Data field definitions
Find data field definitions for each of the following data sets:
- International Aid Transparency Initiative
- Statistical Report on International Assistance - by multilateral organization
- Historical project data sets
- Maternal, newborn and child health
- Project Browser: refer to About Project Browser page
International Aid Transparency Initiative
These are the main data fields found in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Activity File, listed in the order in which they appear in the file. In some cases, the descriptions may differ from similar fields found in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's International Development Project Browser or other data sets. These differences are highlighted.
For more information please visit .
- Reporting Organisation
- Name and unique identifier of the organization publishing the information. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ is the reporting organization. Its Organisation Type Code is 10 for Government.
- IATI Activity Identifier
- Globally unique identifier for each project. It is made up of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's IATI Organisation Identifier (CA-3) and the ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ project number (as it appears in the Project Browser). The first seven digits of that number indicate a project, with the last three digits indicating a sub-project number. The ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ project number (rather than IATI's) also appears in the data sent to the OECD-DAC to report on disbursements.
- Activity Title
- Title of the project. This title may not be exactly the same as it appeared in public announcements or in the former CIDA's Proactive Disclosure reports. In the case of multi-donor projects, the title represents the former CIDA's contribution only and is often different from the title used by other donors.
- Activity Description
- Description of the project. This usually describes the goal and activities of the project in plain language. If the project is part of a larger initiative, that initiative is usually described as well. Sometimes the description lists multiple partners; at this time only the lead agency is reported.
- Activity Status
- Current stage of the project at the time the Activity File is published. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ publishes project data once the project has been approved and is in the implementation stage (operational, in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ terminology). Projects are usually moved into completion (terminating) status once activities have been completed, and go to post-completion (closed) status once the final report has been accepted.
- Activity Dates
- Start and end dates of the project. The start date corresponds to the date the project becomes operational (implementation stage). The end date corresponds to the planned or actual end of activities (or last payment) of the project.
- Activity Contacts
- Contact details for the project. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's email and mailing addresses are provided for those seeking additional information about a project.
- Activity Website
- Link to implementing agency's website. In most cases, implementing partners provide information on individual activities on their website. In some cases, the website might be available in English or French only, or in the language of the implementing partner's country.
- Participating Organisation
Funding: The country or institution that provides the funds. Canada is the default value.
Extending: The government entity or agency within an institution that finances the activity within its own budget. The former CIDA was the extending organization until June 26, 2013. For all projects with a start date of June 26, 2013 or after, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ is the extending organization.
Implementing: The intermediary between the extending agency and the ultimate beneficiary, also known as the executing agency. It can be a private firm, a non-governmental organization, an educational institution, an association, an institute, a government department, or any other individual or organization selected to implement the project or one of its components. "Uncoded" may appear when, for example, a project is operational but does not yet have an official executing agency.
Organizations' names may show some variation because of errors made in the past in assigning more than one code to the same organization. Although these errors have generally been corrected in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's systems, some of the older projects that used duplicate codes are still published.
Currently, only the lead executing agency can be entered in this field in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems. If there are multiple partners executing the project, they are usually listed in the description. Consequently, if the Implementing field is being used as a filter to generate a data set, the file will only contains the vendor identified as the primary partner.
At this time, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ does not use the IATI Organisation Identifiers or the Organisation Type Code for all of its implementing agencies. In the July 2013 file, the IATI Organisation Identifier is provided for multilateral organisations.
- Recipient Country
- This element contains the of the country for whose benefit the aid is provided. In the case of a project taking place in several countries, the file includes a percentage of the project value allocated to each country. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's international development country pages contain more information on its activities in each country.
- Recipient Region
- This element contains the for whose benefit the aid is provided. At this time, it is used only for projects that cannot be coded to specific countries. This includes projects that are regional in nature, for instance benefiting regional institutions, or membership organizations with specific geographic reach (e.g. Asia Development Bank). The project description provides information about the scope of the project.
- Activity Documents
- Links to the project's objective(s) published on the .
- Planned Disbursements
- Disbursements and expenditures expected in the project. Planned disbursements are published per Canadian fiscal year, on a three-year rolling basis (or until the end of the project). Plans are reported with the caveat that these are planning figures and that funds committed are subject to Parliamentary approval of the Government of Canada's annual budget.
- Organization Unique Identifiers
- Globally unique identifiers for organizations. For non-governmental organizations (e.g. civil society, private sector) based in Canada, the Unique Identifier consists of the country ISO code (CA), the governing body for the organisation's number (Canadian Revenue Agency, CRA_ARC) and the organisation's Business Number (123456789). For example, a Canadian organization's Unique Identifier would be CA-CRA_ARC-123456789. All IATI publishers are expected to use the same Unique Identifier for a given organization. Additional information on Unique Identifiers for non-Canadian organizations is available on the .
- Activity Budget
At this time, the value indicated in Canadian dollars corresponds to the maximum amount approved by the former ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ for the project (and is similar to the amount in the Project Browser).
Note 1: The amount indicated does not automatically correspond to the amount in the contractual agreement with the lead implementing organization (as indicated in the former CIDA's Proactive Disclosure pages), because multiple agreements may have been signed for a single project or the amount approved may include monitoring and evaluation components.
Note 2: The amounts listed in the Activity File, in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Project Browser, and in the OECD-DAC data for any given year will usually be different. The amount published in the Activity File and the Project Browser reflects a planned, or partially disbursed, multi-year budget in Canadian dollars, as currently entered in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems. The amount reported to the OECD-DAC is expressed in US dollars on a calendar year basis.
Note 3: The amounts published may not always match amounts publicly announced. In some cases, the budget data may appear to indicate a lesser amount than that announced because the project has been split into sub-projects, for which profiles have yet to be published. In other cases, the data may appear to indicate an amount greater than that announced because the announcement refers only to new funding added to an existing project.
- General/Detailed Sector
- Specific area(s) of the recipient's economic or social development that the transfer intends to foster, also known as the purpose codes. The sector labels and codes used are tertiary-level OECD-DAC sector codes. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's is based on the OECD-DAC sector code table, allowing all donors to compare and coordinate their projects.
- Policy/Thematic Markers
- Indicators tracking key policy issues. At this time, only DAC policy markers are published in the IATI file.
- Collaboration Type
- Information on the character of the resource flows/disbursements e.g. bilateral or multilateral. Corresponds to OECD-DAC field.
- Finance Type
- Identifies the financial instrument used for the project e.g. grant, loan, etc. Corresponds to the OECD-DAC field.
- Flow Type
- Identifies the type of flow of the project e.g. official development assistance, other official flows, private flows, etc. Corresponds to OECD-DAC field.
- Aid Type
- Identifies the type of assistance provided in the project e.g. budget support, sector budget support, core support, project support, etc. Corresponds to OECD-DAC field.
- Conditions
- Identifies the type of conditions attached to the project. Consult the complete list of conditions.
- Results - Expected
- The results expected to be achieved by the project are summarized at the outcome level. This information is only available for projects approved after October 15, 2011.
- Results - Achieved
- The information summarized in this field represents highlights of the project's accomplishments. Unless otherwise stated, the results are cumulative and based on the most current reports available. Results are reported for the project as a whole, not just the ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ contribution. Results achieved by older projects may not be available. In addition, please note that many former development projects do not have results to report within the first two years of activities.
- Activity Scope
- The geographical area covered by the project. The scope is defined by the IATI codelist and can be global, regional, national, sub-national, etc.
- Location ID
- Unique identifier for the location, found in a recognized gazetteer (a geographical index).
- Name
- Name of the location, taken from a recognized gazetteer. This name might appear in the official language of the recipient country.
- Administrative
- Identifies the national or sub-national divisions of the project’s location according to a recognized gazetteer. This element contains the hierarchical level being reported (level 0 is the national boundary, level 1 is the first-level administrative sub-division, etc.); followed by the location identifier code; and an IATI code for the gazetteer that was used to extract this information.
- Point
- The latitude and longitude coordinates of the location (indicated in the format “latitude, longitude”). This element also includes the name of the spatial reference system used by the coordinates. By default:
- Exactness
- Defines whether the location represents the exact location for this project or an approximate location (due to lack of more detailed information).
- Location Reach
- Identifies whether the location represents the area where the intended beneficiaries reside or an implementation site.
- Location Class
- Describes the nature of the location: an administrative division, a populated place (e.g. city or village), a structure, or another topographical feature (e.g. river, nature reserve). The location may refer to one of the four Location Class Codes as defined by the IATI codelist.
- Feature Designation
- Defines a more refined coded classification of the type of feature referred to by the project location, as defined by the IATI codelist.
- Annual forward planning budget data
- According to the IATI standard, this is the total international development budget for each of the next three years, as submitted to Parliament or the organisation’s board. The numbers in this field are those reported in the former ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Report on .
- The annual forward planning budget for funded institutions
- According to the IATI standard, this is the budget for each of the next three years for institutions that receive core funding from the donor. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ publishes the sum of approved international development commitments to key organisations. As the IATI standard does not currently allow the publication of bilingual names of organisations, the file contains the organisations' identification numbers (which can be found on the or websites). The amounts published for later years will likely be lower than expected, as they do not include commitments not yet approved.
- The annual forward planning budget data for countries
- According to the IATI standard, this is the budget for assistance to each recipient country for the next three to five years. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ publishes the planned country-programmable aid spending for the next three years for its countries of focus, and the sum of approved international development commitments for the next three years for other key developing countries. The countries are identified by their . The amounts published for later years will likely be lower than expected, as they do not include commitments not yet approved.
- Organisation documents
- This is a link to public documents that relate to the work program of the organisation.
- Other identifier
- Where populated, these are the identification numbers corresponding to the project in the DAC-OECD Creditor Reporting System (CRS).
- Tied/Untied
- Amount of the project that is tied, Untied, or Partially Untied Aid in Canadian dollars, according to OECD-DAC definitions:
- Untied Aid-grants and contributions which are freely and fully available to finance procurement from substantially all aid recipient countries and from OECD countries (including Canada). Funds provided to finance the recipient's local costs are also defined as untied.
- Tied Aid-grants and contributions which are either tied to procurement of goods and services from the donor country or which are subject to procurement modalities implying limited geographic procurement eligibility other than those described under partially untied aid.
- Partially Untied Aid-grants and contributions which are in effect tied to procurement of goods and services from the donor country and from a restricted number of countries which must include substantially all aid recipient countries.
- Disbursements transactions
- Disbursements under the project, in Canadian Dollars, and the date on which the disbursement was registered (posting date).
Statistical Report on International Assistance — by multilateral organization
- Fiscal Year
- Refers to the fiscal year in which the disbursements (refer to Amount spent) were made. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ uses the fiscal-year basis adopted by the Government of Canada (April to March). For example, the 2009−2010 fiscal year began April 1, 2009, and ended March 31, 2010.
- Branch identification, Branch name, Division identification, Division name, Section identification, Section name, Fund centre identification, Fund centre name
- These fields represent ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's areas of responsibility for budgetary monitoring and reporting. Use these fields to identify which part of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's organization is managing the project. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's four main programming branches are the Geographic Programs Branch (B3000), Afghanistan and Pakistan Task Force (D4125), Multilateral and Global Programs Branch (B5100), and Partnership with Canadians (B6100). Branches are composed of divisions, sections, and fund centres, which represent descending levels of management responsibility where fund centres represent the lowest level of the organization.
- Project Number
- This is a unique identifier used to identify projects in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems. The first seven digits indicate a project, while the last three digits indicate a sub-project number. These ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ-assigned project numbers also appear in the data sent to the OECD/DAC.
- ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ Business Delivery Model
- Represents ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's business management practices, which are structured around three program-neutral delivery models: long-term institutional support, directive, and responsive. Each business delivery model has been designed to allow for the discharge of specific accountabilities in channelling resources to achieve Canadian development objectives:
- Long-term institutional support—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ chooses to support entities (organizations, institutions or recipient countries) taking part in development initiatives that should yield development results reflecting ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ goals and objectives.
- Directive—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ takes the lead in designing development initiatives that may eventually be implemented by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ or through another organization under ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's supervision.
- Responsive—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ agrees to support development initiatives conceived by an external proponent that are consistent with the goals and objectives of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's programs.
- Project Browser URL
- Points to the project's profile on the ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ Project Browser. As the Project Browser was created in 2004 and is a work in progress, some project profiles are not available. In addition, some of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's multilateral projects are not yet published in the Project Browser.
- Organization identification, Organization name
- The organization(s) receiving ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ funding to implement the project or one of its components. "Information not available" will appear for instances where it is not appropriate to disclose all of the information associated with a specific contract, grant, or contribution (that is, where disclosing the details of a contract, grant, or contribution may jeopardize national security or the protection of the individuals concerned).
- Organization type
- The type of multilateral organizations as reported in the Statistical Report on Financial Assistance. In this data set, a multilateral organization is classified as one of the following:
- Main international development institutions
- International financial institutions
- Humanitarian assistance institutions
- Regional multilateral organizations
- Multilateral organizations and peace and security missions
- La Francophonie and Commonwealth
- Other multilateral organizations
- Parent organization identification, Parent organization
- Certain institutions belong to a larger network of organizations that work together toward a common goal. This field allows the tracking of total expenditures for the whole (parent) organization. For example, each research centre that is part of the Consultative Group on International Agriculture Research (CGIAR) consortium is given the Parent organization identification "CGIAR".
- United Nations flag
- This field allows the identification of United Nations (UN) organizations, including specialized agencies. A value of "1" means that the organization is part of the UN system.
- Comparability
- In order to compare fiscal years, this data set was prepared using the most recent reporting methodologies and classifications (as presented in the latest Statistical Report on Financial Assistance). Data prior to 2007-2008 were normalized and may differ slightly from figures presented in the print versions of the statistical reports. For example, all expenditures are reported on an encashment basis and exclude the change in value of investments in international financial institutions, whereas this may not have been the case prior to 2007-2008.
Historical project data sets
- Status
- ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's projects progress through a life cycle of tentative, planning, operational, terminating, and closed. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ only publishes project data after the project has been approved and is in operational status. Projects are usually moved into terminating status once activities have been completed and are changed to closed status once the final report has been accepted.
- Amount spent
- This value, indicated in Canadian dollars, corresponds to the money paid out by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ. Each line in the Historical Project Data Set contains a value, which represents the lowest and most detailed level: the estimated amount paid out to an organization to implement an aid project, in whole or in part, for a specific fiscal year, for a given location (country or region) and for a given sector. Unlike the maximum ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ contribution, this field can be aggregated at any level (fiscal year, country, sector, organization, delivery model, etc). Note that an assumption is made that every organization implementing a ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ aid project works in all estimated countries and sectors, which may not always be the case.
- Fiscal year
- Refers to the fiscal year in which the disbursements (refer to Amount spent) were made. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ uses the fiscal-year basis adopted by the Government of Canada (April to March). For example, the 2009−2010 fiscal year began April 1, 2009, and ended March 31, 2010.
- Project number
- This is a unique identifier used to identify projects in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems. The first seven digits indicate a project, while the last three digits indicate a sub-project number. These ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ-assigned project numbers also appear in the data sent to the OECD/DAC. Note that in the Historical Data Set, any given project number could repeat over several rows because implementation through multiple organizations and across several countries and sectors is common.
- Branch identification, Branch name, Division identification, Division name, Section identification, Section name, Fund centre identification, Fund centre name
- These fields represent ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's areas of responsibility for budgetary monitoring and reporting. Use these fields to identify which part of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's organization is managing the project. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's four main programming branches are the Geographic Programs Branch (B3000), Afghanistan and Pakistan Task Force (D4125), Multilateral and Global Programs Branch (B5100), and Partnership with Canadians (B6100). Branches are composed of divisions, sections and fund centres, which represent descending levels of management responsibility, where funds centres represent the lowest level of the organization.
- Regional program (marker)
- Use the regional program marker to single out regional programs managed by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Geographic Programs Branch (refer to Branch identification and Branch name) that address the regional issues countries of a region face together.
- Maximum ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ contribution (project-level)
This value, indicated in Canadian dollars, corresponds to the maximum budget amount approved by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ for the project at the time of the Historical Project Data Set update. When the project moves to closed status (refer to Status), the final amount of the contribution is posted. This value could be less than the maximum amount initially approved.
Important: The value of this field represents the total budget for the project. Given that project numbers can repeat over several rows (refer to Project number), adding this data field as part of a summary will cause double counting and lead to erroneous statistics.
- Untied amount (project-level)
- This value, indicated in Canadian dollars, corresponds to the untied portion of the maximum ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ contribution. As for the maximum ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ contribution field, when the project moves to closed status (refer to Status), the final amount of the contribution is posted. This value could be less than the maximum amount initially approved. Similarly, the untied amount value represents a total at the project level and should not be added as part of a summary total. Refer to Note 3 for more information on tied and untied aid.
- FSTC percent
- The estimated percentage of the project that is considered free-standing technical cooperation (FSTC). It comprises activities whose primary purpose is to augment the level of knowledge, skills, technical abilities, or productive aptitudes of the population of developing countries, that is, increasing their stock of human intellectual capital or their capacity for more effective use of their existing factor endowment. This relates essentially to activities involving the supply of human resources (teachers, volunteers and experts—or technical cooperation personnel) or action targeted on human resources (education, training, advice). Associated supplies are also classified as technical cooperation.
- IRTC percent
- The estimated percentage of the project that is considered investment-related technical cooperation (IRTC). It is defined as the financing of services with the primary purpose of contributing to the design and/or implementation of a project or program aimed at increasing the physical capital stock of the recipient country.
- Project Browser URL
- Points to the project's profile on the ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ project data bank. Note that as the Project Browser was created in 2004 and is a work in progress, some project profiles are not available. In addition, many of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's multilateral projects are not yet published in the Project Browser.
- ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ business delivery model
- Represents ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's business management practices structured around three program-neutral delivery models: long-term institutional support, directive and responsive. Each business delivery model has been designed to allow for the discharge of specific accountabilities in channelling resources to achieve Canadian development objectives:
- Long-term institutional support—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ chooses to support entities (organizations, institutions, or recipient countries) taking part in development initiatives that should yield development results corresponding to ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ goals and objectives.
- Directive—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ takes the lead in designing development initiatives that may eventually be implemented by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ or through another organization under ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's supervision.
- Responsive—used when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ agrees to support development initiatives conceived by an outside proponent that are consistent with the goals and objectives of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's programs.
- Bilateral aid (international marker)
- This field identifies bilateral aid (value = 1) as defined in the OECD/DAC directives, in which bilateral aid is effectively defined as any spending other than long-term institutional support to multilateral organizations (value = 0).Bilateral aid is characterized as aid in which the donor retains effective control of specific aspects of the investment, such as identifying the recipient country, sector, or other elements of fund disbursements. Bilateral aid can be undertaken by Canada:
- directly with a developing country
- with national or international non-governmental organizations active in development
- through internal development-related transactions, such as interest subsidies, spending on development awareness, debt reorganization, and administrative costs
- with multilateral organizations, when Canada effectively controls the disbursement of funds and retains a role specifying other aspects of the investment
- Program-based approach type
- Program-based approaches (PBAs) are a way of engaging in development cooperation based on the principles of co-ordinated support for a locally owned development program, such as a national development strategy, a sector or thematic program, or a specific organization's program. PBAs share the following features: leadership by the recipient country organization; a single comprehensive program and budget framework; and a formalized process for donor co-ordination and harmonization of donor procedures for reporting, budgeting, financial management and procurement. There are four possible values for this field:
- General budget support (GBS) - A general contribution to a recipient country's overall budget where the policy dialogue between donors and the country government is focused on overall policy and budget priorities.
- Sectoral budget support (SBS) - Similar to GBS but is earmarked to a discrete sector or sectors, with any conditionality relating to these sectors.
- Pooled funding - An arrangement negotiated between multiple donors and the recipient to finance a specific program. Pooled funding involves donor control or oversight upon release of funds to the recipient country and in terms of financial reporting, which is expected to show how the funds were used. The scope of the use of the pooled funds may be very broad, but more typically such funds are focused on a subset of sector activities.
- Other PBA support - Other PBA support, such as project funding, can be used within a PBA with the use of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ funds for specific activities. Projects carried out in the context of a PBA often take place as agreed elements within a sector-wide approach. As such, they are distinct from stand-alone projects. They are characterized by the adoption of a more collaborative approach to decision making and the close involvement of the recipient country or organization in the project design and management.
- Policy markers (Environmental sustainability; Climate change adaptation; Climate change mitigation; Desertification; Participatory development and good governance; Trade development; Biodiversity; Urban issues; Children issues; Youth issues; Indigenous issues; Disability issues; Information and communications technologies as a tool for development; Knowledge for development)
- The data set contains 15 policy markers. These policy markers are descriptive rather than quantitative. The indicators are complementary to the sector classification (refer to Sector identification, Sector name). Policy markers, however, are not directly associated to expenditures and apply to the whole investment. They cover the areas of economic well-being, social development, environment sustainability and regeneration, democratic accountability, protection of human rights, and the rule of law. Data collection on the policy objectives of aid is based on a marking system with three values, with the exception of gender equality, which has four possible values (refer to Policy markers—Gender equality).
- Policy markers—Gender equality
- Unlike other policy markers, the gender equality marker can have four possible values, the meaning of which also depends on the ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ business delivery model (that is, directive and responsive vs. long-term institutional support). As indicated by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Policy on Gender Equality, gender equality must be explicitly and systematically integrated into all of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's policies, programs and investments. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ measures the level of integration into the Agency's investments (for directive and responsive programming) or the capacity of an institution to integrate gender equality (for long-term institutional support).
- Organization identification, Organization name
- The organization(s) receiving ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ funding to implement the project or one of its components. "Information not available" will appear for instances where it is not appropriate to disclose all of the information associated with a specific contract, grant, or contribution (that is, where disclosing the details of a contract, grant, or contribution may jeopardize national security or the protection of the individuals concerned).
- Organization type, Organization class, Organization sub-class
- The organization implementing a ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ project can be a private firm, a non-governmental organization, an educational institution, an association, an institute, a government department, or any other individual or organization selected by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ to implement the project or one of its components. Three fields allow for the classification of organizations.
- Organization type (origin, for-profit/not-for-profit)
- There are five possible values for this field:
- Canadian non-profit making
- Canadian profit making
- Foreign non-profit making
- Foreign profit making
- Information not available
- Organization class
- Classification of organizations according to the general sector they belong to in society. There are six possible values: Governmental, Multilateral, Civil society, Individual, Paragovernmental, and Information not available.
- Organization sub-class
- Allows for further classification of organizations. When combined with the organization class, there are 29 possible combinations, as illustrated:
- Governmental
- Federal
- Municipal
- Provincial
- Multilateral
- International financial institution
- Other multilateral
- Regional organization
- United Nations
- Civil society
- Associations
- Candidate
- College
- Consulting services
- Contractor In construction
- Co-operative
- Credit financial institution
- Election observer/expert
- International non-governmental organization
- Manufacturers
- Non-governmental organization
- Professional association
- Specialized institute
- Supplier of goods/services
- Trainee
- Umbrella organization
- Union
- University
- Volunteer sending agency
- Individual
- Candidate
- Conference delegate
- Consultant
- Cooperant
- Paragovernmental
- Crown corporations
- Governmental
- Country/Region identification, Country/Region name, Country/Region percent, Project Browser country identification
These fields indicate where the project is carried out. The location may be a country or a region. Additionally, a project may be carried out in more than one location. The country/Region percent field indicates the estimated percentage of project activities in each location. Country identifications are based on the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 convention, while the Region identifications are based on a number of conventions, including lists maintained by the United Nations Statistics Division, the Development Assistance Committee questionnaire, as well as on ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's internal system conventions.
In the Historical Project Data Set, the preferred method for aggregating country/region level statistics is to use the Country/Region identification and the Country/Region name fields. While, the Project Browser country identification matches the presentation in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's Project Browser, it is not compatible with the methodology used to produce official country-level statistics (refer to Note 2).
- Continent identification, Continent name
- These fields indicate the continent(s) in which the project is carried out. The continent-to-mapping convention is based on the Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions list published by the United Nations Statistics Division.
- Sector identification, Sector name, Sector percent
- The sector labels and codes used are tertiary-level DAC sector codes. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's sector coding table for projects is based on the OECD sector code table, allowing all donors to compare and coordinate their projects. Sectors refer to the specific area of the recipient's economic or social structure the aid is intended to foster. Many projects foster more than one sector. The sector percent field estimates the actual cost (or best estimate thereof) for achieving a particular output.
- Note 1
- The amounts listed in the Project Browser data and in the OECD/DAC data for any given year will usually be different. The Project Browser contribution amount reflects a planned, or partially disbursed, multi-year budget in Canadian dollars, as currently entered in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems, whereas the OECD/DAC contribution amount is in US dollars per calendar year, for past years, and includes contributions from other Canadian sources, not just ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ.
- Note 2
- For the majority of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's projects, identifying the aid recipient(s) is straightforward. For certain projects, however, estimating the amount of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's aid going to a specific country/region can be complex. This is especially true for multilateral aid, when ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ provides general financial support to multilateral organizations whose actions are compatible with ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's objectives. A similar situation happens with regional programs that address regional issues countries of a region face together. Often, the exact recipient countries are not well known in advance. In the case of long-term institutional support, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ relies on the reporting of multilateral organizations to the OECD/DAC. Other times, ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ project officers make the best available estimate on project creation and review those estimates as the project evolves. This, in part, explains the minor discrepancies between the Historical Data Set and the Statistical Report on Financial Assistance.
- Note 3
Tied aid is a practice that requires aid funds be used for the procurement of goods and services in the donor country or in a limited number of countries. This practice has, in most cases, a negative impact on cost efficiency and aid effectiveness, as it can limit competition, increase transportation costs, delay the delivery of goods, prevent capacity building in developing countries, and result in the provision of products that are not adapted to local conditions.
Starting in 2001, OECD/DAC members agreed to untie certain categories of aid to least developed countries (LDCs), as stated in the (PDF, 1 MB, 15 pages), amended in 2006 and 2008. In the 2008 Accra Agenda for Action, Canada and other donors committed to make further progress in untying aid, to extend coverage to heavily indebted poor countries (HIPCs), and to improve reporting on untying. The recommendation does not restrict the prerogative of DAC members to untie official development assistance to a greater extent. As such, in addition to untying all of its food aid as of April 1, 2008, the Minister of International Cooperation announced in September 2008 that, by 2012-2013, all Canadian aid will be untied as per the amended DAC recommendation and that untying would apply to all countries receiving Canadian aid (not only some groups, such as LDCs and HIPCs).
Management services and technical cooperation (refer to FSTC percent) are excluded from the specific coverage of the DAC recommendation. In other words, untying is encouraged but not mandatory for projects falling into those categories; aid effectiveness and programming are the decisive factors.
Maternal, newborn and child health
- Fiscal year
- Refers to the fiscal year in which the disbursements (refer to Amount spent) were made. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ uses the fiscal-year basis adopted by the Government of Canada (April to March). For example, the 2014−2015 fiscal year began April 1, 2014, and will end March 31, 2015.
- Commitment
- Indicates if the project belongs to the Muskoka Initiative ($1.1B) or to the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Baseline ($1.75B).
- Branch name
- This field represents ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's area of responsibility for budgetary monitoring and reporting. Use this field to identify which part of ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's organization is managing the project. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's four main development programming branches are the Geographic Programs Branch (B3000), Afghanistan and Pakistan Task Force (D4125), Multilateral and Global Programs Branch (B5100), and Partnership with Canadians (B6100).
- Project number
- This is a unique identifier used to identify projects in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems. The first seven digits indicate a project, while the last three digits indicate a sub-project number. These numbers also appear in the data sent to the OECD/DAC. Note that in this data set, any given project number could repeat over several rows because implementation across several countries and sectors is common.
- Project title
- The project title as it appears in the Project Browser or this file may not be exactly the same as it appeared in announcements or in the Proactive Disclosure reports. In the case of multi-donor projects, the title represents ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's contribution only and is often different from the title used by all donors in the recipient country.
- Continent name
- These fields indicate the continent(s) in which the project is carried out. The continent-to-mapping convention is based on the Composition of macro geographical (continental) regions list published by the United Nations Statistics Division.
- Country/Region identification code, Country/Region name, Country/Region percent
- These fields indicate where the project is carried out. The location may be a country or a region. Additionally, a project may be carried out in more than one location. The country/Region percent field indicates the estimated percentage of project activities in each location. Country identifications are based on the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 convention, while the Region identifications are based on a number of conventions, including lists maintained by the United Nations Statistics Division, the Development Assistance Committee questionnaire, as well as on ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's internal system conventions.
- Sector identification code, Sector name, Sector percent
- The sector labels and codes used are tertiary-level DAC sector codes. ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's sector coding table for projects is based on the OECD sector code table, allowing all donors to compare and coordinate their projects. Sectors refer to the specific area of the recipient's economic or social structure the aid is intended to foster. Many projects foster more than one sector. The sector percent field estimates the actual cost (or best estimate thereof) for achieving a particular output.
- Amount spent
- This value, indicated in Canadian dollars, corresponds to the money paid out by ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ. Each line contains a value, which represents the lowest and most detailed level: the estimated amount paid out to an organization to implement an aid project, in whole or in part, for a specific fiscal year, for a given location (country or region) and for a given sector. Unlike the maximum contribution field, this field can be aggregated at any level (fiscal year, country, sector, organization, delivery model, etc). Note that an assumption is made that every organization implementing an aid project works in all estimated countries and sectors, which may not always be the case.
- Multilateral G8 Methodology
- The project uses the imputed percentage attributed to multilateral contributions according to the .
- Thematic Priority
- This refers to the Government of Canada’s three priority themes for development: increasing food security, securing the future of children and youth, and stimulating sustainable economic growth.
- MNCH Code
- This code is from the . For multilateral contributions, the code represents the organization funded. For bilateral contributions under the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Baseline, the code indicates the Sector identification used.
- MNCH Percentage
- This is the imputed percentage attributed to multilateral contributions according to the G8 Muskoka 2010 Methodology for Calculating Baselines and Commitments.
- Muskoka Path
- This text information shows which of the Muskoka paths the project contributes to: strengthening health systems; reducing the burden of diseases; or improving nutrition. Some projects contribute to more than one path.
- MNCH Amount Spent
- This value, indicated in Canadian dollars, corresponds to the amount disbursed under the Muskoka Initiative or the Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) Baseline.
- Note:
- The amounts listed in the Project Browser data and in the OECD/DAC data for any given year will usually be different. The Project Browser contribution amount reflects a planned, or partially disbursed, multi-year budget in Canadian dollars, as currently entered in ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ's information systems, whereas the OECD/DAC contribution amount is in US dollars per calendar year, for past years, and includes contributions from other Canadian sources, not just ¶¶ÒùÊÓƵ.
- Date modified: