyle is the sponsor of Bill S-2, An Act to amend the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act. Bill S-2 seeks to amend Canada’s Chemical Weapons Implementation Act to align with the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons, otherwise known as the Chemical Weapons Convention, or CWC.

Marty Deacon
(ISG – Ontario, Waterloo Region)
Date of nomination: 2018-02-15
Date of retirement: 2033-04-23

MARTY DEACON
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Prior to serving in the Senate, Senator Deacon completed a 35-year career in education. As an Educator with a Master in Education (Western University), she taught (physics, science, physical & health education) in secondary schools (Waterloo Region District School Board), at two universities (University of Toronto, Western University), was a consultant, and an administrator at the elementary and secondary school levels. Deacon finished her career in education as Superintendent. Senator Deacon presently serves as Director on the Canadian Olympic Committee, Commonwealth Games Canada, Ontario Excellence Leadership Centre and the Grand River Jazz Society.

Senator Deacon is most passionate about the physical and mental well-being of all Canadians. She is an advocate for the future of women and young girls and children, worldwide. She has mentored and supported leaders in developing countries with a belief that sport, arts and education can build better communities, one community at a time. Senator Deacon is dedicated to ensuring organizations can thrive and function at optimal levels. She has assisted with developing governance and policies that allows this to happen in a meaningful, purposeful and respectful way.

Stephen Greene
(CSG—The Citadel, Halifax, Ns)
Date of nomination: 2005-01-02
Date of retirement: 2024-12-08

STEPHEN GREENE
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Greene was a candidate for the Reform Party in the 1993 and 1997 federal elections. He also served as Chief of Staff to Preston Manning of the Reform Party of Canada from 1993 to 1996. In 2006, he became Principal Secretary and Deputy Chief of Staff to Nova Scotia Premier Rodney MacDonald.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Greene was born in Montreal and went to high school in Lorne Park, Mississauga, Ontario. He has an honours BA from McMaster University and an MA from Dalhousie University. He lives in Halifax. Senator Greene worked at the Canadian embassy in Washington D.C. where he was asked to report on how the United States made its fisheries policies in the aftermath of the 200 mile limit. Subsequently, he managed the government relations of H.B. Nickerson & Sons Limited.

While in the fishing industry, he was asked to return to the Foreign Service. He was sent to the Canadian Consulate in Boston where he managed the new boundary in the Gulf of Maine. He subsequently joined Clearwater Fine Foods, Inc. Under his guidance, the Canadian fishery adopted a system of transferable property rights, which enabled investment to thrive.

Senator Greene served as Chief of Staff to Preston Manning of the Reform Party of Canada from 1993 to 1996. He subsequently worked in the insurance industry and became engaged in national and international insurance issues.

Amina Gerba
(PSG— Riguad,Quebec)
Date of nomination: 2021-07-29
Date of retirement: 2036-03-13

AMINA GERBA
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Senator Gerba is a member of the Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association and the Canada-France Inter-Parliamentary Association.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Hailing from Cameroon, Senator Gerba worked for a number of Canadian companies from 1993 to 1995, with a focus on the development of African markets. In 1995, she started her own consulting firm, Afrique Expansion Inc., in order to build bridges between Canada and Africa, and encourage business opportunities. Since then, she has created and managed other businesses, including Flash Beauté Inc. and Kariliss Laboratories Inc., as well as the non-profit organization Forum Afrique Expansion.

From February 2018 until her appointment as an independent Senator in the Parliament of Canada in July 2021, Senator Gerba was Chair of the Board of Directors of Entreprendre ici, an organization set up as part of Quebec’s 2017-2022 Plan d’action gouvernemental en entrepreneuriat to support entrepreneurs from cultural communities. A very socially engaged woman, Senator Gerba has served on several public and private boards, including the Université du Québec à Montréal and its Executive Committee. She is a member and former President of the Rotary Club of Old Montreal, and a mentor for the Réseau des entrepreneurs et professionnels africains.

Senator Gerba holds a bachelor’s degree in business administration and a Master of Business Administration from the Université du Québec à Montréal. She is the mother of four children: Ali, Aïcha, Habi, and Kiari, and a grandmother of three.

Gwen Boniface
(ISG— Ontario)
Date of nomination: 2016-11-10
Date of retirement: 2030-08-05

GWEN BONIFACE
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

She is a member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association and the Canadian Delegation to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Parliamentary Assembly.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Boniface initiated a truth and reconciliation project in her home community of Orillia in 2019 with Indigenous and non-Indigenous members. The initiative has grown and continues to evolve through regular meetings with local Elders and community stakeholders. She has dedicated her efforts in the Senate to address human trafficking, ending domestic violence and curbing the opioid crisis. In November of 2021, she introduced a Senate public bill entitled Bill S-232: An Act respecting the development of a national strategy for the decriminalization of illegal substances, to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.

Prior to Senator Boniface’s appointment to the Upper Chamber, she served internationally for 10 years, including as Deputy Chief Inspector of Ireland’s Garda Síochána Inspectorate tasked with reforming Ireland’s national Police Service, as a Transnational Organized Crime Expert with the United Nations Police Division and as Deputy Executive Director of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Senator Boniface was the first female Commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police and is a past President of the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police. Ms. Boniface served with Law Commission of Canada for 5 years as a Commissioner.

David Richards
(CSG—New Brunswick)
Date of nomination: 2017-08-30
Date of retirement: 2025-10-17

DAVID RICHARDS
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

David Adams Richards is an acclaimed Canadian novelist, essayist, screenwriter and poet, whose commitment to the Miramichi River valley, his province, and the country is reflected in his body of work. His writings, through which he gives voices to the marginalized and helps to deepen the reader’s understanding of the human experience, have been translated into 12 languages, and are part of the curriculum of Canadian and U.S. universities.

Mr. Richards has been a writer-in-residence at several universities and colleges across Canada and has received honorary doctorates from three New Brunswick universities and the Atlantic School of Theology. He is one of only three writers to have won in both the fiction and non-fiction categories of the Governor General’s Literary Award. He was a co-winner of the 2000 Giller Prize for his novel Mercy Among the Children and has received numerous other prestigious awards, including the Canada-Australia Literary Prize, two Gemini Awards for scriptwriting, the Alden Nowlan Award for Excellence in the Arts, the Canadian Authors Association Award and the 2011 Matt Cohen Award for a distinguished lifetime of contribution to Canadian literature.

In 2007, he was awarded the regional Commonwealth Writers’ Prize award. He is a member of the Order of New Brunswick and the Order of Canada. The Writers’ Union of New Brunswick and St. Thomas University have established annual awards in Mr. Richards’ name.

Yuen Pau Woo
(ISG—British Columbia)
Date of nomination: 2016-11-10
Date of retirement: 2038-03-02

YUEN PAU WOO
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Senator Woo served as the ISG Facilitator 2017-2021.

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Woo has worked on public policy issues related to Canada’s relations with Asian countries for more than 30 years. From 2005-2014, he was President and CEO of the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, where he continues to serve as Distinguished East Asia Fellow. He is also a Senior Fellow at Simon Fraser University’s Graduate School of Business, and at the School of Public Policy and Global Affairs at the University of British Columbia. He is a member of the Trilateral Commission and on the board of the Vancouver Academy of Music. He also serves on the Advisory Boards of the Mosaic Institute, the Canadian Ditchley Foundation, and the York Centre for Asian Research.

Mohamed-iqbal Ravalia
(ISG—Newfoundland And Labrador)
Date of nomination: 2018-06-01
Date of retirement: 2032-08-15

MOHAMED-IQBAL RAVALIA
Key Interests
Parliamentary Roles

Member of the Canada-Europe Parliamentary Association

Notable Committee Memberships
Background

Senator Ravalia is a respected physician, medical educator and has strong community ties to Twillingate, NL.

Senator Ravalia was born and raised in the southern African country of Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe). He immigrated to Canada in 1984 and practiced family medicine in Twillingate, NL until his appointment to the Senate in June 2018.

Senator Ravalia attended the Godfrey Huggins School of Medicine in Rhodesia where he earned his medical degree (MB.ChB.) in 1980. He completed his Certification in Family Medicine (CCFP) in 1992. He is currently a Fellow of the College of Family Physicians of Canada (FCFP). His community engagement has included involvement with the local minor hockey executive, community outreach initiatives, and fundraising for the Lions Club and support of the Anglican Church Sunday school program.

B. Our People

Hybrid Work & the Future of Work

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The future of work at GAC will be characterized by innovation and the embracing of digital tools; new attitudes that prioritize organizational culture and job satisfaction; and greater efforts to advance inclusivity, diversity, and equity. Employees will increasingly look for the flexibility offered by hybrid models, which will need to be balanced against departmental needs and talent management considerations.

Harnessing ideas and feedback generated from comprehensive employee outreach, as well as through outreach to other foreign ministries, GAC is examining a host of crosscutting issues, including employee well-being and morale; talent and performance management; evolving learning and training needs; diversity, equity and inclusion; and achieving a coherent approach across GAC’s many different business lines.

Looking ahead, GAC’s transformation agenda envisions a re-examination of:

Talent Management

Supporting facts and figures

Background

HR has since been developing tools and improved communication products to support employees and managers with performance and talent management.

Foreign Service Skills Development

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Canadian Foreign Service Institute (CFSI) provides learning programs and services in the areas of international affairs, intercultural effectiveness, international assistance, global leadership, international and domestic operations, and foreign languages. The focus of the training is on developing staff competency to promote individual and organizational excellence. Priority is afforded to the alignment of learning activities with key departmental objectives and core responsibilities and to promote the development of international competencies: intercultural proficiency; influence and alliance building; judgement within a global context; resilience and adaptability, and communication in a foreign language.

GAC’s Foreign Service Onboarding Program (FSOP) provides new rotational employees with the opportunity to acquire and strengthen the core competencies, skills and knowledge necessary to be effective Foreign Service Officers. The two-year program, launched in the fall of 2021 to coincide with the recruitment of new foreign service officers, is designed to equip them with an understanding of how the Foreign Service, and the unique streams within, contribute to Canada’s place on the global stage. New Foreign Service Officers recruited from across Canada can obtain fluency in Canada’s official languages through up to one year of full time language training on Ab Initio status. Once they attain these levels, they are placed in a working level assignment and begin a program of core training, a cross Canada engagement project, and a structured mentorship program. Thereafter, participants receive specialized training within one of the four foreign service streams as well as foreign language training in support of an overseas posting, when required.

In advance of the annual posting cycle, the Institute also offers comprehensive pre- posting training, designed to prepare diplomats for the roles and responsibilities they will assume when abroad. This training is tailored to the specific needs of the officer, considering the position and location of their posting.

Additional information on mentorship

Foreign Language Training

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Centre for Foreign Languages, part of the Canadian Foreign Service Institute, supports the development and maintenance of employees’ foreign language competency to allow them to fully demonstrate their international competencies abroad, including judgement in a global context, resilience and adaptability, influencing and alliance building, and intercultural proficiency.

Overall, an average of 575 employees benefit annually from all the programs of the Centre, including full-time acquisition, part-time acquisition and maintenance. The Centre also administers proficiency testing based on an internationally recognized scale and system, as well as Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) testing, designed to predict the likelihood of success in learning a foreign language.

An average of 140 employees are assigned to full-time foreign language training of various durations in a given year, from a few months (e.g. Spanish) to a few years (e.g. Chinese). Training can be made available in all official languages of foreign countries.

Diversity & inclusion and gender equality

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

DATA – Employment Equity trends
Note for every graphs:
Data source: Human Resources Management Systems (HRMS)
Data as of March 31 of each year

Section 1: Overall Representation of the four EE groups at GAC, and Black Employees and Movement (Recruitment, Promotions, Actings and Departures)

Women

 Women Representation at GACWomen WFA % at GACWomen LMA (48,2%)

2018-03-31

55.6%

57.6%

48.2%

2019-03-31

55.4%

57.1%

48.2%

2020-03-31

55.7%

56.2%

48.2%

2021-03-31

56.2%

56.2%

48.2%

2022-03-31

56.7%

56.2%

48.2%

 

 RecruitmentPromotionsActingsDepartures

2018/19

56.4%

63.2%

55.8%

61.5%

2019/20

63.6%

62.3%

56.2%

60.2%

2020/21

60.8%

63.5%

58.7%

58.6%

2021/22

61.7%

60.4%

57.0%

58.6%

Indigenous people

 Indigenous People Representation at GACIndigenous People WFA % at GACIndigenous People LMA (4,0%)

2018-03-31

4.9%

3.1%

4.0%

2019-03-31

5.5%

3.2%

4.0%

2020-03-31

6.3%

3.5%

4.0%

2021-03-31

6.5%

3.5%

4.0%

2022-03-31

6.2%

3.5%

4.0%

 

 RecruitmentPromotionsActingsDepartures

2018/19

10.6%

7.0%

6.0%

7.1%

2019/20

10.1%

5.5%

5.6%

10.3%

2020/21

7.5%

7.7%

6.5%

9.6%

2021/22

6.5%

9.0%

6.3%

7.8%

Persons with Disabilities

 Persons with Disabilities Representation at GACPersons with Disabilities WFA % at GACPersons with Disabilities LMA (9,1%)

2018-03-31

3.3%

3.9%

9.1%

2019-03-31

3.4%

3.9%

9.1%

2020-03-31

3.4%

9.1%

9.1%

2021-03-31

3.3%

9.1%

9.1%

2022-03-31

3.7%

9.1%

9.1%

 

 RecruitmentPromotionsActingsDepartures

2018/19

4.1%

3.1%

4.0%

3.4%

2019/20

3.8%

3.2%

4.1%

4.3%

2020/21

4.5%

3.3%

4.0%

6.0%

2021/22

5.5%

3.2%

4.2%

4.9%

Visible Minorities

 Visible Minorities Representation at GACVisible Minorities WFA % at GACVisible Minorities LMA (21,3%)

2018-03-31

20.3%

13.9%

21.3%

2019-03-31

21.9%

13.9%

21.3%

2020-03-31

23.7%

15.8%

21.3%

2021-03-31

25.3%

15.8%

21.3%

2022-03-31

26.2%

15.8%

21.3%

 

 RecruitmentPromotionsActingsDepartures

2018/19

30.3%

20.3%

21.0%

17.5%

2019/20

28.4%

23.2%

23.3%

21.0%

2020/21

25.5%

28.4%

25.5%

19.8%

2021/22

26.0%

30.0%

25.2%

23.7%

Black people

 Black People Representation at GACBlack People LMA (21,3%)

2018-03-31

3.4%

3.18%

2019-03-31

3.7%

3.18%

2020-03-31

4.1%

3.18%

2021-03-31

4.4%

3.18%

2022-03-31

4.8%

3.18%

 

 RecruitmentPromotionsActingsDepartures

2018/19

5.7%

3.5%

2.9%

4.3%

2019/20

7.6%

4.7%

4.5%

3.7%

2020/21

6.0%

5.6%

5.0%

3.2%

2021/22

7.6%

4.8%

5.3%

4.0%

Section 2: Representation – EX occupational Group

Women in EX Group

 Women in EX Group Representation at GACWomen in EX group - WFA % at GACWomen - LMA (48,2%)

2018-03-31

44.0%

51.4%

48.2%

2019-03-31

44.5%

49.1%

48.2%

2020-03-31

45.9%

48.5%

48.2%

2021-03-31

46.3%

48.5%

48.2%

2022-03-31

49.7%

48.5%

48.2%

Persons with Disabilities in EX Group

 Persons with Disabilities in EX Group Representation at GACPersons with Disabilities in EX group - WFA % at GACPersons with Disabilities - LMA (9,1%)

2018-03-31

2.8%

2.3%

3.9%

2019-03-31

2.7%

2.3%

3.9%

2020-03-31

2.6%

5.3%

9.1%

2021-03-31

2.2%

5.3%

9.1%

2022-03-31

1.7%

5.3%

9.1%

Indigenous People in EX Group

 Indigenous People in EX Group Representation at GACIndigenous People in EX group - WFA % at GACIndigenous People - LMA (4,0%)

2018-03-31

3.8%

5.0%

4.0%

2019-03-31

3.7%

5.8%

4.0%

2020-03-31

3.2%

6.0%

4.0%

2021-03-31

3.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2022-03-31

3.3%

6.0%

4.0%

Visible Minorities in EX Group

 Visible Minorities in EX Group Representation at GACVisible Minorities in EX group - WFA % at GACVisible Minorities - LMA (21,3%)

2018-03-31

11.4%

9.5%

21.3%

2019-03-31

10.9%

8.5%

21.3%

2020-03-31

11.8%

8.5%

21.3%

2021-03-31

14.4%

8.5%

21.3%

2022-03-31

15.6%

8.5%

21.3%

Black People in EX Group

 Black People in EX Group Representation at GACBlack People LMA (3,18%)

2018-03-31

0.8%

3.18%

2019-03-31

0.6%

3.18%

2020-03-31

0.6%

3.18%

2021-03-31

0.6%

3.18%

2022-03-31

1.1%

3.18%

Official languages

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Distribution of the Canadian workforce by first official language

PopulationEnglishFrench
Canadians (according to the 2016 census)*75,4%22,8%
In all federal institutions subject to the Official Languages Act (as of March 31, 2020)*74,4%25,6%
In the core public administration**69,5%30,5%
¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ (based on HRMS data as of December 31, 2021)59%41%
* Treasury Board's 2019-2020 Annual Report on Official Languages, based on data as of March 31, 2020
** , Core Public Administration, 2021

Linguistic profile of GAC Executive Cadre

 FrancophoneAnglophoneTotal
EX016728%17172%238
EX024033%8166%122
EX031919%8381%102
EX04316%1684%19
EX05325%975%12
Total13227%36073%493
 FrancophoneAnglophoneTotal
HOM Current2619%9065%116
HOM Planned 20223324%10376%136

Staffing: GAC’s rotational workforce

Supporting facts and figures

Rotational Pools Demographics
 PositionsEmployeesOccupancyGoalGap
Total2494205983%100%435
FS, IT, AS2014168484%100%330
EX48037578%100%105

Background

Recruitment and Assignments

Key Messages

Background

Head of Mission Appointment Process

Key Messages

Background

Diversity, Inclusion & Gender Equality

Key Messages

Locally engaged staff

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Text version
YearsConsularDevelopmentHOM SupportManagementOGD ProgramOGD SupportPolitical / EconomicReadinessTradeTotals

2011

316

-

467

1855

351

1277

384

-

630

5280

2012

333

-

469

1920

344

1298

414

-

568

5346

2013

311

-

404

1798

302

1054

354

-

584

4807

2014

308

153

396

1789

211

985

353

-

579

4774

2015

324

160

398

1836

216

1048

373

-

607

4962

2016

322

164

378

1863

213

1073

384

-

599

4996

2017

312

167

378

1872

207

1066

383

-

613

4998

2018

325

171

386

1879

203

1075

396

-

621

5056

2019

344

173

388

1916

190

1122

388

-

636

5157

2020

335

174

367

1973

186

1187

397

-

678

5297

2021

342

169

361

1930

174

1176

393

79

690

5314

Background

The Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs has been delegated broad authority to manage all aspects of the Government of Canada’s LES program (classification, staffing, labour relations, compensation and benefits, etc.) The LES community represents about 45% of GAC’s total workforce and 75% of its staff in the 178 missions across 112 jurisdictions around the world.

LES are not Canadian public servants but they constitute a vital building block of Canada’s presence abroad and their role has been evolving. The trend of increasing level of responsibilities for the LES working in Canadian missions is reflected in the practice of most foreign ministries. However, the principles set by Treasury Board on the LES program, namely those of local law, local labour market and operational needs, mean that LES conditions of employment around the world is pegged to local labour market analysis.

In recognition of the need to provide good working conditions and an environment which promotes inclusion as well as competencies, GAC undertook on a regular basis a review of key parameters governing the LES program. The 2019 LES HR Management Framework Reform began as an effort to update the 50-year old framework to include alignment with broader Canadian public service principles, as well as to ensure coherence with Canada’s foreign policy priorities.

In spite of challenges introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic and the lack of additional reference level increase, such priorities as those identified in the 2019 first Global LES Symposium (classification, governance and engagement) have been implemented.

The key Employment and Staffing Directive as well as the Work Outside of Mission Premise Guidelines have been introduced in response to evolving workplace reality.

This, combined with a series of recent geopolitical crisis affecting mission operations, will continue to guide GAC’s ongoing efforts to develop the management framework, tools and strategies for the LES program.

Conditions of the foreign service – enabling rotationality

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Foreign Service Directives (FSDs): In combination with salary, enable departments and agencies to recruit, retain and deploy qualified employees in support of government programs outside Canada. They are part of a negotiated agreement between the employer (Treasury Board) and the bargaining agents. They are reviewed, negotiated and updated every 3-5 years to better reflect the needs of a modern Foreign Service, balance the benefits to ensure fairness, and make any necessary administrative changes.

In advance of next year’s negotiated revisions to the Directives, a GBA+ analysis and stakeholder engagement are being conducted to ensure the provisions enable a modern foreign service and provides equitable support to our increasingly diverse workforce.

Benefits: Government of Canada, Canada-based public servants on assignment abroad are paid based on their classification level. In addition to their wages, Canada- based staff also receive a series of allowances which may include, among others, the Post Living Allowance (to compensate for the higher costs of purchasing goods and services at post) and the Post Differential Allowance (for posts where living is considered to be more challenging than in Ottawa-Gatineau). Allowances may vary significantly in the amount received by each individual employee, since they are based on the employee’s family configuration, salary, number of years abroad, and the hardship level of the post.

Families: The Foreign Service Directives contain a number of provisions to support families, such as annual family reunion travel if families are separated during a posting, education allowances, and additional allowances for accompanying family members.

Salaries

Accidental Death and Dismemberment Insurance: ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ also provides employees travelling to hostile locations with Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance, over and above the current Public Service Health Care Insurance Plan. Based on the current criteria, this insurance is in place for Kabul, Afghanistan; Erbil and Baghdad, Iraq; Juba, South Sudan; the South Sudan states of Unity, Jonglei, Upper Nile, Lakes, Eastern Equatoria, and Western Equatoria; Tripoli, Libya; and the Gaza Strip.

Wellbeing

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Occupational Health and Safety

Psychological Health

COVID-19

Unexplained Health Incidents (UHI)

Prevention of Harassment and Violence in the Workplace

Aftercare and departmental medical capacity

C. Our Policy Capacity and Core Responsibilities

Global trends & drivers of diplomacy

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Key trends at the strategic and operational levels are prompting questions about how fit for purpose Canadian diplomacy is today.

On the strategic side, tense geopolitical dynamics have placed pressure on all countries, including Canada, to align with the major powers on key issues – a delicate diplomatic process.

At the operational level, the transformation of work has posed questions about the relative importance of physical proximity for the conduct of diplomacy and how other methods may be more effective at influencing key interlocutors in some circumstances.

Rapid changes in technology are also requiring diplomats to access and process big data analytics, as well as to effectively use new and more immediate forms of communication.

Considerations for diversity and inclusion are driving expectations about a Foreign Service that better accounts for the linguistic, gender, ethnic and racial diversity of Canada.

Different channels of diplomacy and an increase in the number of non-state diplomatic actors and their influence are forcing a reappraisal of the most effective ways through which Canada can promote its interests abroad.

International Advocacy and Diplomacy

Supplementary messages

*Seven Core Services

Information and Analysis

Provide political economic intelligence and analysis on existing or emerging international issues.

Policy Development

Provide the international context and propose foreign policy options.

Policy Integration

Provide leadership and advice to broker coherent national positions on international policy issues.

Advocacy

Coordinate strategic advocacy internationally to advance Canadian interests.

Access

Facilitate and maintain access to potential key interlocutors and decision makers.

Program Delivery

Implementation of programs with an international dimension.

Visits Guidance

Provide assistance to Canadian dignitaries on official visits abroad.

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The revitalization of public diplomacy, strengthening Canada’s diplomatic capacity and public engagement abroad are priorities for this department based on ministerial mandate letters, including through cultural diplomacy. However, without high-level strategic direction or centralized oversight on public diplomacy and public affairs, and without new resources for the coordination of these activities at HQ but also at missions, there has not been notable progress. The efforts are very much a work-in-progress as the department needs to clarify program mandates, prioritize strategic direction, and improve training and assessment of outcomes.

Canada could more effectively deploy culture and other public diplomacy tools such as academics, science and sport to advance its foreign policy interests as has been done by other middle powers. Due to decades of inconsistent funding, Canada’s foreign ministry has the lowest cultural diplomacy engagement and investment in the G7, and one of the lowest in the G20, lagging behind players like Australia, South Korea, Brazil, Russia and China.

Targeted public advocacy campaigns present opportunities, especially through media and social media, to bring local issues and actors into the public eye. Effective advocacy increases Canada presence, influence, and leadership on key priorities.

From capacity-building workshops for young women interested in political participation to training journalists on using data and effectively writing about human rights abuses, advocacy strategies and campaigns help missions identify and seize upon opportunities to support change. This year, for example, Canada’s feminist policies will remain at the forefront with #SheLeadsHere – a Generation Equality Forum action commitment that will see our missions, over the year, provide women with access to and meaningful engagement with key government officials and decision makers.

Evidence based foreign policy analysis

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

GAC Data Strategy: The implementation of the 5-year departmental data strategy has supported advances in use of data as evidence for decision making throughout the department. The Strategic Policy Branch leads the implementation, with support across the department from stakeholders that lead on cultural change, access to tools and data, human resources and training, performance measurement, and management and governance.

Advanced tools in foreign policy and diplomacy: The Data Science team in the IM/IT Bureau have supported efforts to monitor global events and disinformation. A Situational Awareness application provides a centralized platform to allow Foreign Policy and Diplomacy Service (FPDS) officers to leverage large volumes of open-source unstructured data, monitor, and respond to global events in support of Canadian foreign policy objectives. They have further supported FPDS policy and decision-making through support of in-depth text analysis of the federal parties’ foreign policy priorities during the 2019 and 2021 Canadian election campaigns to determine impacts on GAC’s approaches.

In addition, the Centre for International Digital Policy leads the G7 Rapid Response Mechanism (RRM), provides an early warning system to threats to democracy by leveraging open-source data and advanced data analysis. The RRM Canada team conducts research to identify emerging trends and tactics related to foreign interference in democratic processes and institutions, and has published their

open-source data analytics reports on European Parliamentary elections, the Ukrainian elections of 2019, and the Alberta elections of 2019.

Delivering, measuring & reporting on results

Supplementary messages

Background

Managing for Results (MfR) is an organization-wide approach to using data to make evidence-based decisions, including how to optimize the achievement of results at all stages of an initiative. It is also key to reporting on what GAC has achieved, and to ensuring that performance measurement metrics are used to inform decisions and deliver effectively on the Department’s objectives.

Given the importance of performance measurement in contributing to evidence-based decision-making and improving results for Canadians, the department continues to seek opportunities to improve its capacity by:

The Department is currently working to develop a comprehensive plan for improving MfR across the department, championed through the Performance Measurement and Evaluation Committee, co-chaired by the Deputy Minister for International Development and the Associate Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs.

Managing for Results in the area of Diplomacy:

Trade and investment

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures (2021-2022)

Background

The TCS provides a free client-oriented, advisory and support service to help Canadian businesses increase exports and diversify markets, facilitate FDI into Canada, establish research and innovation partnerships, and support recruitment of international students. The TCS works in collaboration with Export Development Canada, the Canada Commercial Corporation, and Invest in Canada, as well as other federal and provincial partners with complementary trade and investment mandates.

As part of the Government’s ongoing Export Diversification Strategy, the TCS is implementing a strategic plan focussed on customizing services for firms with high potential; supporting inclusive and progressive trade; creating a high-impact, agile TCS workforce through talent management and training; expanding and modernizing digital tools for better service delivery and data analysis; and aligning with partners to simplify the exporter journey across federal programs.

Recent investments in the TCS include:

Development, peace and security programming

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ leads Canada’s international assistance efforts to reduce poverty and inequality by leveraging Canadian expertise and financial resources, providing bilateral development assistance and institutional support to multilateral organizations, humanitarian assistance responses, and security and stability assistance in fragile and conflict-affected states.

The department’s international assistance is largely delivered to countries through three main programming channels: multilateral, bilateral, and Canadian partners. Canada seeks the best mix of channels and partners to achieve impacts in crises or long-term development contexts.

As part of the Feminist International Assistance Policy (FIAP), the department has committed to (1) streamlining and accelerating our funding and reporting procedures; (2) reducing administrative burden on funding recipients; and (3) being more responsive, transparent and predictable. A big part of delivering on this commitment is our five-year transformation plan for grants and contributions. The plan is organized into six focus areas (each of which has elements of work related to process, technology and tools, people and organizational culture): (1) internal operations, (2) data collection and centralization, (3) risk assessment and management, (4) project financial management, (5) results-based management, and (6) transparency and efficiency for partners. The remainder of the work plan has recently been divided into three phases, each 18 months. Work includes changes to existing processes, new processes to facilitate work at the portfolio level, new ways of working with partners, new ways of collecting and using data for decision-making, and different ways of telling our story.

Complementary to the above-referenced transformation plan is a multi-year plan to improve the department’s capacity to undertake more effective “Triple Nexus” efforts, such as integrated planning and programming in conflict-affected situations. “Triple Nexus” refers to humanitarian, development and peace efforts that are undertaken more coherently and therefore more effectively. To advance this internal “Triple Nexus” plan, focus is on building internal strategic, operational and functional capabilities across the department through tools, guidance, training and behaviour change.

Help for canadians abroad

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Typically, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ manages 7,800 cases annually that require enhanced consular support to help Canadians through difficult events or situations abroad. These can include cases involving arrest and detention, child and family-related issues, victims of assault, medical assistance and deaths. Consular services requirements in the context of international crises can be acute.

Canadians requiring consular assistance abroad can access 260 points of service in 150 countries. The majority of consular services are provided by trained consular officers at Canada’s network of missions. In locations where Canada does not have a mission, services are offered through the global network of honorary consuls and like- minded missions with which Canada has a service-sharing agreement (e.g. Australia).

Complex consular cases

The following factors can contribute to the complexity of a consular case:

Emergency management

The geopolitical context in which consular services are provided his increasingly complex. There has been a steady rise in the number of large scale emergencies requiring ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ emergency management services due to their impact on Canada, Canadians and Canadian interests. Since 2020/21, this included support for the government-wide response to the downing of Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 (PS752) and the repatriation of approximately 62,500 Canadians and permanent residents from 109 locations around the world in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and complex responses to the crisis in Afghanistan and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Successive crises over the past five years have resulted in important innovations but also severely strained existing capacities.

Arbitrary detention initiative

Canada launched the Declaration Against Arbitrary Detention in State-to-State Relations to demonstrate global opposition to the practice of arbitrary arrest, detention and sentencing of foreign nationals for diplomatic leverage on February 15, 2021. The Declaration is now endorsed by more than one third of the world’s countries (68 and the EU). Turning words into action, Canada developed an associated Partnership Action Plan, welcomed by G7 Ministers in May 2021 and by G7 Leaders in June 2021 to coordinate further action. A conference in Canada is being prepared, as announced at the G7 Foreign Ministers Meeting, in December 2021.

D. Our Technological and Digital Capacity

Digital and data strategy

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

The Departmental Plan on Service and Digital (DPSD) provides the operational plan to implement the Digital Strategy. This includes building a modern and secure international network and infrastructure, while phasing out the department’s inefficient and less secure legacy IT operations, and providing new digital solutions and information to enable our people and programs. The DPSD is moving away from siloed investment management and technology-driven decision-making to a coordinated effort to focus on business outcomes and product improvements.

The Departmental Data Strategy coordinates initiatives to increase the use of data in decision-making. Leveraging behavioural science, it works to increase the awareness and engagement of branches with the Data & Analytics program, as well as skilled recruitment, and data competency development activities.

GAC’s Data & Analytics Program supports the Data Strategy, by deploying a set of analytics tools that allow self-service analytics and visualization by all employees, as well as sophisticated capabilities for data engineers and data scientists. These tools are already being leveraged within GAC, for example: 1) To monitor global events and disinformation, the Situational Awareness application provides Foreign Policy and Diplomacy Service (FPDS) officers with an application to leverage large volumes of open source media and web feeds in a centralized platform to monitor and respond to global events in support of Canadian foreign policy stance, 2) To inform policy and decision-making, in-depth text analysis was performed on the federal parties’ foreign policy priorities during the 2019 and 2021 Canadian election campaigns to determine impacts on GAC’s policies.

Innovation and experimentation

Supplementary messages

Background

GAC’s policy framework specifically requires that all managers encourage experimentation, staff identify new opportunities, use data and share lessons learned, and that corporate enablers will facilitate action. From an IM/IT perspective, experimentation is essential to modernizing Canada’s diplomacy, and involves identifying and piloting various solutions in iterative an approach. This requires a culture that supports new ideas and accepts the risks of investing in new digital solutions when conventional approaches are not meeting departmental objectives efficiently.

While encouraged by GAC from a vision standpoint, several factors hinder the Department’s ability to be more enterprising with innovative:

  1. Cyber and security risks, inherent to global political climate and to our presence abroad, have to be considered when experimenting with new solutions to ensure the security and integrity of our sensitive information. This can sometimes slow down experimentation or reduce the business’ appetite for change.
  2. Significant time, effort and resources are required to identify, experiment, develop, implement, communicate and provide training on modern technologies. As setting time aside specifically for experimentation can be challenging, competing departmental priorities and finite resources often make it difficult to put our innovation ambition to action.
  3. Technological experimentation and innovation cannot be achieved solely by standing up digital solutions; they require significant business engagement and involvement. Concerted efforts between IT and the business are required to invent new ways to deliver services to Canadians.

To support innovation, GAC’s Data and Analytics Program provides advanced analytics functions – beyond traditional analytics – to address the Department’s more complex business challenges. Subsequently, GAC is experimenting and innovating with new technologies, artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities to turn large volumes of complex data into actionable insights for senior management, supporting data-driven decision and policy making. For example, 1) the Situational Awareness application provides Foreign Policy and Diplomacy Service (FPDS) officers with an application to monitor global events and disinformation. This application leverages large volumes of media and web in a centralized platform and trains the application to identify key information to monitor and respond to global events in support of Canada's foreign policy stance; and 2) several small-scale experiments focused on policy analytics and text analytics using cognitive search capabilities are currently underway.

Risk management at global affairs Canada

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures

Background

Risks are managed at all levels (corporate, program, project) in the Department. To better support its planning exercises, decision-making processes and resource allocation activities, GAC introduced an Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Strategy in 2021. The strategy is centered around three main pillars:

As part of this strategy, at the beginning of each two-year planning cycle senior management identifies the top five strategic risks to the department’s operations. Once these key strategic risks are selected, risk response strategies are developed to help manage, minimize and monitor these risks and are included in the department’s Enterprise Risk Profile. They are also monitored at the Corporate Management Committee and Executive Committee. The top risks for 2022-2024 are:

  1. Pressure on the workforce to continuously adapt to change and increased workloads could impede the health, safety, well-being of employees, impact retention, particularly in the face of increased competition for talent, and limit the department’s ability to deliver on its mandate.
  2. The need for adequate health care services and supplementary health and safety measures due to the pandemic may impact our ability to keep our staff at mission healthy and safe and meet our duty of care obligations.
  3. Normalized and prolonged remote work arrangements and digital solutions increase cyber vulnerabilities and impact the department’s ability to respond.
  4. The department’s IT infrastructure may not be sufficient to support the effective functioning of the Canadian government abroad or at HQ.
  5. Pandemic impacts, including supply chain issues, could impede the department’s ability to deliver real property investments including duty of care obligations and security requirements.

In the international assistance domain, the department is piloting an innovative Risk Appetite Framework to enhance its ability to take appropriate risks by helping staff and senior management better weigh opportunities, benefits and potential threats and take measured risk.

The Department continues to leverage experimentation where possible to test projects and services on a smaller scale before investing to scale up, thereby lowering overall risk. As GAC expands its experimentation efforts, it will become increasingly better positioned to innovate, take smart risks, tackle uncertainty and strengthen its evidence base for decision-making.

E. Our Global Presence

Global footprint and services

Supplementary messages

Property, infrastructure and technology

Supplementary messages

Supporting facts and figures: GAC property portfolio

Asset TypeOwnedLeasedTotal
Chancery6381144
Head of Mission Residence6359122
Staff Quarters41815211939
Multi Units281644
Total57216772249

F. Additional Materials

GAC Attrition Rate for CBS indeterminate employees

Data Source: HRMS as of March 31, 2022
Produced by HSF – HR Demographics, Employment Equity and Diversity & Inclusion

 2018/192019/202020/212021/22

Attrition Rate

The proportion of Indeterminate employees who have left GAC over a period of time (by Fiscal Year).

9,1%

7,1%

6,5%

6,7%

GAC Attrition Rate for Rotational CBS indeterminate employees

Data Source: HRMS as of March 31, 2022
Produced by HSF – HR Demographics, Employment Equity and Diversity & Inclusion

Rotational Employee Stream2018/192019/202020/212021/22

FSIA (Dev)

 

 

1,5%

0,0%

Exec Pers.

4,5%

3,9%

7,3%

9,4%

HOM Suppor

8,1%

2,0%

1,8%

3,3%

Mgmt

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

Mgmt/Cons

3,1%

1,0%

1,3%

4,2%

Political

2,8%

2,7%

2,5%

4,9%

Rot Admin

7,0%

4,9%

4,1%

5,4%

Rot Cleric

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

50,0%

Rot IT

0,0%

0,0%

7,7%

0,0%

Trade

2,7%

3,7%

2,6%

3,1%

GAC (rotational employees)

3,7%

3,0%

2,8%

4,2%

GAC Attrition Rate for Rotational CBS indeterminate employees

Data Source: HRMS as of March 31, 2022
Produced by HSF – HR Demographics, Employment Equity and Diversity & Inclusion

Rotational Employee Stream2018/192019/202020/212021/22Annual Average # of Rotational EmployeesAnnual Average # of Départs of Rotational Employees on 4 FY (2 FY for Dev)

FSIA (Dev)

 

 

1,5%

0,0%

230

2

Exec Pers.

4,5%

3,9%

7,3%

9,4%

156

10

HOM Suppor

8,1%

2,0%

1,8%

3,3%

51

2

Mgmt

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

2

0

Mgmt/Cons

3,1%

1,0%

1,3%

4,2%

302

7

Political

2,8%

2,7%

2,5%

4,9%

679

22

Rot Admin

7,0%

4,9%

4,1%

5,4%

235

13

Rot Cleric

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

50,0%

2

0

Rot IT

0,0%

0,0%

7,7%

0,0%

13

0

Trade

2,7%

3,7%

2,6%

3,1%

427

13

GAC (rotational employees)

3,7%

3,0%

2,8%

4,2%

2097

68

Chart – Rotational Pools

Text version

Rotational Pools Demographics

Positions: Total = 2494; FS/IT/AS = 2014; EX = 480

Employees: Total = 2059; FS/IT/AS = 1684; EX = 375

Occupancy Rate: Total = 83%; FS/IT/AS = 84%; EX = 78%

Goal: Total = 100%; FS/IT/AS = 100%; EX = 100%

Gap: Total = 435; FS/IT/AS = 330; EX = 105

Women: 1086 (53%)

Men: 973 (47%)

Employment Equity Groups Representation

Abroad (Rotational and Non-Rotational): Women = 49.7%; Indigenous People = 4.9%; Persons with Disabilities = 2.2%; Visible Minorities = 24.1%; Black People = 4.2%

Rotational Employees in Pools (Diplomats): Women = 52.3%; Indigenous People = 4.0%; Persons with Disabilities = 3.0%; Visible Minorities = 20.8%; Black People = 2.2%

Stream Composition – Working Level (AS, FS and IT)

Political: 31%

Trade: 19%

International Assistance: 15%

Management and Consular: 18%

Information and Technology: 10%

Administrative Assistants: 7%

Rotational Positions Location

HQ: 46%

Abroad: 52%

Regional: 2%

Strategic Objectives

  • Aggressive Processes: close gap by 2023-24
  • Pool overfill to sustain staffing
  • Streamline processes
  • Evergreen strategy and processes

Historical and Projected Pools Growth (Working Levels FS + AS*) – 2018-2024 – Closing the Gap by 2023-24

2018: Employees = 1091; Positions = 1370

2019: Employees = 1260; Positions = 1741

2020: Employees = 1293; Positions = 1734

2021: Employees = 1407; Positions = 1856

2022: Employees = 1524; Positions = 1774

2023: Employees = 1743; Positions = 1825

2024: Employees = 1853; Positions = 1850

*FS + AS have biggest gaps

Processes Timeline

2020: FS02: Ongoing, 126 successful candidates

2021: FS01: PSR ongoing, Target: 200-300; FS03: Ongoing, Target: 150-175; FSITP: IT02 and IT04, Ongoing

2022: EX01: Launched in May; FS01: MCO: 36 successful candidates; FS02: Planned; FS04: Planned; FSEAA: AS03 Planned

2023: FS01: PSR process; FS03: Planned

2024: EX01: Planned; FS02: Planned; FS04: Planned

USS HR Fact Sheet

USS: HR Facts at a Glance

Total GAC employees: 13,106
CBS: 7723
LES: 5383
Canada: 6443
Abroad: 6669 (51%) in 178 missions
Rotational employees (“the foreign service”): 2059 employees (16% of total workforce)
Rotational positions: 2494 (only 83% filled)
Recruitment and promotion: expecting 200 new FS recruits this year; over 1000 candidates recruited or promoted since 2018

Foreign Service by Stream:
Political: 31%
Trade: 18%
Development: 16%
MCO: 19%
IT/Admin: 16%

Employment Equity groups among CBS (2021 data)
Women: 56.2% (similar to the WFA)
Visible Minorities: 26.2%, up from 20.4% in 2018 (WFA=15.8%)
Indigenous: 6.3%, up from 4.9% in 2018 (WFA=3.5%)
Black: 4.8%, up from 3.4% in 2018 (LMA=3.2%, no WFA data)
People with Disabilities: 3.7%; WFA and LMA 9.1%, redefined & nearly tripled in 2020
HOMs: 47% women, 12% visible minorities

Official languages:
Positions designated bilingual: 89% total and 100% abroad
EXs meeting language profile: 93%
Francophones in GAC: 41% (vs 22.8% in general population and 30.2% in public service)
Francophone EXs: 27%

Foreign Language Training:
On full-time language training every year: 140
Positions designated with language requirement: 433
Investment in foreign language training: $13.7m/year

Postings:
Relocations: 950/year
Dependents abroad: 2500

Q & A

Anticipated Questions & Suggested Responses

Contents

Our people

Staffing

What is the breakdown of employees abroad versus at HQ?

What is the ratio of Canada Based Staff at HQ and abroad?

How many FS are there? How many FS have been hired in the last few years?

What is the break down of the Foreign Service by stream?

How many CBS are at multilateral postings?

How many CBS non-FS are on postings at any time?

How many missions do we have?

How many EX are there?

What is the ratio of FS to EX?

How many EX positions are abroad vs. at HQ?

What are the planned recruitment timelines for the next five years?

How can GAC adopt more systematic hiring mechanisms to address the severe understaffing situation? How does GAC plan to address under-recruitment/understaffing in the FS pool?

Would developing a “surge capacity” help to address some of the bottlenecks and operational barriers faced?

What is the FS attrition rate? Can we break that down by year?

YearAll indeterminate employeesRotational poolsInternational AssistanceForeign PolicyTrade
20/216.5%2.8%1.5%2.5%2.6%
21/226.7%4.2%0%4.9%3.1%

What are some of the main reasons people leave the diplomatic service?

How are promotion processes run?

What is the proportion of HoMs that are political appointees vs career diplomats? Should a greater proportion of HoMs be selected from the public service rather than external appointees?

Why are there so many HOM vacancies?

Is GAC considering other models for addressing HR issues related to rotationality and the pool system currently being employed?

Does GAC have an aging workforce?

Locally Engaged Staff (LES)

How many LES are there? What is the average proportion of LES to CBS at missions abroad?

Are we offering competitive terms of employment for LES in order to attract the talent we need? If not, why not?

What is our duty of care when it comes to LES? Do we assist LES in the same way we treat CBS when crises take place? Specifically what can be learned from recent experiences in Kyiv and Kabul about how GAC prioritizes the safety and wellbeing of LES?

Talent Management & Skills Development

How does GAC build diplomatic and issue-specific expertise through ongoing professional development, sustained recruitment of talent with core skill sets reflective of

the current global context and complex issues?

What is GAC’s approach to developing and maintaining expertise (geographic, linguistic and functional)?

Does GAC have mechanisms in place to bring specific types of expertise into the department? Is there space for mid-career entry to attract specific expertise?

How important are foreign languages to GAC’s talent management approach in the FS stream?

How many FS officers receive foreign language training?

How much is spent on non-official language training?

Language Training Yearly Expenditures (in million $) (O&M and salaries of full-time students)
12-1313-1414-1515-1616-1717-1818-1919-2020-2121-22
$13.2$14.6$15.1$13.4$13.6$13.1$14.3$13.4$13.0$13.6

What is the proportion of diplomats that are fluent in a third language? Over 50% (1097 of 2059) of rotational staff, of which a high proportion are executives (295 of 375), have had test results in the past that demonstrate intermediate or advanced working proficiency in one or more foreign languages.

Which key languages will we need to invest more in the future? Is there a plan for this?

Official languages

Is concrete action being taken to address the “English by default” status quo?

How does GAC compare with other departments in terms of bilingualism?

How many FS are on official language training at any one time?

Is full bilingualism a requirement for entering the Foreign Service?

What training in official languages is available for diplomats? Are there full-time options available?

How much does GAC spend on language training per year?

Diversity, Inclusion & Gender Equality

Is there a tension between ensuring diversity and excellence?

What percentage of diplomats are members of Employment Equity Groups such as women, or visible minorities?

EE GroupWorkforce Availability (WFA)GAC (CBS)
Women56.7%56.72%
Indigenous people3.5%6.3%
Visible Minorities15.8%26.2%

What proportion of HOMs are women?

What proportion of HOMs are Visible Minorities?

How is GAC working to improve diversity, equity and inclusion?

What is being done to support LGBTQ2+ Employees?

What is GAC doing to address the under representation of employees of Black or African heritage?

What other actions are being taken to ensure diversity and inclusion in Canada’s foreign service?

Conditions of the Foreign Service (enabling rotationality)

Are the unique conditions and requirements of rotational work compatible with the Public Service HR model?

How does GAC Administer FSDs?

Wellbeing

What health and wellbeing support do we provide to diplomats on postings?

Are diplomats in hardship postings given the resources necessary to ensure their mental and physical health and safety?

Responsive lines on Havana Syndrome:

Responsive lines on COVID:

Does GAC need to review the Duty of Care” doctrine to achieve appropriate balance between safety and security of staff with presence and visibility required to remain relevant and engaged in volatile contexts?

Hybrid Work & the Future of Work

How has GAC’s approach to diplomatic work adapted during the pandemic?

What are some of the ongoing challenges and opportunities?

Has there been high-level strategic thought around what the future of hybrid diplomacy could look like?

How does GAC compare to other organizations in this ever evolving landscape?

What other countries have gone through similar reviews or modernization exercises:

Our policy capacity and core responsibilities

Global Trends & Drivers of Diplomacy

Does GAC have robust policy planning mechanisms in place to identify long term strategic priorities, anticipate emerging issues and challenges, introduce new ideas and solutions and bring coherence to responses?

International advocacy and diplomacy

How does Canada undertake international advocacy?

Will the department undertake a Foreign Policy Review?

What is the status of the Feminist Foreign Policy? Will a formal policy be released?

How do we engage with Canadians and how do we inform Canadians about our diplomatic work and how it impacts their lives?

What are we doing to engage with Canadians through domestic outreach to communicate and garner support for our international engagement?

How do development officers in Canada’s missions work with foreign policy and trade streams at post?

How has GAC equipped Canadian diplomats to advance implementation of the Feminist International Assistance Policy? What challenges have they faced? How has the Policy been useful for furthering Canadian values and interests?

Evidence Based Foreign Policy Analysis

How is evidence used in foreign policy?

Delivering, Measuring & Reporting on Results

How do we measure and evaluate results within the diplomatic sphere?

How do we communicate results both internally and to the Canadian public?

Trade and Investment

How do diplomats support our trade and investment priorities?

How can we improve coherence and coordination between the FS stream and Trade Commissioners?

Are there training programs in place to improve the trade and investment capacity of Canadian diplomats?

Which trade and investment issues will be of strategic importance in the next decade? Do we have forward-looking plans to make sure we are well-positioned in this sphere?

How do we increase coherence between Canada’s trade and development priorities?

Development, Humanitarian, Peace and Security Programming

How does GAC incorporate a triple nexus approach to ensure coordination between development, humanitarian and peace and security challenges?

Help for Canadians Abroad (Consular)

What were our consular responses to recent crises: ex. COVID-19, Ukraine, Afghanistan etc?

Any key stories or anecdotes that highlight our consular capacity or its importance to Canadians?

How do we communicate with Canadians abroad?

Our technological and digital capacity

Digital and Data Strategy

What does our data strategy look like? Is our foreign policy informed by data?

Do we have estimates for future spending to modernise our digital technology? Was a cost benefit analysis completed?

How are we leveraging digital technologies for diplomacy? Do we have a cohesive strategy?

How will we/do we measure the effectiveness of our digital strategy?

Managing Risks – IT and broader issues

Is GAC’s senior management too risk averse?

What are your main IT risks and how do you address them?

What are the trade-offs around mitigating risk vs making space for innovation and experimentation?

GAC was recently the victim of a cyber attack, what are we doing to improve your technological security?

Do missions abroad have the resources and technology they need to ensure the integrity of sensitive information?

With COVID-19 and the two years of work-from-home, how did GAC deal with sensitive information without access to secure servers (C6)?

Our global presence

Global Footprint & Services - International Platform

Were COVID-19 vaccines delivered to diplomatic staff and their families? Were LES given vaccines from Canada?

How do we compare with like-minded in terms of number of missions abroad and number of CBS abroad versus at HQ?

How many missions are there abroad in total? How many by region?

How does GAC support wider Government of Canada presence abroad?

What are the top ten sized missions?

What are the top ten costliest missions? Why are these missions so costly?

What is the total annual cost of our missions? By region

What is the annual budget for mission security?

Which missions are most costly from a security perspective?

There is shortage of Management and Consular Officers (MCOs) across the mission network. Do you have a strategy in place to address this shortage?

What is the average cost to post a CBS abroad?

Are missions abroad properly equipped?

What is the composition of our physical presence abroad? How many buildings? How many are owned/leased?

Asset TypeOwnedLeasedTotal
Chancery6381144
Head of Mission Residence6359122
Staff Quarters41815211939
Multi Units281644
Total57216772249

Overall what is the condition of our physical presence abroad? Are most buildings in good condition?

Do properties abroad meet Canadian health and safety standards?

How did the pandemic affect the delivery of property management at missions?

Property, Infrastructure & Technology

Is our global footprint abroad aligned with our priorities?

We say that Asia is fastest growing region in the world, and thus emerging priorities. How come this is one of the regions where we have less missions and CBS?

Canada recently closed embassies, such as in Tehran and Caracas. What is the process for re-opening these or other missions?

Date modified: